The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF 'ZONING APPEALS . HEARING OFFICER SIGN VARIANCE. FOR . . PARKWOOD'CROSSING,- BUILDIN.G7' , , .TH ' 280 E. 96",' ,Street I" I ,I I' I I I I I I "I I J I I I' :1 I' I 05050027 V CSO'Schenkel'Shultz, . June 7, 2005 Steven' H.. Granner, AI Cp" , Zoning Consultant .Bose McKinn~y& Evans LLP, 600 East 96th Street, Suite 500 Indianapolis, IN 46240 (317)684~5300' 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REQUEST Due to a merger with Schenkel Shultz, CSO requests approval to replace its existing sign with a new wall sign. The sign letters and the logo will both be black in color. Only the logo will be illuminated, which will be a back-lit halo-effect illumination - the .same illumination as the existing logo. The letter heights are 14 inches and the logo height is 3 feet 9.25 inches. The area of the.letters is 28.24 sq. f1. and the logo area is 15.1 sq. f1. The ordinance requires that this be measured by enclosing all the elements of the sign within one rectangle. This results in an overall area of 154.33 sq. f1. which exceeds the 75 sq. ft. maximum permitted by the ordinance. 67946_I.DOC If? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3) I I I I I I I I 5) 6) I /~~~~~~~ L t-.\ ~,~! CITY OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY. INDIANA t~::.C\ ICA TION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION i \ /" ;.. .......<.\, \~";'~\ '\~~?'~ EVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST ''<,i/JjF>., ..,...-,-....\10 " ' FEE:Sing~~a I ~ i \lmary Residence) $257.50 for the first variance, plus $77.25 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied. All Other $978.50 for the first variance, plus $463.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied. OR see Hearing Officer Fees DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: Mav 13.2005 1) CSO Schenkel Shultz Applicant: Address: clo Steven B.Granner. Bose McKinney & Evans LLP 600 E. 96th Street. Ste. 500 Indianapolis. IN 46240 2) Phone: Project Name: Seven Parkwood 848-7800 Engineerl Architect: T. Brent Davis. A. I. A. Phone: 848-7800 Attorney: Phone: 684-5301 Philip A. Nicely Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property (b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property x (c) Other: Tenant 4) If Item 3 ) (c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Duke-Hawk LLC Owner's address: 600 East 96th Street. Ste. 100 Indianapolis. IN 46240 Phone: 808-6000 Record of Ownership: Deed Book NO.nnstrument No. 9931300 Page: Purchase date: May 24. 1999 Common address of the property involved: 280 East 96th Street Legal Description: (See attached) Tax Map Parcel No.: 16-13-11-04-17-001-003 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16) I 17) I I I I 7) State explanation of requested Development Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section number(s) of the CarmeVClay Zoning Ordinance that applies and/or creates the need for this request). Petitioner requests a development standards variance of the Sign Ordinance Section 25.7.02 - 10(c) to allow the maximum area of the sign to exceed that permitted by the ordinance. 8) State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Development Standards Variance"). The merger of CSO with Schenkel Shultz requires a sign change. The existing sign was permitted by V -58-99. The second tenant sign for Morgan Stanley was permitted by V-223-00. 9) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): B-6/US 31 Corridor 10) Size of lot/parcel in question: 4.363 acres 11) Present use of the property: Office 12) Describe the proposed use of the property: Same 13) Is the property: Owner occupied Yes Renter occupied Yes Other 14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. Morgan Stanley was granted a variance to have a second tenant wall sign of the north facade by V -223-00. 15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: Building Permit Number: N/A Builder: N/A If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? ASAP If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this application is being filed? CSO Schenkel Shultz I I AFFIDA VIT I I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applican to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. I Signed: 05/13/05 Date I I Philip A. Nicely (Please Print) STATE OF INDIANA I SS: I County of Hamilton (County in which notarization takes place) Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for I I this I I I I I I I I I Marion (Notary Public's county of residence) County, State of Indiana, personally appeared Philip A. Nicely (Attorney) and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument 13th day of May , 20 05 (SEAL) I ' , /~r. " / . otary Public - Signature .r" Steven B. Granner Notary Public - Please Print My Commission expires: October 23.. 2008 I I CARMEUCLA Y ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA I Docket No.: I Petitioner: Duke-Hawk.. LLC FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE I 1. The approval of this variance will not. be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: I The sign will be fabricated by a sign companv.. be internally illuminated and be underwriters listed. The sign will be installed by professionals using standard engineering practices. I 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: I The surrounding areas of this site are also zoned B-6 with similar office buildings and similar maior tenant signs. The proposed sign is tYpical of the maior tenant wall signs in the development. I 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: I the proposed positioning of the logo results in a significant area of non-sign area being figured as part of the sign area for calculation purposes.. as stated in the ordinance. I DECISION I IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. I Adopted this day of June , 20 05. I CHAIRPERSON, CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals I SECRETARY, CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals I Conditions of the Board are listed on the back (Petitioner or his representative to sign). I 63796_I.DOC I I _;;;" _, _! _1 _, _i _~ _; l,..t ,.i:"i:::~:': . '( ~:'~":~f ",/\ '.. //~/>- /..,:)/ ~! .-".'-1 _..;\ \~\ - _, _I _, _i _I _ _; _, _ ~ t.'''",?1 I . DUrie ==-~ ~.... .... M-QOO '- hL~ PARKWOOD CROSS CARMEL, INDiiNi ~z ~m z< ~< :::Ow ~- o(j) 8z )> (j) m ;oz ~~ ~sa m(j) ~z -~ gJm ~o ~ ~ z (j) en (i) ~ (j) m ~~~ -- -= = = - ~ /'..) I ~. ~+ I I I I -: I U I T I I I /'..). .3~ =z "'lClH '1 a NaH Ds 0 J .(aIUg1S~e8Jow '" r", I ~ I II I ~ , I I II I II I I I I I I I I J I II I II I II I I I I I i I I II II I II I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ." I I ~ I cb "J t...-.., ..0-,17 Z/7- ...'7 :_ :_ ,_ - 1_- :_ '__ 1_:___ __ _ ,__ ,_ ~ ~ >t:)V'18 - ~010:) (::IS 9L) 0$01 a3lHSI1>t~V8 M3N >t:)Vl8 :~010~ (::IS g~) S~31131 3SVN81S a3lNnO~ Nld .~n1V 1VnalAlaNI M3N (::IS t79 L) 3~NVNla~0 ~3d V3~V 3SVNSIS 1'1101 aOOM>l~'fd N3^3S 38'v'N81S M3N SC),17&Wt\!IJ N$S30 3S~eIS NOI1'f^313 Hl~ON a)i1i(j ~,'" Z11C1HS 1:J){1\3IDS <i9 I I I I I I' I I I I I I ,I I I 'I I I I 30 .. (!) ~o X-J ;Co ~~ 't(!) ~::i ~a z~ J(6-J .~.~ Al-.~ ~ ~ .~ rJ) o u . w ~(!) :::><( -Iz :5~ <(cn ~ :::>O(i:'U Q~cn~ ~z~a) Q:::>'-'.. zOcna:: -~a::o ~z~o za:~u ~ I" N 3g I N G:' ~CI) a::~ <(,-, WW (!)u <(z ze( (!)~ Ci5@ -10 ~Q:: ~~ w o <( zo 08 -~ C/)a::: $~ ww z~ ~ ~ 8 ~ z (J) ~ i ~ z o ~ ~ -I W o w <.!) O!: ~ Z w J21 4~::S8 b~ N .... :::> ~ EXISTING SIGNAGE . Duke REALTV CQRPORATJON SH ULTZ c.9J SCHENK CSO ~ ~ o ~ o 'Jj ~ ~ 'Jj ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~a ~S:: ~.. ~.....~ ~FD '" c ;-,.:. () '.Fo o '" () ~ zo... ^ 0'" -----------------