HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence: Engr'g PHASE 1 REV#2NMI s a A �.
IlM a Ie M
��'tirl►'rTT ,,
March I, 2013
JAbIPS MAINAIZD, KNYOR
Mr. Andy Taylor
Structurepoint, Inc.
7260 Shadeland Station
Indianapolis, IN 46256
RE: The Bridges Phase [-Project Review #2
Dear Mr. Taylor:
The City received your development plans on January H, 2013. We offer the following comments:
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING REVIEW COMMENTS
1. Previous Comment 14 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. On C200, the note for the
entrance on 116' €' Street refers to Landscape Plans. Details for this entrance were not
included on the Landscape Plans. Please submit details for this entrance with the
construction plan set. The plans for the bridge were still not found in the submitted
construction plan set.
2. Previous Comment 18 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. Please label the curb return radii
for the Springmill entrance. The City's standard requires commercial entrances to have
a 30 -foot curb return radii.
3. Previous Comment 19 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. Please indicate the milling and
resurfacing of the entire width of Springmill across the limits of the auxiliary lanes on
Springmill. The LDS Temple is not resurfacing Springmill Road. This project will be
responsible for milling and resurfacing the entire width of Springmill to the limits of the
City's 116'h Street /Springmill roundabout project. Any milling and resurfacing will
count toward this development's Thoroughfare commitments.
4. Previous Comment 20 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. On C202:
b. Acceleration /Deceleration Dimension Plan: Please indicate the subsurface drain,
including the connection to the storm sewer system. The subsurface drain needs to be
extended to outlet back into the site.
c. Please indicate the lane markings on Springmill Road, including the double yellow
centerline, solid white lane line, and edge markings. Please include the edge markings.
5. Previous Comment 23 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. Sheet C300:
c. Are the pipes shown under Springmill and 1 16 "' Streets existing or proposed? Are these
being accommodated into the site? These pipes need to be accommodated.
6. Previous Comment 34 of a letter dated November 30, 2012. Please include the City Standard
Drawing for Commercial Driveways. Standard Detail 10 -18 has not been included.
7. The southern entrance on Illinois needs to align with the opposing entrance off Illinois so that
the left turns do not conflict.
If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2441.
Sincerely,
JyR Jr., P.E.
ity Engineer
DerARTMI -NI OF F.tir >IxFFR1 ,6
ONE CRIC Sol-ARE, C RN11 -_L, IN 46032 OIt-Ict; 317.771.24 =41 F. x 317.571.2439
ENTAII, cn} nerrmt ��c.um�'Lu .tnc
Mr. Andy Taylor
March 1, 2013
RE: The Bridges Commercial Amenity Use Block — Phase 1, Review 42
Page 2 of 2
Department of Engineering
cc: Angelina Conn, Department of Community Services
Rachel Boone, Department of Community Services
John Duffy, Carmel Utilities
Paul Pace, Carmel Utilities
Paul Arnone, Carmel Utilities
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Greg llko, Crossroad Engineers, PC
issvrappsluser datalz:lshared0evelopmeut ReviewslPROJREV 121The Bridges Commercial Amenity Use Block — Phase 1. Review
#2