Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence Conn, Angelina V From: Justin Moffett[Justin@otdg.net] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:07 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW That sounds like a good compromise to mem On Thu,Feb 21, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> wrote: JUSTIN - THANKS FOR WORKING WITH US. AND,THANKS FOR PAYING THE FILING FEE. LOOKS LIKE THERE IS JUST 1 ITEM LEFT, AND I AM SURE WE CAN COME TO SOME SORT OF AGREEMENT ON IT: 10. Is the glass in the front window dormer clear vision glass? That dormer is simply an architectural feature and the windows will be blacked out. The Dept. would like to see more detail on these blacked out windows. Is there a different treatment you can do, like curtains or shades? Can't say we've ever had this issue come up. We'll be flexible on coming up with a window treatment we can all agree on, but 99.9%of the time we just black out of the glass with a film that covers the glass. We frequently have dormer windows on our houses with the scenario and haven't addressed it any differently. Can we live with the black film? L.....NSTEAD OF AN OPAQUE BLACK FILM, CAN IT BE MORE OF A TRANSLUCENT TINTED GLASS LOOK, BY APPLYING A DARK RAY TRANSLUCENT FILM THAT LETS SOME LIGHT THROUGH? Angie From: Justin Moffett [mailto:JustinCla otdg.net] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:18 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Here is our final revision from our conversation this morning. Let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks, .Tustin On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> wrote: Good evening, Justin—thanks for the responses. Below are the Department's responses, in black italic text: 1 Im a p '>o,al�nn�ekisepfxJo SWUM! °' 4 dno�zo uSisaQ Z�o9;y I i lama?) — ...... en.i d o1 emopro sto..Ia.'1,,as, {°�9w,oP9n a rom on rdr kiwi po p.,„err,vevaun.d of'wd,o 'bro.p+tc..a4.a ap. A A Z pip � anuany lsJ! I ZY .aM U, ld s,...,..„,..:o e.,aacwurn.,fiw ,,,,, yn a a�i �1 r 1� o7n•d,a9 Awl�,e1 PIO aw ae 6F,edP,d.1 uxd 4y{1, 140,0"3"0.1.....t, ayu 71Sa`T eta 1D !0 a(lUUllt�2 al D-n'anoaoNO,saaoyaTO.v.1cosOO wi�w�.m 2gj, "r• a 1 11d 1 [1 I..m 'OH.o-,0.'S1+01 Staf0Ia1N0,IS-MIN/3N 5$ 4,_ 1/ .0/54;FZ a Wq N LL Q � � - . .1.1.1 ` ' IIIIIII k i ry . • . 2 i 1'1:1:1• I 3 2:,:1.1 1:1:1:1:IIiil o :1.1.1:1 i R IIIIIIII .1:1:1 1 I :1:1:1:1 �. lilil 1 : 1 . 1 : li 111 :1.1.1.10111111 x I 1 , It III. 1 III ,,1:1:,: Q w I III I:I:I .IIIIIIIIIIIIII I!IIU 7 - I i IIII f hiIIIIIIIII0<'. i 1 I'I III!1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIII114_ W 11 1 �III , 1:I'.I S I I ! ill 1.,-,: 111111(IIIIII Itl; ., SkIllllfflIIlII, .b C.i• m I : I;I ,:1: nnn nmmi ua s a-- 111. I I I . ! 11 il. z I= A. . IIII ,• 1 I ..........!14! 3'!$I!I IIIlilllllllll II IrMq! II 1 ,.,.I.,: 1 . 1 I - ^��� !EMI I, �. ■ PI : I.I. miliilllllll;;Idl 1 1 : I - — III I l • y'—cam.�a ii • _I'!. I�n\I:_L nmm ' : : : 11111 11111111;;; P g : I I ' 1:1 1=1 1 Amon* ' �...� ,.111--- g1- 4 Z I : 1 ' 1 . :� moo : ! I • � CIIIIIIII ii 1 I P MMill mnnn n imiil rr A: 8 9 IIIIII 26 I I �II�Illlul11 g N g A� MI.01-4 1{ 1 1 r/.112 1.*1-_11 • III z (llllullH a I o ,:1 1 .,e — l',;,1 I , ,:1. w I I I aa,�, I 1:,:1 a I— 4— °'� I 1 Illilllllm 1 11:1 ' 111111111011111 4 H 1:1 a,n I °�° I / I , I 1:1: n C na Q � :1: pvt- .,a 1 /3/12 I 1:1:1:1 p�,_ L nm 1:1:1:1 p --= I.''11 lunmmmElj 1111 M-7: 1 1 1 II:I:I: 111 'i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. Iaft V Conn, Angelina V From: Justin Moffett[Justin @otdg.net] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:18 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Attachments: Marley 2-21-13 ELEV.pdf Here is our final revision from our conversation this morning. Let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks, Justin On Wed, Feb 20, 2013. at 5:31 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> wrote: Good evening, Justin—thanks for the responses. Below are the Department's responses, in black italic text: 3. Please try to save the existing tree in the front yard. If it cannot be saved, please mitigate that loss by planting a shade tree in the front yard.—No longer there. Fell down in a storm. Okay, Thank you.And, do they plan on planting a shade tree in the front yard, eventually?Yes 4. The front yard building setback should be closer to 29 feet from the road right of way, instead of 20-ft,and that is based off the dominant and/or average setbacks of the existing buildings on the same side of the block. Please change. - Changed on plan. Sent Site Plan this morning. 5. The driveway width cannot be wider than 24-ft. Please change. This would mean you can't build three car garages or that you have to break the driveway into two sections.This has not been enforced in the past.Thoughts? /really have no suggestions to get around this requirement... perhaps you can come up with something creative, and run it by us?Ok as side load per Director. 8. The 12/8 roof pitch does not quite meet the minimum pitch required per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.i. Not sure what •u mean by"not quite".The ordinance calls for a minimum of 8/12 and our roof is 8/12. We are referring to the Right Elevation and the Rear Elevation, where it shows 12 over 8, or 12/8. Corrected plans. 9. Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer, etc. See ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). Actually ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). Read, "Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer, or poured-in-place concrete." Our foundation is poured in place concrete per ordinance.The client does not like a lot of brick so we just kept brick to the porches. We've upgraded to a moisture resistant synthetic trim board around the base so we can run the base trim to the ground level and cover the foundation without wicking up moisture. This is good;please label that poured concrete foundation on the elevations, as well as labeling the moisture resistant synthetic trim board around the base. Labeled on plans. 0 Is the glass in the front window dormer clear vision glass? That dormer is simply an architectural feature and the windows will be blacked out. The Dept. would like to see more detail on these blacked out windows. Is there a different treatment you can do, like curtains or shades? Can't say we've ever had this issue come up. We'll be flexible on coming up with a window treatment we can all agree on, but 99.9%of the time we lust blac out of the alasith a film that covers the glass. We frequently have dormer windows on our houses with the enario and haven't addressed it any differently. Can we live with the black film? e'� isu ' Angie Conn, Planning Administrator 1 421 1st Ave. N.W. Z 20 c 20._0. r N I- I-0 O-I 0 -•n � co c C)00 r+ D o a"• -< 0 m m r M `° _o 66'-O• N w Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:32 PM To: 'Justin Moffett' Subject: RE: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Good evening, Justin—thanks for the responses. Below are the Department's responses, in black italic text: 1. Please submit a color palate for the building exterior.—Cover Letter Attached. Thank you. 2. Please submit a conceptual landscape plan.—Cover Letter Attached. Thank you. 3. Please try to save the existing tree in the front yard. If it cannot be saved, please mitigate that loss by planting a shade tree in the front yard.—No longer there. Fell down in a storm. Okay, Thank you.And, do they plan on planting a shade tree in the front yard, eventually? 4. The front yard building setback should be closer to 29 feet from the road right of way, instead of 20-ft, and that is based off the dominant and/or average setbacks of the existing buildings on the same side of the block. Please change. - Changed on plan. The revised site plan was not attached to your email. 5. The driveway width cannot be wider than 24-ft. Please change. This would mean you can't build three car garages or that you have to break the driveway into two sections.This has not been enforced in the past. Thoughts? I really have no suggestions to get around this requirement... perhaps you can come up with something creative, and run it by us? 6. Please provide any exterior lighting design details, such as a porch light or garage lights. Sample photo attached. Thank you. 7. Please label the siding and roof materials on the architectural building elevations. Labeled on plan. Thank you. 8. The 12/8 roof pitch does not quite meet the minimum pitch required per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.i. Not sure what you mean by"not quite".The ordinance calls for a minimum of 8/12 and our roof is 8/12. We are referring to the Right Elevation and the Rear Elevation, where it shows 12 over 8, or 12/8. 9. Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer, etc. See ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). Actually ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). Read, "Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer,or poured-in-place concrete." Our foundation is poured in place concrete per ordinance.The client does not like a lot of brick so we just kept brick to the porches.We've upgraded to a moisture resistant synthetic trim board around the base so we can run the base trim to the ground level and cover the foundation without wicking up moisture. This is good;please label that poured concrete foundation on the elevations, as well as labeling the moisture resistant synthetic trim board around the base. 10. Is the glass in the front window dormer clear vision glass? That dormer is simply an architectural feature and the windows will be blacked out. The Dept. would like to see more detail on these blacked out windows. Is there a different treatment you can do, like curtains or shades? 11. Please provide more detail about the field built lattice proposed for the rear porch. A photograph example would be okay. Sample picture attached. Thank you. 12. Is there anything you can do to 'dress up' that northwest corner of the house, especially on that Left Elevation? We could add a window in the front bathroom. In fairness,this side of the house is on an alley and the client has a good landscape budget in place.They will be adding in shrubs and trees which will soften up the view quite a bit. Thank you. That small window looks good, and the landscaping you mentioned will help it, too. 13. House height : please label the building height, that is measured from the ground level up to the peak. Will adjust. Thank you. '')Please provide the heights of the nearest two Contributing Buildings, per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.k(iii). Labeled on the plan. Is this two measurements that happen to be the same number/height?Please provide the heights of the nearest two Contributing Buildings. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning &Zoning Division Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Justin Moffett [mailto:Justin @otdg.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:48 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Subject: Re: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Angie, Thanks for the review comments. I have provided our responses below along with attachments. Justin 1. Please submit a color palate for the building exterior. —Cover Letter Attached 2. Please submit a conceptual landscape plan.—Cover Letter Attached 3. Please try to save the existing tree in the front yard. If it cannot be saved, please mitigate that loss by planting a shade tree in the front yard.—No longer there. Fell down in a storm. 40. The front yard building setback should be closer to 29 feet from the road right of way, instead of 20-ft, and that is based off the dominant and/or average setbacks of the existing buildings on the same side of the block. Please change. - Changed on plan. CO The driveway width cannot be wider than 24-ft. Please change. This would mean you can't build three car garages or that you have to break the driveway into two sections.This has not been enforced in the past.Thoughts? 6. Please provide any exterior lighting design details, such as a porch light or garage lights. Sample photo attached. 7. Please label the siding and roof materials on the architectural building elevations. Labeled on plan. The 12/8 roof pitch does not quite meet the minimum pitch required per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.i. ,t sure what you mean by"not quite".The ordinance calls for a minimum of 8/12 and our roof is 8/12. O t Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer, etc. See ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). ctually ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). Read. "Foundations must be split face block,stone veneer,or poured-in-place concrete."Our foundation is poured in place concrete per ordinance.The client does not like a lot of brick so we lust kept brick to the porches.We've upgraded to a moisture resistant synthetic trim board around the base so we can run the base trim to the ground level and cover the foundation without wicking up moisture. 10: Is the glass in the front window dormer clear vision glass? That dormer is simply an architectural feature and the windows will be blacked out. 11. Please provide more detail about the field built lattice proposed for the rear porch. A photograph example would be okay. Sample picture attached. 12. Is there anything you can do to 'dress up'that northwest corner of the house, especially on that Left Elevation? We could add a window in the front bathroom.In fairness,this side of the house is on an alley and the client has a good landscape budget in place.They will be adding in shrubs and trees which will soften up the view quite a bit. 13. House height : please label the building height, that is measured from the ground level up to the peak. Will adiust. 14. Please provide the heights of the nearest two Contributing Buildings, per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.k(iii). Labeled on the plan. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> wrote: 2 Tkren Prq ZE09� M � dnoJDutsa �� UM oil � anual )J!Pou o1 m Z P T O yuautanoldun aauaplSay c(ayvh ...noa oa ara aI I, / „b-,be !DI „O-,oZ 41 ,,Z/IO-,trl „Z/I !HS C Se (Z) , „9-,€ - /�.? (Ni F I-- m a 4 - m m in N " tZ/I G--,£i I lL N N ry W ( -\ 0 w O NI � O C 09 1 I- 0 q I __ „ ,. AO„8-,b /VM 890 ' <v �i ° N I 8 I / yy W I N „Z/I 5 ,�I (iI „O ■� °_/IO-,Z\ cw 89BZ No S I 89.\ Zap LU�J W I —v I Leo J „Z/I 0-.171 07 8905 = 0- --/,S — O I m \ r L „0-, A Q WcA I-,OZ I- P� el / g a� �_ m „0,1 0 W 0 o _ cv r VQ� im Email / HP 4 ill a i ry "519H9 m zit b-,ze L ,, 2 0' ,.1" i r N ,Z a, Z `r' o "J Q I Q Z BOO may.- LP m $ _ N 00 -- m - Fi 3 ® ,, m / �. d� r J a ,in V raxV0 8992 ~ m y „Zll 1_-.M 1 in I cc)— ---- \ ------ r " 7��F 'd ,"� � dnai� uSisa j z�o9� t r`lauu ,,,,,f,...AA 1,N-01�i Oltpllwn eroau11,671 III a Pmt. W9u°.0 T �/y✓.�)T 711' 9.6IS70 Flo.101..41,,,,P.41,1./3' s1.1-md `■ L LO MN anuany slid IZi mcwo.tnt.odpagap A A .I�H u•u>Id 5'41 41,uop�az4d7� 7.p7A.royuln ky .9�'Jn'�J�auo1 1 r 1 �' Asaa wol no.11 41,ty'7do a�d s14L 110.@ mm�e� aau Sa�r t(a v.r�r jo �/� tG an'anox7 ldDIS3a WW1 cno.v.nor Q m�a>wa +aaala+aaa aLLL Q I J' �""!d 1-191H.6,9L 51 340N 9MN®2ll40714H1vaa' R , ! r r- 1 .1.1.1.1 I I:I: : `fib O .� m � CO 1.1:1:1: _ ['°�17� O I:I:I I: ° i� �- Q' G :1:1:1:1 III .. �-i m 1:1:1:1: ' ' 1 Q •1:1:1:1 e m 1:1:1:1: IIIIIIIII 11:1:1.1 ca : 1:1:1:1: I : T��i�Il�4lilii�jilia III x I : • I �� hI �Q1,1,1, =�f„ H2 :III I . m 1I. 0j 1:I:I I_I111 . ,7 ? i1: ' • pJIIl!IllhlOhIlIIIiI I 1 1 1 1 1: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1,,- W 1, 1 1 1 I 1 . :- • i 1:1:1.1: - 1 1- 1 1 , �� 111 ,EE: I , • _. 1 01 1!I to ,: �:� ,1, 1:1:1: e 1:1:1 �� 1 IMfill ,I ' '� a 1 1 AMI I z 1 ® 1:1:1.411 O 0 1 �I r� l a „ -e■ III) INIUIUIIIIIIIf�I 1 . 1 1 . I . I A gilt zl ! I'IIII��I�'III ��II, (�II ' I ' IIIIIII0I0I o ° = p _� 11 111 1:1:1.1:1:1 , IIIIIIIHIIIIMI r ;�E .. :,.1 �1�f� ��� I . , = III 111 H ' 1 Ut : =�E u ��III����� 9 g 1 I I . I `=_` �� ��II 11111117'; 2 F1, 1 N ��� ��� 1:1:1: I : I : ILL 41 .1.11., god N. 1 : E . I . 19. IIIIIIIIIII 1 \ 1 1 If1MI1111111111M1111 g 1 ill I: 1"11 1 F i 9:E pp 11111 1E11) g ,9 - 111:I 11I�10�1d1 1:1:1 :7:11' all 01-9 A I A (aa■ AZI IIIVIIIIIII MIME I1, 1 . III 1 — i <----1,-,,,„1 1 I 1,, 110110011 I 1 1 9 1 ,:,:, ' ri I 1 —I _J — n,i I 1 11111! ,IIIIIIIIIII —— I I I:'I:!I:'1 �IIIIIIIIIIIIII e,1, I H 1:1:1:1: n°=- :1:1:1:1 up,-= 10/¢ I 1.1:1:1: Y= e,9 I + :I.I:I.1 0U 8 c,1, 1 1:1:1:1: n•=sW 1111'1'1 I1 o,¢L _V L>s nz J I :1:.:1 I 1.:::1 I:11:::1I.1:::1 II -p0I� �i,.4.1.1;1 —RIM iZ1:1:1: a I:I:1:1 c.UM F.AMI'1'l,JA4.4%A V M.A...�M9.W/A f 31tla SNLLWi 5.IN31YJ �i dno TO u�TQ Z£09b tYU+I`1 ti� •yens}peaqum,,,,,,,,,,,6„,,, ...,n o'A p fin ao u�d 6a•o een "04O°°p''�'� pszUOy1 a7 s7 amp.,wow In6si�llo oen 7m.!?'I®IF9yA0 Ina,,TI'dro�9,&tea vlo upel et 8,,ttf9Jd a•,.Ad n mom AV.�ro47.4 M I pip ! anuan�1511 I Zb N slap A 900 WI fo uonameudw,a esn pazparyuun Fuv apavm7li J 0.4 �-"-o '�TI'�a J u6l+eQ uaoi alo a7 3.fil+edod.t wld st41 AA� +a,aa��+. aauapisaH Kamm Jo!UV 4 j bounutt a q D'17'MOxJ N'J15Aa NA1o1 U70.¢L MK© m-'-°va�wa=a ata 1.2 2 5, 545, .4,1gE o 0 .f,b do trJl ' .zn II-,s ' r �i I1 km 2 ilk I , ow J 1 �wael i 1 C ' � ?-1 y O FF ' ,,,�!!N '91 O 1.I - m \ 33� .,6JL.b Q` _ 111111// 1 o . M F g w 1 - I = h _p1 I �- 4 I g a JiBU-L_ I .01 l,b I '''E mgr �_L .... F---------------- J 1 •°- G �__:B9K �- I Y �_ J— � I b4 E -3=�AZf„ i T 7L^ a 1 � ,a-,E1 < 10 0 Z4-I.. q I ,) .6,41, F , a. ry Q I g e A III o ,� �vq I P9 •b-s V (NJ 313b'JNOO 1 CA X C �` LIx,9ES9E I 4 4 1 I = ra lEOd i4 I__J I a i I= i yv�¢�oaa a Jr ,bn z-,LI / .d,Li 1 A.. SS Y , I m L. .0-4 p� I .1^4Z LL i ' W 5g I l cc -_ a 1 I aN I 1 F- II II I s m li I 1 , I it I w s ii � I v 11 in I 1 i1■ i - ia 1I I ml ' .64 ( .Q',LL ' .B-,4 ' .Y,bE - awn 4o,40Al'1'WA lwer..YT fl ? 000't Af r fon @FgAvs OIm(OM.teNTh IO i& Conn, Angelina V From: Justin Moffett[Justin @otdg.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:49 PM To: Duncan, Gary R Cc: Foley, Amanda J; Conn, Angelina V; Boone, Rachel M.; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R Subject: Re: Docket No. Assignment: (#13020006 SDR) Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Gary, Thanks for the explanation. Glad to provide you with a plot plan for review, but we always do that after we do SDR with the planning staff as the plot plan frequently changes after they've had a chance to review. I will gladly get your staff a copy of the plot plan once we get that far. Thanks you, Justin On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Duncan, Gary R <9duncan @carmel.in.gov> wrote: Justin, Your improvement to the lot will need to comply with the following codes.The property maintenance code is not tied to the amount of disturbance. The following code references are the ones that came to mind of the top of my head...there are likely more. If your plot plan provides adequate information for us to assess compliance to the following,then a plot plan is acceptable. Some plot plans provide adequate information, some do not. When a lot is to be improved on a parcel of ground that is not included in a larger development(such as a new subdivision), it is customary for our office to review certain things to insure a negative impact is not being created on the adjacent properties. 6-227 (a)(7) Grading, filling, excavating or any change in the grade of the premises is permitted outside of platted or dedicated easements or rights-of-way, but shall be acceptable in appearance, shall not cause, create or result in or represent the potential to cause, create or result in a detriment and shall not result in the diversion of stormwater. 6-227(c)(1) The City, and in some instances the homeowners association, depending on the restrictive covenants of subdivision, reserves the right to review, approve or deny any and all proposed improvements, or modifications to existing improvements on the premises, within the right-of-way or within platted or dedicated easements. 6-227(e)(2) All proposed private drainage systems or modifications to existing private drainage systems are subject to review by the City.The owner or responsible party shall submit a plan and other requested documentation for review and approval by the City. If review and approval authority lies with another federal, state or local government agency, the City shall direct the owner or responsible party to file the information with the appropriate agency. 6-227(e)(3) All premises shall be graded so as to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water thereon, within any structure located thereon, or on other premises. Stagnant water shall be determined as any accumulation that has not dispersed within seven days of the last recorded local rainfall, with the exception of stormwater detention or stormwater quality facilities approved and or permitted by the City. 6-227(g)(1) No soil runoff shall be permitted from the premises during and after installation of any improvement or maintenance thereof. 6-227(2) Erosion control,sediment control and stormwater quality measures shall be installed and shall be maintained for the duration of the work and are subject to inspection by the City. Installation of erosion control, sediment control and stormwater quality measures shall conform to § 6-220(b)(7) of this code. 6-227(h)(5) Pursuant to Carmel City Code §§ 8-62 and 8-65, Right-of-Way Permits, and proper posting of right-of-way bonds or performance bonds (at the discretion of the City) are required for all modifications to the portions of the existing drives that are located in the right-of-way, installation of new driveways within the right-of-way, temporary construction entrances or other type of temporary access, and use of an existing driveway, curb cut or main property access as a temporary construction entrance or other type of temporary access,whether or not the work requires approval by the Board of Public Works and Safety. 6-227(h)(6) The portions of proposed driveways within the right-of-way or modifications to the portion of existing driveways within the right-of-way shall be constructed of concrete, unless the restrictive covenants or other prevailing conditions warrant an asphalt drive. The portion of the driveway within the right-of-way shall be constructed or modified in strict accordance with the current City standards. If an asphalt drive is installed, the sidewalk across the driveway shall be concrete. Under no circumstances shall an asphalt driveway be constructed within the right-of-way where the existing roadway has concrete curb and gutter. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks so much, Gary From: Justin Moffett [mailto:Justinaotdg.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 2:14 PM To: Foley, Amanda 3 2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 2:52 PM To: 'Justin Moffett ' Subject: Review Comments for Docket no. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW Hello,Justin - The Planning Department's review comments are below. Please address these ASAP. Thank you. 1. Please submit a color palate for the building exterior. 2. Please submit a conceptual landscape plan. 3. Please try to save the existing tree in the front yard. If it cannot be saved, please mitigate that loss by planting a shade tree in the front yard. 4. The front yard building setback should be closer to 29 feet from the road right of way, instead of 20-ft, and that is based off the dominant and/or average setbacks of the existing buildings on the same side of the block. Please change. 5. The driveway width cannot be wider than 24-ft. Please change. 6. Please provide any exterior lighting design details, such as a porch light or garage lights. 7. Please label the siding and roof materials on the architectural building elevations. 8. The 12/8 roof pitch does not quite meet the minimum pitch required per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.i. 9. Foundations must be split face block, stone veneer,etc. See ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.g(vii). 10. Is the glass in the front window dormer clear vision glass? 11. Please provide more detail about the field built lattice proposed for the rear porch.A photograph example would be okay. 12. Is there anything you can do to 'dress up'that northwest corner of the house, especially on that Left Elevation? 13. House height : please label the building height, that is measured from the ground level up to the peak. 14. Please provide the heights of the nearest two Contributing Buildings, per ZO chapter 23D.03.C.3.k (iii). Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning &Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 Office: 317-571-2417 I Direct: 317-571-2281 I Fax: 317-571-2426 I E-mail: aconnOcarmel.in.gov W: www.carmeldocs.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:42 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; 'jmolitor @prodigy.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Tingley, Connie S; Duncan, Gary R; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Blanchard, Jim E; Stewart, Lisa M; Martin, Candy; Lux, Pamela K; Haney, Douglas C; Mishler, Nicholas F; Maki, Sue; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda J; Worthley, Matthew D; Motz, Lisa Cc: 'Justin Moffett ' Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (#13020006 SDR) Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW I have issued the necessary Docket Number for (SDR) Marley Residence,421 1st Ave NW. It is the following: Docket No. 13020006 SDR: Marley Residence,421 1st Ave NW. The applicant seeks site plan & design review approval for a new house with attached garage. The site is located at 421 First Ave NW. It is zoned R-2/Residence, within the Old Town Overlay Character Subarea. Filed by Justin Moffett of The Old Town Design Group, LLC, for Mark& Rita Marley,owners. Justin can be contacted at 317-966-2023. 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Justin Moffett [Justin@otdg.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 2:14 PM To: Foley, Amanda J Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Boone, Rachel M.; Duncan, Gary R; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R Subject: Re: Docket No. Assignment: (#13020006 SDR) Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW I don't believe we do grading plans for less than .25 acre of impact. The lot itself is less than .25 so it's not possible to impact more than that. We'll submit a plot plan to building and code services when we submit for a building permit, but that will come after the SDR. Does that make sense? On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Foley, Amanda J <afoley @carmel.in.gov> wrote: Justin, _ The Engineering Department will need to see a grading plan for this project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Amanda Foley Staff Engineer City of Carmel Department of Engineering 317-571-2309 (direct) afoley@earmel.in.gov From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 12:42 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; 'imolitorftrodigy.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Tingley, Connie S; Duncan, Gary R; Donahue-Wold, Alexia K; Blanchard, Jim E; Stewart, Lisa M; Martin, Candy; Lux, Pamela K; Haney, Douglas C; Mishler, Nicholas F; Maki, Sue; Thomas, John G; Redden, Nick; Barnes, David R; Foley, Amanda 3; Worthley, Matthew D; Motz, Lisa Cc: 'Justin Moffett ' Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (#13020006 SDR) Marley Residence, 421 1st Ave NW