The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05050049-CorrespondenceLillard, Sarah N Duncan, Gary R Friday, May 20. 2005 12:18 PM Lillard, Sarah N RE: Fineberg BIdg. Sarah, Yes Engineering is satisfied. The City can issue the permit, I just talked to Dave Fineberg, He asked if you could just g~ve him a call when ~,ou are back in from lunch and he will come t~ack over to get his stuff. His number is 844-3993. Thanks so much Sarah. Gary .... Original Message From: billard, Sarah N Sent: Frday May20 2005 11:54 To: Duncan, G~ry R Subject: Fineberg Bldg. Importance: High Okay, Does Engineering have everything ir needs for the Fineberg Buildinng--so we can issue the permit? Please llt me knc~,v. David alreadk stopped by once to try to pick Ul~ ~he permit. Thank you. Sarah Lillard, Sarah N Brewer Scott I Tuesday, May 17, 2005 2:53 PM Lillard Sarah N RE The Fineberg Building ursery has gotten me plans that show the structural soil installaltion, buflderi~ 178444673 THE F'INEBERG GR~OUP THE FINEBERG GROUP PAGE 81/82 Property Development & Management FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET 317~3 [] URGENT [] FOR REVIEW [] PLEASE COMMENT ri PLEASE REPLY [-[ PLEASE RECYCLE ,~rom: ent: To: Subject: Hill, Dick B Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:15 PM Lillare. Sarah N RE: FINEBERG BLDG MEETING this afternoon The BPWS items were approved this a.m. ..... Odginal Nessage ..... From= Lillard, Sarah N Sent: Wedn~sday~ Nay 04, 2005 11:t9 AN To= Duffy, John PI; H II, Dick B; Duncan Gary R Cc: Kendall, .]eft A Subject: FJNEBERG BLDG MEETING this afternoon [mportance: High Gentlemen. e have set up a pre-submittal meeting for the Fineberg building at the SE corner of Range Line nd Carmel Drive for this afternoon at 2:30. The builder is reporting that all outstanding issues have now been completed, and that you are all okay With us prdceeding ~vith the building hermit. Can you please each reply regarding the item designated bdoW for yohr response. We ~vant to make sure this is really realty f~r the building process. ~: Engineering plan review is completed and approved. Dick: All BPW's items are now approved. (Curb Cut modification; Right of Way Dedication and permit and bond) · , r _ ~: The builder reports that you are not going to be assessing additional water aha sewer tees ar this time--that this 4dll most likely come in wi~h the tenant fir~ish submittals. Thank you, Sarah I~. From: Sent: To Subject: Duncan, Gary R Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:30 AM Lillard, Sarah N; Duffy, John M; Hill Dick B Kendall, Jeff A RE: FINEBERG BLDG MEETING this afternoon We are ust ssmng our comments today related to the plans and our review. The drainage is still being reviewed by our subconsultant. We have not granted final approva of the project at this point, Gary ..... ~riginat Message ..... From: Lillard, Sarah N Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:19 To: Duffy, John M; Hill, Dick B; Duncan, Gary R Cc: Kendall, Jeff A Subject: FINEBERG BLDG MEETING this afternoon Importance: High Gentlemen, We have set up a pre-submittal meeting for the Fineberg building at the SE comer of Range Line and Carmel Drive for this afternoon at 2:30. The builder is reporting that all outstanding issues have now been completed, and that you are all okay with us proceeding ;vith the building permit. Can you please each repl} regarding the item designated below for your response. We want ro make sure this is really ready for the building process. Ga_Q~ Engineering plan review is completed and approved. Dick_: All BPW~s items are now approved. (Curb Cut modification: Right of Way Dedication and permit and bond) ~: The builder reports that you are not going to be assessing additional water and sewer fees at this time-~that thiS xvill rhost likely come in with the tenant finish ~ubmittals. Thank you, Sarah L Lillard, Sarah N 'marko@f neberg-olnick.com' RE: Pre-Submittal Meet ng for the Fineberg Bldg @ 1301 S. Range Line a building will still have a fire sprinkler system, We requested an e also need a knox box and fire department connect on caps for bldg, have a master key system, wl~ere spaces are mastered of one ~,ey that be purchased on-line at <www'kno~box.com>_ 571-2600 FAX (317)571-2674 e-mail-ghoyt@ci.carmel,in.us .... Original Message ..... From: Lillard, Sarah N ~ent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:25 PM TO: Kenda I, Jeff A DobosieWicz, ,ion C; Conn, AngeJina V; Brewer, ScoLt I; Hill, Dick B; Duncan, Gary R; AKers, William P; HOy~, Gary A; B anchard .1 m E; Do ag, Veronica A Duff'/ .1ohn M Cc: marko@fineberg-olnick,com SubjeCt: Pre-Submittal Meeting for the F neberg BIdg ~ 1301 S Range Line jt~ tgfOr the purpose of une Rd: Page 1 o£2 10:56 PM rah N ~g money~ · but they were deficient Jori told me not to OK them until they were right. the structural soils details during the planning ans to ~ e for my sign off, Mike Deboy red structural soils for tn the Main~ They ~lan after th, 31an commission approval, and decide they don't C 18, 2005 11:51 AM Building Iii they are amended to include the structural soils as shown on the approved plans. 0:01 AM ~:L ilaing pies) on April 6 for the Fineberg Building When I called DeBoy Engineenng, Stacy told me ey were landscape plans because the structural soils component was on the previous red. L. illard, Sarah N Duncan, Gary R Friday, April 22, 2005 11:06 AM Lillard, Sarah N Hill Dick B; Redden, Nick RE: The Fineberg Building Sarah, We have rece red plans and a TAC response but we are still reviewing what was submitted. To my knowledge, they have other approvals listed, ..... Or ginal Message From: Lillard, Sarah N Sent: Friday April 22, 2005 11:00 To: H , Dick B Duncan, Gary R Brewer, Scott I; Subject: The Fineberg Building Gentlemen, Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Hoyt, Gary A Representatives of Fineberg and Olnick are stating that all outstanding issues regarding the Fineberg Building have been approved. Can you verify this? DICK/GARY D.. I don't believe we have had a response to our TAC review comments. Outstanding remaining requirements include: · Board of Works approvals required Commercial Curb Cut Modification approva Water and San tary Sewer Avai abi ity Right of Way Dediization (5' Additiona on Carmel Drive) RRight of Way Permit and Bond esponse to our TAc comments Payment of additional Water and Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees GARY H: The fire department is under the mpression that the building will still have a fire sprinkler system. We requested an additional fire hydrant east of the drive up. We also need a Knox box and fire department connection caps for bldg. siamese We are a ~o requesting that the building have a master key system, where ~paces are mastered of one key that will be placed in the Knox box. K~ox products can be purchased on-line at <www,knoxbox.com> JON: Have you completed/approved review of the elevations? SCOTT You did not respond with any comments. Do they not have any landscape requirements, or :hey already submitted plans to you? If the latter, were they approved? Please let me know. 07, 2005 8:50 AM Kendall Jeff A; Dobosiewicz, Jori C; Conn, Angelina V; Brewer, Scott I; Duncan Gary RAkers Wil lam P Hoyt Gary A Blanchard Jir~ E; Dolan, Veronica A; Duffy, John M 'marko@fineberg~olnick com RE: Pr~-Submiti~l Meeting for the Fineberg Btdg @ 1301 S. Range Line to our TAC review comments. Outstanding remaining requirements include: on Carmel Drive) it and [ ~1 Water and San Bldg @ 1301 t I; Hill, Dick B; Duncan, Gary R; Akers, william P; Hoyt, Gary Range Une (signs) r~ick.com Dobosiewicz, Jon C Thursday, April 07.2005 9:52 AM Lillard, Sarah N RE: Pre-Submittal Meeting for the Fineberg Bldg @ 1301 S. Range Line ira. levations and will review them today. obtaini Sarah N Corm, Angelina V; Brewer, Scott]; Hill, Dick B; Duncan, Gary R; Akers, William P; Hoyi:, GaryA; N 'marko@fineberg-olnick.com' Pre-Submittal Meeting for the Fineberg Bldg @ 1301 S. Range Line Building & Code Enforcement division, has a pre.submittal meeting for the purpose of ! permit. 301 S. Range Line Rd. Time: PENDING Related Planning & Zoning docket nL O5O2O040 V 5020041 (signs) Ilnick ick tick.corn : might affect the issuance of this permit, please this e.mail. Gary Scott I Hill, D ck B Duncan, lim E; Dolan, Veron ca A DuffY, John M ~t S. Range Line ~1 meetil }1301S. Range Line Rd. 05020041 (signs) Inick. com of this permit, please page 2 of 2 Technical Adwsory Commattee [hnutes October 2(l 2004 Filed by E. Davis Coots REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER: M/ke DeBoy, DEBOY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Stacey Hosler. DEBOY LAND DELELOPMENT SERVICES David Fineberg, THE FINEBERG GROUP LLC Comes now 1301 South Rangeline Road, Development Plan, Architectural Design, Lighting and Signage Application. The applicant proposes a new commercial building and associated signage. Tt~e site is l~)cated at 1301 South Rangeline Road. The site is zoned B-8/Business. We are going to demo the original 11,000 square feet develop on the northwest quad. This will be mixed use professional offices and restaurants with a proposed drive-thru from the south with an outlet to the east. DeBoy: We would like info on transformer placement from Cinergy. We would like to get together on the specs for the Carmel Drive Streetscape. Duncan: We have comments ready. DeBoy: We show fifty feet (50') right-of-way and Engineering says it is forty-five (45)? I looked at the plans along Rangeline it shows forty-five (45) and DOCS is requesting fifty-five (55). What is the right-of-way? Dobosiewicz: Is the building angled? DeBoy: The right-of-way angles. We will be addressing the parking after we get your comments. Dobosiewicz: We asked for the right-of-way for a future dedicated right mm. DeBoy: What is the timeframe? Duncan: None yet. DeBoy: What about the path? Dobosiewicz: We will use a sidewalk here. DeBoy: You requested a traffic study? Dobosiewicz: Not traffic study but turrfing movements at the entrance of your site on Rangeline. Queuing of traffic turning into your site. DeBoy: Traffic impact study or count? DUnc~m: Give us information from peak times. Dobosiewicz: We should have info on that area from twelve (12) to twenty-four (24) months ago. Hoyes: No comments Shupperd: Passing contact sheet. Are you using Gas? DeBoy: A remote meter maybe. Gajownik: No commems. Duncan: Call us. DobosieWicz: Are all the areas outside the planting plan is that sidewalk from the back of curb to the building space. DeBoy: Limits of demolition to the west and north are to the back of curb other than the ornamental gate at the intersection. The outside limits to the south and east are limits of the parking lot. pag~ 3 of 2 Dobosiewicz: Identify the fence on the Construction Plans. Convey to D. Coots we will be looking for dedication commitments on the right-of-way. Transfer the landscaping to a set that shows the rights-of-ways. Make sure you have the traffic study with you so you are not held up in Plan Commission. We would want to see this plan dashed in of how it could connect with the site to the south and provide on the Development Plan a cross access easement for future redevelopment. Hoyt: Two story? DeBoy: Multi-story but not a full two story. Hoyt: We may n~ed an additional Fire Hydrant at the connection or within fifty, feet (50') of the hookup. DeBoy: East of the drive up? Hoyt: Yes. South: Storm Water Prevention Plan is still nnapproved. DeBoy: Southern most manhole is the location we think we will use. We can use a separator if necessary and most cost effective. South: Look for areas you can use for Storm Water Quality. Brewer: Comments for you, I will pass them down. Areas on the east side of the White Pines save those but the bushes to the south need to go. Like J. South said maybe you can use the courtyard to help with storm water. Work with the Bank on that m integrate landscaping on the south side. Species and graphic details we can talk about later. Planters will work but consolidate make small larger and relocate. Beef up landscaping on the Carmel Drive and Rangeline sides. Dobosiewicz: Turn curb out on site plan and add spaces wider for the two lanes then it will not interrupt you if the change comes. It was my understanding that it is two stories 4,000 square feet up and 11,100 square feet down that meets the parking needs. Our support of the Variance is necessary to pull this building to the street are contingent upon providing some portion of second story occupyable space, that needs to be passed on to D. Coots. Provide to us a sketched drawing of the site showing a building with required parking, and landscaping space. Submit a rough sketch to us as soon as possible and we will get comments back to you. DeBoy: , Do we have to show where a truck will make a three point turn? Dobosiewicz: You do have to shoTM it, I suggest you use a template. Comment letter was sent to D. Coots. We need to get together with Engineenng on the right-of-way dedication. Photo-metric Plea needed, cut sheets for light fixtures, attached fixtures need to be 90 degree cut~off, down lights. Need to see detail of the trash enclosure side materials need to be consistent with building. Show canopy extended to the south and incorporated into the building. Show stacking but it appears you are fine. Dedication of right-of-way is necessary pursuant to Development Plan approval. Outdoor seating show cut sheets with tables, chairs. and um~brellas to the Plan Commission if any. You will need to submit applications to the BZA if they have not been made. Blanchard: Each required accessible means of egress shall be continuous to a public way. The means of egress, including the exit discharge, shall be illuminated at all times the building space served by the means of egress is occupied. Will there be a Construction Trailer? If so, it will need a Temporary Use Permit. Applications are at the office of Building and Code Enforcement on the 1s~ floor of City Hall. A page 4 of 2 , Tech~fical Adwsory Committee Minute. October 20. 2004 pre-submittal meeting will be required. No Building Permit will be issued before the pre-submittal meeting. You may g.e.t a copy of the pre-submittal checklist and commercial procedures on our web site: ..... .-- ' · ,-, ' . Make sure you have all agencies' approvals prior to contacting Sarah Lillard for your pre- submittal meeting: ' ~ · ' a, ¼ ~ -. After your pre-submittal meeting it is normally 10 days before your company will be issued a permit. ...END... Docket No. 04090029 SP: Park Northwestern, Lot 4 - Replat Filed by Dave Barnes of Weihe Engineering REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER: Dave Barnes WEIHE ENGINEERING Jim Adams, SIMPLY STORAGE Comes now Park Northwestern, Lot 4, Replat. The applicant seeks to create 2 lots on 1.07 acres. The site is located west of Northwestern Drive and Michigan Road. Current zoning is I-1 Industrial. Hoyes: No comments. Shupperd: No comments, Broermann: No comments. Gaj ownik: No comments. Hoyt: No comments. South: No commems. Brewer: No comments. DObosiewicz It is our preference that you show the cross access easement identified on the plat instead of the privately recorded instrument Barnes: We can put the recorded easement number on the plat. Dobosiewicz: That works. This will get routed through the County Commissioners. Feltner: The District has no co~nments on the Replat. Owner will need to provide to the District information on how Sanitary Sewer service will be provided to this lot for future development. ...END... Docket No. 04090038 DP Amend: Century 21 - Alexander Office Building Filed by David R. Warshauer of Barnes and Thomburg Wayne Haney suggested the petitioner "tighten up" the consmtction materials to be used on the proposed homes. Docket No 04080056 PP~ Villas at Morgan's Creek, Primary Plat was referred to the Subdivision ComnUttee for further review on Tuesday, November 30. 2004 at 7:00 PM in the Caucus Rooms of City Hall. 2h. Docket No. 04090039 DP/ADLS: 1301 South Range Line Road The applicant proposes a new commercial building and associated signage. The site is located at 1301 S. Range Line Road. The site is zoned B-8/Business. Filed b~ E. Davis Coots for Fineberg Group LLC. Dave Coots, attorney appeared before the Commission representing the applicant. Also in attendance: Barbara Eden, Carson Designs; Mike DuBoy, DuBoy Land Development; and Adam Garvey, Landscape Architect with Gardens of Growth. square feet of the 11,000 square-foot footprint. ~ Road located adjacem to Carmel will be storefront friendly, pedestrian well as a dual frontage into the Courtyard is provision for two-stones, , front on Carmel Drive and Range structure. The east and west elevations containers and also shows sign detail for the tenants. The site is heavily additional planungs. The intent is not only to make the pedestrian friendly l~ut also to create a courtyard in the center of to create an outdoor seating area for patrons. The lighting plan consists of four parking lot standards located along the perimeter of the parking lot and two, canopy recessed light fixtures within the drive-through facility. There will also be a number of decorative wall sconces that will be directiohal in lighting to cast light both up and down on the face of the building and not spill over onto Carmel Drive or Range Line Road. The light fixtures are on all elevations of the building. There will also be ground lighting in the landscaped area. Signage would be similar to what was recently approved for Merchants Pointe--individual letters, interior lit, white- faced with bronze returns. The signage would comply with the Ordinance as to the elevations on Range Line R,o, ad and Cannel Drive. The signs on the interior will be hatf the size. and a variance would be needed for the "doubling' of the size under the new Overlay Zone. Regarding the parking, additional land to the southeast, behind Cannel Walk is incorporated into this plan and will be utilized for employee parking so that the balance ofthe parking on site wilt be used by patrons. A c.ross~easement MI1 be obtained with the property to the south, Carmel Walk. Carmel Walk is under common ownership w~th the subject property--The Fineberg Group. The pedestrian orientation of the project, plus the restaurant use prinmrily at night when other stores are not as busy will provide more than adequate parking for proposes of both business, retail use as well as a restaurant. Mr. Coots noted that public notice was certified to adjacent properties as to the Development Plan. Members of the public were invited to speak in favor of or opposition to the petition; no one appeared and the public hearing was closed. S:\PlanCommissionWlinntesLPlancomnUssion\2004.\pc2004nov 16 3 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CAP~MEL, INDDMNA 46032 317/571-2417 Department Comments, Jon Dobosiewicz. Signage and building mounted lighting adjacent to the street should be addressed at the Committee level. Docket No. 04090039 DP/AI)LS~ 1301 South Range Line Road, was referred to the Special Study Committee for further review on November 3, 2004 at 7:00 PM in the Caucus Rooms of City Hall. 3h. Docket No. 04090043 PP: Bella Tara Subdivision The applicant proposes 8 residential lots on 8.44 acres~ The petitioner also seeks the following subdivision waiver: ~ SW: SCO 6.3.20 Private Streets 106t~ and Towne Road. The site is zoned SI/Residential. 'Mid States Engineering for Brad Walker. :. appearedbefore the Commission BP Developmem. custom builders of the of 106t~ Street and Towne Road. The site is south ~ that be removed in its entirety. ['he home sizes a frontage road to be private. The eight lots will driveways into this section. There is also an existing frontage road, it will be safer in that then make a "U" turn at the end of the median and head south to enter the developmem. The site is served by existing utilities. There is an existing, multi-use path that was constructed along with the road widening on Towne Road. As part of the proposed development, the applicant will be adding a multi-use path along the frontage on 106th Street. Entry landscape treatments are proposed where the drive/frontage place road is located, and the applicant is requesting that the frontage road be private rather than public. The road would be constructed to the same depth requirements in asphalt and stone, and the homeowners would maintain the private road as a part of their lots. Members of the public were invited to speak in favor of the petition; no one appeared. Members of the public were invited to speak in opposition to this petition; the following appeared: Randy Sunsha, 10730 Torrey Pines Circle, Crooked Stick, was concerned with the negative impact the proposed development would have UPon wildlife in the area as well as density 0fthe project. Concern was also expressed regarding the through street as opposed to a cul-de-sac and possible light pollution. Mr. Sunsha requested that lighting shine down and not up. The public hearing was then closed. Gary Murray responded that the required buffer yards have been provided. The developers are sensitive to the fact that this is a wooded site, and they are trying to save as many trees as possible. The developer is proposing dusk-to-dawn lighting--no streetlights. Department Comments, Ion Dobos~ewtcz. The Department is in support ofthe private frontage place. However, as a condition of the approval, the Deparunent would like to see a requirement that this would not be a gated community. Dan Dutcher was concerned about a "gated community." Dan also encouraged the petitioner to provide to the neighbors the materials in the information packets. The landscaping plan is significant and worth reviewing. S:\PlanCommissionW[inutes\PlanCommissionL2004\pc2004nov 16 4 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CALOMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-241- landscap'_m_~ work was done last spring. A rock has now been placed in such a fashion that no one can drive across Mr. Spray s property. Mr. McComas said the applicant has tried to accommodate Mr. Spray and has made its best effort, but there is no formal, written agreement at this time. lerry Chomanczuk said he was somewhat taken aback at the full commission meeting at cormnems made by some of the neighbors. received this aRemoon from Mr. Spray and distributed this ~ fact that variances have been filed and he would have and voice his opmionmgarding those variance requests. The Department ~ Development Plan as proposed. The recommendation was made to the petitioner t : a variance to allow additional height to the fence from the adjacent neighbor. The fence r offset. If the BZA prefers the offset in the fence, the BZA needs to have the taring to return to the Committee for review. The off-set would to be on the residents side of the fence as well as the petitioner's side of the fence. ~ authority granted to the Committee by · subject to the dedication of the right-of-~vay as depicted on the site plan. Also. the Department is requesting that the Committee forward a favorable recommendation on to the City Council on the Rezone request. Note: At this t/me, the public hearing was officially closed on these Dockets. Mark Rattermann moved for approval of Docket No. 04030047 DP/ADLS, My Three Sons Ventures, LLC, conditioned upon dedication of right-of-way pursuant to the site plan, seconded by Madeleine Torres, APPROVED 5-0. Mark Raatt.ermann made formal motion to forward Docket No. 04030048 Z, North Augusta, See 10pt-ll and Sec 2, Lot 39, My Three Sons Ventures, LLC to the City Council with a favorable recommendation, seconded by Madeleine Torres, Approved 5-0. 2. Docket No. 04090039 DP/ADLS: 1301 South Range Line Road The applicant proposes a new commercial building and associated signage. The site is located at 1301 S. Range Line R~ad, The site is zoned B-8/Business, Filed by E. Davis Coots fOr Fineberg Group LLC. Dave Coots, attorney, Coots Henke & Wheeler appeared before the Committee representing the applicant. Also in attendance: Steve Cain, architect with Carson Design Group; Mike DuBoy, site work engineer; Mark Fineberg, owner of the property. The design for the new building will include a dropped cornice of a different material, color. The tenant sign will be mOved closer to the awning in an effort to break up some of the sizeable space utilized previously for tenant signage; this will be done on the north, west, and rear elevations. The tenant signage complies with the Ordinance in terms of The second issue raised was the lighting to ensure that the fIztures used on Carmel Drive and Range Line Road would not spill over onto traffic on either roadway. The cut sheets of the wall sconce intended for use provides for directional lighting to illuminate the facade of the building and also to illuminate the 10-foot wide wa~vay in front of the building. eDepamnent Comments, Jon Dobosiewicz, The Department had asked for some modifications on the building levafion that reduced the area above the awnings with the tenant name and lowered it slightly. The petitioner has made the requested changes and nothing additional is required for discussion at Committee. The Department is recommending that this item be return to the full Commission with a favorable recommendation. S:~PlanCommission~Vlinutes\SpecialStudyComrmtteeX2004~ss2004nov30 2 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317 571-2417 There was discussion regarding moving the sign brackets higher to provide safety for persons walking below, and the petitioner was agreeable to the suggestion. Parking was also discussed and adequacy questioned. Dave Coots said there is a cross easement agreement and additional parking is available behind Carmel Walk. The drive-through tenant at this site could be a Bank or a Starbucks--not a fast food; the intention is a bank. Note: A drive-through tenant--perhaps a bank--is a possibility at this location. Jerry Chomanczuk asked if bike racks would be added; the petitioner is agreeable. ~dpark Rattermann made formal motion to recommend approval to the full Commissxon of Docket No. 04090039 /ADLS, 1301 South Range Line Road, seconded by Steve Stromquist, Approved 5-0~ 3. Dockel No. 04090045 ADLS: O'Malia Fireplace The applicant seeks approval of a building and parking lot expansmn. The site is located at 220 South Range Line Road. The site is zoned B-l/Business. Filed by Paul Reis of Drewry Simmons Vomehr~ LLP for Helen J. O'Malia Trust. Paul Reis~ attorney, Drewry, Smamons, Vornehr~ 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1200 appeared before the Committee representing the applicant. Also in attendance: Kevin O Malia. The O'Malia Fireplace Shop bas been in business over 40 years in the City of Carmel. The current location is at 220 South Range Line Road. The cmxent proposal is for a building and showroom expansion at th/s particular location. The ground to the north is owned by the Carmel Redevelopment Commission. There are businesses to the south and the west; along the east side of Range Line Road is residential apartments, and businesses to the north and south. The site is zoned B-1 Business: an ADLS application is required--a Development Plan is not At the time conswaction begins, it is anticipated that the petitioner will return to Technical Advisory Committee to show the freer, engineering details. One of the comments has to do with the landscaping. The landscaping required under the Ordinance is the bufferyard requirement. The requirement would be for the installation of 22 shade trees. 14 ornamental trees, and 66 shrubs or 22 evergreens. Because of the bufferyard requirement and the layout of the site, the landscaping has been modified. The applicant feels the modified plan reasonably provides landscaping m a very attractive manner and is sufficient in view of the fact that there are no residential uses immediately to the north. south or west. Currently, the parking is to the north at the site of the former O'Malia's Bakery parking lot. However, with the Redevelopment Com~qission acquisition of that property, the parking must be moved. Also, with the property being owned by the Redevelopment Commission, the applicant is unable to obtain a permanent easement for parking and/or access; a curb cut is provided on Range Line Road. The dynamtcs of the site design at this t/me require a new curb cut off Range Line Road as well as new, un-site parking in conjunction with the new building and the existing building. In addition to the landscaping shown, there is a dumpster enclosure with landscaping around the enclosure to the west. A new sign will be located on the side of the building that will replace the existing ground sign along Range Line Road. The current entrance to the building will be refurbished with a new awning and new railing on the brick patio. However. once the improvements are completed, the main entrance will be relocated to the south. The elevations show the all brick construction with the different brick coarsxng to break up the faqade. Windows are not seen because these are display areas and typically, there are fireplaces located there. In order to accommodate those fireplaces, and to break up the faf adc. the brick coarsing has been added The west elevation shows the primary entrance and those persons entering from the parking lot will use this entrance. The current building will have added new railing and decking, and this will be a service entrance for deliveries. S:XPlanComnnssion~Minutes\SpecialStudyCommitteeX2004\ss2004nov30 3 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317 571~2417 Commission Comments: ents Secondl Dan Dutcher asked if any contribution was being made by the developer for Shelborne Road improvem . y, the landscape plan shows several lots that indicate no landscaping at all--obviously the devchiper picks up the exterior and the homeowers are responsible for the interior. However, in looking at the covenants, there are no planting requirements on the part of the homeowners. Thirdly, is the gatehouse a house without a gate. similar to that seen in Windsor Grove? Steve Wilson responded that the gatehouse is sort of a trademark structure, rhare is no gate. Regarding the landscaping, the builder would have to obtain approval fi.om the developer for landscaping plans on the home sites. The developer is also looking for the same quality of landscaping--trees, plantings, etc, The petitioner ~s granting an additional 15 feet of easement on Shelbome Road on both sides of the entrance, for future expansion of Shelbome Road. Rick Ripma asked ho~v tall the wall is to be and whether or not the streets wilt be dedicated. Steve Wilson responded the wall is approximately seven and one-half feet (7 ½"~. Jori Dobosiewicz stated that the streets would be public streets on the interior of the development. Docket No, 04100034 PP, Kendall Wood, Primary Plat and Docket No. 04100025 SW, Subdivision Waiver were referred to the Subdivision Committee for further review on January 4. 2005 at 7:00 PM in the Caucus Rooms of City Hall. L ~-' Ii. Docket No. 04090039 DP/ADLS: 1301 SouthRange Line Road The applicant proposes a new commercial building and associated signage. The site is located at 1301 S. Range Line Road. The site is zoned B-8/Business. Filed by E. Davis Coots for Fineberg Group LLC. Jim Wheeler, attorney, Coots, Henke & Wheeler, 255 East Carmel Drive appeared before the Commission representing the applicant. Mark Fineberg, Fineberg Group was also in attendance~ Approval is being requested for the redevelopment of the southeast comer of Range Line Road and Carmel Drive. This development has been reviewed by the Special Studies Committee and forwarded to the full Commission with a unanimous recommendation for approval. Jerry Chomanczuk, chairperson for the Special Studies Comrmttee reported their findings. This proposal is a high visibility project, The Committee reviewed the overall design of the build/ag--the lights, parking, the signage. There will be up to 20 signs on this building; 10 of them will be in the interior court. The Committee voted 5-0 to recommend approval. Department Comments, Jori Dobosiewicz. The Department recommends approval subject to two conditions. The dedication of right-of-way illustrated on the site plan, the second is subject to approval of the variances currently before the Board of Zoning Appeals at the January meeting. Jim Wheeler confnmed that the petitioner is willing to dedicate right-of-way. Jerry Chom~anczuk moved for approval of Docket No. 04090039 DP/ADLS, 1301 South Range Line Road, subject to receipt of written commitment regarding the dedication of additional right-of-way as illustrated on the site plan, and subject to approval of the variances by the Board of Zoning Appeals. seconded by Rick Ripma, APPROVED 11-0. 2i. Docket No. 04090043 PP: Bella Terra Subdivision S:PlanCommissionWlinutesX2004 pc2004dec 14 3 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CAPuMEL, INDIANA 46032 317 571-2417 Page 1 Lillard, Sarah N From: Akers, Witliam P Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 9:47 AM . To: Zale, Elva A; Crockett, Terry N; Daley, Penny J; Duffy, John M; Gray, Pat A; Hill, Dick B; Hoyt. Gar~ A; Kempa, Lisa L; Krueskar~p, Theresa A; Lillard, Sarah N; McCoy, David W; Spears, Jack J Cc: BMG@CO.HAMILTON.IN.US Subject: Fineberg Building have assigned an address of I E Carmel Drive for the future Fineberg Building (previous site of Ponderosa) that will be constructed on the corner of South Range ine Road and E Carmel Drive. Thanks Bill 8ill Akers 911 Op~ratmn~ ~A~e~ Pager,~ 553-1919 Cell ~ 7~7-8~7 Fax~ 57~-Z585 April 1, 2005 CITY OF CARMEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Planning & Zoning LETTER of GRANT E. Da~Ss Coots Coots Henke & Wheeler 255 E Carmel Drive Carmel IN 46032 Re: 1301 S. Range Line Road= Commercial Building - 05020040 V: 05020041 & 05020042 V Dear Mr. Coots: At the meeting held Thursday, March 31.2005. Carmel Advisory Board of Zoning Appeal~ took the following action regarding the Developmen~ Slandards Variances (V) filed by you for the property located at 1301 g. Range Line Road. APPROVED: Docket Nos. 05020040 V. 05020041 & 05020042 V: Development Standards Variances for the building setback, number/type of signs, and number of parking spaces. Please be advised that per Section 30.05.05: Time Limit of the Zoning Ordinance, the aforementioned Development Standards Variance approval is valid for one (1) year. By that time, either continuous construction of the improvements must be underway, or a written request for a one-time, s/x-month extension of the approval must have been received and approval granted by this Department. The expiration date of the approval is March 31, 2006. Please be advised that per Section 25.07.07: Sign Permits of the Zoning Ordinance, the signs approved purstmnt to the aforementioned Development Standards Variances must be established within one (1) year. The expiration date of the approvals is March 31, 2006. When applying for applications for permits regarding the improvements contained within this approval, please include a copy of this letter with your application materials in order to assist the Department's review. IfI can be of any fm-ther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 317/571-2417. Sincerely, Augelina Conn P]anuing & Zoning Administrator Department of Community Services Jeff Kendall. Building Comn~ssioner. DOCS ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317-571-2417 CITY OF CARMEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Division of Planning & Zoning LETTER of GRANT December l6, 2004 Dave Coots FiNEBERG GROUP LLC 1201 South Range Line Road Carmel, IN 46032 Re: 1301 SouthRan_g_e Line Road Docket 04090039DP_/ADLS Dear Dave; A:t ~the meeting held December 14, 2004 the Carmel Clay Plan Commission took the following action regarding the approvals for the property located at t301 South Range Line Road. APPROVED: Docket 04090039 DP/ADLS. The Commission approved the request eleven [11) in favor zero (0) opposed thereby granting the petition subject to approval of the dedication of right-of-way pe~ plans and variances by the Board of Z0ning Appeals. In order to assist the Department's review, please attach a copy of this letter when making application for permits regarding the improvements contained within this approval. Do ntt hesitate to contact me ifI can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Jon C. Dobosiewicz Planning Adm/nistrator Depar~ent of Community Services 317-571-2417 cc: Jm'TKendall, Building Commissioner DOCS Dawn Pattyn Ramona Hancock Sarah Lillard 12 04090039 DP ADLS pb ,', \I ~, ....:,... o S-Os-ooLfq ASI ASSOCIATES PROJECT: Ard1itect's Supplen lentallnstrudion Decmeber 2, 2005 ASI-II Fineberg Building 130 I South Rangline Road Carmel, Indiana 46032 CARSON DATE: DESIGN ASINo: www.carsondesign.com TEL 317.843.5979 FAX 317.843.5975 PROJECT NO: i04600 17 2325 POINTE PARKWAY CONTRACTOR: Marksmen Construction 1331 Sadlier Circle West Drive Indianapolis, Indiana 46239 SUITE 200 CARMEL INDIANA 46032 COPIES TO: Mark Olnick David Fineberg, file The Work shall be carried out in accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the Contract Documents without change in Contract Sum or Contract Time. Proceeding with the Work in accordance with these instructions indicates your acknowledgement that there will be no change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. If the Work indicated in this supplemental instruction will require a change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, Contractor shall notify Architect in writing within five days and submit Work Change .proposal indicating the proposed change to Contract Sum or Contract Time required by the Work indicated in the Supplemental Instruction. DESCRIPTION: I. Modification to fire-resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. . ''"'......'''.,':'':.,. ATTACHMENTS: 2. Specification Section 07815 Sprayed-on Fireproofing. 3. Sketch Number: I-ASI-II Fire Rating Columns & Beams indicating fire-resistance construction requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. 4. Sketch Number: 2-ASI-11 Fire Rating Columns & Beams indicating fire-resistance construction requirements of steel tube columns. ISSUED By: CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES Steven J Cain Architectural Team Leader . - . .f> CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES www.c:arsondeslgn.com TEL 317.843.5979 FAX 317.843.5975 2325 POINTE PAFOONAY SUITE 200 CARMEL INDIANA 46032 December 2, 2005 Mr. James Oclts Building I nspector/Plan Review Department of Community Services Carmel City Hall One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 RE: FINEBERG BUILDING. ONE EAST CARMEL DRIVE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS CDA PROJECT NO: 10460017 Dear Mr. Ochs: This letter ,shall serve as our commitment that our office has prepared the attached documents, which are being delivered to the owner, David Fineberg, and the owner's construction contractor, Marksmen Construction, to modify the fire- resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. The attached ASI-I 0 illustrate the fire-resistance rating requirements as per your meeting with Tom Conway of Marksmen Construction at the site on December I, 2005, per IBC sections 706.2, 706.3.1, 706.4 and 1005.3.2. ....., '. Please contact me to confirm that progress of the work is approved for tenants and building shell contingent upon the contractor making the above mentioned modification in the two weeks you indicated to Mr. Conway. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. . Sincerely, ",,'.II1...~,1: . ~~~~'f. p.,. SJ ''#''#.' ~ a ~ ..........;./f.-" ~~ ,$' ~ ....~ (; \ S T t R ;"';-:b- ~ $ 1-...... ~. () ....-0 ~ .. . ~I . ... =:. I~~O. \ = :*i10200051J*: .. --.. ' .- - . . - ~. \ SlATE Of l :: . ~. e. ,_!Iii ~ ....1 ND U.I'\~ ..,~ $ ~~#. -</ f( ...~_..., c," ~.. ~'#;, CHI 1" ~ ~~~.... ;""IJ""'~~ CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES --rt-- Q (~ Thomas J. Kemp, AlA NCARB Registered Architect Project Architect for Fineberg Building cc: File; David Fineberg, Mark Olnick, Marksmen Construction LIUIl Ochs 12020S.doc Fineberg Building 10460017 SECTION 07815 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING PART1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Fireproofing of interior structural steel. 1.02 REFERENCES A. ASTM E 84 - Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials. B. ASTM E 605 - Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to Structural Members. C. ASTM E 736 - Standard Test Method For Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members. D. ASTM E 760 - Standard Test Method for Effect of Impact on Bonding of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material Applied to Structural Members. E. ASTM E 761 - Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material Applied to Structural Members. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Sprayed-On Fireproofing Systems: Provide UL fire-rated assemblies to hourly ratings as follows: 1. Indicated interior beams: 1 hour. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements, for submittals procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data indicating product characteristics. performance criteria. and limitations of use. C. Test Reports: Reports from reputable independent testing agencies for proposed products, indicating compliance with specified criteria. conducted under conditions similar to those on project. for: 1. Bond Strength. 2. Bond Impact. 3. Compressive Strength. 4. Fire tests using substrate materials similar those on project. D. Manufacturer's Installation Instructions: Indicate special procedures and conditions requiring special attention. E. Manufacturer's Certificate: Certify that sprayed-on fireproofing products meet or exceed requirements of contract documents. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Applicator Qualifications: Company specializing in performing the work of this section, and approved by manufacturer. 1.06 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Conform to applicable code for fire resistance ratings. B. Provide certificate of compliance for fireproofing materials to authority having jurisdiction, indicating approval for use on this project. 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815-1 Fineberg Building 10460017 1.07 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Do not apply spray fireproofing when temperature of substrate material and surrounding air is below 40 degrees F. B. Provide ventilation in areas to receive fireproofing during application and 24 hours afterward, to dry applied material. C. Provide temporary enclosure to prevent spray from contaminating air. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS A. Sprayed-On Fireproofing: 1. Carboline Company: www.carboline.com. 2. Grace Construction Products: www.na.graceconstruction.com. 3. Isolatek Internationallnc: www.isolatek.com. 4. Southwest Fireproofing Products Company: www.sfrm.com. 5. Substitutions: See Section 01600 - Product Requirements. 2.02 FIREPROOFING A. Low Density Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material: Factory mixed, cementitious material blended for uniform texture with vermiculite or lightweight synthetic aggregate, and conforming to the following requirements: 1. Bond Strength: ASTM E 736, 200 psf when set and dry. 2. Bond Impact: ASTM E 760, no cracking, flaking or delamination. 3. Dry Density: ASTM E 605, minimum average density of 14lb/cu ft, with minimum individual density of any test sample of 13 Ib/cu ft. 4. Compressive Strength: ASTM E 761, minimum 7.0 psi. 5. Surface Burning Characteristics: Maximum flame spread of 0 and maximum smoke developed of 0, when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84. 6. Product: Monokote MK-6 manufactured by Grace Construction Products. 2.03 ACCESSORIES A. Primer Adhesive: Of type recommended by fireproofing manufacturer. B. Sealer: As recommended by manufacturer of fireproofing material. C. Water: Clean, potable. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. Verify that surfaces are ready to receive fireproofing. B. Verify that clips, hangers, supports, sleeves, and other items required to penetrate fireproofing are in place. C. Verify that ducts, piping, equipment, or other items that would interfere with application of fireproofing have not been installed. D. Verify that voids and cracks in substrate have been filled. Verify that projections have been removed where fireproofing will be exposed to view as a finish material. 3.02 PREPARATION A. Perform tests as recommended by fireproofing manufacturer in situations where adhesion of fireproofing to substrate is in question. B. Remove incompatible materials that could affect bond by scraping, brushing, scrubbing, or sandblasting. 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815 - 2 Fineberg Building 10460017 C. Prepare substrates to receive fireproofing in strict accordance with instructions of fireproofing manufacturer. D. Protect surfaces not scheduled for fireproofing and equipment from damage by overspray, fall- out, and dusting. E. Close off and seal duct work in areas where fireproofing is being applied. 3.03 APPLICATION A. Apply primer adhesive, fireproofing, and sealer in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Apply fireproofing in sufficient thickness to achieve required ratings, with as many passes as necessary to cover with monolithic blanket of uniform density and texture. C. Apply sealer at the rate recommended by fireproofing manufacturer. 3.04 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Inspect the installed fireproofing after application and curing for integrity, prior to its concealment. Ensure that actual thicknesses, densities, and bond strengths meet requirements for specified ratings. B. Re-inspect the installed fireproofing for integrity of fire protection, after installation of subsequent Work. 3.05 CLEANING A. Remove excess material, overspray, droppings, and debris. B. Remove fireproofing from materials and surfaces not required to be fireproofed. C. At exposed fireproofing, clean surfaces that have become soiled or stained, using manufacturer's recommended procedures. END OF SECTION 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815 - 3 0ENCLOSD STEEL TUBE COLUMN WITH \..:..:.J 1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION, SEE DETAIL#2ASI11 t;'\ENCLOSED STEEL BEAM IN i-HOUR \::;J FIRE-RESISTIVE GYPSUM WALL BOARD CONSTRUCTION, @0ENCLOSE STEEL BEAM IN '-HOUR H \:;J SPRAYED-ON FIRE PROOFING SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 07815 (6)~ 5'-11* I (i) 19'-5" 4~ W1l Sf ~ .. ....... I in .:::. + N N ~ ~ - . ....... I io - ........ + 'N N >C ~ ~ - ~ 10 - ..... ') ~ 33k J -Ilk .. '. \U . " CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES JOB NO. DATE: 10460017 02 DEe 2005 Fineberg Building -' TEL317,B~3,S979 FAX 31 i.a~3,S97S J 1590 N.I-1ERIDIA1~ SUITE 1 ~ CARMEl.. INDIANA ~6032 FIRE RATING COLUMNS & BEAMS I East Carmel Drive Carmel, Indiana 46032 REFERENCE SHEET: SKETCH NUMBER I-ASI- ( I 3-5/B" CONTINOUS METAL STUDS . ..- EXISTING TUBED STEEL COLUMN '. \. 5/8" CONTINOUS FIRE RATED GYPSUM WALL BOARD ~ ~ -l o '. ... ... . TYPICAL COLUMN WRAP ENCLOSURE ('."OJ~ f'~.~~\~N'E.. Ll~'-OS~) NOTE: COLUMN WRAP ENCLOSURE - WRAP CONTINOUS TO METAL DECK AND STRUCTURE- SEAL JOINTS WITH FIRE RATED SEALANT ... CARSON . . DESIGN . ASSOCIATES .. TEL 3) 7.8<43.5979 FAX 317.B~3.5975 11590 N. MERIDIAN SUITE l~ CARMEl., INDIANA ~6032 Fineberg Building FIRE RATING COLUMNS & BEAMS I East Carmel Drive Carmel, Indiana 46032 JOs. NO. DATE: 10460017 02 DEC 2005 REFERENCE SHEET: SKETCH NUMBER 2.ASI-11 Page 1 of 1 Ochs, James A Sent: To: Cc: From: Eden, Barbara J [edenbj@CarsonDesign.com] Friday, December 02, 2005 2:54 PM Ochs, James A Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruction.com Subject: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Jim, Attached is our commitment letter and ASI-11 regarding modifications to the fire resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier - per your request on site 12-1-05. Please contact me by return email to confirm your receipt. Thank you Project Manag('r Carson Design Associates 2325 Pointe Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46032 317-843-5979 317-843-5975 fax edenbj@carsondesign.cQm Note: Please contact the sender of this email with verification of receiving this email and any attached documents. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including any attachments, is for the sole use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e- mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. Thank you. 12/05/2005 Ii ~ ,"lo . ~ Page 1 of 1 Ochs, James A Sent: To: Cc: From: Ochs, James A Monday, December 05, 200510:17 AM 'Eden, Barbara J' Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruction.com Subject: RE: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Ms. Eden, The submitted request is APPROVED subject to an independent inspection agency conducting the required inspection per IBC 1704.11 for spray on fire resistave materials. JimOchs -----Original Message----- From: Eden, Barbara J [mailto:edenbj@CarsonDesign.com] Sent: Friday, December 02,2005 2:54PM To: Ochs, James A Cc: Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruction.com Subject: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Jim, Attached is our commitment letter and ASI-11 regarding modifications to the fire resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier - per your request on site 12-1-05. Please contact me by return email to confirm your receipt. Thank you Barbara F:den, Project!'vlanager Carson Design Associates 2325 Pointe Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46032 317-843-5979 317-843-5975 fax edenbj@carsondesign.com Note: Please contact the sender of this email with verification of receiving this email and any attached documents. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including any attachments, is for the sole use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. Thank you. 12/05/2005 .. os-osOOqq :<fi)l CARSON DATE: Ardlitl!ct'. Suppiementallnstruction Decmeber 2, 2005 ASI-II DESIGN ASI No: ASSOCIATES PROJECT, Fineberg Building 130 I South Rangline Road Carmel, Indiana 46032 www.carsondesign.com TEL 317.843.5979 FAX 317.8435975 PROJECT NO, i04600 17 2325 POINTE PARKWAY CONTRACTOR: Marksmen Construction 1331 Sadlier Circle West Drive Indianapolis, Indiana 46239 5UITE 200 CARMEL INDIANA 46032 COPIES TO: Mark Olnick David Fineberg, file ", The Work shall be carried out in accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the Contract Documents without change in Contract Sum or Contract Time. Proceeding with the Work in accordance with these instructions indicates your acknowledgement that there will be no change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. If the Work indicated in this supplemental instruction will require a change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, Contractor shall notify Architect in writing within five days and submit Work Change Proposal indicating the proposed change to Contract Sum or Contract Time required by the Work indicated in the Supplemental Instruction, DESCRIPTION: I. Modification to fire-resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. ",.~,'--~ ATTACHMENTS: 2. Specification Section 07815 Sprayed-on Fireproofing. 3. Sketch Number: I-AS I-I I Fire Rating Columns & Beams indicating fire-resistance construction requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. 4. Sketch Number: 2-ASI-11 Fire Rating Columns & Beams indicating fire-resistance construction requirements of steel tube columns. ISSUED By: CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES Steven J Cain Architectural Team Leader SCANNE:D ~ .e. CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES WVIW,carsondeslgn,com TEL 317.843.5979 FAX 317.843.5975 2325 POrNTE PARKWAY SUITE 200 CARMEL INDIANA 46032 December 2, 2005 Mr. James Ochs Building Inspector/Plan Review Department of Community Services Carmel City Hall One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 RE: FINEBERG BUILDING - ONE EAST CARMEL DRIVE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS CDA PROJECT NO: 10460017 Dear Mr. Ochs: This letter shall serve as our commitment that our office has prepared the attached documents, which are being delivered to the owner, David Fineberg, and the owner's construction contractor. Marksmen Construction, to modify the fire- resistance rating requirements of the steei structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier. The attached ASi-1 0 illustrate the fire-resistance rating requirements as per your meeting with Tom Conway of Marksmen Construction at the site on December I, 2005, per IBC sections 706.2, 706.3.1, 706.4 and 1005.3.2. '. Please contact me to confirm that progress of the work is approved for tenants and building shell contingent upon the contractor making the above mentioned modification in the two weeks you indicated to Mr. Conway. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, .,\tllIl."" ,\ ~#. ~., ~S J """ ~..\, ~ ........; f,- -" .,.... $' <-':~..~c,\ STF:R?'..~-~ ~ $/-...._/ ~ tJ .....-o~ ... . ~ .' .... =: I" 0 ~:. S*t10200051i*E .. . . - .. . .. .... ':. .... STATE OF .l :: ~ ~ ~- ~ -../A/OIAI'II>- ..- $' ..... /f I::;........... G '\ ~.. -;""; rCH I reo .~~.." 11"'IIIt..t"'~ CARSON DESIGN ASSOCIATES --rL Q (~ Thomas J. Kemp, AlA NCARB Registered Architect Project Architect for Fineberg Building cc: File; David Fineberg, Mark Olnick, Marksmen Construction LJiD:O~~ 120205.doc Fineberg Building 10460017 SECTION 07815 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Fireproofing of interior structural steel. 1.02 REFERENCES A. ASTM E 84 - Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials. B. ASTM E 605 - Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to Structural Members. C. ASTM E 736 - Standard Test Method For Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members. D. ASTM E 760 - Standard Test Method for Effect of Impact on Bonding of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material Applied to Structural Members. E. ASTM E 761 - Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material Applied to Structural Members. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Sprayed-On Fireproofing Systems: Provide UL fire-rated assemblies to hourly ratings as follows: 1. Indicated interior beams: 1 hour. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01300 - Administrative Requirements, for submittals procedures. B. Product Data: Provide data indicating product characteristics, performance criteria, and limitations of use. C. Test Reports: Reports from reputable independent testing agencies for proposed products, indicating compliance with specified criteria, conducted under conditions similar to those on project, for: 1. Bond Strength. 2. Bond Impact. 3. Compressive Strength. 4. Fire tests using substrate materials similar those on project. D. Manufacturer's Installation Instructions: Indicate special procedures and conditions requiring special attention. E. Manufacturer's Certificate: Certify that sprayed-on fireproofing products meet or exceed requirements of contract documents. 1.05 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Applicator Qualifications: Company specializing in performing the work of this section, and approved by manufacturer. 1.06 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Conform to applicable code for fire resistance ratings. B. Provide certificate of compliance for fireproofing materials to authority having jurisdiction, indicating approval for use on this project. 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815 - 1 Fineberg Building 10460017 1.07 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Do not apply spray fireproofing when temperature of substrate material and surrounding air is below 40 degrees F. B. Provide ventilation in areas to receive fireproofing during application and 24 hours afterward. to dry applied material. C. Provide temporary enclosure to prevent spray from contaminating air. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS A. Sprayed-On Fireproofing: 1. Carboline Company: www.carboline.com. 2. Grace Construction Products: www.na.graceconstruction.com. 3. Isolatek Internationallnc: www.isolatek.com. 4. Southwest Fireproofing Products Company: www.sfrm.com. 5. Substitutions: See Section 01600 - Product Requirements. 2.02 FIREPROOFING A. Low Density Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material: Factory mixed, cementitious material blended for uniform texture with vermiculite or lightweight synthetic aggregate, and conforming to the following requirements: 1. Bond Strength: ASTM E 736, 200 psf when set and dry. 2. Bond Impact: ASTM E 760, no cracking, flaking or delamination. 3. Dry Density: ASTM E 605, minimum average density of 14 Iblcu ft, with minimum individual density of any test sample of 13 Iblcu ft. 4. Compressive Strength: ASTM E 761, minimum 7.0 psi. 5. Surface Burning Characteristics: Maximum flame spread of 0 and maximum smoke developed of 0, when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84. 6. Product: Monokote MK-6 manufactured by Grace Construction Products. 2.03 ACCESSORIES A. Primer Adhesive: Of type recommended by fireproofing manufacturer. B. Sealer: As recommended by manufacturer of fireproofing material. C. Water: Clean, potable. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. Verify that surfaces are ready to receive fireproofing. B. Verify that clips, hangers, supports, sleeves, and other items required to penetrate fireproofing are in place. C. Verify that ducts, piping, equipment, or other items that would interfere with application of fireproofing have not been installed. D. Verify that voids and cracks in substrate have been filled. Verify that projections have been removed where fireproofing will be exposed to view as a finish material. 3.02 PREPARATION A. Perform tests as recommended by fireproofing manufacturer in situations where adhesion of fireproofing to substrate is in question. B. Remove incompatible materials that could affect bond by scraping, brushing, scrubbing, or sandblasting. 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815-2 Fineberg Building 10460017 C. Prepare substrates to receive fireproofing in strict accordance with instructions of fireproofing manufacturer. D. Protect surfaces not scheduled for fireproofing and equipment from damage by overspray, fall- out, and dusting. E. Close off and seal duct work in areas where fireproofing is being applied. 3.03 APPLICATION A. Apply primer adhesive, fireproofing, and sealer in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Apply fireproofing in sufficient thickness to achieve required ratings, with as many passes as necessary to cover with monolithic blanket of uniform density and texture. C. Apply sealer at the rate recommended by fireproofing manufacturer. 3,04 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Inspect the installed fireproofing after application and curing for integrity, prior to its concealment. Ensure that actual thicknesses, densities, and bond strengths meet requirements for specified ratings. B. Re-inspect the installed fireproofing for integrity of fire protection, after installation of subsequent Work. 3.05 CLEANING A. Remove excess material, overs pray, droppings, and debris. B. Remove fireproofing from materials and surfaces not required to be fireproofed. C. At exposed fireproofing, clean surfaces that have become soiled or stained. using manufacturer's recommended procedures. END OF SECTION 10/05/05 SPRAYED-ON FIREPROOFING 07815-3 t0ENCLOSD STEEL TUBE COLUMN WITH ~1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL #2 ASI11 f?\ENCLOSED STEEL BEAM IN 1-HOUR \::;J FIRE-RESISTIVE GYPSUM WALL BOARD CONSTRUCTION. o (2)ENCLOSE STEEL BEAM IN 1-HOUR H SPRAYED-ON FIRE PROOFING SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 07815 (6)(6:3) 5'-11" I (i) 19'-5" IO~" 4 ~ W1: if; if; ~ . I'-- I 'in .:s. + ~ . I'-- I 'in - ~ + .N N ::t- 3' ~ . I'-- I 'in - ~ + N N ::t- 3' ---Ifl x .... ~ /~ / w <0 N x <0 'J ill '" fik e - Fineberg Building JOB NO. DATE, 10460017 02 DEe 1005 FIP-E P-ATING COLUMNS & BEAMS TELJI7.B'13.5979 FAX317.a'13.5975 11590N,I-1ERIDIAI\J sum:: ID~ CARI~EL II>JD!ANA 46.Q32 I East Cal-mel DI-Ive Carmel, Indiana 46032 REF~RENCE SH::ET: S!CEiCH NUMBER I-AS!-II t>: ~ ..J o 3-518" CONTINOUS METAL STUDS 518" CONTINOUS FIRE RATED GYPSUM WALLBOARD EXISTING TUBED STEEL COLUMN TYPICAL COLUMN WRAP ENCLOSURE C,. \tc<'>~ fl~'A:~I~TI-Jc.. LlG.I-OS..tl2E-) CA~SON DESIGN ASSOCIATES Fineberg Building I ED I NOTE: COLUMN WRAP ENCLOSURE - WRAP CONTINOUS TO METAL DECK AN D STRUCTURE- SEAL JOINTS WITH FIRE RATED SEALANT <t JOB NO. DATE, 10460017 02 DEe 2005 TEL317,B'l3.S979 FAXJI7,B<l3.S97S 11590 N. MERIDIAN SUITE 1<H CARHEl.., INDIANA 46D31 FIRE RATING COLUMNS & BEAMS I East Carmel Drive Carmel, Indiana 46032 REFERENCi: SHEET: SKETCH NUMBER 2.ASI.11 Page 1 of 1 Ochs, James A From: Eden, Barbara J [edenbj@CarsonDesign.com] Sent: Friday, December 02,20052:54 PM To: Ochs, James A Cc: Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruclion.com Subject: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Jim, Attached is our commitment letter and ASI-11 regarding modifications to the fire resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier - per your request on site 12-1-05. Please contact me by return email to confirm your receipt. Thank you Barbara r:dcn. ProJect ]\<hmilg(:r Carson Design Associates 2325 Pointe Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46032 317-843-5979 317-843-5975 fax edenbj@carsondesign.com Note: Please contact the sender of this email with verification of receiving this em ail and any attached documents. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including any attachments, is for the sole use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e~ mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. Thank you. 12/05/2005 Page 1 of I Ochs, James A From: Ochs, James A Sent: Monday, December 05,200510:17 AM To: 'Eden, Barbara J' Cc; Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruction.com Subject: RE: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Ms. Eden, The submitted request is APPROVED subject to an independent inspection agency conducting the required inspection per IBC 1704.11 for spray on fire resistave materials. JimOchs -----Original Message--m From: Eden, Barbara J [mailto:edenbj@CarsonDesign.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:54PM To: Ochs, James A Cc: Cain, Steve J.; Kemp, Thomas J.; david@fineberggroup.com; mark@fineberggroup.com; mark@marksmenconstruction.com Subject: Fineberg Building at One East Carmel Drive Jim, Attached is our commitment letter and ASI-11 regarding modifications to the fire resistance rating requirements of the steel structure supporting the stair and stair fire barrier - per your request on site 12-1-05. Please contact me by return email to confirm your receipt. Thank you Barbma Eden. Project Carson Design Associates 2325 Pointe Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46032 317-843-5979 317-843-5975 fax ed enbj@carsondesign.com Note: Please contact the sender of this email with verification of receiving this email and any attached documents. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including any attachments, is for the sole use of addressee and may contain proprietary. confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies. Thank you. 12/05/2005