HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceConn, Angelina V
From:
Conn, Angelina V
Sent:
Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:40 PM
To:
Blair Carmosino
Cc:
Boone, Rachel M.
Subject:
RE: McDonalds (ground sign)
Blair - it was nice seeing your face back in this office, too!
Regarding your ground sign question: i think if you can submit a memo, requesting the change of the ground sign base
material, and show a before /after rendering, then we can most likely approve it administratively and just update the
current rebuild file.
you will most likely have to show that Mr. Wilson would be okay with that change, too. a letter or email from him would
suffice.
-Angie
From: Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:40 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: McDonalds
Angie, good afternoon, I hope all is well with you. Wanted to thank you for working through the above petition with us. I have to
admit, it was fun working back in Carmel again and working with you and your associates up there on the 3rd floor.
Looking forward to seeing the final results up and running. Not 100% sure but I'm getting conversations out of Mc.Donald's that they
may accelerate this project to 2013.
One question came up that I wanted to run by you. They inquired if they wanted to modified the existing ground sign to be renovated
with the same hearth stone material, would you expect that to be run back through full planning commission and ADLS process? It's
one of those "wish you would have asked early continents ". Sign would stay the same dimensions, copy and everything. It would be
basically a re -skin of the brick that exists with the arcade wall stone. Not sure yet how they would do that, if it would be a re- build, or
if they literately can take of existing brick and re -skin it with the new.
I have them checking the existing easement covering that sign to understand what other (if any) third parties would need to approve or
have interest in that sign and gain their permission /approval prior to filing anything.
Your thoughts on procedurally what we can / should do for such a re -skin of the monument sign?
Thanks.
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, Inc.
317 -513 -8568
blair@carmosinogroup.com
www.carmosinoLroup.com
Letk*l
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Mindham, Daren
Sent:
Wednesday, November 07, 2012 9:18 AM
To:
'Blair Carmosino'; Timothy.Ochs @icemiller.com; Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com
Cc:
Conn, Angelina V
Subject:
RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Thank you for the response. I will await the final version. I do not have any further comments, assuming the plans reflect
your remarks.
Daren Mindham
Urban Forester
From: Blair Carmosino [ mailto :blairCa�carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Mindham, Daren; Timothy.OchsCa icemiller.com; Nichole.Perry@icemiller.com
Cc: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Daren, I gather by Angie's dept. report for our pending special studies committee meeting that our response to your
comments have yet to make it your way. We initially responded prior to our Plan Comnussion meeting and then again in a
correspondence prior to the meeting. We have reviewed your corrunents and will adhere to all with more specific
responses as noted below:
1. We can and will incorporate the standard tree planting details into the final 100% construction documents prior to filing
for our building permit.
2. The existing trees you note - we will best attempt to keep those existing trees with the renovations. McDonald's
understand and values keeping the existing vegetation where possible. The site is still being reviewed and until we are
through the ADLS process. 1 cannot commit at this point that the revisions requested by other department will not
interfere with the existing trees. As stated, we will best attempt to keep existing trees pending final review and input from
all departments.
3. We will remove notation.
4. Foundation planting are typically limited to the rear of the building and used to supplement the large planting area
between the drive through and the rear of the building. The other opportunity for foundation plantings are in the front of
the building. I would ask if we could agree to, or commit to foundation plantings in these areas and request that we re-
submit such planting plans as a part of our final construction document development. We see no issues with providing
necessary and sufficient plantings in these areas.
5. So noted.
Thank you and should you have any questions or require additional information at this point, please call or reply
accordingly.
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, Inc.
317- 513 -8568
blair @carmosinoL,roun.com
www.carmosinogroup.com
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Mindham, Daren [ mailto:dnrindham @carmel.in.govl
Sent: Fri 8/24/2012 9:31 AM
To: 'Timothy.Ochs @icemiller.com'; 'Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com'; Blair Carmosino
Conn, Angelina V
From: Foley, Amanda J
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:41 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Duncan, Gary R; Barnes, David R
Subject: Engineering staff report
Wedgewood:
Our office has received a site plan to review but has not received construction plans. We issued comments accordingly on
11/1/12. The site plan submitted was not to scale. Our office has requested engineered construction plans, including a
grading and drainage plan, in order to fully review the project and ensure there are no negative impacts to the surrounding
properties or right -of -way. The site plan indicates three parallel parking spaces along the alley. Per the site plan, the
property only has 65 -feet fronting the alley, and parallel parking generally requires 22 -25 feet for maneuvering. Three
parking spaces would require between 66 and 75 -feet, in addition to any buffering required The developer has indicated
a rain garden on the site plan for stormwater quality and detention. Since this is in excess of the stormwater standards for
this size site, the Engineering Department appreciates the developer's desire to construct this stormwater improvement.
McDonald's
The developer has made changes to the south entrance to the site, per concerns from the Engineering Department. While
the entrance is not ideal, the changes that have been made are sufficient for the Engineering Department to approve the
entrance location. The developer has not submitted all items necessary to fully review the stormwater drainage and water
quality for this project. However, the Engineering Department has no issues with the project moving forward, conditional
upon the developer addressing any issues that may arise as additional stormwater details are provided to the Department
during the construction plan review process.
146`h and Gray Rezone
The Engineering Department has not received any new submittals for this project.
Kunkle Familv Minor Subdivision
The Department has requested a buffer strip in lieu of stormwater detention and stormwater quality requirements. The
buffer strip shall include the entire extent of the floodplain or the regulated drain easement, whichever is greater, plus an
additional 10 -feet. This has not been indicated on the most recent primary plat submitted to the Engineering Department.
A 20 -foot easement shall be indicated on the plat, centered on the property line between Lots 1 and 2, per the Subdivision
Control Ordinance.
Mr. Kunkle has submitted an acceptable draft conmiitment for the required alternative transportation path. We will work
with him to finalize this commitment.
Ultimate Car Wash Modifications
The Engineering Department has not received construction plans for full review of this project. A site plan was submitted
via email.
Amanda Foley
Staff Engineer
City of Carmel
Department of Engineering
317 -571 -2309 (direct)
afoley @carmel.in.gov
Conn, Angelina V
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:14 AM
To: 'Blair Carmosino'
Cc: Timothy.Ochs @icemi(fer.com; Boone, Rachel M.
Subject: RE: Special Studies Material (McDonald's)
Good morning, Blair —
You do not necessarily need to duplicate everything from the original info packet, but you should, at the very least,
provide any supplemental info that would help address any outstanding staff comments from the Dept. Report, as well
as any comments /concerns made by the plan commission at the public hearing.
Regarding the landscape plan and the City Forester, please touch base with Daren Mindham directly and see if he needs
anything else from you. (I will touch base with him 5 days prior to the committee meeting, to see if he has any
comments to add to the revised Dept. report, too.)
Yes, the more items you can address and alleviate our concerns, then the shorter the new Dept. Report will be and the
happier the committee will be!
Yes, please keep me posted on your progress with the City Engineering Dept. (I will also touch base with them 5 days
prior to the committee meeting, to see if they have any comments to add to the revised Dept. report, too.)
And to address your voicernail question, yes, you should be following up with each TAC member to address their review
comments /concerns. And, our Dept. would like copies of any correspondence that you send them or that they send you.
Have a great day,
Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division
Dept. of Community Services
1 Civic Square, 3rd Fir.
Carmel, IN 46032
O: 317 -571 -2417 1 F: 317 -571 -2426 1 E: aconn @carmel.in.gov
W: www.carmeldocs.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail
From: Blair Carmosino [ mai Ito: blair @carmosi nog roup.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:06 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Timothy.Ochs @icemiIler.com
Subject: Special Studies Material
Angie, good morning, I hope this finds you well. I wanted to make sure you get everything you need tomorrow for special studies.
First, do you need me to duplicate the material I submitted prior to PC that was dated 10.12.12`1
Second, the continents to the Urban Forester, I am assuming was was submitted with the 12th material was sufficient. I will shoot
them an email this morning with the same responses.
Finally, the material I will be subnutting tomorrow will address those items on the staff comments numbered as follows:
7 -10, 12, 15 -19, and 24. I understood from our phone conversation all other items of staff report were previously address.
Should you think of something, that I am missing, please let me know and I will incorporate information in my information tomorrow
Finally, our engineer has placed calls to engineering department in attempts to get more information/clatification on the out letting
storm pipe issue. As of writing of this email, I don't believe their calls have been returned. I do blow that we are decreasing the
impervious area for the site so theoretically, the receiving downstream storm sewer system should not present any issues. I will keep
you posted on this matter should I hear anything more on this.
Thank you.
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, Inc.
317 -513 -8568
blairC@carmosinogroup.com
www.carmosinogroup.com
Conn, Angelina V
From: Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 2:47 PM
To: Mindham, Daren; Timothy.Ochs @icemiller.com; Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com
Cc: Conn, Angelina V; g.lukas @landwatergroup.com
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Daren, thank you. We will incorporate your comments into the final plans. I see no issues with this with the exception of the
tree saving as the plans are still adjusting a bit for storm and entry access points. To the degree they can save trees on a rebuild,
McDonald's does best attempt to do so. They understand the value added of keeping existing where possible.
The other details will be incorporated into the final plans.
Thank you.
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, Inc.
317 -513 -8568
blair @carmosinogroup.com
www.carmosinogroup.com
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Mindham, Daren [mailto:dmindham @carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Mon 10/15/2012 2:28 PM
To: 'Timothy.Ochs @icerniller.com'; 'Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com'; .Blair Carmosino
Subject: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Tim,
I thought I would resend my review comments. Please let me know what decisions are made per my continents below
Thanks.
Daren Mindham
Urban Forester
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
From: Mindham, Daren
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:32 AM
To: Timothy. Ochs @icemiller.com'-, 'Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com'; 'blair@carmosinogroup.com'
Subject: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Tim,
The following email represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of landscaping. I have reviewed the
drawings and offer the following comments:
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Blair Carmosino [blair@carmosinogroup.com]
Sent:
Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:53 PM
To:
Conn, Angelina V
Cc:
'Ochs, Timothy'; 'Helms Jr Hank'
Subject:
McDonald's Rebuild - Comment Responses
Attachments:
October 11th RESPONSE LETTER.pdf
Angie, the cut sheets for lights hit. Attached are response to comments with associated attachment. One thing I am
still hunting for is an existing example of a store at night. You would think McDonald's would have a ton of photos but
so far, nothing. I think they actually have too many and can't get their hands on the one they want.
Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Also please note, we have resubmitted a site
plan that includes adjustments to the southernmost access point on Keystone Way.
I'm awaiting feedback on the revisions from either Gary or Amanda before I start calling it complete.
Thanks much.
Take care.
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, INC.
317 -513 -8568
blair(a)carmosinoarouo. com
www, carmosInoclroup, com
Conn, Angelina V
From: Blair Carmosino [blair@carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:28 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: Oct. 16 Plan Commission Meeting - dept. reports
Angie, good afternoon. Hope this finds you well. You will be getting responses to the comments later this
afternoon /this evening. I'm waiting on the lighting company to send all the cut sheet info and other details on the
lighting. If I don't have it by this evening, I'll send what I have and then supplement that when the lighting company
gets me their information.
My apologies on the delay in getting this to you.
Thanks.
Blair
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn(d)carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:24 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: Oct. 16 Plan Commission Meeting - dept., reports
Dear Plan Commissioners,
1) The department reports for the Tuesday, October 16 Plan Commission meeting are attached in 2 file
formats. Paper copies of this and supplemental info will be mailed to you today.
2) Do not forget about the Dialogue Dinner, which takes place on Tuesday, Oct. 30 at 6pm, here at City Hall.
Free dinner and presentation about Market Trends & Real Estate Supply and Demand. Please contact
Ramona Hancock or Adrienne Keeling at 571 -2417 for more info or to RSVP.
3) The scanned info packets can be viewed online at:
http:// cocdocs .ci.carmel.in.us /weblink /0 /fol /19877 /Row1.aspx ; just refer to the agendas to find the
docket no. for each petition. (The first two numbers of a docket no. represent the year, such as with docket
no. 12030008, the year is 2012.)
Have a great day,
Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division
Dept. of Community Services
1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr.
Carmel, IN 46032
0:317- 571 -2417 1 F: 317 -571 -2426 1 E: aconn@carmel.in.gov
W: www.carmeldocs.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail
From:
jay.dorman [dorman.jay @gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:28 PM
To:
Conn, Angelina V
Cc:
Hollibaugh, Mike P
Subject:
McDonald's rebuild (Comments from Jay Dorman, for the Special Studies Committee)
Angie, feel free to pass the following observations to members of Special Studies.
1. 1 visited existing McDonald's today for breakfast. It's been quite awhile since I've dined there and it gave
me a better appreciation for the rebuild. I encourage members of SS Committee to go have a Big Mac and dine
inside. I tried to envision where the handicapped parking would be placed and was confused until I examined
their new plan. That new plan seems to move the building to the west which eliminates the existing parking
near the present drive through location. Thus, additional space is available for the handicapped spots next to the
building. Not sure if 3 spots are sufficient quantity?
2. Expansion of parking area (encroaching into some portion of the Keystone Overlay ?) - if this is a possible
consideration then please be advised there are two large trees in that area.
3. In petitioner's packet, I did not quickly see:
a. Bike rack`?
b. Outdoor dining, outdoor picnic table, or, any outdoor seating? Is outdoor seating being considered?
If so, could or should this be placed in the Overlay area, if that space was not used for parking?
4. A memo was sent by Steve Wilson, owner of office complex to the north of McDonald's. His request was to
screen his view of the dumpster. Are the current plantings sufficient? If we were in Steve's place as owner of
the office complex would we be satisfied with the screening?
Thanks, and remember: "you deserve a break today!"
Jay
Hancock, Ramona B
From: Sawbuilder @aol.com
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 2:53 PM
To: Hancock, Ramona B
Subject: McDonald's Meeting Concerns
Ramona -
My concerns that would like to voice regarding the tear down /rebuild McDonald's at Keystone and
Carmel Drive:
Our Office Park shares a sign with McDonalds and I want to make sure that any
future landscaping around that said sign does not cover our part of the sign.
I also want to make sure that the new dumpster area is landscaped to block it from our parking lot
view.
An ongoing major concern is the traffic. Since the thru -way to the west of McDonalds has been
blocked off and the city of Carmel took away the left hand turn onto Carmel Drive, it is EXTREMELY
difficult for McDonalds traffic and our tenants /customers to get to Keystone. Traffic making U -turns in
the middle of Carmel Drive is very dangerous for everyone. This issue needs to be addressed.
Morning, Lunch and Evening traffic also gets backed up onto Carmel Drive lining up to the drive thru
which is dangerous for traffic exiting off the Keystone /Carmel Drive roundabout.
Please let me know if you have any questions about my concerns.
Thanks,
Steve Wilson
Steven A. Wilson, Inc.
317 -846 -2555
317 - 846 -9594 fax
www.sawbuilder.com
(� �-('-z--e o (AJ �
Conn, Angelina V
From: Whiting, Duane A. ( DWhiting @citizensenergygroup.com)
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 5:49 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: September 19 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (REVISED)
Angie,
The Department of Public Utilities of the City of Indianapolis d /b /a Citizens Water ICWI has
reviewed the below listed TAC agenda topics. CW's response for each topic is stated in the Bold
Blue Text below each topic description (and underlined, too).
Docket No. 12080005 ADLS: McDonald's Rebuild.
The applicant seeks design approval to rebuild a fast food restaurant building with two drive thrus,plus add new
landscaping, lighting, and signage.. The site is located at 750 E. Carmel Dr. and is zoned B- 8/Busiriess, within the
Keystone Parkway Corridor Overlay Zone. Filed by Timothy Ochs of Ice Miller, LLP.
CW has no objection to the design approval to rebuild the McDonald's fast food restaurant at the
above described site. This site is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities.
Docket No. 1.2080004 Z: Springmill Court PUD.
The applicant seeks approval to rezone approximately 15 acres to PUDlPlanned Unit Development for multiple -
family dwellings. The site is located at 400 W. 96th Street, at the northwest corner of 96th St. & Springmill Rd. It is
currently zoned S- 2/Residence. Filed by Timothy Ochs of Ice Miller, LLP, on behalf of Sexton Development, LLC.
CW has no objection to the approval to rezone the site for the PUD/ Planned Unit Development
for multi - family dwellings.
Docket No. 12090001. TAC: Sanctuary at 116th Street, Section 1, Block E- Amenity Area.
The applicant seeks approval for a 2.12 -acre amenity area that has walking paths, a playground, a small parking
area, and a sports field. The site is zoned S- 1/Residence and is located at approximately 11820 West Rd. Filed
by Lori McElroy of CESO, Inc.
CW has no objection to the approval of the amenity area for the above described site. This site
is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities.
Duane A. Whiting
Real Estate - Property Planner
rcitizens
4 energy gr-cup-
ClUl 4 S 08s 1 ctlzen, The n-ol I cltfzeie. 'wvaa-r
1220 Waterway Boulevard
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Tel 317 -263 -6418
dwhiting @citizensenergygi-oup.com
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:36 PM
To: Blanchard, Jim E; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; 'Greg
03 F CA'd��F� \
t"W 'T 0 M
, A C
DLTAIZTN1ENT OF CO-NIMLNITY SERVICES
September 11, 2012
Mr. Timothy Ochs
Ice Miller LLP
One American Square Ste 2900
Indianapolis, IN 46282
RE: McDonald's Rebuild
Dear Mr. Ochs:
The following letter represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative
transportation. I have reviewed the drawings submitted for the September 19, 2012 Technical Advisory Cornmittee
meeting and offer the following continents:
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMENTS
1) The City of Carmel's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan requires a 5' sidewalk along Keystone Way. Please
revise the plans to include this sidewalk.
2) The City of Carmel Parking Ordinance requires bicycle parking devices that are inverted U- typeor an
A -type structure that can support the bicycle frame at two locations. Please see the City of Carmel's
Parking Ordinance in order to determine the appropriate constriction details for the above.
3) Please provide a direct pedestrian connection to the entrance of the building from Cannel Dr and /or
Keystone Way.
We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may
result in delay of the review process.
It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if
any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans
indicating all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes
resulting from Plan Commission, Special Studies or other conunittee meetings_
The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent.
reviews.
If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417.
Sincerely,
David Littlejohn
Alternative Transportation Coordinator
Department of Conununity Services
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARIvIE.L, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
,-i_ _I AN 11\
cc: An-
gie Conn, Department of Community Services
Engineering Department Review
Project File
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARTMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417
Conn, Angelina V
From: Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:15 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V; Boone, Rachel M.
Cc: 'Ochs, Timothy'
Subject: Revised elevations - for color
Attachments: 12022 Carmel— A2.0— c— bw.pdf; 12022 Carmel_A2.1_c_bw.pdf
Angie and Rachel, good morning. These just hit. These are the revised elevations that flip the colors to the Chocolate
theme. You'll find that the match the previously submitted elevations, except for the block color. No EIFS or any other
material switch on the building. Just a color change.
You'll also note that these revised elevations have the roof top units dashed in for reference and the labeling of the
various elevations — Front — DT side, etc. — now are also labeled with direction — North, East, West, etc.
I'll be stopping by Rachel's office later today and I'll drop off the 11x17 hard copy versions with her.
I'll shoot you the colored versions later today if you are interested. Those will be in shortly.
Thanks
Blair D. Carmosino
The Carmosino Group, INC.
317 -513 -8568
blair0carmosinoarouo. com
www. carmosinogroup.com
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent:
Friday, September 07, 2012 2:34 PM
To:
Conn, Angelina V
Cc:
'Ochs, Timothy'
Subject:
RE: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Angie, thanks for the heads up but I believe the elevations originally submitted do not include any EIFS. This will be new
construction, therefore split face and smooth face block will be used. The example I sent yesterday, was a typical
standard to demonstrate color themes and it includes materials for rebuilds, new construction and renovation of
existing. EIFS is more commonly used on the rebuilds to transition the old walls, where exposed with the removal of the
Mansard or for other reasons.
I'll double check with the architect but I believe the elevations as submitted will remain and EIFS will not be an issue. All
that will change with this color scheme change will be the colors of the block.
Essentially, the elevations will be the same as those submitted initially and block color changes. That's it.
Thanks
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:59 AM
To: 'blair @carmosinogroup.com'
Subject: RE: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Hi, Blair:
I can tell you now that Staff will ask that you do not use EIFS or stucco within 8 feet of ground level.
Angie Conn
Planning Administrator
From: Blair Carmosino [ mailto :blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Angie, thanks for the quick response. We'll get all plans revised. In the interim, attached are pages from their standard
building color options. First is the Chocolate, second is the Khaki what was originally proposed. The arcade stone will
still remain the Southwest Ledgestone. Sorry for the last minute change.
Take care.
Blair
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:59 PM
To: 'blair @carmosinogroup.com'
Subject: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Conn, Angelina V
From: Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:29 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: September 19 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda
Thanks. I have another and similar note from someone else at the Health Department. I think we are good with them
and understand that their review and interest will be prior to the actual start of construction. I have that form printed
and in McDonald's files.
Thanks.
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:AconnCabcarmel.in.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:28 PM
To: Blair Carmosino
Cc: Mr. Timothy E. Ochs
Subject: Fwd: September 19 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda
FYI - email from health dept. below.
Angie Conn
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Larry D. Beard" < Larry .Beard @hamiltoncounty.in.gov>
Date: September 7, 2012 3:25:56 PM EDT
To: "'Conn, Angelina V "' <Aconn @carmel.in.gov>
Cc: "Jason T. LeMaster" < Jason. LeMaster @hamiltoncounty. in. gou >, "Amanda S. Hartley"
< Amanda. Hartley @hamiltoncounty.in.gov >, "Morgan E. Johnson"
< Morgan. Johnson @hamiltoncountyi.n.gov >, "Tammy L. Gleber"
< Tammy. Gleber( a�hamiltoncounty.in. ov>, "Amy C. Ballman"
<Amy. Ballman @ hainiltoncouniy. in. aov>
Subject: RE: September 19 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda
Angie,
I wanted to let McDonald's know that the plans, application, and plan review documents must be
submitted to the Health Department at least thirty days prior to opening. The information for obtaining a
food service permit can be found at www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov.
Thanks,
Larry Beard
Hamilton County Health Department
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn()carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10.57 AM
To: Blanchard, Jim E; Brooke M. Gajownik; David E. Lucas; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison,
Christopher M; 'Greg Ilko'; Hohlt, William G; Huffman, David; 'Jason Kirkman'; )axon T. LeMaster; Joel B.
Conn, Angelina V
From: Blair Carmosino [blair @carmosinogroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 3:50 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Attachments: Pages from 2011_ Exterior_ Building _Color_Schemes_Materials CHOC.pdf; Pages from 2011
_ Exterior_ Building _Color_Schemes_M ate rials - Khaki. pdf
Angie, thanks for the quick response. We'll get all plans revised. In the interim, attached are pages from their standard
building color options. First is the Chocolate, second is the Khaki what was originally proposed. The arcade stone will
still remain the Southwest Ledgestone. Sorry for the last minute change.
Take care.
Blair
From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto :AconnCa)carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:59 PM
To: 'blair @carmosinogroup.com'
Subject: chocolate theme for me Donald's
Good afternoon, Blair —
I just listen to your phone message. It would not be hard for you to switch to the chocolate theme for McDonald's. We
would just need a revised full size paper set and a digital copy of the new exterior architectural building elevations this
week or early next week, so we can review those new plans, and make sure that we do not have any major issues with
the revised design. We would also need color elevations or renderings or a color palate too, since we did not get that
the first time around with the original submittal.
Thanks,
Angie Conn, Planning Administrator
City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division
Dept. of Community Services
1 Civic Square, 3rd Fir.
Carmel, IN 46032
O: 317 -571 -2417 1 F: 317 -571 -2426 1 E: aconn @carmel.in.gov
W: www.carmeldocs.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail
August 30, 2012
JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR
ivlr. Timothy E. Ochs
Ice Miller, LLP
One America Square, Suite 2900
Indianapolis, iN 46282 -0200
RE: McDonald's Restaurant 750 East Carmel Drive remodel - Project Review 41
Dear Mr. Ochs:
The City received your construction plans on August 17, 2012.. The project is scheduled for review at the
September 19, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee meeting. We offer the following comments:
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING REVIEW COMMENTS
I . This project is subject to the City's Storm Water Management and Storm Water Quality
Ordinances.
2. Will this development be platted?
3. Please provide a title sheet with the following:
a. Project title, site location map, soils map, and index.
b. Engineering firm's name, address, phone, fax, and e -mail address. The name of the
Project Manager and the Owner /Developer.
c. Legal description of site, zone district, setback distances.
d. Professional Engineer's stamp,
4. Please omit Sheet C6.0p, Landscape Plan; and Sheet C7.0p, Site Lighting Plan, from
construction sets to be submitted for review by this department. The Department of
Engineering does.not have approval authority over landscape plans or site lighting plans.
5. Please stamp the plans, "APPROVAL PENDING —NOT FOR CONSTRUCITON ".
6. Please add the following note to the drawings: "IF iT WILL BE NECESSARY TO
RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITIES, THE EXPENSE OF SUCH RELOCATION SHALL
BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER. ALL UTILITY POLES SHALL BE
LOCATED WiTHIN ONE FOOT OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT -OF- WAY."
7. Please add note stating "NO EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITY MAY COMMENCE
WITHOUT AN APPROVED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT" to construction
set.
8. Sheet C I.Op does not agree with the other sheets in the plan set.
9, Please clearly mark all construction limits.
10. Please label all existing and proposed right -of -way lines.
11. Provide all current easements for entire tract to pertinent sheets with correct calls for each.
12. Please indicate the location of all existing utilities, with the top of curb and invert elevations,
pipe sizes, and direction noted.
11 Are any offsite easements needed? Please include these on the plans, if applicable.
14. Please indicate the markers at the external corners of the property. Can you verify that
McDonalds is not the fee owner to the centerlines of Keystone Way and Carmel Drive?
15. Please indicate on the plaits all fire hydrants on or adjacent to the site.
16. Please indicate a 50 -foot half right- of -way along Carmel Drive consistent with the
Thoroughfare; Plan,
17. Please indicate all proposed easements in accordance with the Storm Water Technical
Standards Manual Section 306. Ensure proposed easements do not overlap existing
easements that cross the proposed development.
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FLx 317.571.2439
EMAIL engineeringOcarmel.in.gov
Mr. Timothy E. Ochs
August 30, 2012
RE: McDonald's Restaurant 750 East Carmel Drive remodel- Project Review 41
Page 2 of 5
18. City standard Commercial Drive entrances shall be provided. Please indicate on the plans
and provide the City standard Commercial Driveway and Depressed Curb details.
19. Please label the entrance radii. The City standard commercial driveway requires a 30' radius.
20. The south entrance is located too close to Carmel Drive. Please remove this entrance.
21. Please provide a sidewalk along Keystone Way. Confirm with David Littlejohn, Alternative
"Transportation Coordinator, what other bicycle and pedestrian facilities are needed to
accoimnodate this site.
22. All sidewalks within the public right -of -way shall meet the City standards. Please provide
the City standard sidewalk detail.
23. All proposed ADA ramps within the public- sight -of -way shall meet the INDOT
specifications for ADA ramps. Please provide the INDOT standard details.
24. City standard curb is required for all curbing. Please indicate on the site plan, include the
appropriate City standard curb details, and the City's Curbing Policy in the plans.
25. The maximum spacing of concrete curb control joints shall be 10 feet on tangents and 5 feet
on radii. The maximum spacing of concrete curb expansion joints is 50 feet.
26. Curb along Keystone Way shall be demolished to the nearest joint during the construction of
any new drives. 4
27. Please ensure that all improvements remaining from the previous entrance to the site off of
Carmel Drive are removed.
28. Please include a Maintenance of Traffic Plan, meeting all requirements of the Indiana
Department of Transportation Work Zone Safety Manual current edition, for the construction
of the entrances.
29. Please add the note as required in Storm Water Technical Standards Manual Section 102
"Permit Requirement and Procedures," Article 102.02 vii pertaining to construction and
approval of storm sewer systems to all storm sewer plan and profile sheets.
30. Please provide a drainage summary per Section 102.02 (xi)(m) of the City's Stormwater
Technical Standards Manual on the plans.
31. Please submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, in accordance with the City of Carmel
Stor nwater Standards Manual Section 102. 04 with the plan set.
32. The pond is located less than 50 feet from the Keystone Parkway right -of -way; however, the
proposed grading appears to create a barrier from Keystone Parkway traffic.
33. Please provide the local flood routing through the site (all inlets plugged during a 100 -year
storm event).
34. Please provide the MFPG and MLAG for the building.
35. Please label the critical pond elevations for the detention facility including the 100 -year,
normal pool and top of bank.
36. Please provide the offsite receiving stormwater system on the plans.
37. Please analyze the receiving stormwater system and ensure it is not restrictive and will not
require more detention on site.
GENERAL INFORMATION
• These comments represent the Department of Engineering's first review ofthe civil plans for
this project.
• We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing and be accompanied by
a drawing reflecting the requested revisions. Failure to provide written responses may result
in the delay of the review process.
• It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-
submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our
previous reviews. Please provide revised plans including all revisions. Please notify us of
any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting fi•om Plan
Commission, BZA or other committee meetings.
Mr. Timothy E. Ochs
August 30; 2012
RE: [McDonald's Restaurant 750 East Carmel Drive remodel - Project Review #1
Page 3 of 5
• We: have engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage
calculations submitted to this office for review. If you.have not already done so, please
provide a set of drainage plans and calculations to their office for review. We will share
Crossroad's comments as they are received
• Final., drawings will not be approved for construction until:
a. All Engineering Department and Utility Department and Hamilton County Surveyor
issues have.been resolved.
b. All bonds and performance; guarantees are posted.
c. All Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency
approvals (if required) are obtained.
d. All off -site easements necessary to install utilities to serve the development are
secured.
e_ SWPPP is approved.
f. All fees are paid.
• The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent
reviews.
• An approved Stonn Water Management Permit is required prior to commencing any earth
dist:urbing,activity. Please contact.Mr. John Thomas regarding storan water quality
requirements.
• An approved right -of -way permit is required prior to commencing any work in the public
right -of -way and for construction equipment access fi•om the City's right -of -way.
• If it will be necessary to relocate existing utilities, the costs for such relocation shall be borne
solely by the developer. Any utility poles requiring relocation shall be relocated to within one
foot of the outside. edge of the proposed right -of -way.
• The Department;requires that the construction drawings be developed in accordance with the
City of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required; submittals for primary plat,
secondary plat, and construction drawings be made. The digital files must be submitted to the
Department of Engineering prior to the approval of the construction plans. Please contact the
City GIS Department for the requirements.
• Jurisdictions:
a. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits.
b. Perimeter Street and Right -of -Way — City of Carmel (Cannel Drive, Keystone Way,
Keystone Parkway).
c. Water — City of Carmel Utilities
d. Sanitary Sewers — City of Carmel Utilities
e. Storm Sewers /Drainage — City of Carmel.
f. Legal Drains — .Hamilton County Surveyor's Office.
• Drawings :submitted for approval:
a. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval.
b. This office wiR require 9 sets of drawings for approval after all issues have been
resolved. The drawings will be stamped. as approved. and signed by the City Engineer
and by Carmel Utilities. The Owner will receive 3 sets, one of which must be maintained
on the construction site at all times. If this project is subject to review and approval by
the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office, a total of I sets will be required for final
approval.
• Carmel Utilities will provide separate reviews of this project for water issues. Please assure
that copies of all drawings.are sent to:
Paul Pace Paul Arnone.
Carmel Utilities Distribution Carmel Utilities Collection
3450t 131" Street 901 North Range Line Road
Westfield, IN 46074 Carmel, IN 46032
Mr. Timothy E. Ochs
August 30, 2012
RE: McDonald's Restaurant 750 East Carmel Drive remodel - Project Review it]
Page 4 of 5
Carmel Utilities subscribes to "Holey Moley" who should be contacted directly for all water
main locations.
The following items will be sent electronically upon request regarding this correspondence
and project:
c. Project Approval Checklist.
d. Performance /Maintenance Guarantees
e. Utility Jurisdictions /Right of Way Permits
f: Availability (acreage) Fees
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
• A schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines will be
sent electronically for your use upon request. Please use the Engineering Department
deadlines for submissions to the Board,
• Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by the Carmel Clay Plan
Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of
review by the Technical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the
Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of
approval by the Plan Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable).
• Water Availability and Sanitary Sewer approval from the Board will be required. This is an
EDU approval based upon the proposed use of the site. Reference Items 933 to 435 below for
additional details /explanations: Please note that if an entryway or other irrigation system
is planned for this development, additional Water Availability Approval from the Board
will be required and additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the
size and usage of the system as determined by the Director of Carmel Utilities.
• Commercial Curb Cut Approval. Please provide 81/ x 1.1 exhibits with the request for
approval. Provide all pertinent information including lane widths, overall width, radii, lane
markings, location of opposing drives or streets, relationship to the location of previous curb
cut, etc.
• Temporary Construction Entrance Approval. A temporary construction entrance is not shown
on the plans.
• The installation of any permanent, privately owned and /or maintained improvement (signs,
decorative street signs, walls, streetlights, etc.) within dedicated right of way or dedicated
easements requires the execution of a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner
and the City of Carmel. Such agreements are executed by the Board of Public Works and
Safety. The City Engineer may approve irrigation system agreements.
• Secondary Plat approval if applicable. All performance guarantees must be posted prior to
submission of secondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval.
• Dedication of right -of -way if not platted. This is based upon the City of Carmel 20 -Year
Thoroughfare Plan requirements. Dedication documents are available upon request. Please
be advised that all Right -of -Way Dedications must be accompanied by a Sales Disclosure
Agreement completed by the owner for the property being dedicated to the City. The
dedication document cannot be recorded without a completed Sales Disclosure. The form is
available upon request.
• Any open pavement cuts of City right -ofway will require Carmel Board of Public Works and
Safety approval.
BONDING REOUIREMENTS
• Please contact Mr. Dave Barnes to review performance guarantee requirements. Please
contact Mr. John Duffy to review water and sanitary sewer bonding requirements.
• The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for
100% of the cost of labor and materials to consn•uct the individual improvements, to be
Mr. Timothy E. Ochs
August 30, 2012
RE: McDonald's Restaurant 750 East Carmel Drive remodel- Project Review # l
Page 5 of 5
provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each
improvement including quantities, unit costs, pipe sizes, and materials, etc.
Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees, a three -year
Maintenance Guarantee will be required (see Street Sign comments above). The Maintenance
Guarantee amount is based upon 15% of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and
10% of the Performance amount for all other improvements.
Performance Guarantees may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Letters of
Credit.
Please reference the available enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures.
RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND BONDING
• Any work in the dedicated right -of -way will require an approved Right -of -Way Permit and a
License R. Permit Bond.
• The bond amount is determined by our Right -of -Way Manager. However, if the wort: is
included in the scope.of work of a required and posted Performance Guarantee, the
Performance Guarantee may be used to satisfy the bond requirements of the Right -of -Way
Permit:
• Please contact our Right -of -Way Manager, Fred Glaser, to arrange right -of -way permitting
and bonding.
AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES
• We defer to Carmel Utilities regarding this issue.
• If an entryway or overall site irrigation system is planned for this development,
additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the
system and upon the recommendations of the Director of Carmel Utilities.
• These fees are required to be paid prior to final approval of construction plans by Engineering
and prior to issuance of building permits by Building Codes Services. Please con finn these
fees and calculations with Cannel Utilities.
if you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2441.
Sincerely,
Gary R. u an, J P.E.
Assista City ngineer
Department of Engineering
cc: Angelina Conn, Department of Community Services
John Duffy, Cannel Utilities
Paul Pace, Carmel Utilities
Paul Arnone, Carmel Utilities
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Greg Ilko, Crossroad Engineers, PC
isswappsluser data%z!%sharedlDl9tLL1PROJREV 12 W1CD(.)NAL.D'S RESTAUR ANTR F.MODI:I_REV:I i
August 29, 2012
RyEY0R'S OFpt
• � 4 v,b
Xenton C• `Ward, Crf.'Vt
Surveyor of Jfamilton County
Phone (317) 776 -6495
'Fax (317) 776 -96.26
Ice Miller LLP
ATTN: Timothy Ochs, Esq.
One American Square
Suite 2900
Indianapolis, IN. 46282
VIA E- MAIL: Tim.othy.Ochs(ibicemiller.com
RE: McDonald's — Carmel Drive Remodel
Dear Mr. Ochs:
Suite 166
One Namilton County Square
Noblesville, Indiana 46c6o -2230
We have reviewed the submittal to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on August 16, 2012,
for this project and have the following comments:
1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of
Carmel.
2. The proposed project DOES fall in a Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone.
3. The proposed project does fall in the Moffitt- Williamson Regulated Drain Watershed.
4. The proposed project is providing detention and a reduction of stormwater runoff
from the existing building. This complies with the requirements of the Hamilton
County Stormwater Management Technical Standards Manual.
5. No permits will be needed from our office.
Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317- 776 -8495.
Sincerely,
1.111 (V
Greg Hoyes, AC, CFM, CPESC
Plan Reviewer
CC: Angie Conn — Carmel DOCS, John Thomas — Carmel Engineering
Dave Barnes — Carmel Engineering, Greg Ilko Crossroad Engineers
Conn, Angelina V
From: Mindham, Daren
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:08 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
I just talked with Mike on #3 below, and basically he doesn't want buildings buffered on Carmel Dr or business fronted
roads. I took this comment off the McDonalds landscape review.
Daren Mindham
Urban Forester
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:15 PM
To: Mindham, Daren
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Thanks, Daren.
Angie Conn
Planning Administrator
From: Mindham, Daren
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
1. ZO Chapter 26.04 - Perimeter Buffeiyards - is the north side a side or a rear yard - needs a 5 -ft wide planting
strip or a 10 -ft ? thought you decided what is a side and what is not a side? I guess I would consider it a side
5' as there is parking on the back side of the north lot line and a site with the same commercial use
2. Street trees might be required within the road right of way, per ZO Chapter 19, for the B -8 /Business Zone,
right ?[here is no green space or room for street trees in the ROW in front of McDonalds]
3. front yard buffer along carmel drive, which I think is a Secondary Arterial road. Does that mean a 15 -11
wide bufferyard is required ?[ es, however, the new ordinance patch has exemptions for the bufferyard so
this requirement will be disappearing until I can hopefully re- instate it. I GIS'ed the area and there is no
consistency anywhere. This is a good question, I think we got an answer from Mike last time and he said he
wanted the building up front with minimal landscaping for buildings on Cannel. DD
Daren Mindham
Urban Forester
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:03 PM
To: Mindham, Daren
Subject: RE: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Oops - I also forgot to ask about the front yard buffer along carmel drive, which i think is a Secondary Arterial road. Does
that mean a 15 -ft wide bufferyard is required?
Angie
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:12 PM
To: Mindham, Daren
Subject: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Hi Daren - I have these 2 questions for you, as you begin to review the landscape plan for the new McDonald's
building:
4. ZO Chapter 26.04 - Perimeter Bufferyards -is the north side a side or a rear yard -needs a 5 -ft wide planting
strip or a 10 -ft?
S. Street trees might be required within the road right of way, per ZO Chapter 19, for the B -8 /Business Zone,
right?
Thanks!
Angie
Conn, Angelina V
From: Mindham, Daren
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:32 AM
To: 'Timothy.Ochs @icemiller.com'; 'Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com'; 'blair @carmosinogroup.com'
Subject: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Attachments: Treedetail- Carmel.pdf; Evergreendetail- Carmel.pdf; Shrubdetail - Carmel.pdf; Tree
Preservation Detail.pdf
Tim,
The following email represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of landscaping
have reviewed the drawings and offer the following comments:
URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW COMMENTS
1) 1 request our standard city tree planting details be used on the landscape plan. The main reason
being that we promote removal of the entire basket and nursery packaging when planting.
(attached)
2) There are two existing honeylocust trees along the east side of the property that could be
preserved. If construction would not affect the trees or their root systems I would request that they
be preserved. I have attached our tree preservation detail to be used on the landscape plan.
(attached)
3) 1 believe there is an extra PS /16 label on the GT /8 row of trees. This should be removed.
4) Are there plans for foundation plantings? Please provide some level of foundation plantings.
5) In the plant schedule the word evergreen is missing an 'n' within the Pinus Strobus row.
Please illustrate how these comments will be addressed by letter or revised plan. If you have any questions,
feel free to contact me. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Daren Mindham
Urban Forester
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 2:47 PM
To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mindham, Daren; Hancock, Ramona B; Littlejohn, David W; 'jmolitor @prodigy.net'; Boone, Rachel
M.; Tingley, Connie S; Duncan, Gary R; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Blanchard, Jim E; Stewart, Lisa M; Martin, Candy; Lux,
Pamela K; Haney, Douglas C; Mishler, Nicholas F; Maki, Sue; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R; Foley,
Amanda J
Cc: Ochs, Timothy; 'blair @carmosinogroup.com'; 'Perry, Nichole'
Subject: Docket No. Assignment: McDonald's Rebuild ( #12080005 ADLS)
Conn, Angelina V
From: Ochs, Timothy [Timothy.Ochs @ icem iller.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:06 PM
To: Boone, Rachel M.; Perry, Nichole
Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K
Subject: RE: McDonald's
Rachel: Please see my responses below in black.
Tim
From: Boone, Rachel M. [mailto:rboone @carmel.in.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Perry, Nichole
Cc: Ochs, Timothy; Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K
Subject: RE: McDonald's
Hi Nikki,
I am working on this and have a few questions. Perhaps you can get with Tim and make sure I remember our
meeting correctly?
L I thought the words "McDonald's" were being removed on the west and east elevation. Sorry about
any miscommunication, but the words "McDonald's" is only being removed on the east side.
a. The large format drawings only show the west elevation sign removed.
b. The 11 x17 format drawings still show the "McDonald's" sign on the west /drive thru elevation.
2. 1 also thought the ground directional signs would be reduced to 3' tall so a variance wouldn't be
required for those. You are correct. All ground directional signs are supposed to be reduced to 3'.
a. The drawing for the main directional signs by the entrances was not included with the
application. Are these still proposed? And have they been reduced to 3' in height? Yes, and, as
indicated, 3' maximum height.
b. Also the "please have your payment ready" sign looks like something was typed over the
existing 50" numbers. Has this height been reduced to 3' tall? Yes, it was not done very well,
sorry. 3' tall is what it is supposed to be.
3. The 11 x 17 building elevations still show an "M" on the rear /north elevation. Can you confirm this is
not proposed? That is wrong. No signage on the rear /north elevation is proposed.
4. One of the 11 x 17 plans still shows the "Thank You" pavement marker. Please confirm that this is no
longer proposed. I need to confirm this but will be in touch shortly.
Please let me know these answers and I will have the docket number assignment finalized.
Thanks so much!
lac ,e.LB&Oi ue,
Sign Permit Specialist
City of Carmel
Department of Community Services
317 -571 -2417
From: Perry, Nichole [ mailto :Nichole.Perry @icemiller.coml
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:25 PM
To: Boone, Rachel M.
Subject: RE: McDonald's
Conn, Angelina V
From: Donahue -Wald, Alexia K
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:21 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P
Subject: RE: mcdonalds - photo examples
I kind of agree with Rachel too, at least as it relates to the yellow. I think if it wasn't yellow, it would look more natural
on the building. The first image where the building isn't finished looks pretty good. I don't know why, but on the other
ones I think it just looks to cheesy maybe.
Lex
From: Conn, Angelina V
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 2:20 PM
To: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K
Subject: RE: mcdonalds - photo examples
Mike- These are pretty cool. I kind of agree with Rachel, but I think you should also forward these to Blair Carmosino &
Tim Ochs, if you have not done so already. O
Angie
From: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9 :32 AM
To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Conn, Angelina V
Subject: FW: mcdonalds - photo examples
Lex and Angie,
I was cherry picking images for mcd's rebuild yesterday. Rachel likes the one they are proposing more than the ones
below (with funny hat on top), but I'd like your opinions too... I'm ok either way, just don't want to settle if we don't
have to...
From: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:09 PM
To: Hollibaugh, Mike P
Subject: mcdonalds
Conn, Angelina V
From: Whiting, Duane A. [ DWhiting @citizensenergygroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:05 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V
Cc: Perry, Nichole; Ochs, Timothy
Subject: RE: ADLS Application for McDonald's located at East Carmel Drive
MR
Citizens Water has reviewed the above subject request and has no obiection to the application for the proposed plan for
a McDonald's Restaurant to be located on East Carmel Drive. Please note that this location is inside the service area of
Carmel Utilities, therefore this site will not have water service from Citizens Water.
Thank you,
Duane A. Whiting
Real Estate - Property Planner
citizens r�� energy group'-
Citku"s Gas I Citizens- rNerinat I Clozer, kvater
1220 Waterway Boulevard
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Tel 317 - 263 -6418
dwhiting @citizensenergygroup.com
From: Perry, Nichole [ma ilto : Nichole. Perry @icemi Ile r.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 3:56 PM
To: aconn()carmel.in.gov; awold @carmel.in.gov; dminham @carmel.in.gov; dlittlejohn @carmel.in.yov;
plux@carmel.in.gov; gduncan @carmel.in.gov; afoley @carmel.in.gov; nredeen @carmel.in.gov; dbarnes @carmel.in.gov;
david.lucas @hamiltoncounU in.gov; whohlt @carmel.in.gov; iblanchard@carmel.in.gov; jduffyocarmel.in.gov;
t4reen()carmel.in.4ov; tkrueskamp@carmel.in.gov; mwestermeier @carmelclayparks.com;
iason. lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; brooke. gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Jason .kirkman@mybrighthouse.com;
shirley.hunter @duke- energy.com; gary.mcnamee @duke- energy.com; dan.davenport @aes.com; Whiting, Duane A.;
rfarrand @ccs.k12.in.us; tr y.yackle@sug.com; sk49860att.com
Cc: Ochs, Timothy; Perry, Nichole
Subject: ADLS Application for McDonald's located at East Carmel Drive
TAC — City of Carmel Technical Advisory Committee Members:
Per the request of Tim Ochs, please find attached the following items relating to the ADLS Application for the
McDonald's located on East Carmel Drive, which has been filed with the City of Carmel Department Community Services,
Planning & Zoning Office, for your review:
1. Building Elevations (A2.0 and A2.1);
2. Conceptual Site Plan; and
3. Civil Plans Q pages).
If your organization has also requested a paper copy of plans, per the chart we have from the City of Carmel, we will
distribute the copies through regular mail to your attention.
Conn, Angelina V
From:
Perry, Nichole (Nichole.Perry @icemiller.com]
Sent:
Monday, August 13, 2012 3:56 PM
To:
Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; dminham @carmel.in.gov; Littlejohn, David W;
Lux, Pamela K; Duncan, Gary R; Foley, Amanda J; nredeen @carmel.in.gov; Barnes, David R;
david.lucas@hamiltoncounty.in.gov; Hohlt, William G; Blanchard, Jim E; Duffy, John M;
Green, Timothy J; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Forward for Westermeier, Mark;
jason.lemaster @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; brooke. gajownik @hamiltoncounty.in.gov;
jason.kirkman @mybrighthouse.com; shirley.hunter @duke - energy.com;
gary.mcnamee @duke - energy.com; dan.davenport @aes.com;
dwhiting @citizensenergygroup.com; rfarrand @ccs.kl2.in.us; troy.yackle @sug.com; sk4986
@att.com
Cc:
Ochs, Timothy; Perry, Nichole
Subject:
ADLS Application for McDonald's located at East Carmel Drive
Attachments:
1116- CP3- CSP10.pdf; 12022 Carmel—A2 0_a_bw 6.8.12.pdf; 12022 Carmel—A2 1_a_bw
6.8.12.pdf; CIVIL PLANS.pdf
TAC — City of Carmel Technical Advisory Committee Members:
Per the request of Tim Ochs, please find attached the following items relating to the ADLS Application for the
McDonald's located 'on East Carmel Drive, which has been filed with the City of Carmel Department Community Services,
Planning & Zoning Office, for your review:
1. Building Elevations (A2.0 and A2.1);
2. Conceptual Site Plan; and
3. Civil Plans (7 pages).
If your organization has also requested a paper copy of plans, per the chart we have from the City of Carmel, we will
distribute the copies through regular mail to your attention.
Please let Tim Ochs or myself know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Nikki Perry
NICHOLE R. PERRY
Real Estate Paralegal
Phone 317- 236 -2124
Fax 317 - 592 -4299
Email nichole.perry @icemiller.com
One American Square
Suite 2900
Indianapolis, IN 46282 -0200
www.icemiller.com
Open as vCard
:{- * ;{::}:: }::!= * * X * * k * �k * :}: * * ;{::k * :}� :}= k * * * � ;?: � * :k :f::{: = f::}::k� >k :k =S- %k k -f= �f= k %}, k k k k :k •k- -k• :f::k :k :f::k k k -f= k k k � :{c k :#c -k• :}c �}c .k :#= a::{: k :k k %f� %f= =k k �{� =k k k k �= �= �l=
************* 4,******************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Except to the extent that this advice concerns the qualification of any
qualified plan, to ensure compliance with U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise
you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication,
including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the
purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any tax - related matters addressed herein.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E -mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use
of this E -mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this E -mail in error, please notify us
immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system.
Thank you.
ICE MILLER LLP