Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence' Z Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Wednesday, August 29, 2012 8:57 AM Conn, Angelina V; Hollibaugh, Mike P Fwd: Centre - Anchor 2012- 8- 27_EarthFare -EW [5].pdf; ATT00001.htm; 2012- 8- 27_EarthFare- NS[4].pdf; ATT00002.htm See below. What do you think? I think it's better and probably as good as we are going to get. Lex Begin forwarded message: From: "Ashley Bedell" <abedell @kiterealty.com> To: "llonahue -Wold, Alexia K" <awold @carmel.in.gov> Subject: Re: Centre - Anchor Alexia: Our architect finally returned from a two week vacation and got me responses and the attached plans to share — sorry for the delay! 1. Along the South elevation, since you are bricking in a previously glass area, we were wondering if you could have more clear glass on the remaining spandrel area. The area that we are showing as bricked in would not have been visible unless you were walking down the "ally" between the two buildings. If you zoom in on the attached south elevation you will see the outline of the shop building to the south of the anchor. We do not have the ability to adjust the spandrel/clear split on what is remaining due to equipment placement behind the glass. 2. For the areas that do have spandrel, is there a type of spandrel you could put in that isn't totally dark? Perhaps a frosted glass or some other variation that blocks direct sight, but does not create a dark/lights off look? We are proposing to use a white frosted spandrel glass. This will not have the stereotypical dark look of spandrel. This is consistent with the material we have shown on Walgreens. 3. On the North and South elevation, on the very top cornice, it appears that the brick under the cornice does not continue all the way west along that screen wall. We would like to see the brick continue the entire length under that cornice. We do not have the physical structure there to support the weight of masonry. The attached elevations keep this area as EIFS, but have it in a color to match the brick. From the parking lot, this is at a far enough distance that it will read as the brick continuing. 4. On the East elevation there are what, appear to be columns that separate each window bay area. We would like to see those as a more distinct architectural feature of the building. Please "punch" them out of the building so they have some depth (if not already done so) and add their own cornice /cap on top. It is kind of hard to tell from the elevations, but it appears that they are flush with the rest of the brick facade. If this is not the case, please let me know. We can bump the columns out a small amount, but we are constrained by sidewalk width. The attached show the brick corning forward 1" for the decorative pilasters at the east. This will put the brick flush with the stone base underneath. 5. Finally we are still not completely satisfied with the "brick detailing" within the top portion of each bay along the East elevation. From the elevations it appears as though the brick is to be a different color than the rest of the building? Instead of merely a change in color we would request a different pattern to help break up the large expanses of brick. Please refer to the images we passed out to you at the committee meeting when this got approved subject to our final approval of the brick. If you would like more images for examples of what we are looking for, please let me know. The brick is a different color and it is installed at a stacked -bond coursing to differentiate it from the balance of the building. It doesn't show up the best in the elevations. Please let me know if this doesn't answer your questions. I'm happy to come by your office with CSO to 1 review in person if that would be helpful. Thanks! Ashley Bedell 1 Project Manager 317 713 5666 [direct] 317 577 5600 [main] 317 577 5605 [fax] Kite Realty Group 30 South Meridian Street, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 www.kiterealty.com From: "Donahue -Wold, Alexia K" < awold@ carmel. in. gov<mailto:awold @carmel.in.gov» Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:39:37 -0400 To: Ashley Bedell < abedeli @kiterealty.com<mailto:abedell @kiterealty.com» Cc: "Conn, Angelina V" < Aconn @carmel.in.gov <mnilto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov» Subject: RE: Centre - Anchor Hi Ashley, I don't believe I have responded to you yet regarding the proposed minor changes to the Centre Anchor store elevations. Sorry for my delay. I spoke with Mike and Angie about the new proposed spandrel areas and overall I think we are ok with the changes. We do have a few comments however. 1. Along the South elevation, since you are bricking in a previously glass area, we were wondering if you could have more clear glass on the remaining spandrel area. 2. For the areas that do have spandrel, is there a type of spandrel you could put in that isn't totally dark? Perhaps a frosted glass or some other variation that blocks direct sight, but does not create a dark/lights off look? 3. On the North and South elevation, on the very top cornice, it appears that the brick under the cornice does not continue all the way west along that screen wall. We would like to see the brick continue the entire length under that cornice. 4. On the East elevation there are what appear to be columns that separate each window bay area. We would like to see those as a more distinct architectural feature of the building. Please "punch" them out of the building so they have some depth (if not already done so) and add their own cornice /cap on top. It is kind of hard to tell from the elevations, but it appears that they are flush with the rest of the brick facade. If this is not the case, please let me know. 5. Finally we are still not completely satisfied with the "brick detailing" within the top portion of each bay along the East elevation. From the elevations it appears as though the brick is to be a different color than the rest of the building? Instead of merely a change in color we would request a different pattern to help break up the large expanses of brick. Please refer to the images we passed out to you at the committee meeting when this got approved subject to our final approval of the brick. If you would like more images for examples of what we are looking for, please let me know. 2 (o -2 -- i2_ Conn, An•elina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hi Angie, Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Monday, June 25, 2012 11:32 AM Conn, Angelina V FW: Centre - Anchor Grocery store Front -Back Elevations.pdf; Side Elevations.pdf; EF Glass[1].pdf What do you think about the revised elevations. They basically want to remove some of the clear glass because of the store layout. They are proposing some brick to replace it and some spandrel glass. I am going to ask for more detail on the drawings for specifically where the spandrel glass will be vs. the clear glass, but I wanted to get your thoughts first. Alexia Original Message From: Ashley Bedell [ mailto :abedellaakiterealty.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:58 PM To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: Centre - Anchor Alexia: Thank you for taking time to talk about modifications to the anchor store. To recap, the attached shows: * The far north and south bays of the store changed to brick instead of glass. * The second bay from the south as spandrel glass, or could be glass with graphics on it. * The panel behind the sign as glass. * The north elevation as solid brick. * The south elevation with one bay of brick (this isn't seen because of the shop building next to it) and one bay spandrel or glass with graphics on it. They have also shifted the entry south. The attachment (EF Glass) shows the square footages of glazing on the plan we previously presented (noting which bays would need to switch to spandrel) and then the new glass square footages. This actually increases the amount of glass. We feel that the revised elevation with more brick and less spandrel is more appealing. Please let me know what your thoughts are. We can further develop this concept to show you details, but wanted to get your general input first. Thanks. Have a good weekend. Ashley Ashley Bedell 1 Project Manager 317 713 5666 [direct] 317 577 5600 [main] 317 577 5605 [fax] Kite Realty Group 30 South Meridian Street, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 1 Approved Elevation Revised Elevation Glass (SF) Spandrel Total Glass (SF) Spandrel Total South Bay 1 47.32 171.39 218.71 Brick 0 Bay 2 47.32 171.39 218.71 45.7 165.92 211.62 East Bay 1 21.46 72.63 94.09 Brick 0 Bay 2 37.03 125.24 162.27 35.76 120.97 156.73 Bay 3 162.27 0 162.27 156.73 0 156.73 Bay 4 162.27 0 162.27 0 Entrance 0 356.84 0 356.84 Entrance Sign 0 0 0 362.56 0 362.56 Bay 5 162.27 0 162.27 156.73 0 156.73 Bay 6 162.27 0 162.27 156.73 0 156.73 Bay 7 162.27 0 162.27 156.73 0 156.73 Bay 8 0 218.71 218.71 90.86 0 90.86 Bay 9 0 Brick North Bay 1 0 45.5 45.5 Brick 964.48 804.86 1769.34 1518.64 286.89 "Approved" Spandrel area is what would need to be spandrel in order to work with EF Layout "Revised" Spandrel is the area that still needs to be spandrel to work with EF layout 1805.53 Donahue -Wold, Alexia K From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:01 AM To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: FW: 116th and Rangeline Road Kite Redevelopment FYI Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 - 571 -2283 From: Mindham, Daren Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 8:39. AM To: 'Alyssa Prazeau' Cc: Kara Strickland; Rich Kelly Subject: RE: 116th and Rangeline Road Kite Redevelopment Alyssa, This looks great, my only other comment is that the labeled fencing should probably be along the property line since the neighbors property is a wooded area. I am sure if there are any complaints about this project it would be from the neighbors worrying about their tree /roots preservation. With that, will any trees be able to be saved in this area on your side of the property line, the plan shows not. Otherwise, I think the landscape plan looks great and you are way ahead of the curve. I will wait for the official submittal, thanks. Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 - 571 -2283 From: Alyssa Prazeau [mailto:aprazeauacontext- design.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 4:52 PM To: Mindham, Daren Cc: Kara Strickland; Rich Kelly Subject: RE: 116th and Rangeline Road Kite Redevelopment Darren - Thank you for the quick response and updated tree list. I have made your suggested substitutions. Please see the attached plans. These should be the same as what will be received as part of the official submittal. Thanks again, Alyssa Prazeau 1 • 12 S. Main St., Ste. 100 Fortville, Indiana 46040 tel 317.485.6900 fax 317.485.6912 www.context - design.com ONTEXT landscape architecture Alyssa P. Prazeau, ASLA Managing Partner Program Development ftkIliBatt Plan ing Desig Grading Design Development Planting &;Drainage Environmental writing Construction Construction Design Docume , tation Q'bserV ati n DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e -mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. E -mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard -copy version. Consider sending time- sensitive messages and messages containing action deadlines via phone or fax. From: Mindham, Daren [mailto:dmindhamc. carmel.in.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 3:52 PM To: Alyssa Prazeau Subject: 116th and Rangeline Road Kite Redevelopment Alyssa, The following email represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of landscaping. I have reviewed the drawings and offer the following comments: URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW COMMENTS 1) I advise against Maples as they are overplanted within the City and tend to have undesirable characteristics. Please choose a substitute tree off of our Recommended Tree List and I would like to emphasize natives species because of the area. (bald cypress ?) 2) I have attached our tree preservation detail to be used on Carmel projects. Please add this detail to the plans along with some kind of labeling on the plan for where the fence should be located on all 3 sides. 3) Please add a quantities column to the plant schedule. 4) The word `shrubs' is spelled wrong in the Ordinance Chart on L -1A. 5) Keeping along the lines of native trees in this area, just a thought of mine would be to substitute the honeylocust (which will grow wide eventually for this site) for a native hackberry. I will leave that up to you. Please illustrate how these comments will be addressed by letter or revised plan. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks. Sincerely, Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Office: 317 - 571 -2283 2 From: Alyssa Prazeau [ mailto :aorazeau0context- design.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:15 PM To: Mindham, Daren Subject: 116th and Rangeline Road Kite Redevelopment Darren - I am not sure if you are aware of this project or not. This is on the NW corner of 116th and Rangeline Road. It is within the Rangeline /Carmel overlay district (ZO 23F). At this phase of development, Kite is only removing the existing CVS building and replacing the building to meet the new client's specifications. Kite has asked the City (and Planning has agreed) that the entire site does not need to be brought up to current ordinance standards. The area that is being most affected from a landscape perspective is the rear buffer yard. This site is against residential zoning. The attached plan shows the addition of a compliant buffer yard along the distance of the new anchor store. A variance to reduce the buffer yard width from 25' to 15' is being filed. Please let me know your thoughts. If it makes sense to meet in person to discuss in more detail, please let me know you availability. Thanks, Alyssa Prazeau 12 S. Main St., Ste. 100 Fortville, Indiana 46040 tel 317.485.6900 fax 317.485.6912 www.context-design.com OTET landscape architecture Alyssa P. Prazeau, ASLA Managing Partner Program. Development Analysis Development Drainage Planning Design Design Grading Environmental Writing €011StIlletiOrt Documentat'on Design Graphics Construction Observation DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e -mail reply and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. E -mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard -copy version. Consider sending time - sensitive messages and messages containing action deadlines via phone or fax. This message was scanned by IT Professionals and is believed to be clean. Outsource. Expand. Simplify. Save. 1 http: / /www.indianatech.us 3 Conn, Anjelina V Ink From: Paul G. Reis [preis@kdlegal.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:31 PM To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Revised Elevations Alexia I will pass these on. Our architect will be at the meeting to further discuss. Best regards, Paul From: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K [mailto:awoldOcarmel.in.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:25 PM To: Paul G. Reis Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Revised Elevations Hi Paul, Another thought. 1 appreciate the addition of the brick instead of the EIFS, but the more I look at it the more I wonder if there is a possibility to add some additional detail to those end bays where the EIFS was replaced. 1 was just thinking of some additional brick detailing to sort of break up the large expanse of brick that is now shown. Also, could the cornice line be adjusted a bit on those end bays (taller perhaps) to help offset the "heaviness" of the brick below? Those are just some additional thoughts that I had and wanted to pass along to you before the meeting tonight. Thanks, Alexia From: Paul G. Reis [mailto:preisOkdleaal.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:27 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: Revised Elevations Mike and Alexia Sorry for the lateness of this. Here are the revised elevations. The only areas with EIFS are the sign area for the store and accent. Please let me know if these will have your support. Many thanks. Best regards, Paul Paul G. Reis Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 1 12800 N Meridian Street 1 Suite 300 1 Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 - 238 -6293 1 Cell: 317-431-0063 1 Fax: 317 - 636 -1507 preis@kdlegal.com 1 www.kriegdevault.com 1 V -Card 1 Bio KRIEG I DEVAULT Indiana 1 Illinois 1 Georgia 1 Florida 1 Minnesota CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This e -mail message is for the sole use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Paul G. Reis [preis @kdlegal.com] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:13 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: March 29 & April 10 Plan Commission Committee meetings - dept. reports Angie, Alexia and Mike: In response to the department report and in the interest of resolving staff issues in advance of the Special Studies Committee meeting next Thursday, I would like to submit the following responses from our architects and additional information. 1. The 32 -ft tall entry element: Can you make this all brick? Or, perhaps shift the EIFS sign area up so it is centered within the brick area? We are hesitant to make the entry element all brick. Apart from making the whole piece look rather heavy over the entry, the intent of the EIFS was for a signage backdrop. One of the reasons it is pushed down against the canopy is to make it read as a continuation of the opening from below...centering it in the brick field would lose this. We could envision keeping the geometry very similar, but perhaps changing the EIFS material above the canopy in that center portion to either a metal panel w/ reveals or a spandrel /frosted glass style storefront above the canopy as the signage backdrop. 2. Please raise the parapet walls to be taller in order to screen the HVAC, so that there is not a separate blank screening wall. Rather than raise the whole parapet everywhere, which would result in a very tall building and lots of additional material, we are thinking about extending the North and South sidewalls of the entry features a full structural bay further back into the building, and then position the rooftop units close up behind them. This way the units are screened from the front by the entry feature, from the side by deeper sidewall returns, and may be far enough from the back of the building to be blocked from the line -of -sight by the existing rear parapet height. Because Angie will be out of the office next week, Alexia please contact me on Monday to discuss and if necessary we can arrange a meeting with the architects. Have a great weekend. Best regards, Paul Paul G. Reis Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 1 12800 N Meridian Street 1 Suite 300 1 Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 - 238 -6293 1 Cell: 317- 431 -0063 1 Fax: 317 - 636 -1507 preis@kdlegaf:com 1 www.kriegdevault.com I V -Gard I Bio KrzrECjDEVAuLT Indiana 1 Illinois 1 Georgia 1 Florida 1 Minnesota CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This e -mail message is for the sole use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply e -mail and destroy all copies of the original message. IRS Circular 230 Notice: Advice rendered in this communication, including attachments, on U.S. tax issues (1) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS on taxpayers, and (ii) may not be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement. This notice is intended to comply with Section 10.35 of IRS Circular 230, which is located at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/pcir230.odf. 1 Donahue -Wold, Alexia K From: Paul G. Reis [preis @kdlegal.comj Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 2:31 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; 'Ashley Bedell'; David George; Mark S. Jenkins; 'Rich Kelly'; 'Kara Strickland' Subject: RE: Review Comments for The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) Attachments: Revised Site Plan for Anchor Store footprint.pdf; Revised Site Plan 3- 16- 12.pdf Angie In preparation for our phone conference, I wanted to send some additional information in response to your comments. Attached is an updated site plan showing the footprint of the anchor store. This is included as the second page under TAB 3 of the info packet. We can discuss my previous response concerning the overall site plan for Phase II of the project. The entry element design issue is being reviewed as is the potential increase in the height of the parapet wall. Bicycle Parking and vehicle parking are included in the Phase II plans which will be covered in our full PC consideration of the Development Plan Amendment. Attached is a copy of that site plan that is included in the TAC filing. Pedestrian walkways are shown on the Phase 11 Plan. Best regards, Paul Paul G. Reis Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 1 12800 N Meridian Street 1 Suite 300 1 Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 - 238 -6293 1 Cell: 317 - 431 -0063 1 Fax: 317 - 636 -1507 preis('kdlegal.com 1 www.kriegdevault.com I V -Card 1 Bio Ki21EGI DEV,nULT Indiana 1 Illinois 1 Georgia 1 F orida 1 Minnesota CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This e-mail message is for the sole use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. IRS Circular 230 Notice: Advice rendered in this communication, including attachments, on U.S. tax issues (1) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS on taxpayers, and (ii) may not be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement. This notice is intended to comply with Section 10.35 of IRS Circular 230, which is located at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/pcir230.pdf. From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn ©carmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:00 PM To: Paul G. Reis Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP Subject: Review Comments for The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) Good afternoon, Paul — below are the Planning Department's preliminary review comments. Please address them as soon as possible. Thank you. 1 1. Please submit a site plan, showing the overall proposed changes to the sites, such as the new bank building and the new Panera building. 2. Is the submitted building footprint just a generic shape, or are there no building projections and recessions with the facade walls? 3. The 32 -ft tall entry element: can you make this all brick? Or, perhaps shift the EIFS sign area up so it is centered within the brick area? 4. Please add a bicycle parking near the front entrance, to comply with Zoning Ordinance Chapter 27.06. Also, provide the bicycle rack design details. 5. Will signage be part of this petition? If so, please submit the signage design and location details. 6. Please label the number of parking spaces, required and proposed, on the application and on the site plan. 7. Please submit the design details of the wall mounted light fixtures, such as the sconces and any wall packs on the rear of the building. 8. Please include a sidewalk or some type of safe & direct pedestrian path /walkway from the exterior sidewalk (that runs along Range Line Rd.) to the front entrance of the anchor store. -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:11 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mindham, Daren; Hancock, Ramona B; Littlejohn, David W; 'jmolitor @prodigy.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Tingley, Connie S; Duncan, Gary R; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Blanchard, Jim E; Stewart, Lisa M; Martin, Candy; Druley, Elizabeth A; Haney, Douglas C; Mishler, Nicholas F; Maki, Sue; 'GARY DOXTATERT; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda J Cc: 'Paul G. Reis'; 'Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP' Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (ADLS Amend) The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store (#12030008 ADLS Amend) I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (ADLS Amend) The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store. It is the following: Docket No. 12030008 ADLS Amend: The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store. The applicant seeks approval to renovate the tenant space for a new anchor store /grocery store. The site is located at 1342 -1430 S. Range Line Road. It is zoned B -3 /Business, within the Carmel Dr. Rangeline Rd. Overlay Zone. Filed by Paul Reis of Krieg Devault, for Kite Realty Co. Paul can be contacted at 317-238-6293. ADLS Amend Application Fee: $306.00 Total Fee: $306.00 Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This item does not need to be on an agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee. 2. Mailed and Published Public Notice does not need to occur. 3. Proof of Notice is not needed. 4. The Filing Fee and Eight (8) Information packets must be delivered to Plan Commission Secretary, Ramona Hancock, no later than 12:00 PM, Friday, March 16. If filing fee and materials are not delivered by this time, this application will be continued to the May 1 meeting. 5. This item will appear on the THURSDAY, March 29 agenda of a Plan Commission Special Studies Committee at 6:00 pm in the Caucus Room, Second Floor, City Hall. Please have a representative attend to present your request. 6. Review Comments will be issued soon. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 0: 317 -571 -2417 1 F: 317 -571 -2426 1 E: aconnacarmel.in.gov W: www.carmeldocs.com 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Paul G. Reis [preis @kdlegal.comj Friday, March 16, 2012 4:25 PM Conn, Angelina V Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; 'Ashley Bedell'; David George; Mark S. Jenkins; 'Rich Kelly'; 'Kara Strickland' RE: Review Comments for The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) Security Lighting Cut Sheets.pdf; Location of Back Wall Lighting on Anchor Store.pdf Angie Thanks. I will pass these on. I do have some preliminary comments. As far as the site plan for the rest of the center, I would prefer to limit the discussion to the anchor store and not get into a discussion about Phase II. I will follow up on the footprint. We are proceeding with the accepted approach that this is a reconstruction of the anchor and not a new standalone building subject to the architectural requirements of the overlay zone. We are separating the signage portion from this petition and will return once the sign details are finalized. I would prefer to deal with the parking in connection with the discussion of Phase !land the planned zoning waiver. Lighting specification cut sheets are included in the information booklet. I believe that the fixtures on the back of the building are included. I am attaching the two sheets and the location of same on the plans submitted. What additional information would you like to see? Many thanks for all of your help. Best regards, Paul Paul G. Reis Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 1 12800 N Meridian Street 1 Suite 300 I Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 - 238 -6293 I Cell: 317 - 431 -0063 I Fax: 317 - 636 -1507 preis a@ kdlegal.com 1 www.kriegdevault.com 1 V -Card 1 Bio KRIEG DEV.nULT Indiana 1 Illinois I Georgia I Florida I Minnesota CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This e-mail message is for the sole use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. IRS Circular 230 Notice: Advice rendered in this communication, including attachments, on U.S. tax issues (i) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS on taxpayers, and (ii) may not be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement. This notice is intended to comply with Section 10.35 of IRS Circular 230, which is located at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/pcir230.pdf. From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:00 PM To: Paul G. Reis Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP Subject: Review Comments for The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) Good afternoon, Paul — 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:00 PM To: 'Paul G. Reis' Cc: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; 'Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP' Subject: Review Comments for The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) Good afternoon, Paul — below are the Planning Department's preliminary review comments. Please address them as soon as possible. Thank you. / 1. Please submit a site plan, showing the overall proposed changes to the sites, such as the new bank building and �l the new Panera building. 2� Is the submitted building footprint just a generic shape, or are there no building projections and recessions with '1 the facade walls? 3. The 32 -ft tall entry element: can you make this all brick? Or, perhaps shift the EIFS sign area up so it is centered within the brick area? 4. Please add a bicycle parking near the front entrance, to comply with Zoning Ordinance Chapter 27.06. Also, provide the bicycle rack design details. 5. Will signage be part of this petition? If so, please submit the signage design and location details. 6. Please label the number of parking spaces, required and proposed, on the application and on the site plan. 7. Please submit the design details of the wall mounted light fixtures, such as the sconces and any wall packs on the rear of the building. 8. Please include a sidewalk or some type of safe & direct pedestrian path /walkway from the exterior sidewalk (that runs along Range Line Rd.) to the front entrance of the anchor store. -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:11 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mindham, Daren; Hancock, Ramona B; Littlejohn, David W; 'jmolitor @prodigy.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Tingley, Connie S; Duncan, Gary R; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Blanchard, Jim E; Stewart, Lisa M; Martin, Candy; Druley, Elizabeth A; Haney, Douglas C; Mishler, Nicholas F; Maki, Sue; 'GARY DOXTATER'; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda 3 Cc: 'Paul G. Reis'; 'Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP' Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (ADLS Amend) The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store ( #12030008 ADLS Amend) I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (ADLS Amend) The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store. It is the following: Docket No. 12030008 ADLS Amend: The Centre - Anchor Store /Grocery Store. The applicant seeks approval to renovate the tenant space for a new anchor store /grocery store. The site is located at 1342 -1430 S. Range Line Road. It is zoned B -3 /Business, within the Carmel Dr. Rangeline Rd. Overlay Zone. Filed by Paul Reis of Krieg Devault, for Kite Realty Co. Paul can be contacted at 317-238-6293. ADLS Amend Application Fee: $306.00 Total Fee: $306.00 Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This item does not need to be on an agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee. Donahue -Wold, Alexia K i7cx.Yeely 1g o3cxo t A Tx5 From: Rick Radabaugh [radabaugh @kiterealty.comj Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 10:00 AM To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Conn, Angelina V Cc: Joy Skidmore; Jeremy Dixon, LEED Green Associate; Jeff Mroz (jmroz @Meyer - Najem.com) Subject: RE: Approved Elevations for Earth Fare at The Centre Alexia and Angie, Thank you for working with us to come up with a glass solution that works for everyone. Yes, the 3M Fasara Milano is the correct film that we agreed to. I am copying Joy Skidmore on our construction side and Meyer Najem as well so that are aware of the final selection and can proceed with ordering the proper materials. The glass will be vision glass to match the rest of the building and the film will be added to the interior of the glass at the locations indicated on the building elevations as "frosted white spandrel." Thanks again for all the help. -Rick From: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K [mailto:awoldcarmel.in.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:17 PM To: Rick Radabaugh; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Approved Elevations for Earth Fare at The Centre Rick, Thanks for meeting with us today. Per our conversation, we approved the 3M Fasara Milano glass finish for the windows labeled white frosted spandrel glass on the approved Earth Fare elevations. If you wouldn't mind confirming this, then I will add this to the file as well. Thanks again for finding a solution for those windows. Sincerely, Alexia Donahue Wold Planning Administrator City of Carmel, DOCS One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 awold@carmel.in.gov Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Alexia From: Rick Radabaugh [mailto :radabaugh@ kiterealtv.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:43 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: Approved Elevations for Earth Fare at The Centre Thank you ladies, I appreciate your help with this to make sure everyone is caught up with their paperwork. I feel a lot better now having that stamped. -Rick 1 From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:AconnOcarmel.in.gov] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:58 PM To: Rick Radabaugh; Motz, Lisa Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Tingley, Connie S; Mishler, Nicholas F; Blanchard, Jim E Subject: Approved Elevations for Earth Fare at The Centre Good afternoon, Rick — Attached are the stamped, approved final building elevations. We have placed a copy of this in the plan commission file, and Lisa will also add a pdf of this to laser fiche , within docket no. 12030008 ADLS Amend The Centre, Anchor Store, Grocery Store. (Lisa, please add the .pdf to laser fiche.) Thanks, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 Office: 317 - 571 -2417 I Direct: 317 - 571 -2281 I Fax: 317 - 571 -2426 W: www.carmeldocs.com Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 2 I E -mail: aconn @carmel.in.gov