HomeMy WebLinkAbout05040090-Misc. InfoLillard, Sarah N
James
~ject:
; m~nimum grades
Section 8
Lots 244-----'-'-~nd 245
Please do not approve permits with pad elevations less than 753.4 MFPG.
Lots 259, 260 and 261
Please do not approve permits with pad elevations tess than 753.2 MFPG.
Lots 262 and 263
Please do not approve permits with pad elevations less than 753.9 MFPG.
Veronica A; Lillard, Sarah N; Blanchard, Jim E; Ochs,
J
construction of infrastructure.
in lots that are adjacent to Detention
the permitting process and during
~heir MFPG.
:)t in our office, If you would like copies of the
let us know,
Point (LF.!S
Poin~ (LBS
Point (LBS
' 0.00
0' 5.~
>;' 1.50"
f!n~
229
72
22
A~ ~b~e sigr~
ow St~ ess De.
FW: Grading Questions on
FYi.
eT
14~ 2005 9:17 AM
Hill, Dick B; Duncan, Gary R; Greskamp, Dan
53, Lakes at Hazel Deli
lot 253
yard drainage
254 which I think has been addressed but
no openings below the MFPG before
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:51 PM
To: McBride, Mike T; Duncan, Gary R; Greskamp, Dan
Subject: FVV: Grading Questions on Lot 253, Lakes at Hazel Dell
Anyone have any recollection on this?
..... Original Message
From: Weddington, Trudy A.
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:37 PN
TO: Hill, Dick B
Cc: Schfiner, Adam
Subjecl:: RE: Grading Questions on Lot 253, Lakes at Hazel Dell
Thank you, Dick.
Sarah gave me a copy of your original e-mail from 4/23/02. So, we don't need that, anymore.
However, we still need you to look into it, if you could. We are particularily interested in knowing if the concerns from 2
years ago are still valid today,
..... Original Message .....
From: Hill, Dick B
Se,hr: wednesday April :[3 2005 3;4.9 PN
To, Weddington, Trudy A.
Subject: RE: Grading Questions on Lot 253, Lakes at Hazel Dell
SorryTrudy, not ignoring you. I'm going to have to do some reseach on this. Will let you know as soon as I find
something.
..... ~riginal Hessage .....
FrOm, Weddington, Trudy A.
~nt: Tuesday, Apdl :[2. 2005 2:08 PH
To: Hill Dick B
Cc: Dolan, Veronica; Lillard, Sarah; Stewar~, Lisa
Subject: Grading Questions on Lot 253, LaKes at Hazel Dell
Hi, Dick.
Back in 2002, Drees applied for a building permit for Lot 253, Lakes at Hazel Dell. They later decided to
cancel the application, ~lue to the buyers switching lots. Today, Drees brought an application in for this lot
once ag,a, in. As I was entering the information into Pentamation, I found the following note on the 2002 permit
record: ,iSPEClAL REVIEW NOTE: This lot must meet minimum grades...see e-mail from Dick Hill dated
4/23/02. Are those issues still valid? If so, could you send us some information, perhaps the 4/23/02 e-maiL
about this lot? '
Thank you.
Trudy
~ P, O1 ~
~ TR~NS~OTION REPORT ~
~ aPR-lB-2005 NON 04,55 PM ~
FOR:
START REOEIVER
aPR-lB 04,54 PN 93477318
TX TINE PAGES TYPE
NOTE N~
OK 597
TOTAL : 1M 3S PAGES: 3 ~
(317) 571-2499
CITY OF CARMEL
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES -
Building & Code Enforcement
PERMIT PLAN REVIEW STOPS
From:
Adam Schriner, Building Inspector & Plan Review
Dept. of Community Sermces - Building & Code Enforcement
One Civic Square
Carmel. IN 46032
Email: aschrine~
Ph.: (317) 571-2491 Fax: (317) 571-2499
The attached document, titled "PERMIT PLAN REVIEW STOPS" reflects
incomplete items found at plan review for your project. "REVIEW
NOTES" lists the items that need to be addressed
Please submit these items at your earliest convenience. Corrections to plans
should be made on the plans at the office, in some cases a letter stating the
scope of work for correction can be faxed or e-mail. If you have any
questions, call the above referenced telephone number.
When corrections have been received it may take ~
All permits
are reviewed >rder in which they are received. Do
not § business days have passed! Always
o the pending PERMIT NUMBER located at the top
' PLAN REVIEW STOPS PAGE in all
correspondence.
Building permit applications will be maintained in our office for
two weeks; if we do not receive a response from vou regarding
these incomplete items, the application will no longer be
considered a valid submittal.
S/permits/TRANSMITTAL sheets for plan review
. TABLE R404.1d(2)
REINFORCED cONCRETE AND MA$ON~[~ FOUNDAT
#4 a~ 48" o.c,
havin[ s.~ ~!uivalent cross-secuonal a~a of mmfo~nt p~r ilneal foot of wall sh~ be p~'nttmd provided tho
from tho f~c~ of the soil sid~ of the wall to the c~n~ of ve~cal ~infor~rn~nt shallbt a~leas[
the ext~or ~nish