HomeMy WebLinkAbout05050028.2N
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 5 10 20
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 10 ft.
"DON'T DIG BLIND"
CALL TWO WORKING DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
WITHIN INDIANA:
1- 800 - 382 -5544
FROM OUTSIDE INDIANA:
1- 800 - 428 -5200
1 st Street S.E
30 ft. Public R�iqht —of —Way
Legend
SURVEY
Set 5/8 —inch rebar w/ yellow cap stamped "Benchmark"
>
D4
Water Valve
cD..>
Utility Pole
I*
Tl160l
O
Parking Bollard
❑Electric
Meter
®
Water Meter
CO
Gas Meter
cn
L
Area Light / Ligh Post
OFound
survey marker (as noted)
(�
Manhole
D
Inlet
Stormwater inlet
POINT OF BEGINNING \
SET 5/8' REBAR W/
�IM CAP STAMPED "BENCW4RK" S�M STM
Inlet
TC = 839.79
STM STM
O
Bell Manhole
TC = 839.98 I
- Asphalt *111 e".
Found Mog. Nail
0.5'N.&0.4'I
10
i
z
Z
Z
I
Z
n
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with "Minimum Standard Detail Requirements of
ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS in 1999, and includes Items 1 -5, 7a, 8, 9, 10, 11 a, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of
Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA, NSPS, and ACSM and in effect on the date of this certification, undersigned further
certifies that the survey measurements were made in accordance with the "Minimum Angle, Distance, and Closure Requirements for Survey Measurements Which
Control Land Boundaries for ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys." This certification is made with respect to the information shown hereon as of the date of the last
fieldwork.
Record Land Description
Instrument No. 200389180
(Now or Formerly; Helen L. Gray per Affidavit of Survivorship, dated 9- 02 -03)
A part of Lot Number Seven (7), Lot Number Eight (8) and an unnumbered lot lying West of Lot Eight (8), all in Davis & Bales Addition to the Town of Carmel,
Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning 57.5 feet Wet of the Northeast corner of Lot 7 in said addition and run thence West 74.5 feet, more or less, to the East line of an alley, thence
South 132 feet; thence East 74.5 feet, more or less, too point 57.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of Lot No. 7 in said Addition, thence North 132 feet to
the Place of Beginning, as shown by Plat in Deed Record 21, Page 416 of the Records in the Recorder's Office of Hamilton County, Indiana.
More commonly known as 31 First Street, Carmel, Indiana.
I further certify that points were set or found at the corners of said real estate, as shown, and that this survey correctly shows the location of all visible
improvements, unless otherwise noted, on the premises and any easements, highways, rights —of —way, restrictions and covenants, of which the undersigned has
been advised, and all visible encroachments, if any, across the established survey lines.
w
CERTIFIED February 22> 2005 ``��glltltlyNzA�''
`�. H/
• `�����ISTERE;� Vol,
i
_ _ =Z N 0.
rman H Hiselman
"- - - - - -- = * � S 0 4 61
Registered Land Surveyor STATE OF
Indiana No. SO461 %<e P•,.�'Q ��
st
Surveyor's Report
In accordance with Title 865, Article 1, Rule 12 of the Indiana Administrative Code, the following observations and opinions are submitted regarding the various
uncertainties in the locations of the lines and corners established this survey as a result of uncertainties in reference monumentation; in record descriptions and
plats; in lines of occupation; and as introduced by random errors in measurement ( "Theoretical Uncertainty "). - (.
�e-s u�r.err ; "nrie�. The client should assume there is an amount of uncertainty along any line equal in magnitude to the discrepancy in the location of the
lines of possession from the surveyed lines.
There may be differences of deed dimensions versus measured dimensions along the boundary lines shown hereon and, likewise, there may be found survey
markers near, but not precisely at, some boundary corners. In cases where the magnitude of these differences are less than the Theoretical Uncertainty stated
below, less than the Positional Tolerance, and less than the uncertainty identified for the reference monumentation (discussed below), the differences may be
considered insignificant and are shown only for purposes of mathematical closure. Such differences that are greater than the Theoretical Uncertainty, Positional
Tolerance and the uncertainty in reference monumentation should be considered worthy of notice and are therefore discussed further below.
Unless otherwise noted or shown on the within survey plat, there is no evidence of occupation along the perimeter lines of the subject tract. All survey
monuments set or found on this survey are flush with existing grade unless otherwise noted.
The accuracy of any flood hazard data shown on this report is subject to map scale uncertainty and to any other uncertainty in location or elevation on the
referenced Flood Insurance Rate Map. The within described tract of land does not lie within Flood Hazard Zone X as said tract plots by scale on Community
Panel Number 180081 0207 F of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Carmel, Indiana (maps dated February 19, 2003).
Purpose:
The purpose of this survey was to retrace and monument the boundary of the real estate described hereon under the above captioned "Land Description.
Reference lAonumentotion:
The range line being the west line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 18 North, Range 4 East, was established based on the location of the
southwest and northwest corners as located in the field. County Surveyor's ties were not available for Section Corners in the area, all corners were marked by
existent monuments. A Harrison monument was found at the southwest corner, an Iron Pin was found 8 inches down at the northwest corner, and an iron pin
was found near the sixteenth corner. It is my opinion that the original surveyors used the line between the West Quarter Corner and the sixteenth corner as the
basis for the west lines of area subdivisions. This line was held rather than the physical center of Rangeline Road. We located the physical center of surrounding
streets and compared the results with the dimensions of the record plats. After doing so we found that First Avenue S.E. didn't seem to work with curb splits.
We then examined the overall distance from Second Street S.E. to the West Quarter Corner and found that the overall distance when compared to the plat
distances of the record plats was within one foot. This would place the center of First Avenue S.E. 1.4 feet south of the physical center. This adjustment made
a better fit with existing improvements and occupation.
Discrepancies in record descriptions and plats:
Based on current research for the subject and adjoining real estates, no title deed gaps or overlaps have been revealed.
Discrepancies in Lines of Occupation:
A brick retaining wall along the north line is as much as 0.9 feet north of said line.
As a result of the above observations, it is my opinion that the uncertainties in locations of the lines and corners established on this survey are as follows:
a) Variance In reference monuments: 1.4 feet In the north south direction and one foot in the east west direction.
>tr
b) Discrepancies in record descriptions and plats: none found.
c) Inconsistencies in lines of occupation: Fence as much as 0.9 feet related to a brick retaining wall along the north line.
d) Theoretical Uncertainty (due to random errors in measurements) of the corners of the subject tract established by this survey is within the specifications of
a Class C survey ( +/— 0.50 feet) as defined in I.A.C. 865.
Surveyor's Notes
The within plat and survey were prepared without benefit of current evidence of source of title for the subject tract or adjoining parcels and are therefore
subject to any statement of facts revealed by examination of such documents.
The locations of utilities shown hereon are based on above ground structures and /or locations as marked by others. No excavations were made during the
progress of this survey to locate buried utilities /structures.
Along any line where a deed gap or overlap or inconsistency in line of occupation occurs, unwritten rights may be available to the subject and /or the adjoining
real estates.
The subject tract is zoned per the :..f _ » /. Planning and Zoning data . The various zoning restrictions for R -2 district, together with any
modifications to those restrictions that may have been agreed to at the time of approval, must be obtained from the appropriate government officials qualified
to certify regulatory adherence of the subject real estate.
ALTA /TOPO
SURVEY
CARMEL, INDIANA
N
- -
/ j
tiev. = i w."n
Primary Entrance
O
E
www.bencbmarkLS.com
DATE: February 22, 2005
Approved By. NH
Drawn By. RD
Date of Lost Field Work. 2119105
Date Plotted: 2122105
ALTA /TOPO
SURVEY
cn
L
I
'
D
• o
Q
1.43'
O �
J
I
I I
o t
1.90'
4.1
'
*E
i-- ° CL O
p o
Downspout -
—
lD
CL
Concrete
-�
'
I
GRA
AREA
X
Q
r~
c
D
/
/
Existing Building
o
GRASS AREA
(Former Church)
U Z
/
Existing Building
r)
(-D
a
/
I
J
Concrete / Block
�Q a
CL
N pp U
®
W
I
o I
o
CL
\
Z
Q
QQ
CD
Project
m
\ \Server \Projects\ 1 -19525 \DWG \amap.b
VICINITY MAP — NOT TO SCALE
Reference Project Number:
N/A
Project Number:
1 -19525
\
to
r-r
0 \
Z
C)
\B4 j\
Q I
C 71
C)
o I
\ \
o �.
I
`
L71
L71
1.43'
\
°'W
' V
c
'
m
I 0
I I '
TC = 841.04
o
N
/
INV(N), 10" CLAY = 832.83
C.11
'
o
Shed
INV(S), 10" CLAY = 832.75
�Slbesl Mvgtie Frowns
_-
- --
I
Finish Floor 4.
•30, Finish Floor Elev. = 102.43
0'
S41-- �-
'
841--
/
°
Elev. = 100.26
(Rear Entrance)
I -_ - \
Wood
/(Secondary Entrance)
o
concrits
i O
I
- Asphalt *111 e".
Found Mog. Nail
0.5'N.&0.4'I
10
i
z
Z
Z
I
Z
n
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with "Minimum Standard Detail Requirements of
ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS in 1999, and includes Items 1 -5, 7a, 8, 9, 10, 11 a, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of
Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA, NSPS, and ACSM and in effect on the date of this certification, undersigned further
certifies that the survey measurements were made in accordance with the "Minimum Angle, Distance, and Closure Requirements for Survey Measurements Which
Control Land Boundaries for ALTA /ACSM Land Title Surveys." This certification is made with respect to the information shown hereon as of the date of the last
fieldwork.
Record Land Description
Instrument No. 200389180
(Now or Formerly; Helen L. Gray per Affidavit of Survivorship, dated 9- 02 -03)
A part of Lot Number Seven (7), Lot Number Eight (8) and an unnumbered lot lying West of Lot Eight (8), all in Davis & Bales Addition to the Town of Carmel,
Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning 57.5 feet Wet of the Northeast corner of Lot 7 in said addition and run thence West 74.5 feet, more or less, to the East line of an alley, thence
South 132 feet; thence East 74.5 feet, more or less, too point 57.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of Lot No. 7 in said Addition, thence North 132 feet to
the Place of Beginning, as shown by Plat in Deed Record 21, Page 416 of the Records in the Recorder's Office of Hamilton County, Indiana.
More commonly known as 31 First Street, Carmel, Indiana.
I further certify that points were set or found at the corners of said real estate, as shown, and that this survey correctly shows the location of all visible
improvements, unless otherwise noted, on the premises and any easements, highways, rights —of —way, restrictions and covenants, of which the undersigned has
been advised, and all visible encroachments, if any, across the established survey lines.
w
CERTIFIED February 22> 2005 ``��glltltlyNzA�''
`�. H/
• `�����ISTERE;� Vol,
i
_ _ =Z N 0.
rman H Hiselman
"- - - - - -- = * � S 0 4 61
Registered Land Surveyor STATE OF
Indiana No. SO461 %<e P•,.�'Q ��
st
Surveyor's Report
In accordance with Title 865, Article 1, Rule 12 of the Indiana Administrative Code, the following observations and opinions are submitted regarding the various
uncertainties in the locations of the lines and corners established this survey as a result of uncertainties in reference monumentation; in record descriptions and
plats; in lines of occupation; and as introduced by random errors in measurement ( "Theoretical Uncertainty "). - (.
�e-s u�r.err ; "nrie�. The client should assume there is an amount of uncertainty along any line equal in magnitude to the discrepancy in the location of the
lines of possession from the surveyed lines.
There may be differences of deed dimensions versus measured dimensions along the boundary lines shown hereon and, likewise, there may be found survey
markers near, but not precisely at, some boundary corners. In cases where the magnitude of these differences are less than the Theoretical Uncertainty stated
below, less than the Positional Tolerance, and less than the uncertainty identified for the reference monumentation (discussed below), the differences may be
considered insignificant and are shown only for purposes of mathematical closure. Such differences that are greater than the Theoretical Uncertainty, Positional
Tolerance and the uncertainty in reference monumentation should be considered worthy of notice and are therefore discussed further below.
Unless otherwise noted or shown on the within survey plat, there is no evidence of occupation along the perimeter lines of the subject tract. All survey
monuments set or found on this survey are flush with existing grade unless otherwise noted.
The accuracy of any flood hazard data shown on this report is subject to map scale uncertainty and to any other uncertainty in location or elevation on the
referenced Flood Insurance Rate Map. The within described tract of land does not lie within Flood Hazard Zone X as said tract plots by scale on Community
Panel Number 180081 0207 F of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the City of Carmel, Indiana (maps dated February 19, 2003).
Purpose:
The purpose of this survey was to retrace and monument the boundary of the real estate described hereon under the above captioned "Land Description.
Reference lAonumentotion:
The range line being the west line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 18 North, Range 4 East, was established based on the location of the
southwest and northwest corners as located in the field. County Surveyor's ties were not available for Section Corners in the area, all corners were marked by
existent monuments. A Harrison monument was found at the southwest corner, an Iron Pin was found 8 inches down at the northwest corner, and an iron pin
was found near the sixteenth corner. It is my opinion that the original surveyors used the line between the West Quarter Corner and the sixteenth corner as the
basis for the west lines of area subdivisions. This line was held rather than the physical center of Rangeline Road. We located the physical center of surrounding
streets and compared the results with the dimensions of the record plats. After doing so we found that First Avenue S.E. didn't seem to work with curb splits.
We then examined the overall distance from Second Street S.E. to the West Quarter Corner and found that the overall distance when compared to the plat
distances of the record plats was within one foot. This would place the center of First Avenue S.E. 1.4 feet south of the physical center. This adjustment made
a better fit with existing improvements and occupation.
Discrepancies in record descriptions and plats:
Based on current research for the subject and adjoining real estates, no title deed gaps or overlaps have been revealed.
Discrepancies in Lines of Occupation:
A brick retaining wall along the north line is as much as 0.9 feet north of said line.
As a result of the above observations, it is my opinion that the uncertainties in locations of the lines and corners established on this survey are as follows:
a) Variance In reference monuments: 1.4 feet In the north south direction and one foot in the east west direction.
>tr
b) Discrepancies in record descriptions and plats: none found.
c) Inconsistencies in lines of occupation: Fence as much as 0.9 feet related to a brick retaining wall along the north line.
d) Theoretical Uncertainty (due to random errors in measurements) of the corners of the subject tract established by this survey is within the specifications of
a Class C survey ( +/— 0.50 feet) as defined in I.A.C. 865.
Surveyor's Notes
The within plat and survey were prepared without benefit of current evidence of source of title for the subject tract or adjoining parcels and are therefore
subject to any statement of facts revealed by examination of such documents.
The locations of utilities shown hereon are based on above ground structures and /or locations as marked by others. No excavations were made during the
progress of this survey to locate buried utilities /structures.
Along any line where a deed gap or overlap or inconsistency in line of occupation occurs, unwritten rights may be available to the subject and /or the adjoining
real estates.
The subject tract is zoned per the :..f _ » /. Planning and Zoning data . The various zoning restrictions for R -2 district, together with any
modifications to those restrictions that may have been agreed to at the time of approval, must be obtained from the appropriate government officials qualified
to certify regulatory adherence of the subject real estate.
ALTA /TOPO
SURVEY
CARMEL, INDIANA
RE /MAX — ABILITY PLUS
eFNCHMP��
Benchmark Land Services, Inc.
Fishers Office Loc8 ii0n: BrownsbwZ Office Location:
AM 0WAYa111illt � � IIO 20 S /feport l884 a& 5W
prs l6ux
rAW 11,7JIU r &W 1?AW&:
Atr x7m idw Air J17.Ri R7
www.bencbmarkLS.com
DATE: February 22, 2005
Approved By. NH
Drawn By. RD
Date of Lost Field Work. 2119105
Date Plotted: 2122105
ALTA /TOPO
SURVEY
cn
L
• o
Q
O �
J
*E
i-- ° CL O
p o
CL
c
o
t°
U Z
Q
a
�Q a
CL
N pp U
W
CL
Project
Location
\ \Server \Projects\ 1 -19525 \DWG \amap.b
VICINITY MAP — NOT TO SCALE
Reference Project Number:
N/A
Project Number:
1 -19525
Sheet Number :
Clof8