Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence ~ 'i 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 317 -842-6777 FAX: 317-841-4798 www.cripe.biz Architecture Construction Administration Engineering Geographic Information Services Landscape Architecture Land Planning Land Surveying Real Estate Consulting Transportation Engineering ISQ.,; 001 "\~ \\\}~\~~ ~,~ Q.~\)\\~~(JI~ ~~~ e e December 10, 2004 Mr. Matthew Griffin, AICP Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 SADDLEBROOK AT SHELBORN, PRIMARY PLAT DOCKET NO. 04080059 PP CRIPE JOB NO. 010463-20100 Dear Mr. Griffin: We have addressed the attached comment letter, dated September 8, 2004 for the above referenced project. Revised plans were prepared October 8, 2004. I apologize that you were not included in the distribution at that time. We offer the following responses. 2. 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 11 . 12. 1 . The location map',.has been revised to scale, incorporating the requested features. Refer to attached email from Scott Brewer, December 2, 2004, indicating acceptance of the landscape and tree preservation plans. 10. The plans are labeled Primary Plat. Plans have been revised to show the zoning classification 8-1. Individual lot square footage is shown on the overall map. Area is called out for Public Use Parcels in square feet and acres. Drainage easements and buffer yards overlap in accordance with direction by the Urban Forrester and the Hamilton County Surveyor. Required buffer yard is indicated along project boundaries. Lots have been revised as requested. No lot is shown with less than 50' of frontage. A 10' multiuse path is indicated along Shelborne Road, An 8' multiuse path will be provided as requested along the southern boundary and at the Northeast corner of the site. Normal depth of the pond is sho\'Vn. The pond has less than 1 ft of freeboard at the normal depth. Detention capacity is nominal. Proposed access for Lot 1 is shown. The existing access has been removed. The developer has submitted commitment letters to the Jon Dobosiewicz, City of Carmel. Open Space Breakdown is included on the Cover Sheet of the Plans. 0:\2001 \010463\201 00\Docs\Permits\ltr121 004Griffin.doc e Matthew Griffin December 10, 2004 Page 2 e Please contact me if you need clarification or have any additional questions regarding this project. PAUL I. CRIPE, INC. ~~ ~/~ Kevin Roberts, PE Senior Project Manager als Attachment 0:\2001\010463\201 00\Docs\Permits\ltr121 004Griffin.doc IS~2 001 .,c ,~ ........'.....: ,\\)~\\\\~Cf. ~%S\) e e City of Carmel VIA FAX: 776-8654 Original by mail September 8, 2004 Steven Hardin 970 Logan Street Noblesville, IN 46060 RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Mr. Hardin: This letter is in response to your priJnary plat application for Saddlebrook at Shelbome. The fol1o\ving issues n1ust be resolved: The [oIIowing required supporting data must be subn1itted: I. Area location Inap of 1 "=500' showing the following: a. Existing adjacent uses. b. Watershed boundaries. c. Thoroughfares directly related to proposed subdivision. d. Existing adjoining zoning classifications and proposed llses. e. Title on area location nlap, its scale, north aITO\V and date. 2. Copy of the landscape plan approval letter from the Cannel Urban Forester. Concerns and COffi.Jllents are as follo\v: I . The plat should be labeled as "Prilllary", and not ~'Prelinlinary" 2. The present zoning classification is 8-1, not R 1 /PUD. 3. Square footage of individual lots must be identified on the "Overall" nlap. 4. Square footage of public use parcels JllUSt be identi tied. 5. Drainage easen1ents and required buffer yards must be separate. Clearly identify drainage easernents and required buffer yards, as \vell as their widths. Required landscape plantings are not pelmitted in drainage easenlcnts. 6. Required buffer yards and landscaping are nlust he shown along al1 project boundaries. 7. Lot 69 Inust be at least 50 feet wide at the right-of-\vay. Currently it is 45 feet wide. 8. As per the Alternative 'Transportation Plan, a 10-foot nltI1ti-use path is required along Shelbonle Road for the extent of this pnInary plat. Please provide. 9. Normal depth and 1 OO-year elevation 11111st be shown for the pond near the access on Shelbollle Road. Page I ()NE CI\7IC S(~UARE CAR.i\-fEL, INDIA NA 46032 3]7/571-24]7 e e 10. Renlove the existing access configuration for Lot 1, and show only what is proposed (except in the existing conditions exhibit). 11. At the intersection of Shelbome Road and Blue Grass Lane, Shelbon1e Road should have an acceleration lane, deceleration lane, and a passing lane. 12. An open space breakdown chart containing the infon11ation required by SC Chapter 7, Exhibit "A", mllst be included on the plat. Please wait to subn1it a revised pritnary plat until after the Technical Advisory Committee (T AC) has met on this application. The resublllitted plat should include edits addressing the above COll1ments along with any requiren1ents that arise fron1 the ~r AC Ineeting. Additional comn1ents may be made after the requested revisions have been submitted. Sincerely, J ~. . ' ~Ij '. ~ ;/., ." ". I .i){z~ ~v Matthew Griffin, AICP Planning Adlninistrator Saddlcbrook at Shelborne - PP I Page 2 ONE CIVIC S(~U/\RE Ci\lZi\JEL) INDIANA 46032 3 1 7 /57 1 - 24 1 7 e e Page 1 of5 Kevin Roberts .........................".-....... From: Brewer, Scott 1 [SBrewer@cLcarmel.in.us] Sent: Thursday, December 02,2004 8:55 PM To: Brewer, Scott I; Kevin Roberts; Conn, Angelina V; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Griffin, Matt L Cc: Matt S. Skelton; KCB Bridenthal Design Associates; Michael H. Stikeleather(E-mail); Steve Hardin; Roger Tucker (E-mail); David Lach Subject: RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Tree Preservation / Landscape plans To all it may concern: I have reviewed both the tree preservation plan, and the bufferyard/landscaping plan for Saddlebrook at Shelborne Subdivision, and they are acceptable. If you wish to follow the email correspondance, they are below. After the secondary plat, and contruction plans are submitted and approved, I will stamp and sign the approved set of landscape plans before the presubmittal meeting with the Building Permit Department. Scott Brewer Environmental Planner, City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2478 -----Orig i na I Message----- From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 8:57 PM To: 'Kevin Roberts'; Conn, Angelina V; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Griffin, Matt L Cc: Matt S. Skelton; KCB Bridenthal Design Associates; Michael H. Stikeleather (E-mail); Steve Hardin; Roger Tucker (E-mail); David Lach Subject: RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Tree Preservation graphic details Kevin: The drawings are acceptable. I will add them to the file. Scott Brewer Environmental Planner, City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2478 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Roberts [mailto:kroberts@cripe.biz] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:09 PM To: Brewer, Scott I Cc: Matt S. Skelton; KCB Bridenthal Design Associates; Michael H. Stikeleather (E-mail); Steve Hardin; Roger Tucker (E-mail); David Lach Subject: RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Scott: Please examine the attached PDF files and confirm they are appropriate and sufficient for preservation of the buffer for Saddlebrook at Shelborne. We intend to include these details on sheet L 106; Landscape Notes and Details. 12/10/2004 12/10/2004 e Page 2 of5 e Kevin Roberts, PE Paul I. Cripe, Inc. Architects & Engineers 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46250 Phone: 317-842-6777 Direct: 31 7 -841-4797 Ext. 664 Mobile: 317-997-6412 Fax: 317-841-4798 E-Mail: kroberts@cripe.biz -----Original Message----- From: Brewer, Scott I [mailto:SBrewer@ci.carmel.in.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 3:08 PM To: Matt S. Skelton; KCB Bridenthal Design Associates; Kevin Roberts Subject: RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Kevin: I am ok with the tree preservation plan, but please add graphic tree preservation details to sheet L 106 for the preservation BMP's you will be using (fencing). Other than that, it appears acceptable. Scott Brewer Environmental Planner, City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2478 -----Original Message----- From: Matt S. Skelton [mailto: MSkelton@binghammchale.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:02 PM To: Brewer, Scott I Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C;Griffin, Matt L; Kevin Roberts (E-mail); Steve Hardin; Michael Stikeleather (E-mail); Chuck Bridenthal (E-mail) Subject: Saddlebrook at Shelborne - Street Trees Scott : Thanks for your response. I will have our engineering folks contact you to explain our street tree dilemma for this project. Evidently, the Surveyor's Office will not allow them to be installed in regulated drain subdivisions. I will let our project engineers explain this (either Kevin Roberts or Chuck Bridenthal). (Kevin and/or Chuck: Will you please contact Scott to discuss this item? Thanks.) We submitted revised packet materials today to the planning office for the November 30th Subdivision Committee meeting. Please let us know if you have any questions. Have a great weekend, Scott. Matt Matthew S. Skelton, AICP BINGHAM McHALE 970 Logan Street e e Page 3 of5 Noblesville, IN 46060 Phone: (317) 776-8654 Fax: (317) 776-8657 www.binghammchale.com -----Original Message----- From: Brewer, Scott I [mailto:SBrewer@ci.carmel.in.us] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:47 AM To: Matt S. Skelton Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Griffin,. Matt L Subject: RE: Tree Preservation Plan Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Matt: This subdivision is located now within the City of Carmel, and I believe that Carmel's Engineering Department has jurisdiction over the streets. If you do have a true conflict with the Surveyor's office on this subdivision, please let me know. I am not asking you to go head to head with the surveyor's office. Street Trees are not required by ordinance yet, since we administrate zoning for both the City and County Township. As I explained several times, I am asking for them only on the streets that have the potential to become thoroughfares (which the county has allowed planting on before). They are regularly required for subdivisions that are within the City of Carmel. Street trees are viewed as a value to the City for a variety of reasons, including adding to the property values of the subdivision, and the salability. Scott Brewer Environmental Planner, City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2478 -----Orig i na I Message----- From: Matt S. Skelton [mailto:MSkelton@binghammchale.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:27 PM To: Brewer, Scott I; Kevin Roberts Cc: Charlie and Krista; Conn, Angelina V; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Griffin, Matt L Subject: RE: Tree Preservation Plan Saddlebrook at Shelborne Scott: Can you please tell me where the street tree requirement is in your ordinance? I have looked everywhere and cannot find it. We are running into a problem with this item because the County Surveyor will not allow us to install street trees in Saddlebrook (because we are a regulated drain subdivision). Please advise. Matt Matthew S. Skelton, AICP BINGHAM McHALE 970 Logan Street 12/10/2004 e 12/10/2004 e Page 4 of5 Noblesville, IN 46060 Phone: (317) 776-8654 Fax: (317) 776-8657 www.binghammchale.com -----Original Message----- From: Brewer, Scott I [mailto:SBrewer@ci.carmel.in.us] Sent: Wednesday, November'17, 2004 4:10 PM To: Kevin Roberts; Matt S. Skelton Cc: Charlie and Krista; Conn, Angelina V; Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Griffin, Matt L Subject: RE: Tree Preservation Plan Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Kevin: The draft copy of the tree preservation report in acceptable. On the landscape plans, I still need to see a graphic detail for the tree preservation method (BMP) that you are going to use, and we are asking for street trees along Homestretch Drive. They must be shown graphically on the landscape plans and have species labeled. And as a ROSa subdivision, an Open Space plan and schedule must be submitted. I have not recieved copies of either yet. Scott Brewer Environmental Planner, City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2478 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Roberts [mailto: kroberts@cripe.biz] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:53 AM To: Matt S. Skelton (E-mail); Michael H. Stikeleather (E-mail) Cc: Brewer, Scott I Subject: Tree Preservation Plan Gentlemen: The attached draft tree preservation plan has been presented to Scott Brewer, City of Carmel Urban Forrester. I understand that Scott's initial reaction was that the plan, with minor revisions, appears to be sufficient, but a thorough review is necessary. Understanding time constraints, Scott intends to review the plan as soon as possible. We expect comments late Thursday or early Friday of this week. Please review the attached meeting report. Kevin Roberts, PE -1 ,'( r e e Paul I. Cripe, Inc. Architects & Engineers 71 72 Graham Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46250 Phone: 317-842-6777 Direct: 31 7-841-4797 Ext. 664 Mobile: 317-997-6412 Fax: 317-841-4798 E-Mail: kroberts@cripe.biz 12/10/2004 Page 5 of5 ,,~ e e ~ovember26,2004 To: Michael Stikeleather Matt Skelton Carmel Plan Commission Re: Saddlebrook at Shelborne We appreciate your willingness in the past to listen to our concerns about this project-in both private and public forums - and we trust that this dialogue will continue. In that vein, we hope this letter will be received in the spirit of cooperation that was intended. As the Carmel Plan Commission studies Saddlebrook at Shelbome, we still have several concerns that need to be addressed before we will be satisfied that the project should move forward. They are enumerated below. 1. As you are aware, existing new projects north of 116th Street-two new schools, a highway department facility, a soccer complex and several new subdivisions - have created a major traffic problem in the area. With Saddlebrook and still more projects in the pipeline, this already untenable situation will get even worse. Weare aware that plans are underway to build a roundabout at the intersection of 116th and Shelborne Road, which should alleviate some of the problem. However, we are not aware of an official commitment by the city of Carmel to proceed with this construction or a timetable for the project. We believe that the roundabout at 116th and Shelborne should be formally approved and scheduled by the city of Carmel before the Saddlebrook at Shelbome project gets the green light. In addition, we believe that occupancy of the homes in Saddlebrook should not be granted until construction of the roundabout is complete. 2. We have previously expressed our concerns to the Commission and to the developer about the lack of adequate landscaping for the buffer between the backyards of Oak Tree and the proposed Saddlebrook subdivision. While we have received verbal acknowledgement of our concerns and promises of some adjustments to the original landscaping plan, we have not seen a detailed rendering of the new plan and an explanation of how it will address our concerns. 3. As you are aware, the entry road proposed for Saddlebrook at Shelborne is tight against the backyards of several residents of the Oak Tree subdivision. We believe there is room for the developer to move the road north to increase the distance between it and our backyards. 4. We understand, applaud and appreciate the City of Carmel's emphasis on making sure that all new housing developments incorporate a significant amount of green space. We see that the developer of Saddlebrook has incorporated a nice amount of green space, but the design e e primarily benefits his own residence. We suggest that the plans be modified so that more green space can be used to create greater distance and additional buffer between Saddlebrook and Oak Tree. 5. Saddlebrook at Shelbome will have major implications for Mike Ulerich, a long-time resident on Shelbome Road near the entrance to the project. He submitted a list of 10 questions to the Commission on Oct. 19,2004, and received answers to some of his questions, but not all. We would like the Commission and the developer to address the unanswered questions. We want to emphasize that we are not anti-development. Weare expressing our concerns as Carmel citizens and as neighbors who are concerned about the safety of the roads we travel in our vicinity, the value of our properties and the quality of our lives. We appreciate your willingness to hear us and work with us on resolving these issues to everyone's satisfaction. Respectfully, Sam and Karen Tancredi Bill and Cheryl Olsen Chris Katterjohn David and Linda Tortora Mike Ulerich 11686 Oak Tree Way 11692 Oak Tree Way 11696 Oak Tree Way 11700 Oak Tree Way 11859 Shelbome Road Attachment: Oct. 19 letter from Mike Ulerich to Carmel Plan Commission ~ e e Mike Ulerich 11859 Shelborne Road Carmel, IN 46032 October 19,2004 Re:Saddlebrook at Shelbome Carmel Plan Con1mission, Idonot \vant to block the development, but I vvould like to have the follovving questions ans\vered before the Carmel Plal1 Con1l11ission makes it [mal decision. My property is located at the proposed entrance to Saddlebrook at Shelbome. It app~earsthat the fro'nt of n1Y property \villbe needed for a turning lane into the development. 1. Hovv n111ch of my property vvilI be needed for the tuminglane? 2. \\T}10 "viII be responsible to reimburse ll1e for the use of the front of my property? The developer of the c.ity of Carmel? " Ho\v n1uch \viII Ibe reimbursed for the trees that are removed and to re-IaI1dscapethis area. 3. My septic system is located in the frontofnlY property. If this turning lane involves removing part of the septic finger system who will pay for the changes? 4'. Will I be reqllired to conhecttocity sevver and \vater service. What is the estimated cost to connect and who will pay for connection? I ftes. 5. Will my drive ,val' exit !2-Shelbo~e Road.Q! to t~ new subdivision street? I. h e.<E'.G.~' Of r c G.~'l. IJtof! tf:"("? ( f'r Q~f f ~ 4 ~ I () )Je. uJ 6 Tr"~r/r~',/ r 11' ". \; 6. If my drive is nloved to ~he new street ~ \\-ho \vill pay for driveway relocation? What type of material will be used forthe ne\v drive? !3J.-... @Ifn1ydrive is moved to the new street will I be required to pay an association fee. Ho'vv much do you estimate the association dues and fees to be? 8. Willyoll allo\v me to divide my current lot into t\VO separate building lots? Both lotvvould require a drive way to the ne\\" street. 9. Will the pOvver line running" between n1yproperty and the new street be buried? 10. Will the ne\v street be a city street ora private street? l\vould hope tl1at the Cann'el Plan Commission \vould require ansvvers to these questions before they make an)! decisions. Once ,again it is not my desire to block any ~ i .-:- I he. Chr JI'''9U<%';<>'1 ~.. I A" '< ,Pj i"~ -. .!,' ~~. /'1'J ... ,t"':, ;;"'" ~ <;.;l y....... -- \" .~"'" "o!" i (~.;... t..J \"c-'" ,~ , l f'. A )~ -f"~re.~il C,.-I (( ~ , 1 T~ t2 t l>=J e V .....1> I rejU ;,~ ~7 'P' . ..'~ - e development, but to make sure that this development does not cost me any money and does not redllce the value of my property. Sincerely, Michael Ulerich Plan Commission Continuance . . Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Matt S. Skelton [MSkelton@binghammchale.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:21 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C Subject: Plan Commission Continuance Angie: Do you need a request from us to continue the Saddlebrook at Shelborne project to the December Plan Commission meeting? If so, please let this correspondence serve that purpose. We are planning to appear before the Subdivision Committee again next month (on December 7th) and then before the Plan Commission on December 21 s1. Please let me know if you need anything else. Matt Matthew S. Skelton, AICP BINGHAM McHALE 970 Logan Street Noblesville, IN 46060 Phone: (317) 776-8654 Fax: (317)776-8657 www.binghammchale.com 11/12/2004 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 317-842-6777 FAX: 317-841-4798 www.cripe.biz Architecture Construction Administration Engineering Geographic Information Services Landscape Architecture Land Planning Land Surveying e November 4, 2004 Mr. John Dobosiewicz City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 SADDLEBROOK AT SHELBORNE Dear Mr. Dobosiewicz: e ;( \~. ~ ~v ' ~.; Attached is an estimate for widening Shelborne Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision, Saddle brook t Shelborne. This estimate is to accompany e agreement transmitted to you by Bingham McHale, LLP, und separate cover. Please contact me with y questions or concerns you may have. You have been most helpf . Thank you. Sincerely, PAUL I. CRIP , INC. ~~,~ Kevin oberts, PE Seni r Project Manager Real Estate Consulting Transportation Engineering 0:\2001 \010463\201 00\Docs\Engr\Correspondence\ltr11 0404Dobosiewicz.doc e e Shelborne Road - Road Improvements Summary 7172 Graham Road Pavement Required Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Indianapolis, IN 46250 Subgrade Preparation 1215 SY $2.50 $3,037.50 317-842-6777 12" #53 Compacted Stone 1215 SY $8.00 $9,720.00 FAX: 317-841-4798 4" HAC Binder 1215 SY $7.05 $8,565.75 www,cripe.biz 1" HAC Surface 1215 SY $2.48 $3,013.20 Shoulder 280 SY $2.90 $812.00 2" Resurface 2050 SY $5.20 $10,660.00 Architecture Total $35,808.45 Construction Pavement to be Built Quantity Unit Unit Price Total Administration Subgrade Preparation 280 SY $2.50 $700.00 12" #53 Compacted Stone 280 SY $8.00 $2,240.00 4" HAC Binder 280 SY $7.05 $1,974.00 Engineering 1" HAC Surface 280 SY $2.48 $694.40 Shoulder 280 SY $2.90 $812.00 2" Resurface 2050 SY $5.20 $10,660.00 Geographic Information Services Total $17,080.40 Difference $ 18,728.05 Landscape Architecture Land Planning Land Surveying Real Estate Consulting Transportation Engineering ISQ-- 001 ~'~\) I\"\~~ ~~~\)\\L"~ J ~y . . Mike Ulerich 11859 Shelborne Road Carmel, IN 46032 October 19, 2004 Re: Saddlebrook at Shelbome Carmel Plan Commission, I do not want to block the development, but I would like to have the following questions answered before the Carmel Plan Commission makes it final decision. My property is located at the proposed entrance to Saddlebrook at Shelbome. It appears that the front of my property will be needed for a turning lane into the development. 1. How much of my prop"erty will be needed for the turning lane? 2. Who will be responsible to reimburse me for the use of the front of my property? The developer of the city of Carmel? How much will I be reimbursed for the trees that are removed and to re-landscape this area. 3. My septic system is located in the front of my property. If this turning lane involves removing part of the septic finger system who will pay for the changes? 4. Will I be required to connect to city sewer and water service. What is the estimated cost to connect and who will pay for connection? 5. Will my drive way exit to Shelborne Road or to the new subdivision street? 6. If my drive is moved to the new street, who will pay for driveway relocation? What type of material will be used for the new drive? 7. If my drive is moved to the new street will I be required to pay an association fee. How much do you estimate the association dues and fees to be? 8. Will you allow me to divide my current lot into two separate building lots? Both lot would require a drive way to the new street. 9. Will the power line running between my property and the new street be buried? 10. Will the new street be a city street or a private street? I would hope that the Carmel Plan Commission would require answers to these questions before they make any decisions. Once again it is not my desire to block any e e development, but to make sure that this development does not cost me any money and does not reduce the value of my property. Sincerely, Michael Ulerich . ~. J~ l /1111 \'tK . :;~ok/~ . (I ... . . September 21, 2004 ]A1\1ES BRAINARD, MAYOR CI EL Mr. Rick Radabaugh Paull. Cripe, Inc. 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Primary Plat-Project Review #1 Dear Mr. Radabaugh: We have reviewed the primary plat submitted for T.A.C. review for this project and offer the following comments: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. 2. Jurisdictions: . Interior and Exterior Streets and Right of Way, Curbs, Street Signs, Sidewalks - City of Carmel. . Water - City of Carmel Utilities . Sanitary Sewers - Clay Township Regional Waste District . Storm SewerslDrainage - Hamilton County Surveyor's Office (City of Carmel Review). . ~ Regulated! Legal Drains - Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. 3. Board of Public Works and Safety Requirements: . Water Availability . Additional Water Availability for Irrigation Systems. . Temporary Construction Entrance (if applicable and if located at a location other than planned permanent entrances). Please be advised that any open cuts of dedicated streets will require separate Board of Public JJlorks and Safety approval. . Any permanent improvement (including irrigation systems) to be installed within dedicated right of way or dedicated easements. This approval would require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the O\vner/Developer and the City of Carmel. . Secondary Plat approval. . Right of Way Dedication (if applicable) A copy of the schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines is included for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board. Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by the Carnlel Clay Plan Commission and/or the Board of ~oning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of review by the Technical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of approval by the Plan Co/nnzission and/or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable). 4. T.A.C. ReviewIDrawings submitted for approval: We request that all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for construction until all Engineering Department, Carmel Utilities and Hamilton County Surveyor's Office issues have been resolved. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. Because of the dual jurisdiction bet\veen the City of Carmel and the Hamilton County Surveyor, we will require a minimum of eight-sets of drawings for approval after all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be stamped as approved and will be signed by the City Engineer and by Carmel Utilities. The eight-sets will then be sent to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office for approval and signatures. Three approved sets are to be returned to the City of Carmel. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office will retain two-sets. The Developer, the Engineer and the Contractor will each receive one-set. DEPARTNIENT OF ENGINEERING ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARIVIEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAX 317.571.2439 ENL<\IL e ngin ee ri ng@ ci. earn1 el. in. us . en Mr. Rick Radabaugh September 21, 2004 Page 2 5. Please be advised that any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated right of way or dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement with the City of Carmel's Board of} Public Works and Safetv. 6. Carmel UtilitiesAVater Distribution should be provided copies of all drawings and revisions for review of water issues. They will provide a separate review regarding these issues. 7. Carmel Utilities does not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted directly for all water main locations. 8. I have included copies of the following for your use: . Subdivision Project Approval Procedures . Performance Release Procedure . Subdivision Building Permits . Permit Data, Contacts, etc. . Subdivision Sign requirements BONDING REQUIREMENTS 9. Individual Performance Guarantees will be required for the following subdivision improvements: . Streets (base, binder and surface). You may bond perimeter street improvements separately. . Curbs . Water Mains . Street Signs . Monuments & Markers* . Sidewalks (builders lot sidewalks, perimeter right of way sidewalks and perimeter asphalt paths may be bonded separately). *Storm sewer bonding will be under the jurisdiction of the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. They may also require bonding for Monuments & Markers. If that is the case, we will not require duplicate bonding. Sanitary sewers are under the jurisdiction of the Clay Township Regional Waste District. The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for 100% of the cost of labor and materials to construct the individual. improvements, to be provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineers Estimates for each improvement including unit costs, quantities, materials and types of materials, etc. Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees, a three-year Maintenance Guarantee will be required. The Maintenance Guarantee amount is based upon,15% of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and 10% of the Performance amount for all other improvements. Performance Guarantees may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds, Irrevocable Letters of Credit or Cashier's Checks, Certified Checks or Official Checks. Please reference the enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures. AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES 10. A vailability (acreage) Fees must be paid after all other Engineering Department requirements have been satisfied and prior to the start of construction activities. Availability Fees are based upon total platted acreage for the development at the current rate of$1,010.00 per acre (Water Availability Fee). Based upon the secondary plat indicated acreage, the following Water Availability Fees would apply: 60.210Acres @ $1,010.00/Acre = $60,812.00 Connection Fees are currently $1,310.00 for water per single-family residence. Connection Fees are paid when the infrastructure has been complete, satisfactory test results obtained and the subdivision has been released for permits. Water Connection Fees are paid on a per-lot basis. . If an irrigation system, swinlming pool or clubhouse is planned for this development, or any future section of the development, additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the recommendation of the Director of Carmel Utilities. 11. We have engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage calculations submitted for review to this office. We will share Crossroad's comments as they are received. .When construction plans are submitted for T.A.C. review for this, development, please provide 2-sets of plans and calculations to allow us to send the extra set to Crossroad and save some time in the review process. -:-:-..-.:---=--~----;------ -. . . e Mr. Rick Radabaugh September 21, 2004 Page 3 COlVllVlENTS - PRIMARY PLAT 12. The scale on some of the drawings is so small that it is impossible to read the information presented. Please adjust to a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. Resubmit the plat at the adjusted scale requested. 13. Shelbome Road is classified as a Secondary Arterial on the City of Carmel 20- Year Thoroughfare Plan. A 150' Deceleration Taper, 100' Deceleration Lane and a 250' Acceleration Taper need to be provided at the entrance on the east side of Shelbome Road. Please make provisions for a passing blister on the west side of ShelbomeRoad~The full length will be 160' and each taper will be 150' long. 14. Are you required to provide additional stub street connections for future development to the east, west and south of this subdivision? 15. Are all existing entrances/streets on Shelbome Road shown? This information is required so the City can evaluate the proposed entrance location. 16. Please provide drainage calculations for this project. 17. There is an apparent conflict of the drainage system near the main entrance with an existing 12" HDPE pipe. 18. Please show a 10' multi-use path in the right of way across the frontage of the development. 19. Please indicate widening of travel lanes to 15' and a 3' stone shoulder across the frontage. 20. Please label existing and proposed right of way for Shelbome Road. Proposed right of way shall be 45-feet at a minimum. 21. Have you considered connecting the 10' multi-use path to Block B open space in the vicinity of Lot 4? 22. Is there no planned detention of the westerly section of Blue Grass Lane? Why is this drainage system interconnected with the existing drainage system? The Department reserves the right to provide further comments on the grading and drainage system upon receipt of more detailed construction drawings which provide grading elevations, pipe sizing and invert elevations. These comments may affect the drainage system layout presented on the primary plat. These comments represent the Department of Engineering's initial review of this project. If you have questions, please caB me at 571-2441. . unca, Jr. P.E. Assistant Cit)} ngineer Department' f Engineering c--c: Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Carmel Utilities Paul Pace, Carmel Utilities Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office John South, Hamilton County Soil & Water Project File Copy Engineering Department Review S :\DHILL \PROJREV04\SADD LEBROOKA TSHELBORNEPRIMAR Y SEP 17 '04 01:18PM P . 1/2 . . :'Kentol1 ('. 'l~~}a rlt, ~~'lIrLJl.jJtJr "I'limlt' (.3 ' 7) 77b-84~~ $ 'If/x (J 17) 77';-:H,~8 September 17t 2004 ,,5uitt. I ~~ S ()n(.1 J{nmillm . *,,1"'&Wal"l' ..NoblesrJill I, nid1,/I"h, ~tit1~~~. -' ~ ~< P}'5 <t.' f\ 't:\}.. '. ,?"',\:\\'\-\)@'\\ ~I ~\.-~~~'--=-\ ~~~ '~Q " j;:;-) \~, {',~\.,S ~!(r< V~..... '- 7 ~"":/ " ~' /i:i;----. ?3 \ .Y'/ O~L_~ Paul I. Cripe, Inc. A TIN: Rick Radabaugh 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 VIA FACSIMILE: 841...4798 Re: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Mr. Radabaugh: We have reviewed the primary plat plans submitted to the Hamilton COU11ty Surveyor's Office on August 31!1 2004 for this project and have tbe following comments: 1. This project falls within the jurisdiction of the City of Carmel. 2. This proposed project DOES NOT fall in a Carmel Watershed Protection Area. 3. This project falls in the JaW. Brendle Regulated Drain Watershed. The watershed is currently being studied by CBBEL and NO outlet permits will be issues until the study is complete. As it currently stands~ the watershed has an allowable release rate of 0.24 cts per acre, that that could change with the watershed study. 4a This project will involve the reconstruction of the Oak Tree Regulated Drain across this parcel along Shelborne Road. The preliminary design show new pipe and the existing being left in place. The reconstruction will require that only 1 pipe be in place to serve both projects and the existing drain properly abandoned. The pipe will need to be sized to provide a 15" RCP outlet pipe and manhole with sufficient depth set at the existing inlet north of lot 6 of Oak Tree~ This pipe is being sized to allow for the future reconstruction in Oak Tree to resolve some major drainage issues.. s. This will be a IIamilton County Regulated Drain Subdivision. All design will need to be to HC SO Standards and the easelnent will need to be ,1 S feet ltalf easement froln the center line of pipe. Also, a 20. perimeter drainage easement will be required around the project. SEP 17 '04 01:19PM '~-t-'.... P.2/~-- . . e 6. Per Indiana Code 36-9-27-33, no planting will be allowed in the regulated drain easements. The preliminary plans show the entry way wall over the top of a future regulated drain pipe. which wilt not be allowed. 7. Please consider using castings that are desigIled for bi-directional flow in the ..sag" of the streets. The acoeptable castings are Neenah 3501-L2 or East Jordan 749S-M4. The Neenah (or equivalent) 3501 TR Or TL should be used when a single direction of flow entetS the inlet. 8. Please submit complete construction plans to our standards and drainage calculations once they beco~ne available. 9. Please note the additional comments may be warranted at a later date. Should you have any qUestJons~ I can be reached at 317-776-8495. Sincerely, .~~~ Ores Hoyes Plan Reviewer Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz - Carmel DOCD John South - RCSWCD Dick HiU- Cannel Engineering Mike Stikeleather - Leeds_ LLC, SEP-14-2004 12:22 FROM:HAMILTONCIllrWY DEP 3177769S14 TO: 317 ,_571 2426 . HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWA Y DEPARTMENT P.001/001 RE: Saddlebrook at Shelbome Preliminary Plat ' N of 1161h Street I E, of She'bome Road Clay Township ~~$j . $/ 1-' ~~ E! RECFIVED · /" 10\ SIP 14 'Vinll ~ \~ D l.VU'i \1. Des ' ~ .\~~ ~~Y '( . Q;/ ~~ September 14,2004 Mr. Rick Radabaugh Pol. Cripe,. Inc. 7172 Graham Road Indianapolist Indfana 46250 V'A FACSIMILE Dear Mr. Radabaugh: rhls letter serves to acknowledge receipt of a transmittal containing the plans for the above.mentioned project. After reviewing the plans the Highway Department has the following' comments: 1. It appears that this project lies entirely within 'the limits ofthe City of Carmel. . Therefore, all future comments should be directed toward the City. If you have any information contrary to this statement, please contact me immediately. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please feel free to contact me at any tlme_ . Sincerely. //i !!~~- Steven J. Broermann Staff EngIneer cc~ Jon Dobosiewicz Greg Hoyes G:\USERS\SB\04tac\09-14"04saddlebrook.doc 1700 South 10th Street N oblesviUe, In. 46060 www.co.h~mi1t~...Jn.us . Office (31. 7) 773..7770 Fax (317) 776..9814 e - NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN-RE'VIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and' Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN' 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at .ohn-south iaswcd.or h~ectN~~~~~~ Location- Sec~ 32 T- 18N R- 3E. Acreage- 61 Ac Owner/Developer- Mr. Michael Stikeleather Leeds LLC 5300 Hessler Road Muncie, IN 47304 Engineer- Mr. Aaron Reynolds Cripe 71 72 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 Plan Review Date: 'Soils Information: September 11, 2004 . Br Brookston silty clay loam This is a poorly drained soil with a seasonal high water table at 0.0 to 1.0 ft. This soil is located on depressions and is subject toponding; slopes are 0 to 2 pe~cent. The native vegetation is water tolerant grasses and hardwood-trees. The surface layer is silty clay loam and has moderate to p.igh organic inatter c,ontent (2.0 to 6.0 percent). Permeability is moderately slow (0.2 to 0.6 in/hr) in the most restrictive layer above 60 inches. Available water' capacity is high (10.0 inches in the upper 60 inches). The pH of the surface layer in non-limed areas is 6.0 to 7.3. This soil is ' hydric. Wetness is a manag~ment concern for crop production. This soil responds well to tile drainage; it is designated not 'highly erodible (class 3) in the Highly Erodible Land (HEL) classification system. CrA Crosby silt loam, 0 to 3 -perc~,nt slopes This is a somewhat poorly d~ained soil with a seasonal high water table at 0.5 to 2.0 ft. This soil is located' on rises on till plains; slopes,are 0 to 3 percent. The native vegetation is hardwood forest. The surface layer is silt loam and has moderately low to moderate organic matter coritent (1.0 to 3.0 percent). Permeability is very slow (<-0.06 in/hr) in the most restrictive layer above 60 inches. Available water capacity is moderate (6.2 inches in the upper 60 inches). The pH of the surface'layer in non-limed areas is 5.1 to 6.5. Droughtiness andwetness'are management concerns for crop production. This soil respo'nds well to tile drainage; it is designated potentially highly erodibl,e (class 2) in the Highly Erodible Land (HEL) classification system. M;mC2 M_ami silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded This isa moderately well drained soil with a seasonal high water table at 2.0 to 3.5 ft. This soil is located on side slopes on till plains; slopes are 6 to 12 percent. The native vegetation is hardwood forest. The surface layer is silt loam and has moderately low organic matter content e -- (1.0 to 2.0 percent). Permeability is very slow (< 0.06 in/hr) in the most restrictive layer above 60 inches. A vail~ble water capacity is moderate (6.1 inches in the upper 60 inches). The pH of the surface layer in non-limed areas is 5~1 to 6.5., Droughtiness and water erosion are management concerns for crop production. This soil is designated potentially highly erodible (class 2) in the Highly Er<?dible Land (HEL) classification system ,Additional information about soils is available in the "Soil Survey of Hamilton County". The engineer and/or developer should consider the need for an onsite soils investigation. I have reviewed the plans for this project and have the follow_ng comments: · The pond will become the responsibility of the homeowners-association. Is the pond built properly and according to plan? Your design will reduce the watershed area draining into the pond. What watershed is left is not enough to support this size pond.. · Basements are notrecommended in the Brookston and Crosby soil types because of the high w.ater table. · The erosion control plan will be reviewed when the construction plans are submitted. · Recommend a wetland component be added to the forebays o-r the proposed pond to help take up extra nutrients. · What w,ater quality-practices are being used for the storm system that discharges directly to Long Branch Creek? _ , . Do we know where the soil was distributed from the excavation and construction of the pond? · Your proposed grading -plan will affect the watershed for the existing pond north of 'this site. I ,would recommend the flow to the pond not be significantly changed. Should you have -questions concerning these comm~nts, please contact me. Submitted By: John B. South P.E. Certified Professionai in Erosion and Sediment Control Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz, Carmel DOCS Greg Hoyes, County Surveyor File ;"". . e e . > One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4aJ32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 ,Fax To: t::;t~v 0 tic{ vet { ~ 11&J-CO&;c?1 From: M A II (;i (rr[ !9-f" ( N ~ q /'fj-/Z/t7J Fax: Pages: Phone: Date: Re: cc: o Urgent ~or Review 0 P.Jease Comment a Please Reply [J Please Recycle e e 111!f/~ ~\\'JJI ~ Of" C .~t~' ~.~ . ~.,~~~ ~~:CJ ~ ('~ ~ ........ ... ~ ~ Ill' .f:. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~) * ~ ~ ;. $ ~ ~ ~ ~-s..., . .. ~ Q'\' -::::=. 4, \: \I~\' '",,%.II.'t . CO' tin I ~~/$Jl/fl/lllt City of Carmel VIA FAX: 776-8654 Original by mail September 8, 2004 Steven Hardin 970 Logan Street Noblesville, IN 46060 RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Dear Mr. Hardin: This letter is in response to your ,primary plat application for Saddlebrook at Shelbome. The following issues must be resolved: The following required supporting data must be submitted: 1. Area location map of 1"=500' showing the following: a. Existing adjacent uses. b. Watershed boundaries. c. Thoroughfares directly related to proposed subdivision. d. Existing adjoining zoning classifications and proposed uses. e. Title on area location map, its scale, north arrow and date. 2. Copy oftl1e landscape plan approval letter from the Carmel Urban Forester. Concerns and Comments are as follow: 1. The plat should b,e labeled as "Primary", and not "Preliminary" 2. The present zoning classification is 8-1, not Rl/PUD. 3. Square footage of individual lots must be identified on the "Overall" map. 4. Square footage -of public use parcels mllst be identified. 5. Drainage easements and required buffer yards must be separate. Clearly identify drainage easements and required buffer yards, as well as their widths. Required landscape plantings are not pennitted-in drainage easements. 6. Required buffer yards and landscaping are must be shown along all project . boundaries. 7. Lot 69 must be at least 50 feet wide at the right-of-way. Currently it is 45 feet wide. 8. As per the Alternative Transport~tion Plan, a 10-foot multi-use path is required along Shelbome Road for the extent of this primary plat. Please provide. 9. N onnal depth and 100- year elevation must be shown for the pond near the access on Shelbome Road. , Page 1 ONE CI\TIC SQUARE CARIVffiL,. INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 e e 10. Remove.the existing access configuration for Lot 1, an'd show only what is proposed (except in the existing conditions exhibit). 11. At the inter~ectionof Shelbome Road and Blue Grass Lane; Shelbome Road should have an acceleration lane, deceleration lane,. and a passing lane. 12. An OpeIl:SpaCe breakdown chart containing the information required by SC Chapter.?, Exhibit "A", must be included on the plat. Please wait to submit a revised, primary plat until after the Technical Advisory Committee (T AC) has met on this application. The resltbmittedplat should include edits addressing the above comments along with any requirements that arise from the TAC meeting. Additional comments may be made after the requested revisions have been submitted. Sincerely, all ~~' .., . /1. .' /j .~, , Matthew Griffin, AICP Planning Administrator Saddlebrook at Shelborne - PP 1 Page 2 ONE CI\TIC SQUARE CARlvffiL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 e e ,.,:;:(.::;:~:jir::::~i:;::;;::::i;)):: ::.l:;::::,:;::::.: .:::.)::;:.::~::: .~::/:t.:::::::" ;":=:';::{ .- Carmell~l~~~~ipartment 3 ::/i/.:::.r::;::.:,'.,::;.:,::~:::::.::::::::,:::: L:' Carm~ii::;I~~;]~e6032 .. ... . . September 2, 2004 Cripe 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 RE: Saddlebrook at Shelborne PIC Job #: 010463-20100 To Whom It May Concern: I have received and reviewed the information for the above-mentioned project. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, ~j),-t .~ Michael D. Foga1 Chief of Police MDF:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services ~fffi FAX (317) 571-2512 (317) 571-2500 ... .......-............. .... . '.................... ... . . ........................ . A Nationally Accredit~lB:rcement Agency r' . 7172 Graham Road Indianapolis, IN 46250 317 -842-6777 FAX: 317-841-4798 www.cripe.biz TRANSMITTAL I Date: 8/31/04 I PIC Job #: 010463-20100 To: Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Re: Saddlebrook at Shelborne Primary Plat Docket No. 04080059 PP (317) 571-2417 We are sending you the following items via: Hand Delivery Shop Drawings Prints X Plans Samples Specifications Copy of Letter Change Order Attached Report Other Copies Date Description 1 8/13/04 Primary Plat Drawings THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For Approval Submit Approved as Submitted Copies for Approval X For Your Use Return Approved as Noted Copies for Distribution As Requested Not Approved Reviewed for Compliance Signature Requested Resubmit Corrected Pri nts For Review and Comment Remarks: For Review. Please find included the Primary Plat for Saddlebrook at Shelborne. This item will be on the Carmel T AC Agenda for Septembern22, 2004. I c: TAC Members and Rick Radabaugh, PIC Signed: Sheila M. Wakelam, Permit Manager . I Transmittal Only: Notice: The drawing/computer files listed above are the property of Paul I. Cripe, Inc. and are transmitted for reproduction use only. Any modification or reuse of the documents without written permission from Paull. Cripe, Inc. is prohibited. Any person or entity using these documents for any purpose other than the project for which they were originally intended, with or without permission from Paul I. Cripe, Inc., by their use agrees to indemnifY and hold harmless Paul I. Cripe, Inc. from any loss, including, but not limited to attorney's fees occurring from their use. 0:\2001 \01 0463\201 OO\DOCS\PERMITS\T AC- TRANS01.DOC IS 001 ..,\'\~ ~~w.~l\ \\\~