HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION WAIVER
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 04060031 SW
Petitioner: Steve Pittman for Pittman Partners
Section Varied: sea 6.04.01
Brief Description of Variance: Block Length
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to pennit the
granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises :trom some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application oftenns of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the
variance is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive
Plan.
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested
subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this 21 st day of September, 2004.
~r ~
Co~~ssion Member