Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceConn, Angelina V From: Boone, Rachel M. Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:32 PM To: Jon Dobosiewicz Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike P; John Molitor; Rider, Kevin D Subject: Dunkin Donuts sign Hi Jon, After further review, I found that I spoke in error regarding the location of the Multi- tenant Building Complex Directory Sign. The new ordinance would allow it to be placed at or near the vehicular entrance. I was mistaken that it had to be placed at or near the pedestrian entrance to the building. So there is no need for a variance for it to be located near the road. The sign will however, need to represent all the tenants of both buildings. A positive change for you is that the new ordinance does not require that all tenants be equally represented. So the main tenants could have a larger portion of the directory sign than the smaller tenants. Another option would be to make the Dunkin Donuts and C -Store smaller, since they will have larger identification on the main complex identification sign. Regarding using part of the old sign ordinance and part of the new sign ordinance, the old sign ordinance would not have allowed a multi- tenant building complex directory sign because the site is not zoned B -4, B -7, B -8, M -3, or the US 31 overlay zone. The old sign ordinance would have also limited the changeable copy area to 2/3 of the sign area. The new sign ordinance does not limit this. So in conclusion, it is best to go by the new sign ordinance for all signs in this petition. At the meeting, we will amend our Dept. report to not have any conditions regarding the signage. Thanks, Rachel 1c cheli (3oonei Planning Administrator City of Carmel Department of Community Services - 3rd Floor One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 317.571.2426 fax http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/communityservice.html Please consider the environment. before printing this e -mail 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Foley, Amanda J Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:23 PM To: 'Eric Gleissner' Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Duncan, Gary R; Thomas, John G; Barnes, David R Subject: Dunkin Donuts (INDOT and right in right out) Eric, I have reviewed the latest submitted site plan. Again, we reserve the right to comment further when more detail is provided. ® Through conversations with INDOT, I wanted to make you aware that the 98`'' Street entrance to this project may be restricted to a right- in/right -out in the future. If a traffic signal is ever warranted at this entrance, then the entrance will be restncte at t at point and a signal win -o-Me permitted. Could you please communicate this to your client? Regarding stormwater quality treatment, John Thomas is going to follow up with you. The plans do not specify two stormwater quality BMPs, but you alluded to two planned BMPs (with the pond not being one of them) in your response letter to our department. Could you please let our office know what BMPs are planned for this project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Amanda Foley Staff Engineer City of Carmel Department of Engineering 317- 571 -2309 (direct) afoley@carmel.in.gov i Conn, An «elina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Angie, Foley, Amanda J Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:04 PM Conn, Angelina V Duncan, Gary R RE: any dept report comments? The Bridges Commercial Amenity Use Block - Phase 1.doc We have not gotten everything reviewed that is on plan commission next week. We are trying very hard to get our TAC letters out! Here is a brief synopsis from looking through revised plans this morning: Regarding ther)unkin DonutsjI am going to send. them an email today stating that the 98th Street entrance may become a right- intright -out entrance in the future if a traffic signal is ever warranted. INDOT will not support a traffic signal at this entrance in the future. Hadley Grove — I know there are issues with right -of -way on 1.31" Street. The TP requires a 70 -foot half, and they only want to dedicate 50 feet. Their entrance is in excess of the allowable 45 feet. I also need to review the road configuration with Gary due to some of the curve radii. The drainage swales are shown in 20 -foot easements instead of the required 30- foot easement. Park Grenshire has submitted. to the BPW for several variances of stormwater standards. They will be on the first BPW meeting in January. The Bridges — We issued comments on November 30 and have not received a response. Attached is our continent letter. No curbs are shown around CVS. Maximum allowable commercial driveway width is 30 feet. They need a straight arrow for through traffic across Springmill to the LDS property. Is the north entrance on Illinois consistent with what was approved in the PUD? The plans rely on a stormwater detention facility that has not been approved or constructed. So sorry for not being more organized and prompt this week!!!! Amanda Foley Staff Engineer City of Cannel Department of Engineering 317 -571 -2309 (direct) afoley@carmel.in.gov From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:27 PM To: Foley, Amanda J Cc: Duncan, Gary R Subject: any dept report comments? Hi, Amanda — do you have any updated dept. report comments from the Engineering Dept.? Dunkin donuts site at 9800 n Michigan rd? Hadley grove PUD? Park Grenshire 2 -lot plat? Bridges PUD, CVS, and multi tenant building? O Thanks, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator X2281 1 Conn, An •'elina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Duncan, Gary R Monday, December 10, 2012 11:30 AM Hollibaugh, Mike P; McBride, Mike T Conn, Angelina V; Foley, Amanda J Pet Suites /Dunkin Donuts SKMBT_C45112121011290.pdf Good morning. When we met with INDOT last week, we looked at access for the Pet Suites /Dunkin Donuts that is proposed on the west side of Michigan Road at 98th Street. The retail center has proposed two access points...a full access at 98th Street and a right -in /right -out at the southernmost property line. INDOT stated that in order to ensure the southernmost entrances is used as a right -in /right -out, they will require median across the frontage; this median is indicated in green. There is an existing median that extends from 96th Street to just north of 97th Street. The existing median is indicated in red. We have stated in the past to all that have looked, 98th and Michigan will likely be limited to right -in /right -out when /if a traffic signal is warranted. With all this considered, INDOT desires to extend the median between the existing and proposed median for the retail development. This is an additional 400 -feet of median and is indicated in blue. This median will likely draw remonstrance from the hotel and Bartlett Trees. INDOT has asked if there would be support (engineering, planning and politically) to the request for a continuous median in this area. They have asked for something in writing. Thanks so much, Gary Gary R. Duncan, Jr., PE Assistant City Engineer City of Carmel Department of Engineering One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571 -2441 (317) 571 -2439 (fax) gduncan@carmel.in.gov I Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 1 NELSON & FRANKENBERGER JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 December 7, 2012 Re: 9800 North Michigan Road — Docket # 12030014 DP Duncan Donuts and C -Store — Docket # 12030015 ADLS Dear Angie: JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional ti ECEIvE 2012 boas Enclosed you will find 15 paper copies and a CD containing a digital copy of the information booklet for the above referenced matter scheduled for consideration by the Plan Commission on December 18, 2012. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER, P.C. Enclosures • Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Conn, An•.elina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Eric Gleissner [egleissner@civilsite.net] Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:45 AM Mindham, Daren; Conn, Angelina V RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Thanks Darren, I would hold off as we may still have more changes on the way. We'll see how the meeting goes tonight and our next plan commission meeting. Thanks for your help, Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 From: Mindham, Daren [mailto:dmindham @carmel.in.aov] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:36 AM To: 'Eric Gleissner'; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Angie /Eric, I am fine with these changes. Thanks for the updated plan, Eric. I am ready to stamp the landscape plan approved. Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 From: Eric Gleissner [mailto:egleissner @civilsite.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:16 AM To: Mindham, Daren Subject: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Darren, Attached is an updated Landscape Plan for your review. We had to make some tweaks based on comments from Plan Commission members. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or revisions. We will be going to Special Studies Committee this evening. Thanks, Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Tuesday, November 20, 2012 4:56 PM Conn, Angelina V; Boone, Rachel M. FW: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C- Store, and Commercial Building Variances HHR001 -Base Redesign.pdf From: Jon Dobosiewicz [mailto:jond@ NF- LAW.COM] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 4:47 PM To: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Cc: Brad; Jim Shinaver Subject: RE: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C- Store, and Commercial Building Variances Hi Alexia, Thanks for discussing this with me earlier. I have attached a revised site layout that illustrates the changes that have been made to the site. This is an earlier version of what Eric sent with the dimensioning turned off. As you can see the site plan has been revised so that both buildings meet the 120' setback. We need to meet with Rachel Boone so we get the revisions to the sign in compliance regarding the logo and overall square footage. With these items addressed variances would be required for (I) building offset reduction, (ii) second sign, and (iii) drive - thru stacking on the side of the building. The revisions eliminate the need for variances regarding (i) maximum 120' setback, (ii) maximum sign area, and (iii) logo percentage. We therefore have decided to withdraw these three variance requests. Thanks again and see you tonight at Plan Commission. Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson & Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317 -844 -0106 (Office) 317 -428 -8393 (Cell) 317 - 846 -8782 (Fax) ion @nf- law.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. 1 From: Tingley, Connie S Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 8:10 AM To: 'Brian Shapiro' Cc: Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: BZA (9800 N Michigan / Dunkin Donuts site) Brian -Thank you for your comments. I will give a copy of this email to the BZA Board members. Connie Tingley, BZA Secretary 317 -571 -2417 From: Brian Shapiro [mailto:brianCashapiros.com] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 9:36 PM To: Tingley, Connie S Subject: BZA Dear Connie, I am writing comments on the following proposal of Michigan Road and request that you forward to the commissions members. 1. A two multi- tenant buildings with a fuel canopy is proposed on the west side of Michigan Road on land zoned I- 1 /Industrial. They will be seeking a number of variances from the BZA: a. Drive -thru lanes on the side of the building rather than behind. b. Reduced facade offsets on two sides of the building. c. An additional sign, which also puts them over the permitted sq. ft for signs. d. Increasing the size of the logo on the sign from the permitted 25% of the sign to 32% . e. Setting the building more than the 120' feet from the road that the Overlay Zone requires a variance As one of the original writers of the Michigan Road Overlay Zone, we wanted the rules in place to make the requirements easy for the developers to follow. I am a little surprised that this developer wants to change rules this late into the development of the overlay zone. The land is generally flat and rectangular. It does not have a stream on it or unusual characteristics. The Starbucks, Wendy's, Burger King, and Walgreens have their drive thur's in the rear of their buildings. The buildings are screens to this. The drive -thru needs to remain the back. We need to continue with our facade requirement like the rest of the new buildings. We need to maintain our sign conditions as to colors, style, height, numbers, and size. The sign logo should remain at 25% like the rest of the overlay zone. We do not want a sea of cars, so the 120' is imperative to maintain. Sincerely, Brian Shapiro cytA inn 4 " 1 Conn, An elina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Boone, Rachel M. Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:19 AM Conn, Angelina V Donahue -Wold, Alexia K RE: Docket No. Assignment: (V) Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Commercial Building (12110002-07 V) Hi Ladies, I'm finally done with my additional comments /review for the Dunkin Donuts and gas station. I am going to require that they stick to the new sign ordinance rules, since the building will be built when the new ordinance is in effect. It looks like they'll need more variances, unless they decide to make changes. The additional variances they will need are: exceeding Menu board height, exceeding 70% wall sign height, and the electronic price display. My new comments are in blue. Thanks, Rachel 2adtei/ i3ao-vte/ Planning Administrator City of Carmel Department of Community Services - 3rd Floor One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317 - 571 -2417 317.571.2426 fax From: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:28 AM To: Barnes, David R; Blanchard, Jim E; Boone, Rachel M.; Conn, Angelina V; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Duncan, Gary R; Foley, Amanda J; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; 'John Molitor'; Keeling, Adrienne M; Littlejohn, David W; Lux, Pamela K; Maki, Sue; Martin, Candy; Mindham, Daren; Mishler, Nicholas F; Redden, Nick; Stewart, Lisa M; Thomas, John G; Tingley, Connie S; Worthley, Matthew D; Kass, Joslyn Cc: Jon Dobosiewicz (jon @nf- law.com); Jim Shinaver; 'egleissner @civilsite.net Subject: Docket No. Assignment: (V) Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Commercial Building (12110002 -07 V) I have issued the necessary Docket Numbers for (V) Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Commercial Building. They are the following: (V) Michigan Rd. Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Commercial Building. The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals for a new commercial development. Docket No. 12110002 V ZO Ch. 23C.11.G Location of stacking for drive -thru lanes Docket No. 12110003 V ZO Ch. 25.07.02 -9(b) Total number of signs, Docket No. 12110004 V ZO Ch. 25.07.02 -9(c) Total square footage Docket No. 12110005 V ZO Ch. 3 Identification sign 25% logo area, 32% requested Docket No. 12110006 V ZO Ch. 23C.09.D 8 feet deep facade offsets, 4 feet requested Docket No. 12110007 V ZO Ch. 23C.08.02.B 120 feet maximum building setback The site is located at 9800 N. Michigan Road. It is zoned I -1 /Industrial within the Michigan Road Overlay Zone. Filed by Jon Dobosiewicz of Nelson & Frankenberger, for H & H Restaurant Management. Conn, Angelina V From: Tingley, Connie S Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:32 AM To: 'CWIC2' Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Docket #1 203001 4- 1 6ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts Thank you for your comments. I will provide a copy of this email to the BZA Board members. Connie Tingley BZA Secretary From: CWIC2 [mailto:cwic2(vahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:43 PM To: Tingley, Connie S Subject: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts To: BZA Members From: CWIC2 Date: November 13, 2012 Re: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts This project is requesting five variances. As we have also expressed to Plan Commissioners, we are concerned about a trend that seems to be developing with new businesses wanting to benefit from the success established within the Michigan Road Overlay Zone while at the same time, they ask for exemption from fully meeting those standards. These are "standards," not "guidelines." Certainly you can use your judgment, but the standards are meaningful only to the extent that they are upheld. We ask you to carefully consider the necessity of any deviation from holding the newcomers to the standards met by those who came before them. Every exception makes it more likely that other businesses will also seek similar exceptions (especially regarding signage limits and drive -thru locations). Please also remember that there are people whose sole experience of Carmel is through this gateway area. The standards set and met do matter to this area's continuing success. Thank you for your consideration. Marilyn Anderson, President MaryEllen Bonnett, Vice - President Dee Fox, Secretary 1 Conn, Angelina V To: Hancock, Ramona B Cc: Tingley, Connie S Subject: FW: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts Ramona — Please also make copies of this email for the Plan Commission members, to mail out with the Dept. Reports tomorrow. Thank you. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator From: Tingley, Connie S Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:32 AM To: 'CWIC2' Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts Thank you for your comments. I will provide a copy of this email to the BZA Board members. Connie Tingley BZA Secretary From: CWIC2 [mailto:cwic2Ca vahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:43 PM To: Tingley, Connie S Subject: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts To: BZA Members From: CWIC2 Date: November 13, 2012 Re: Docket #12030014- 16ADLS 9800 N. Michigan Road -- Dunkin Donuts This project is requesting five variances. As we have also expressed to Plan Commissioners, we are concerned about a trend that seems to be developing with new businesses wanting to benefit from the success established within the Michigan Road Overlay Zone while at the same time, they ask for exemption from fully meeting those standards. These are "standards," not "guidelines." Certainly you can use your judgment, but the standards are meaningful only to the extent that they are upheld. We ask you to carefully consider the necessity of any deviation from holding the newcomers to the standards met by those who came before them. Every exception makes it more likely that other businesses will also seek similar exceptions (especially regarding signage limits and drive -thru locations). Please also remember that there are people whose sole experience of Carmel is through this gateway area. The standards set and met do matter to this area's continuing success. Thank you for your consideration. Marilyn Anderson, President MaryEllen Bormett, Vice - President Dee Fox, Secretary 1 NELSON & FRANKENBERGER JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 November 9, 2012 Re: 9800 North Michigan Road — Docket # 12030014 DP Duncan Donuts and C -Store — Docket # 12030015 ADLS Dear Angie: JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional Enclosed you will find 15 paper copies and a CD containing a digital copy of the information booklet for the above referenced matter scheduled for consideration by the Plan Commission on November 20, 2012. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER, P.C. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Enclosures JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 NELSON & FRANKENBERGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 November 6, 2012 Re: 9800 North Michigan Road — Docket # 12030014 DP Duncan Donuts and C -Store — Docket # 12030015 ADLS Dear Angie: JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Profesaonal RECEIVED DDCS • Please see below our response to staff comments received via e -mail on October 22, 2012. Planning /Zoning Dept. review comments: off'" `1` Feel free to bring color /material samples of the building to the Plan Commission meeting. Reply: Architect will provide physical samples of exterior materials at Plan Commission Meeting. ��- Please provide paper copies of the revised applications. Reply: See attached paper and digital copies of the applications. Please provide digital copies of any revised plans. Reply: See attached paper and digital copies of the applications. c - \ Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. Reply: See attached. 5. Remember to include the Development Plan application's Findings of Fact sheet in your final information packets. Reply: A proof of publication submittal addressing this item will be submitted on November 16 under a separate transmittal. 6. Provide the filled out and notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing page of the application. Reply: A proof of publication submittal addressing this item will be submitted on November 16 under a separate transmittal. 7. Provide the filled out Notice of Public Hearing page of the application. Reply: A proof of publication submittal addressing this item will be submitted on November 16 under a separate transmittal. 8. Provide the filled out and notarized Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit page of the application. Reply: A proof of publication submittal addressing this item will be submitted on November 16 under a separate transmittal. 9. Provide a copy of the Official List of Adjacent Property Owners from Hamilton County Auditor's Office. Reply: A proof of publication submittal addressing this item will be submitted on November 16 under a separate transmittal. oY-- 1-b\ Show /label a cross access easement across the site, so that when the site connects to the adjacent sites there will not be an issue with vehicular traffic accessing the site from the north and from the south. See Zoning Ordinance Chapters 23C.13 and 23C.11.D, too. Reply: A cross access easement has been added to the Detailed Development Plans. Please see revised sheet C2.0. 11. Please submit to -scale architectural building elevations on 24 "x36" or similar sized paper. Reply: Elevations on 24" x 36" sheets are attached. 12. On each building, please provide the percent of EIFS of all non - window facade areas, per ZO Chapter 23C.09.K.2. (It must be less than or equ 1 to 10 %, otherwise a BZA variance will be required:) ( Q� .Q_ % Lwre.�� Reply: EIFS areas have been reduced based on TAC comments. EIFS is now shown only in high parapet signage areas per TAC comments. See attached revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. 1 . Please lower the parapet to reduce the total percent of EIFS OR use more brick between the heights of 4 -ft and 14 -ft, possibly, for a 10 -ft wide band of brick at least. The ratios look 'off'. Reply: EIFS areas have been reduced. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A- 5, A -6, A -7, A -8. c)(-- 1 Both the C -Store south elevation and Commercial retail building west elevation have long and monotonous walls, which are not permitted by ZO Chapter 23C.09.B. Reply: These elevations have been revised which now have 2' -0" projections in plan and varying roof parapet heights. EIFS has been reduced. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. . What is the bollards color? Reply: All bollards will be painted black. X. Gas canopy location might need BZA variance approval. See ZO Chapter 25.01.02 and ZO Chapter 25.19.c - Setbacks of accessory buildings & uses. Reply: Carmel DOCS staff has determined that a variance is not required from this standard. of, /. Cornices - please finish the detailing /reveals on the sides /ends. Reply: Detailing on cornices and reveals have been continued on all sides of parapet. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5. A -6, A -7, A -8. You will need a BZA variance from ZO Chapter 23C.09.D: 8 -ft deep bumpouts /recessions, facades and detailing, etc. The Dept. recommends that you at least show 4 -ft deep projections and recessions. Reply: The building plans and elevations have been revised. On the Dunkin Donuts /C -Store building, there are 4' -0" projections in plan on the north, east, and west facades. The south facade has 2' -0" projections. On the Retail Building, the east facade has 4' -0" projections. The west facade has 2' -0" projections. See attached building plans A -1, A -2. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. Modulating roof /roofline on all visible elevations is required. Reply: Modulating roof line is now shown on all facades. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4. A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. Building must appear to be 1.5 stories tall. Reply: The highest parapets on both buildings at the main entrance projections is 24' -0 ". Other secondary parapet heights equal 22' -6" and baseline parapet is 19'-0". See attached /revised building elevations: A -3. A -4, A -5. A -6, A -7. A -8. BZA variance is required for the parking spaces located along the front of the site, where it is not setback 36 -ft to accommodate the 30 -ft wide greenbelt, plus the 6 -ft wide parking perimeter buffer, per ZO Chapter 23C.10.03.5.a. Also, per ZO chapter 23C.11.F: Parking within front yard setbacks shall be discouraged and limited to a maximum of two (2) rows of parking, subject to minimum Greenbelt width, minimum bufferyard requirements and maximum building setback standards. Reply: The site has been adjusted to provide the full 36' greenbelt adjacent to the parking along Michigan Road. Please see the revised Detailed Development Plans. Is there not more detailing or a changeup of materials that can be done to break up the upper EIFS portion of the building? Reply: The EIFS areas have been reduced and the facade design has been revised. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. Maybe remove the awnings from the windows, or at least place them lower than they are shown. Right now, it looks awkward. Reply: Awnings have been removed with the exception of the east elevation of the Dunkin Donuts and the Drive Thru awning on the south elevation. .Limestone headers have been shown over windows in lieu of awnings in all other window locations. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. The grids in the windows and the door entries: please make them the same pattern or proportionate. Reply: Window mullions have been revised. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3. A -4, A -5, A -6. A -7, A -8. 2 Please paint the backs of the taller parapets a brick color. Reply: Based on the new facade elevation, no tall parapet backs are exposed in elevation view. All hack sides of parapets will be painted a similar color as the brick should they be seen from an angle. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. iiPlease provide more detail on the metal canopies. Also, can you make them deeper, to provide more of an overhang? Reply: The glass at the entrances is set back from the facade projection 2' -0 ". The metal canopy suspends 6' -0" out from the entrance door /window line. The basis of design for this canopy system is Mapes Architectural Canopies: Super Lumideck Hanger Rod — Flat Soffit. A product sheet is attached. Also see attached building plans A -1. A -2. 0` Please submit to -scale floor plans or typical store layouts for the Dunkin Donuts and C- store. Reply: Building plans of white box tenant spaces for both buildings are attached. See attached building plans A -1, A -2. av Please label the mechanical•equipment locations (rooftop or ground level) on the site plan and building elevations and provide details on how they are screened from view or camouflaged. This includes electric and gas meters; see ZO Chapter 23C.10.02.5. Reply: All roof mounted air handling units are screened by the high main entrance parapets. Ground level meters /utilities are located in recessed areas around the building perimeter and screened by wood gates painted to match complimentary building material colors. See attached roof plan showing mechanical unit layout on sheet A -9. See mechanical unit locations on elevations A -10, A-11, A -12, A -13, A -14, and A -15. 4-'4. Please consider using additional LEED or `green' site and building practices, such as a white membrane roof, solar panels, native plants, rain gardens, etc. List is attached. Reply: These elements have been considered. 30. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that no type of traffic analysis is required. Reply: A&F Fngineering has been commissioned to perform a full traffic impact study (TIS). Based on meetings and correspondence with INDOT, they have dictated the scope and requirements for the TIS. The traffic counts have been completed and once the conclusions and report are compiled, they will be submitted to INDOT for approval. 31. Please provide correspondence from INDOT about the 2 curb cuts and their approvals of that. Reply: We have had multiple meetings with INDOT regarding the proposed driveways for the project. iNDOT has given us the scope and requirements for a full traffic study (TLS) which is currently underway. INDOT will not issue a final approval for the driveways until they have had a chance to analyze the completed TIS. However, based on the preliminary correspondence, INDOT would be willing to approve the two driveways as long as they are supported by data from the TIS and will cause a minimal impact to traffic patterns in the area. Please show /label the bicycle parking areas and provide the bike rack details, per ZO Chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. Reply: Bicycle parking areas were labeled on the previously submitted plans. A detail of the proposed bicycle rack has been added to revised sheet C2.0. Please verify that all parking lot pole light fixtures have flat lenses and /or 90- degree cutoffs so that the light is downcast. Reply: We have verified with the site lighting vender, TechLite, that all proposed fixtures on- site are indeed flat lenses with 90- degree cutoffs. Please provide the wall sconce design details/ cut sheets. Reply: Wall sconces are shown on revised building elevations. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. The basis of design wall sconce fixture is "Avatar Metro OW 1316 ". A cut sheet for this fixture is attached. We intend to have a bronze finish to compliment the other building material colors. p�Ss Per ZO Chapter 23C.12.B, please amend the parking lot pole lights to be a maximum height of 24 feet. Reply: The site lighting plan has been revised to show a maximum height of 24' A.F.G. (above finished grade). Please see revised sheet SL1.0. ---- \(\--6-k-3 L54• Po--VY - 0.A,c..12)26 -:\-AA c s csLek- cd.txsr-S &.mss 0,.A-4c4 2 36. Would like a commitment to have no or very little outdoor sales and displays associated with the gas station /convenience store to limit the propane gas exchanges, mulch stacks, washer fluid displays, etc. per ZO Chapter 23C.14.01, storage areas must be completely screened from view. Reply: An outdoor display /sales area has been shown on the west facade of the Dunkin Donuts /C -store building toward the north end. This area is enclosed with a masonry screen wall and wood gates that are painted to compliment. building material colors. CDS*\1 >\2-c S_ . 37. The Dept. would like the plan modified to shift one or both of the buildings closer to Michigan Rd. Can you rotate the commercial retail building 90- degrees and slide it closer to Michigan Rd, to be sited closer to the north property line? Reply: The site plan works best from a logistical and functionality standpoint as it is laid out currently. The traffic circulation through and around the site is ideal as it is now. Rotating the commercial building 90- degrees and moving it closer to Michigan Road could impede access into the site from the northern curb cut. The location of the northern curb cut is being dictated by INDOT to line up with 98th Street on the East side of Michigan Road. Also, rotating and moving the commercial building would cause the back of the building to be visible from Michigan Road which is not desirable. In addition, tenants ideally will need to face Michigan Road directly for the best visibility. Daren Mindham with the City Forestry Dept, will review the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. Reply: We received two minor comments from the Urban Forester and have addressed those with this revision. BZA variance will be required for the drive thru stacking location, per ZO Chapter 23C.11.G. Reply: A variance application has been filed with Carmel DOCS. .. Signage review & additional review comments: Dunkin Donuts /BP and commercial retail buildings: a) We don't think the EIFS is placed in the best possible location. It should be utilized above the entry doors to aid in installation and visibility of the signage. Right now, the signage blends into the building and does not stand out against the brick. Reply: The building elevations have been revised. EIFS has been removed from the lower parapet areas and is now shown above entrances at signage areas as suggested by TAC comments. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. , Where the EIFS is located, it would be best to continue the brick all the way up the facade to the cornice element, or even use a different color brick to make it stand out from the feature entrances /protrusions of the tenants' areas. Reply: The building elevations have been revised. EIFS has been removed from the lower parapet areas and is now shown above entrances at signage areas as suggested by TAC comments. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. 0 \k/•,), On the commercial retail building, I don't think using the CMU block all the way up the entry feature is an appropriate material. This should be kept at the base. Then perhaps a different color brick could be used to call attention to that particular part of the building, to that tenant's entry feature. Reply: The retail building no longer has the burnished, high finish, smooth faced block on the entry features continuing up to the cornice. The building elevations have been revised. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4. A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. d) We would also like to see some more architectural elements built into the sign band area of each building. It would be good to see some brick detailing around the EIFS, to call out a specific sign band area or placement for the sign - to frame each sign, in a way. Reply: The building elevations have been revised. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3. A -4, A -5, A -6. A -7. A -8. For the both buildings, the recessed brick detail is very distracting. Perhaps this feature would be better on the other facade elevations where the EIFS top half is proposed, but not the main ones. Reply: There is no longer recessed brick detailing. The building elevations have been revised. Sec attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. Would also like to see more detailing to define the two spaces (Dunkin and BP). Perhaps some edge molding at the corners of the building and a matching one in- between the spaces would help add some detail and separation. Reply: The entrances for the Dunkin Donuts and C -Store have been separated into 2 separate high parapet projections. See attached/revised building elevations: A -3, A -4. A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. g) If EIFS is required above the entry doors to the tenant spaces, perhaps have less scoring on them to make it stand out less and /or paint it to match the surrounding materials so it does not stand out as much. Right now the buildings look very busy with so many different elevations and materials. Reply: The reveals have been reduced above the entrance canopies. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. OStaff would like to see the same window awning colors for all sides of the Dunkin Donuts /BP building. Reply: Awnings have been removed with the exception of the east facade of the Dunkin Donuts and at the south elevation above the drive thru. All other awnings have been removed. The logo on each of the canopies = 3 s.f. See attached/revised building elevations: A -3, A -4. A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. Dunkin Donuts /BP building Signage: -.sal` Each tenant is allowed 40 square feet per sign chart B. Reply: All signs are less than 40 s.f. We will consider the main signage /ROW to be facing north, so there is consistency between the signage for the two tenants. Reply: Understood. c) Dunkin Donuts signage and awning detail facing south will need BZA variance approval. We will not support these variances for additional signage and signage not facing a right -of -way. Reply: The proposed sign has been removed. Dunkin Donuts signage facing east will also require a BZA variance for number of signs and going over the total square footage allowed. These variances might be supported by Staff. Reply: Variance applications have been submitted. Dunkin Donuts signage facing all directions will be subject to the 25% logo rule for their coffee cup logo. Please submit additional size information for the logos. Reply: The Dunkin Donuts sign contains a logo that is 32% of the overall sign size. The Indy Go C -Store logo is 10% of the overall sign dimensions. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. g) BP will require a BZA variance for a 100% logo sign. Reply: The BP sign has been removed. Indy Go C -Store signage has been shown in lieu of the BP logo sign. Need to see more detail on the drive thru menu board, menu canopy, etc. The size is limited to 6 feet tall and 16 square feet in size. Staff would like a masonry base on this sign. Reply: The menu board elevation and sizes are shown on sheet A -17. Commercial retail building: a) Please submit information on the signage requirements for tenants, including but not limited to: Size, Color, Lighting style, Installation method, Signage on awnings permitted? —VAA -Q _AW" 1 \llrwu avu-j Lt .t l Evv colOrS Reply: Signage is noted on revised building elevations as individual letters, 40 s.f. maximum. All signage and logos are noted to meet required signage ordinance. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. If they would prefer it just meet the Sign Ordinance requirements, that is okay, too, but we just need to know. Reply: Signage is noted on revised building elevations as individual letters, 40 maximum. All signage and logos are noted to meet required signage ordinance. See attached /revised building elevations: A -3, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -8. 6V Gas Station island & canopy areas: Signage is not allowed on the roof of the gas station canopy. This will require a BZA variance that the Dept. will not support. Reply: Signage has been removed from the gas station canopy. See attached/revised elevations on sheet A -16. b) The design of the canopy as all EIFS material is not preferred. Perhaps the color needs to change? Or have less breaks or scoring in the material? It looks very choppy. We have seen more ornate and detailed canopies recently and this one needs a bit more substance. Reply: The gas station canopy design has been revised to be a metal fascia /coping system. See revised elevations on sheet A -16. , P jj' o ) < <li,,,u Q ccw The gas canopy seem a little top - heavy. Is there a way to widen the columns or to reduce the thickness of the canopy, to remedy this? Reply: The size of the columns has been increased to become more proportionate to the depth of the canopy. See revised elevations on sheet A- 16. d) Need to see signage details for the gas station bumps and pump markers. All signage for pumps and markers needs to be 3 square feet or less to be considered exempt. Otherwise, BZA variances will be required. Reply: All gas station pump markers are less than 3 s.f. These elevations have been added to sheet A -17. Ground signs: a) The height for the Dunkin Donuts /BP ground sign is ok. We need more detail on the size, though. Reply: Dimensions have been added to this sign elevation to give more detail. See revised sheet A -17. b) The ground sign which is for the tenant panels is limited to 20 sq. ft. and 5 -ft tall. Please provide more detail on the size. Reply: This sign elevation has been revised. See sheet A -17. Y�iG�.QaQ • c) The tenant signage sign with four panels will also require the name of the shopping center development to be at the top of the sign. Reply: Center development name has been added to the top of this sign elevation. See sheet A -17. If possible, Staff would like to see a more pronounced base for each sign, to balance out the top cornice of the sign. Right now it seems a bit "top heavy ". Reply: The sign elevations have been revised. See sheet A -17. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER, P.C. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Enclosures 7-AC Ct9 (re jfeiviCO/Ct MJW 1J GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317- 423 -3306 October 31, 2012 Mr. Daren Mindham City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 -571 -2283 Subject: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Commercial Development Docket No. 12030014 -16 DP /ADLS 9800 North Michigan Road Dear Mr. Mindham, Please find attached revisions along with the rest of the items requested in your e -mail from October 8`". The following are responses for each of your comments: 1. The tree preservation area has been more clearly labeled on the revised landscape plan. In addition, the tree preservation detail has been added and a tree preservation fence has been delineated and labeled as requested. Please see revised sheet L1.0. 2. The tree preservation area has been noted as "naturalized area" and the detention basin has been labeled with prairie grass as requested. Please see revised sheet L1.0. 1 hope the above addresses your concerns and we look forward to receiving final approval for the project. Thank you. Sincerely, Civil Site Group, Inc. Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Principal Attachments: Revised Detailed Development Plans Copy of Comment Letter Eric Gleissner From: Mindham, Daren <dmindham @carmel.in.gov> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:47 AM To: 'Eric Gleissner' Subject: (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) Attachments: Tree Preservation Detail.pdf; RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts /... (4.33 MB) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Eric, The following email represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of landscaping. I have reviewed the drawings and offer the following comments: URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW COMMENTS 1) On sheet L1.0, the west perimeter is noted with 'tree preservation area /additional detention (if needed)'. 1 would like to have a more specific bubble or cloud where specifically trees will be preserved including a dashed line showing where a tree protection fence will be installed to preserve this tree area from grading and construction. 1 have attached our tree preservation detail to be used on Carmel projects. Please add this detail to the plan. 2) Also, the word 'grass' is overlaid multiply times over this area. I would like the tree preservation area to be noted as a naturalized area and the dry detention pond and any graded areas west of the pond to be seeded with a prairie mix. Obviously, east of the pond between the pond and the parking should be a grassed area as shown. Please illustrate how these comments will be addressed by letter or revised plan. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks. Sincerely, Daren Mindham Urban Forester City of Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 From: Eric Gleissner [mailto:ealeissner civilsite.netj Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:35 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Blanchard; Jim E; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; 'Greg Ilko'; Hohlt, William G; Huffman, David; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Redden, Nick; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; 'Shirley Hunter'; Westermeier, Mark; • • 'Yackle, Troy '; ilclark(&vectren.com; Thomas, John G; rep .Hoves4hamiltancountv.in.aov; dan.davenoortPaes.com; doland.w.wiseCa usos.aov; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, •r it 4 -ne -.• • - - eu October 10, 2012 Xenton C. `Ward, CYF.711 Surveyor of 3familton County (Phone (317) 776 -5495 'Fax (317) 776 -9625 Civil Site Group, Inc. ATTN: Eric Gleissner 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 VIA E -MAIL: egleissner@civilsite.net civilsite.net RE: Dunkin Donuts /C -Store Dear Mr. Gleissner, Suite 18S One J-tamilton County Square Noblesville, Indiana 4606o -223o We have reviewed the construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on October 10, 2012, for this project and have the following comments: 1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of Carmel. 2. The proposed project DOES NOT fall in a Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone. 3. The proposed project does not fall in a Hamilton County Regulated Drain Watershed. 4. Please direct all stormwater questions to the City of Carmel Engineering Department. 5. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no comments or concerns on this project Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317- 776 -8495. Sincerely, 11041,, 14 Greg Hoyes, AC, CFM, CPESC Plan Reviewer CC: Angie Conn — Carmel DOCS John Thomas — Carmel Engineering Dave Barnes — Carmel Engineering Greg Ilko — Crossroad Engineers © n 0 E3 8 8( 0 .n CITY O LLARMEL JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR October 24. 2012 Mr. Eric A. Gleissner. P.E. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Dunkin Donuts/ C -Store Commercial Development - Project Review #1 Dear Mr. Gleissner: The City received your development plans on October 10, 2012. The project is scheduled for review at the October 17, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee meeting. This is an incomplete submittal. We reserve the right to provide additional comments. Such comments may have a significant impact on the submitted land plan. We offer the following comments: CONSTRUCTION DRAWING REVIEW COMMENTS I . This project is subject to the City's Storm Water Management and Storm Water Quality Ordinances. Section 102.07 of the Stormwater Technical Standards Manual states: Plans submitted to the City of Carmel Technical Advisory Committee as part of the ADLS /DP approval process, shall include the following: i. Construction Plans (Section 102.02) ii. Stormwater Drainage Technical Report (Section 102.03) iii. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Section 102.04) Please ensure all of these items are submitted for DP /ADLS approval. 2. Has the Indiana Department of Transportation approved the two proposed entrances as shown on the plans? 3. There appear to be direct discharges on -site. Direct discharges shall be minimized. 4. Will this development be platted? 5. Please remove the Landscape Plan from the Title Sheet and the plan set. Please remove the Lighting Plan form the Title Sheet. 6. Please determine the capacity of the storm sewer receiving system on Michigan Road. Is the receiving system more restrictive than the City's flat release rates? GENERAL INFORMATION • These comments represent the Department of Engineering's first review of the site development plans for this project. • We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting the requested revisions. Failure to provide written responses may result in the delay of the review process. • It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans including all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, BZA or other committee meetings. DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARAMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAX 317.571.2439 EMAIL engineering @carmel.in.gov Mr. Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. October 24, 2012 RE: Dunkin Donuts/ C -Store Commercial Development- Project Review #1 Page 2 of 4 • We have engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC to review all drainage plans and drainage calculations submitted to this office for review. If you have not already done so, please provide a set of drainage plans and calculations to their office for review. We will share Crossroad's comments as they are received. • Final drawings will not be approved for construction until: a. All Engineering Department and Utility Department and Hamilton County Surveyor issues have been resolved. b. All bonds and performance guarantees are posted. c. All Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency approvals (if required) are obtained. d. All off -site easements necessary to install utilities to serve the development are secured. e. S W PPP is approved. f. All fees are paid. • The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent reviews. • An approved Storrs Water Management Permit is required prior to commencing any earth disturbing activity. Please contact Mr. John Thomas regarding storm water quality requirements. • An approved right -of -way permit is required prior to commencing any work in the public right -of- way and for construction equipment access from the City's right -of -way. • If it will be necessary to relocate existing utilities, the costs for such relocation shall be borne solely by the developer. Any utility poles requiring relocation shall be relocated to within one foot of the outside edge of the proposed right -of -way. • The Department requires that the construction drawings be developed in accordance with the City of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required submittals for primary plat, secondary plat, and construction drawings be made. The digital files must be submitted to the Department of Engineering prior to the approval of the construction plans. Please contact the City GIS Department for the requirements. • Jurisdictions: g. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. h. Perimeter Street and Right -of -Way — Indiana Department of Transportation (U.S. 421 /Michigan Road). i. Water — City of Carmel Utilities j. Sanitary Sewers — Clay Township Regional Waste k. Storm Sewers /Drainage — City of Carmel. I. Legal Drains - Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. • Drawings submitted for approval: tn. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. n. This office will require 9 sets of drawings for approval after all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be stamped as approved and signed by the City Engineer and by Cannel Utilities. The Owner will receive 3 sets, one of which must be maintained on the construction site at all tunes. If this project is subject to review and approval by the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office, a total of 11 sets will be required for final approval. • Carmel Utilities will provide separate reviews of this project for water issues. Please assure that copies of all drawings are sent to: Paul Pace Paul Arnone Carmel Utilities Distribution Carmel Utilities Collection 3450 West 131st Street 901 North Range Line Road Westfield, IN 46074 Carmel, IN 46032 • Cannel Utilities subscribes to "Holey Moley" who should be contacted directly for all water main locations. Mr. Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. October 24, 2012 RE: Dunkin Donuts/ C -Store Commercial Development - Project Review #1 Page 3 of 4 • The following items will be sent electronically upon request regarding this correspondence and project: o. Project Approval Checklist p. Performance /Maintenance Guarantees q. Utility Jurisdictions /Right of Way Permits r. Availability (acreage) Fees BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY • A schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines will be sent electronically for your use upon request. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board. • Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by the Carmel Clay Plan Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable) and completion of review by the Technical Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Number and the date (or dates) of approval by the Plan Commission and /or the Board of Zoning Appeals (if applicable). • Water Availability and Sanitary Sewer approval from the Board will be required. This is an EDU approval based upon the proposed use of the site. Reference Items #33 to #35 below for additional details /explanations. Please note that if an entryway or other irrigation system is planned for this development, additional Water Availability Approval from the Board will be required and additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the system as determined by the Director of Carmel Utilities. • Commercial Curb Cut Approval. Please provide 81/2 x 11 exhibits with the request for approval. Provide all pertinent information including lane widths, overall width, radii, lane markings, location of opposing drives or streets, relationship to the location of previous curb cut, etc. • Temporary Construction Entrance Approval. If the construction entrance is to be located separate from a permanent curb cut, then Board of Public Works approval is required if it will be located within City right -of -way. • The installation of any permanent, privately owned and/or maintained improvement (signs, decorative street signs, walls, streetlights, etc.) within dedicated right of way or dedicated easements requires the execution of a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the Owner and the City of Cannel. Such agreements are executed by the Board of Public Works and Safety. The City Engineer may approve irrigation system agreements. • Secondary Plat approval if applicable. All performance guarantees must be posted prior to submission of secondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval. • Dedication of right -of -way if not platted. This is based upon the City of Carmel 20 -Year Thoroughfare Plan requirements. Dedication documents are available upon request. Please be advised that all Right -of -Way Dedications must be accompanied by a Sales Disclosure Agreement completed by the owner for the property being dedicated to the City. The dedication document cannot be recorded without a completed Sales Disclosure. The form is available upon request. • Any open pavement cuts of City right -of -way will require Carmel Board of Public Works and Safety approval. BONDING REOU1REMENTS • Please contact Mr. Dave Barnes to review performance guarantee requirements. Please contact Mr. John Duffy to review water and sanitary sewer bonding requirements. • The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for 100% of the cost of labor and materials to construct the individual improvements, to be provided by the design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each improvement including quantities, unit costs, pipe sizes, and materials, etc. • Upon completion and release of individual Performance Guarantees, a three -year Maintenance Guarantee will be required (see Street Sign comments above). The Maintenance Guarantee Mr. Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. October 24, 2012 RE: Dunkin Donuts/ C -Store Commercial Development- Project Review #1 Page 4 of 4 amount is based upon 15% of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and 10% of the Performance amount for all other improvements. • Performance Guarantees may be Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Leiters of Credit. • Please reference the available enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures. RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT AND BONDING • Any work in the dedicated right -of -way will require an approved Right -of -Way Permit and a License & Permit Bond. • The bond amount is determined by our Right -of -Way Manager. However, if the work is included in the scope of work of a required and posted Performance Guarantee, the Performance Guarantee may be used to satisfy the bond requirements of the Right -of -Way Permit. • Please contact our Right -of -Way Manager, Fred Glaser, to arrange right -of -way permitting and bonding. AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES • We defer to Cannel Utilities regarding this issue. • If an entryway or overall site irrigation system is planned for this development, additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the size and usage of the system and upon the recommendations of the Director of Carmel Utilities. • These fees are required to be paid prior to final approval of construction plans by Engineering and prior to issuance of building permits by Building Codes Services. Please confirm these fees and calculations with Carmel Utilities. If you have questions. please contact me at 571 -2441. Sincerely, Gary R. Du can. .E. Assistant C ty Engineer Department of Engineering cc: Angelina Conn, Department of Community Services John Duffy; Carmel Utilities Paul Pace. Carmel Utilities Paul Arnone, Carmel Utilities Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Greg llko, Crossroad Engineers, PC issvrapps \user data\z: \shared\PROJ REV 121Dunkin Donuts— C -Store Review #1 - OF CAR October 11, 2012 City of Carmel Mr. Eric Gleissner Civil Site Group, Inc 643 Massachusetts Ave, Ste 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES RE: Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Gas Canopy Dear Mr. Gleissner: The following letter represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative transportation. I have reviewed the project submitted for the October 17, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee meeting, and offer the following comments: Alternative Transportation Review and Comments 1) Please ensure that all ramps and crosswalks comply with ADA standards. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in delay of the review process. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans indicating all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, Special Studies or other committee meetings. The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews. If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417. Sincerely, David Littlejohn Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services cc: Angie Conn, Department of Community Services Engineering Department Review Project File ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 1 CAR1VMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 OCT- 1272012 06:42 From:PANHANDLE EASTERN 317 733 3204 To:94233306 AN • Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line A Sou em Union Company FAX COVER SHEET Address: Date: ! 0/ Gages + Cover. Td'r,L (n‘e,rS 1\Q.f Company: v,L Grouej -rtnC, Fax 3,7- 423 - 2 30 (o Frortr ro� �1 a: AC..�.0 rax Cl -7 3330'-f Phone 377 SS - 3D-I3 Message Po \r r�C`�. ctis+r;1 1r\ 170 C- 0x'106.- ti�J���J6Ci 4'4 Y"-a-M t_l CIc." Pea Ca(( If trarwrissvm is Urlri•1131)1C i)er.∎.Src /�. —S6,r4 ,pray€ P.1/2 Carmel October 12, 2012 Eric A. Gleissner, P.T. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 = ]p Lr1meni qu re I 4OJs2 RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Dear Mr. Gleissner: The above mentioned project has been received and reviewed. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, Tiffiothy J. Green Chief of Police TJG:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services (317) 5711 -2500 A Nationally AccreditedLaW Enforcement Agency Fax (317) 571 -25112 From: Clark. Joanne L. To: Eric 3lelssner Cc: Cana Annellna V fAconn4carmeLin.aov) Subject: RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) Date: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:33:27 AM Eric, We will need a utility easement along the south edge of property line, as we will need to run a main back to catch the buildings and we can't install main on property without being in easement. Other than that Vectren does not have any issues with your development. Thank you, Joanie Clark Vectren Energy 317 - 776 -5532 From: Eric Gleissner [ mailto :egleissner @civilsite.net] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:35 PM To: 'Conn, Angelina V'; 'Blanchard, Jim E'; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; 'Duffy, John M'; 'Duncan, Gary R'; 'Ellison, Christopher M'; 'Greg Ilko'; 'Hohlt, William G'; 'Huffman, David'; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; 'Krueskamp, Theresa A'; 'Redden, Nick'; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; 'Shirley Hunter'; 'Westermeier, Mark'; Gary.McNamee @duke - energy.com; 'Yackle, Troy '; Clark, Joanne L.; 'Thomas, John G'; Greg .Noyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; dan.davenport@aes.com; doland.w.wise @usps.gov; 'Mindham, Daren'; 'Littlejohn, David W'; 'KREBS, STEVEN 3 (ATTINB)'; 'Larry Beard'; 'Green, Timothy J'; 'Duane Whiting'; 'Lux, Pamela K' Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Brad Walker; Brad Smith; Jim Shinaver Subject: RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) Good afternoon TAC members, Please find attached revised Detailed Development Plans for the Dunkin Donuts / C -Store to be located at 9800 North Michigan Road. This project was originally filed back in March of this year; however, the development was undergoing some significant changes so it was not discussed at the April TAC meeting for which it was scheduled. The PetSuites building previously proposed for the rear half of the property has been removed and a smaller commercial building has replaced it. The new building is much closer to Michigan Road and the rear half of the site will be used for tree preservation and detention as needed. There is significantly more greenspace on this revised plan (over 55 %) due to the difficult soils located on the rear half of the subject parcel. Hard copies of the revised plans will be going out in the mail on Monday. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in the meantime. Thanks and have a great weekend, Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 DISCLAIMER: ++ +The information transmitted is intended only for designated recipient(s) and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and do not retain but destroy any copies of this document. + + +. Mf='Ti7' GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 October 31, 2012 Ms. Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Phone: 317 -571 -2281 Subject: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Commercial Development Docket No. 12030014 -16 DP /ADLS 9800 North Michigan Road Dear Ms. Conn, Please find attached revisions and responses related to the Detailed Development Plans provided by Civil Site Group. The following responses below are for selected comments pertaining to our information. Additional information will be provided to you by the Architect and Legal Counsel for the project. 10. A cross access easement has been added to the Detailed Development Plans. Please see revised sheet C2.0. 21. The site has been adjusted to provide the full 36' greenbelt adjacent to the parking along Michigan Road. Please see the revised Detailed Development Plans. 30. A &F Engineering has been commissioned to perform a full traffic impact study (TIS). Based on meetings and correspondence with INDOT, they have dictated the scope and requirements for the TIS. The traffic counts have been completed and once the conclusions and report are compiled, they will be submitted to INDOT for approval. 31. We have had multiple meetings with INDOT regarding the proposed driveways for the project. INDOT has given us the scope and requirements for a full traffic study (TIS) which is currently underway. INDOT will not issue a final approval for the driveways until they have had a chance to analyze the completed TIS. However, based on the preliminary correspondence, INDOT would be willing to approve the two driveways as long as they are supported by data from the TIS and will cause a minimal impact to traffic patterns in the area. 32. Bicycle parking areas were labeled on the previously submitted plans. A detail of the proposed bicycle rack has been added to revised sheet C2.0. 33. We have verified with the site lighting vender, TechLite, that all proposed fixtures on -site are indeed flat lenses with 90- degree cutoffs. Ms. Angie Conn City of Carmel Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Commercial Development October3l, 2012 Page 2 of 2 35. The site lighting plan has been revised to show a maximum height of 24' A.F.G. (above finished grade). Please see revised sheet SL1.0. 36. The only outdoor sales will be at the northwest corner of the C -Store building with the display being located behind the building. It will be screened by a wall with gates. Please see the revised Detailed Development Plans. 37. The site plan works best from a logistical and functionality standpoint as it is laid out currently. The traffic circulation through and around the site is ideal as it is now. Rotating the commercial building 90- degrees and moving it closer to Michigan Road could impede access into the site from the northern curb cut. The location of the northern curb cut is being dictated by INDOT to line up with 98th Street on the East side of Michigan Road. Also, rotating and moving the commercial building would cause the back of the building to be visible from Michigan Road which is not desirable. In addition, tenants ideally will need to face Michigan Road directly for the best visibility. 38. We received two minor comments from the Urban Forester and have addressed those with this revision. I hope the above addresses your concerns and we look forward to receiving final approval for the project. Thank you. Sincerely, Civil Site Group, Inc. Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Principal Attachments: Revised Detailed Development Plans Copy of Comment Letter Eric Gleissner From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn @carmel.in.gov> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 4:28 PM To: 'Jon Dobosiewicz' Cc: 'Eric Gleissner; 'Jim Shinaver; 'bradames @comcast.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Donahue - Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: Review comments for Docket Nos. 12030014 -16 DP & ADLS: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. /BP /Dunkin Donuts Attachments: Carmel Green Building Checklist.doc Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, Jon - The Department has re- reviewed the proposed project for this site, since it has changed in layout, design, and architecture. Please reply to each of the review comments for the DP & ADLS applications via email or letter correspondence by Nov. 5. Also, we can meet prior to that to discuss the review comments you have questions about. Thank you. Planning /Zoning Dept. review comments: 1. Feel free to bring color /material samples of the building to the Plan Commission meeting. 2. Please provide paper copies of the revised applications. 3. Please provide digital copies of any revised plans. 4. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. 5. Remember to include the Development Plan application's Findings of Fact sheet in your final information packets. 6. Provide the filled out and notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing page of the application. 7. Provide the filled out Notice of Public Hearing page of the application. 8. Provide the filled out and notarized Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit page of the application. 9. Provide a copy of the Official List of Adjacent Property Owners from Hamilton County Auditor's Office. 10. Show /label a cross access easement across the site, so that when the site connects to the adjacent sites there will not be an issue with vehicular traffic accessing the site from the north and from the south. See Zoning Ordinance Chapters 23C.13 and 23C.11.D, too. 11. Please submit to -scale architectural building elevations on 24 "x36" or similar sized paper. 12. On each building, please provide the percent of EIFS of all non - window facade areas, per ZO Chapter 23C.09.K.2. (It must be less than or equal to 10 %, otherwise a BZA variance will be required.) 13. Please lower the parapet to reduce the total percent of EIFS OR use more brick between the heights of 4 -ft and 14 -ft, possibly, for a 10 -ft wide band of brick at least. The ratios look 'off. 14. Both the C -Store south elevation and Commercial retail building west elevation have long and monotonous walls, which are not permitted by ZO Chapter 23C.09.B. 15. What is the bollards color? 16. Gas canopy location might need BZA variance approval. See ZO Chapter 25.01.02 and ZO Chapter 25.19.c - Setbacks of accessory buildings & uses. 1 17. Cornices - please finish the detailing /reveals on the sides /ends. 18. You will need a BZA variance from ZO Chapter 23C.09.D: 8 -ft deep bumpouts /recessions, facades and detailing, etc. The Dept. recommends that you at least show 4 -ft deep projections and recessions. 19. Modulating roof /roofline on all visible elevations is required. 20. Building must appear to be 1.5 stories tall. 21. BZA variance is required for the parking spaces located along the front of the site, where it is not setback 36 -ft to accommodate the 30 -ft wide greenbelt, plus the 6 -ft wide parking perimeter buffer, per ZO Chapter 23C.10.03.5.a. Also, per ZO chapter 23C.11.F: Parking within front yard setbacks shall be discouraged and limited to a maximum of two (2) rows of parking, subject to minimum Greenbelt width, minimum bufferyard requirements and maximum building setback standards. 22. Is there not more detailing or a changeup of materials that can be done to break up the upper EIFS portion of the building? 23. Maybe remove the awnings from the windows, or at least place them lower than they are shown. Right now, it looks awkward. 24. The grids in the windows and the door entries: please make them the same pattern or proportionate. 25. Please paint the backs of the taller parapets a brick color. 26. Please provide more detail on the metal canopies. Also, can you make them deeper, to provide more of an overhang? 27. Please submit to -scale floor plans or typical store layouts for the Dunkin Donuts and C- store. 28. Please label the mechanical equipment locations (rooftop or ground level) on the site plan and building elevations and provide details on how they are screened from view or camouflaged. This includes electric and gas meters; see ZO Chapter 23C.10.02.5.. 29. Please consider using additional LEED or 'green' site and building practices, such as a white membrane roof, solar panels, native plants, rain gardens, etc. List is attached. 30. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that no type of traffic analysis is required. 31. Please provide correspondence from INDOT about the 2 curb cuts and their approvals of that. 32. Please show /label the bicycle parking areas and provide the bike rack details, per ZO Chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. 33. Please verify that all parking lot pole light fixtures have flat lenses and /or 90- degree cutoffs so that the light is downcast. 34. Please provide the wall sconce design details/ cut sheets. 35. Per ZO Chapter 23C.12.B, please amend the parking lot pole lights to be a maximum height of 24 feet. 36. Would like a commitment to have no or very little outdoor sales and displays associated with the gas station /convenience store to limit the propane gas exchanges, mulch stacks, washer fluid displays, etc. per ZO Chapter 23C.14.01, storage areas must be completely screened from view. 37. The Dept. would like the plan modified to shift one or both of the buildings closer to Michigan Rd. Can you rotate the commercial retail building 90- degrees and slide it closer to Michigan Rd, to be sited closer to the north property line? 38. Daren Mindham with the City Forestry Dept, will review the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. 39. BZA variance will be required for the drive thru stacking location, per ZO Chapter 23C.11.G. 40. Signage review & additional review comments: Dunkin Donuts /BP and commercial retail buildings: 2 a) We don't think the EIFS is placed in the best possible location. It should be utilized above the entry doors to aid in installation and visibility of the signage. Right now, the signage blends into the building and does not stand out against the brick. b) Where the EIFS is located, it would be best to continue the brick all the way up the facade to the cornice element, or even use a different color brick to make it stand out from the feature entrances /protrusions of the tenants' areas. c) On the commercial retail building, l don't think using the CMU block all the way up the entry feature is an appropriate material. This should be kept at the base. Then perhaps a different color brick could be used to call attention to that particular part of the building, to that tenant's entry feature. d) We would also like to see some more architectural elements built into the sign band area of each building. It would be good to see some brick detailing around the EIFS, to call out a specific sign band area or placement for the sign - to frame each sign, in a way. e) For the both buildings, the recessed brick detail is very distracting. Perhaps this feature would be better on the other facade elevations where the EIFS top half is proposed, but not the main ones. f) Would also like to see more detailing to define the two spaces (Dunkin and BP). Perhaps some edge molding at the corners of the building and a matching one in- between the spaces would help add some detail and separation. g) If EIFS is required above the entry doors to the tenant spaces, perhaps have less scoring on them to make it stand out less and /or paint it to match the surrounding materials so it does not stand out as much. Right now the buildings look very busy with so many different elevations and materials. h) Staff would like to see the same window awning colors for all sides of the Dunkin Donuts /BP building. Dunkin Donuts /BP building Signage: a) Each tenant is allowed 40 square feet per sign chart B. b) We will consider the main signage /ROW to be facing north, so there is consistency between the signage for the two tenants. c) Dunkin Donuts signage and awning detail facing south will need BZA variance approval. We will not support these variances for additional signage and signage not facing a right -of -way. d) Dunkin Donuts signage facing east will also require a BZA variance for number of signs and going over the total square footage allowed. These variances might be supported by Staff. e) Dunkin Donuts signage facing all directions will be subject to the 25% logo rule for their coffee cup logo. Please submit additional size information for the logos. f) BP will require a BZA variance for a 100% logo sign. g) Need to see more detail on the drive thru menu board, menu canopy, etc. The size is limited to 6 feet tall and 16 square feet in size. Staff would like a masonry base on this sign. Commercial retail building: a) Please submit information on the signage requirements for tenants, including but not limited to: i. Size ii. Color iii. Lighting style iv. Installation method v. Signage on awnings permitted? b) If they would prefer it just meet the Sign Ordinance requirements, that is okay, too, but we just need to know. Gas Station island & canopy areas: a) Signage is not allowed on the roof of the gas station canopy. This will require a BZA variance that the Dept. will not support. b) The design of the canopy as all EIFS material is not preferred. Perhaps the color needs to change? Or have less breaks or scoring in the material? It looks very choppy. We have seen more ornate and detailed canopies recently and this one needs a bit more substance. c) The gas canopy seem a little top- heavy. Is there a way to widen the columns or to reduce the thickness of the canopy, to remedy this? 3 d) Need to see signage details for the gas station bumps and pump markers. All signage for pumps and markers needs to be 3 square feet or less to be considered exempt. Otherwise, BZA variances will be required. Ground signs: a) The height for the Dunkin Donuts /BP ground sign is ok. We need more detail on the size, though. b) The ground sign which is for the tenant panels is limited to 20 sq. ft. and 5 -ft tall. Please provide more detail on the size. c) The tenant signage sign with four panels will also require the name of the shopping center development to be at the top of the sign. d) if possible, Staff would like to see a more pronounced base for each sign, to balance out the top cornice of the sign. Right now it seems a bit "top heavy ". Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division • Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Fir. Carmel, IN 46032 0: 317-571-2417 1 F: 317 - 571 -2426 W: www.carmeldocs.com 11 it Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail E: aconn @carmel.in.aov 4 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Conn, Angelina V Monday, October 22, 2012 4:28 PM 'Jon Dobosiewicz' 'Eric Gleissner'; 'Jim Shinaver'; 'bradames @comcast.net'; Boone, Rachel M.; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K RE: Review comments for Docket Nos. 12030014 -16 DP & ADLS: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. /BP /Dunkin Donuts Carmel Green Building Checklist.doc Good afternoon, Jon - The Department has re- reviewed the proposed project for this site, since it has changed in layout, design, and architecture. Please reply to each of the review comments for the DP & ADLS applications via email or letter correspondence by Nov. 5. Also, we can meet prior to that to discuss the review comments you have questions about. Thank you. Planning /Zoning Dept. review comments: 1. Feel free to bring color /material samples of the building to the Plan Commission meeting. 2. Please provide paper copies of the revised applications. 3. Please provide digital copies of any revised plans. 4. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. 5. Remember to include the Development Plan application's Findings of Fact sheet in your final information packets. 6. Provide the filled out and notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing page of the application. 7. Provide the filled out Notice of Public Hearing page of the application. 8. Provide the filled out and notarized Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit page of the application. 9. Provide a copy of the Official List of Adjacent Property Owners from Hamilton County Auditor's Office. 10. Show /label a cross access easement across the site, so that when the site connects to the adjacent sites there will not be an issue with vehicular traffic accessing the site from the north and from the south. See Zoning Ordinance Chapters 23C.13 and 23C.11.D, too. 11. Please submit to -scale architectural building elevations on 24 "x36" or similar sized paper. 12. On each building, please provide the percent of EIFS of all non - window facade areas, per ZO Chapter 23C.09.K.2. (It must be less than or equal to 10 %, otherwise a BZA variance will be required.) 13. Please lower the parapet to reduce the total percent of EIFS OR use more brick between the heights of 4 -ft and 14 -ft, possibly, for a 10 -ft wide band of brick at least. The ratios look 'off. 14. Both the C -Store south elevation and Commercial retail building west elevation have long and monotonous walls, which are not permitted by ZO Chapter 23C.09.B. 15. What is the bollards color? Gas canopy location might need BZA variance approval. See ZO Chapter 25.01.02 and ZO Chapter 25.19.c - Setbacks of accessory buildings & uses. 17. Cornices - please finish the detailing /reveals on the sides /ends. `You will need a BZA variance from ZO Chapter 23C.09.D: 8 -ft deep bumpouts /recessions, facades and detailing, etc. The Dept. recommends that you at least show 4 -ft deep projections and recessions. 19. Modulating roof /roofline on all visible elevations is required. 1 20. Building must appear to be 1.5 stories tall. XBZA variance is required for the parking spaces located along the front of the site, where it is not setback 36 -ft o accommodate the 30 -ft wide greenbelt, plus the 6 -ft wide parking perimeter buffer, per ZO Chapter 23C.10.03.5.a. Also, per ZO chapter 23C.11.F: Parking within frontyard setbacks shall be discouraged and limited to a maximum of two (2) rows of parking, subject to minimum Greenbelt width, minimum bufferyard requirements and maximum building setback standards. 22. Is there not more detailing or a changeup of materials that can be done to break up the upper EIFS portion of the building? 23. Maybe remove the awnings from the windows, or at least place them lower than they are shown. Right now, it looks awkward. 24. The grids in the windows and the door entries: please make them the same pattern or proportionate. 25. Please paint the backs of the taller parapets a brick color. 26. Please provide more detail on the metal canopies. Also, can you make them deeper, to provide more of an overhang? 27. Please submit to -scale floor plans or typical store layouts for the Dunkin Donuts and C- store. 28. Please label the mechanical equipment locations (rooftop or ground level) on the site plan and building elevations and provide details on how they are screened from view or camouflaged. This includes electric and gas meters; see ZO Chapter 23C.10.02.5. `9 Please consider using additional LEED or 'green' site and building practices, such as a white membrane roof, solar panels, native plants, rain gardens, etc. List is attached. 30. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that no type of traffic analysis is required. 31. Please provide correspondence from 1NDOT about the 2 curb cuts and their approvals of that. 32. Please show /label the bicycle parking areas and provide the bike rack details, per ZO Chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. 33. Please verify that all parking lot pole light fixtures have flat lenses and /or 90- degree cutoffs so that the light is downcast. 34. Please provide the wall sconce design details/ cut sheets. 35. Per ZO Chapter 23C.12.B, please amend the parking lot pole lights to be a maximum height of 24 feet. 36. Would like a commitment to have no or very little outdoor sales and displays associated with the gas station /convenience store to limit the propane gas exchanges, mulch stacks, washer fluid displays, etc. per ZO Chapter 23C.14.01, storage areas must be completely screened from view. 37. The Dept. would like the plan modified to shift one or both of the buildings closer to Michigan Rd. Can you rotate the commercial retail building 90- degrees and slide it closer to Michigan Rd, to be sited closer to the north property line? 38. Daren Mindham with the City Forestry Dept, will review the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. XBZA variance will be required for the drive thru stacking location, per ZO Chapter 23C.11.G. 40. Signage review & additional review comments: Dunkin Donuts /BP and commercial retail buildings: a) We don't think the EIFS is placed in the best possible location. It should be utilized above the entry doors to aid in installation and visibility of the signage. Right now, the signage blends into the building and does not stand out against the brick. b) Where the EIFS is located, it would be best to continue the brick all the way up the facade to the cornice element, or even use a different color brick to make it stand out from the feature entrances /protrusions of the tenants' areas. 2 c) On the commercial retail building, I don't think using the CMU block all the way up the entry feature is an appropriate material. This should be kept at the base. Then perhaps a different color brick could be used to call attention to that particular part of the building, to that tenant's entry feature. d) We would also like to see some more architectural elements built into the sign band area of each building. It would be good to see some brick detailing around the EIFS, to call out a specific sign band area or placement for the sign - to frame each sign, in a way. e) For the both buildings, the recessed brick detail is very distracting. Perhaps this feature would be better on the other facade elevations where the EIFS top half is proposed, but not the main ones. f) Would also like to see more detailing to define the two spaces (Dunkin and BP). Perhaps some edge molding at the corners of the building and a matching one in- between the spaces would help add some detail and separation. g) If EIFS is required above the entry doors to the tenant spaces, perhaps have less scoring on them to make it stand out less and /or paint it to match the surrounding materials so it does not stand out as much. Right now the buildings look very busy with so many different elevations and materials. h) Staff would like to see the same window awning colors for all sides of the Dunkin Donuts /BP building. Dunkin Donuts /BP building Signage: a) Each tenant is allowed 40 square feet per sign chart B. b) We will consider the main signage /ROW to be facing north, so there is consistency between the signage for the two tenants. c) Dunkin Donuts signage and awning detail facing south will need BZA variance approval. We will not support these variances for additional signage and signage not facing a right -of -way. d) Dunkin Donuts signage facing east will also require a BZA variance for number of signs and going over the total square footage allowed. These variances might be supported by Staff. e) Dunkin Donuts signage facing all directions will be subject to the 25% logo rule for their coffee cup logo. Please submit additional size information for the logos. BP will require a BZA variance for a 100% logo sign. g) Need to see more detail on the drive thru menu board, menu canopy, etc. The size is limited to 6 feet tall and 16 square feet in size. Staff would like a masonry base on this sign. Commercial retail building: a) Please submit information on the signage requirements for tenants, including but not limited to: i. Size ii. Color iii. Lighting style iv. Installation method v. Signage on awnings permitted? b) If they would prefer it just meet the Sign Ordinance requirements, that is okay, too, but we just need to know. Gas Station island & canopy areas: a) Signage is not allowed on the roof of the gas station canopy. This will require a BZA variance that the Dept. will not support. b) The design of the canopy as all EIFS material is not preferred. Perhaps the color needs to change? Or have less breaks or scoring in the material? It looks very choppy. We have seen more ornate and detailed canopies recently and this one needs a bit more substance. c) The gas canopy seem a little top- heavy. Is there a way to widen the columns or to reduce the thickness of the canopy, to remedy this? d) Need to see signage details for the gas station bumps and pump markers. All signage for pumps and markers needs to be 3 square feet or less to be considered exempt. Otherwise, BZA variances will be required. Ground signs: a) The height for the Dunkin Donuts /BP ground sign is ok. We need more detail on the size, though. 3 b) The ground sign which is for the tenant panels is limited to 20 sq. ft. and 5 -ft tall. Please provide more detail on the size. c) The tenant signage sign with four panels will also require the name of the shopping center development to be at the top of the sign. d) If possible, Staff would like to see a more pronounced base for each sign, to balance out the top cornice of the sign. Right now it seems a bit "top heavy". Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Division Dept. of Community Services 1 Civic Square, 3rd Flr. Carmel, IN 46032 0: 317-571-2417 1 F: 317 - 571 -2426 W: www.carmeldocs.com APlease consider the environment before printing this e -mail E: aconn@carmel.in.gov 4 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Boone, Rachel M. Monday, October 22, 2012 3:31 PM Conn, Angelina V RE: Elevations, 9800 N Michigan Rd (Dunkin Donuts, BP, etc.) Hi Angie, Here are my thoughts for the building and signage design: Dunkin Donuts /BP and commercial retail buildings: 1. I don't believe the EIFS is placed in the best possible location. It should be utilized above the entry doors to aid in installation and visibility of the signage. Right now the signage blends into the building and does not stand out against the brick. 2. Where the EIFS is located, it would be best to continue the brick all the way up the facade to the cornice element, or even use a different color brick to make it stand out from the feature entrances /protrusions of the tenants' areas. 3. On the commercial retail building, I don't think using the CMU block all the way the entry feature is an appropriate material. This should be kept at the base. Then perhaps a different color brick could be used to call attention to that particular part of the building. 4. I would also like to see some more architectural elements built into the sign band area of each building. It would be good to see some brick detailing around the EIFS, to call out a specific sign band area or placement for the sign. 5. For the both buildings, the recessed brick detail is very distracting. Perhaps this feature would be better on the other facade elevations where the EIFS top half is proposed, not the main ones. 6. Would also like to see more detailing to define the two spaces (Dunkin and BP). Perhaps some edge molding at the corners of the building and a matching one in- between the spaces would help add some detail and separation. 7. If EIFS is required above the entry doors to the tenant spaces, perhaps have less scoring on them to make it stand out less and /or paint it to match the surrounding materials so it does not stand out as much. Right now the buildings look very busy with so many different elevations and materials. 8. Would like to see the same awning colors for all sides of the Dunkin Donuts /BP building. 9. Not in favor of the excessive EIFS on the back and sides of the two buildings. Dunkin Donuts /BP building Signage: 1. Each tenant is allowed 40 square feet per sign chart B. 2. We will consider the main signage /ROW to be facing north, so there is consistency between the signage for the two tenants. 3. Dunkin Donuts signage and awning detail facing south will need variance approval. We will not support these variances for additional signage and signage not facing a right -of -way. 4. Dunkin Donuts signage facing east will also require a variance for number of signs and going over the total square footage allowed. These variances may be supported. 5. Dunkin Donuts signage facing all directions will be subject to the 25% logo rule for their coffee cup logo. Please submit additional size information for the logos. 6. BP will require a variance for 100% logo sign. 7. Need to see more detail on the drive thru menu board, menu canopy, etc. The size is limited to 6' tall and 16 square feet. Commercial retail building: 1. Please submit information on the signage requirements for tenants, including but not limited to: a. Size b. Color 1 ra c. Lighting style d. Installation method e. Signage on awnings permitted? 2. If they would prefer it just meet the Sign Ordinance requirements, that is ok as well. Gas Station island: 1. Signage is not allowed on the roof of the gas station canopy. This will require a variance that the Dept. will not support. 2. The design of the canopy as all EIFS material is not preferred. Perhaps the color needs to change? Or have less breaks or scoring in the material? It looks very choppy. We have seen more ornate and detailed canopies recently and this one needs a bit more substance. 3. Need to see signage details for the gas station bumps and pump markers. All signage for pumps and markers needs to be 3 square feet or less to be considered exempt. Otherwise, variances will be required. Ground signs: 1. The height for the Dunkin Donuts /BP ground sign is ok. I need more detail on the size though. 2. The ground sign which is for the tenant panels is limited to 20 sq. ft. and 5' tall. Please provide more detail on the size. 3. The tenant signage sign with four panels will also require the name of the center to be at the top of the sign. 4. If possible, would like to see a more pronounced base for each sign, to balance out the top cornice of the sign. Right now it seems a bit "top heavy ". I hope this helps and covers everything. Thanks, Rachel 2a.chel3oo Sign Permit Specialist City of Carmel Department of Community Services 317 - 571 -2417 From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:29 PM To: Boone, Rachel M.; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hollibaugh, Mike P Cc: Tingley, Connie S Subject: Elevations, 9800 N Michigan Rd (Dunkin Donuts, BP, etc.) All: Please take a look at these proposed elevations /materials, and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks! (Connie — please add this to laser fiche, to docket nos. 12030014 DP & 12030016 ADLS — 9800 N Michigan Rd, Dunkin Donuts, C- Store, Gas Canopy.) Thanks, Angie Conn, Planning Administrator 2 Citizens Energy Group/Water comments from Duane Whiting, for the CARMEL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE items: October 17, 2012 Angie, The Department of Public Utilities of the City of Indianapolis d/b /a Citizens Water (CW) has reviewed the below listed TAC agenda topics. CW's response for each topic is stated in the Bold Blue Text bellow each topic description. 9:00 a.m. (UV) Tom Wood Parking Lot. The applicant seeks the following use variance approval for a surface parking lot on a residentially zoned property: Docket No. 12080016 UV ZO Ch. 6.01.01 Permitted Uses The site is located at 9624 Day Drive. It is zoned S- 2/Residence. Filed by Paul Reis of Krieg DeVault for Tom Wood, Inc. CW has no objection for variance approval for parking lot and (CA) Docket No. 12080017 CA: Tom Wood Day Drive Access. The applicant seeks to amend a commitment made in 1969 as a part of the BZA Special Exception approval for an auto dealership, to allow access to Day .Drive. The site is located at 3130 E 96th Street. It is zoned B -3 within the Keystone Overlay Zone. Filed by Paul Reis of Krieg DeVault for Tom Wood, Inc. CW has no objection to amend the commitment made as part of the BZA Special Exception approval for the auto dealership. This site is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities. 9:15 a.m. (SUA,V) Carmel Seventh -Day Adventist Church Parking Lot Addition (aka Carmel Hope Fellowship). The applicant seeks the following special use amendment and development standards variance approval to expand their parking lot: Docket No. 12090016 SUA - Ordinance Ch 7.02: Church in R -1 district Docket No. 12090017 V - Ordinance Ch 27.03.01: Parking Facilities (temporary gravel requested). The site is located at 1.4445 Carey Rd. and is zoned R I/Residential. Filed by Jamie Shinneman of Weihe Engineers on behalf of the Indiana Association of Seventh Day Adventists, Inc. CW has no objection to the special use amendment and variance of development standards to expand the parking lot. This site is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities. 9:25 a.m. Docket No. 12090018 DP Amend: Ed Martin Parking Lot Expansion (Mayflower Park, Block 6, Lot 2). The applicant seeks approval for a 140 -space parking lot expansion, impacting about 1.18 acres. The site is located at 9896 N. Michigan Rd. It is zoned I -1/ Industrial and lies within the US 421 /Michigan Rd. Corridor Overlay Zone. Filed by Brian Cross of Civil Site Group, Inc. for Ed Martin Buick GMC. CW has no objection for the parking lot expansion. This site is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities. 9:35 a.m. Docket No. 12030014 DP: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. Docket No. 12030016 ADLS: Dunkin Donuts, C -Store & Gas Canopy. 4 The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a multi- tenant building & fuel canopy on 3.98 acres. The site is located at 9800 N. Michigan Rd. and is zoned I -1 /Industrial, within the US 421/Michigan Rd. Overlay Zone. Filed by Brad Walker of H & H Restaurant Mngmt. CW has no objection to the site plan and design approval at the above described site. This site is outside CW's Service Area, it is served by Carmel Utilities WWW.CARMEL.IN.GOV Page 1 of 2 ONE CIVIC SQ. CARMEL, IN 46032 (317) 571 -2417 NELSON & FRANKENBERGER JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317- 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 October 12, 2012 i2 °r JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional Re: 9800 North Michigan Road — Docket # 12030014 DP Duncan Donuts and Retail Building — Docket # 12030015 ADLS Dear Angie: Attached please find building elevations for the above referenced application. We will soon be conferring with you to further discuss the request and determine the items where variance requests may be necessary. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER, P.C. L.--------) Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Enclosures HealthSouth - Ltr to ACoan 081911 'Crfy mI C1irme] Carmel Police Depari .meii 3 Ciyic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 October 12, 2012 Eric A. Gleissner, P.T. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Dear Mr. Gleissner: The above mentioned project has been received and reviewed. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, Tiothy J. Green Chief of Police TJG:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services (317) 571 -2500 A Nationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Fa. (3117) 571-2512 Conn, An • elina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Eric, Clark, Joanne L. [jlclark @Vectren.com] Friday, October 12, 2012 10:33 AM Eric Gleissner Conn, Angelina V RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) We will need a utility easement along the south edge of property line, as we will need to run a main back to catch the buildings and we can't install main on property without being in easement. Other than that Vectren does not have any issues with your development. Thank you, Joanie Clark Vectren Energy 317 - 776 -5532 From: Eric Gleissner [mailto:egleissner @civilsite.net] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:35 PM To: 'Conn, Angelina V'; 'Blanchard, Jim E'; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; 'Duffy, John M'; Duncan, Gary R'; 'Ellison, Christopher M'; 'Greg Ilko'; 'Hohlt, William G'; 'Huffman, David'; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; 'Krueskamp, Theresa A'; 'Redden, Nick'; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; 'Shirley Hunter'; 'Westermeier, Mark'; Garv.McNamee @duke- energy.com; 'Yackle, Troy'; Clark, Joanne L.; Thomas, John G'; Greg .Hoyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov; dan.davenport @aes.com; doland.w.wise @usps.gov; 'Mindham, Daren'; 'Littlejohn, David W'; 'KREBS, STEVEN J (ATfINB)'; 'Larry Beard'; 'Green, Timothy J'; 'Duane Whiting'; 'Lux, Pamela K' Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Brad Walker; Brad Smith; Jim Shinaver Subject: RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) Good afternoon TAC members, Please find attached revised Detailed Development Plans for the Dunkin Donuts / C -Store to be located at 9800 North Michigan Road. This project was originally filed back in March of this year; however, the development was undergoing some significant changes so it was not discussed at the April TAC meeting for which it was scheduled. The PetSuites building previously proposed for the rear half of the property has been removed and a smaller commercial building has replaced it. The new building is much closer to Michigan Road and the rear half of the site will be used for tree preservation and detention as needed. There is significantly more greenspace on this revised plan (over 55 %) due to the difficult soils located on the rear half of the subject parcel. Hard copies of the revised plans will be going out in the mail on Monday. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in the meantime. Thanks and have a great weekend, Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 1 City of Carmel tAO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES October 11. 2012 Mr. Eric Gleissner Civil Site Group, Inc 643 Massachusetts Ave. Ste 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Gas Canopy Dear Mr. Gleissner: The following letter represents comments for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative transportation. I have reviewed the project submitted for the October 17, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee meeting, and offer the following comments: Alternative Transportation Review and Comments 1) Please ensure that all ramps and crosswalks comply with ADA standards. We request that. all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in delay of the review process. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans indicating all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, Special Studies or other committee meetings. The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews. If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417. Sincerely, David Littlejohn Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department. of Community Services cc: Angie Conn, Department of Community Services Engineering Department Review Project. File ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 1 CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 October 10, 2012 Xenton C. '1 -'ard, GEM Surveyor of J- larnilton County 'Pfiione (317) 776 -8495 Tax (317) 776-9623 Civil Site Group, Inc. ATTN: Eric Gleissner 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 VIA E -MAIL: egleissner @civilsite.net RE: Dunkin Donuts /C -Store Dear Mr. Gleissner, Suite 188 One .ifamilton County Square Noblesville, Indiana 4606o -223o We have reviewed the construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on October 10, 2012, for this project and have the following comments: 1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of Carmel. 2. The proposed project DOES NOT fall in a Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone. 3. The proposed project does not fall in a Hamilton County Regulated Drain Watershed. 4. Please direct all stormwater questions to the City of Carmel Engineering Department. 5. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no comments or concerns on this project Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317 - 776 -8495. Sincerely, Greg Hoyes, AC, CFM, CPESC Plan Reviewer CC: Angie Comm — Carmel DOCS John Thomas — Carmel Engineering Dave Barnes — Carmel Engineering Greg Ilko — Crossroad Engineers TRANSMITTAL Prot- c ,10c; GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 ,hut\ 4,' TO: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ONE CIVIC SQUARE -3RD FLOOR CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2417 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 10/8/2012 JOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: ANGIE CONN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store FAX #: 571 -2426 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE OCTOBER 17TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. 0 110 GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317- 423 -3306 October 8, 2012 Subject: Project Narrative Dunkin Donuts / C -Store Commercial Development 9800 & 9802 North Michigan Road Dear TAC Member: Please find attached revised Detailed Development Plans for the Dunkin Donuts / C -Store to be located at 9800 North Michigan Road. This project was originally filed back in March of this year; however, the development was undergoing some significant changes so it was not discussed at the April TAC meeting for which it was scheduled. The PetSuites building previously proposed for the rear half of the property has been removed and a smaller commercial building has replaced it. The new building is much closer to Michigan Road and the rear half of the site will be used for tree preservation and detention as needed. There is significantly more greenspace on this revised plan (over 55 %) due to the difficult soils located on the rear half of the subject parcel. It should be noted that the attached plans are NOT detailed construction plans. These plans are intended to go through the ADLS approval process in which this project will be requesting multiple variances from the standard zoning regulations. Assuming the variances are granted, we will then submit detailed construction plans to go back through the TAC process for the required administrative approvals from the various TAC agencies. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the project. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Civil Site Group, Inc. Eric A Gleissner, P.E. Principal Conn, Angelina V From: Eric Gleissner [egleissner @civilsite.net] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:35 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Blanchard, Jim E; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; 'Greg Ilko'; Hohit, William G; Huffman, David; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Redden, Nick; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; 'Shirley Hunter'; Westermeier, Mark; Gary.McNamee @duke- energy.com; 'Yackle, Troy'; jiclark @vectren.com; Thomas, John G; Greg.Hoyes@hamiltoncounty.in.gov; dan.davenport @aes.com; doland.w.wise @usps.gov; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; 'KREBS, STEVEN J (ATTINB)'; 'Larry Beard'; Green, Timothy J; 'Duane Whiting'; Lux, Pamela K Cc: Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Brad Walker; Brad Smith; Jim Shinaver Subject: RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda (Dunkin Donuts / C- Store) Attachments: C0.0.pdf; C1.0.pdf; C2.0.pdf; C2.1.pdf; C2.2.pdf; L1.0.pdf Good afternoon TAC members, Please find attached revised Detailed Development Plans for the Dunkin Donuts / C -Store to be located at 9800 North Michigan Road. This project was originally filed back in March of this year; however, the development was undergoing some significant changes so it was not discussed at the April TAC meeting for which it was scheduled. The PetSuites building previously proposed for the rear half of the property has been removed and a smaller commercial building has replaced it. The new building is much closer to Michigan Road and the rear half of the site will be used for tree preservation and detention as needed. There is significantly more greenspace on this revised plan (over 55 %) due to the difficult soils located on the rear half of the subject parcel. Hard copies of the revised plans will be going out in the mail on Monday. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in the meantime. Thanks and have a great weekend, Eric A. Gleissner, P.E. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Phone: 317 - 423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Hunter, Shirley A [Shirley.Hunter @duke- energy.com] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:41 PM To: Conn, Angelina V; Blanchard, Jim E; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; 'Greg Ilko'; Hohlt, William G; Huffman, David; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Redden, Nick; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; Westermeier, Mark; McNamee, Gary S; 'Yackle, Troy'; 'jlclark @vectren.com'; Thomas, John G; ' Greg .Noyes@ hamiltoncounty.in.gov'; 'dan. davenport@ aes .com';'doland.w.wise @usps.gov'; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; 'KREBS, STEVEN J ( ATTINB)'; 'Larry Beard'; Green, Timothy J; 'Duane Whiting'; Lux, Pamela K Cc: Boone, Rachel M.; Carter, Ronald E; Mishler, Nicholas F; 'Chuck Shupperd'; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Knott, Bruce; 'Richard Heck'; 'Marilyn Anderson'; 'Mark Zukerman'; McBride, Mike T; Pace, Paul V; 'Judy Hagan'; Tingley, Connie S; Maki, Sue; Keeling, Adrienne M; Stewart, Lisa M; 'mw9285 @aol.com'; Haney, Douglas C; 'Jeffrey Cohen'; Barnes, David R; Worthley, Matthew D; 'amy. schnick @hamiltoncounty.in.gov'; 'Ron Morris'; Whitman, Mike; Foley, Amanda J; 'Jennifer Marlett'; 'Rlchreis @aol.com'; Hoover, Aaron; 'Wiseman, Alan'; Kempa, Lisa L; 'MWhite @buckeye.com'; Martin, Candy; 'McFeely, Dan'; Mishler, Nicholas F; Barlow, James C; 'kcummings @citizensenergygroup.com'; ' jhavard @citizensenergygroup.com'; 'Jon Dobosiewicz'; 'Pohlman, Jesse M.'; 'roberta.driver @faegreBD.com'; Foley, Amanda J; 'Paul G. Reis'; 'Kevin G. Buchheit, AICP'; 'Larry Heid'; 'Jamie Shinneman'; Eric Carter; 'Brian Cross'; 'mharrison @edmartin.com'; 'Bud Snyder'; 'Eric Gleissner'; 'bradames @comcast.net' Subject: RE: Oct. 17 Technical Advisory Committee meeting agenda Angie, All the items on the agenda except the Church on Carey Road is in IP &L's service territory, therefore, I will not be attending the TAC meeting this month. Duke has no issues with the parking lot expansion for the Seventh Day Adventist Church. Shirley Hunter Sr. Distribution Eng Specialist Duke Energy 16475 Southpark Dr Westfield, IN 46074 317.896.6711 From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn@acarmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:22 AM To: Blanchard, Jim E; 'Brooke Gajownik'; 'David Lucas'; Duffy, John M; Duncan, Gary R; Ellison, Christopher M; 'Greg Ilko'; Hohlt, William G; Huffman, David; 'Jason Kirkman'; 'Jason LeMaster'; 'Joel Thurman'; Krueskamp, Theresa A; Redden, Nick; 'Ron Farrand'; 'Ryan Hartman'; Hunter, Shirley A; Westermeier, Mark; McNamee, Gary S; 'Yackle, Troy '; 'jlclark @vectren.com'; Thomas, John G; ' Greg .Hoyes @hamiltoncounty.in.gov'; 'dan.davenport@aes.com'; 'doland.w.wise @usps.gov'; Mindham, Daren; Littlejohn, David W; 'KREBS, STEVEN J (ATTINB)'; 'Larry Beard'; Green, Timothy J; 'Duane Whiting'; Lux, Pamela K Cc: Boone, Rachel M.; Carter, Ronald E; Mishler, Nicholas F; 'Chuck Shupperd'; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Hancock, Ramona B; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Knott, Bruce; 'Richard Heck'; 'Marilyn Anderson'; 'Mark Zukerman'; McBride, Mike T; Pace, Paul V; 'Judy Hagan'; Tingley, Connie S; Maki, Sue; Keeling, Adrienne M; Stewart, Lisa M; 'mw9285 @aol.com'; Haney, Douglas C; 'Jeffrey Cohen'; Barnes, David R; Worthley, Matthew D; 'amy .schnick @hamiltoncounty.in.gov'; 'Ron Morris'; Whitman, Mike; Foley, Amanda J; 'Jennifer Marlet; 'Rlchreis @aol.com'; Hoover, Aaron; 'Wiseman, Alan'; Kempa, Lisa L; 'MWhite @buckeye.com'; Martin, Candy; 'McFeely, Dan'; Mishler, Nicholas F; Barlow, James C; ' kcummings @citizensenergygroup.com'; ' jhavard @citizensenergygroup.com'; 'Jon Dobosiewicz'; 'Pohlman, Jesse M.'; 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Jon Dobosiewicz [jond@NF-LAW.COM] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:06 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Jim Shinaver; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: 9800 N. Michigan Rd project - Dunkin Donuts Angie, Thank you for the e -mail. I will forward this to our client and request a response. Hopefully they will have a direction either way and you will not be required to withdraw the item. Thanks, Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson & Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317 -844 -0106 (Office) 317 -428 -8393 (Cell) 317 -846 -8782 (Fax) jon @nf- Iaw.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. Y .e** * *i:•F:kic *'.'FY,:$Y.t *** *• 1, e% kiF% fa e: k -F •* Flt **** F****x'. ****:r *:,:;c *** *. ; v= FM J,:* ** ******* *%k:FacycaF ****>F:k':; Ica::t>.c Jf:j:x; >,c , r;.X-Y,.****. .*• . *** *Y. *r, . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *;: * * * * * * ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:16 PM To: Jon Dobosiewicz Cc: Jim Shinaver; Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: RE: 9800 N. Michigan Rd project - Dunkin Donuts Good afternoon, Jon — I am just following up on my original email. We need to know if your client is moving forward with this petition. If we do not get a response by October 1, 2012 that they are moving forward, then the Department will have to withdraw the petition /submittal, due to lack of prosecution. 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Jon Dobosiewicz [jond @NF - LAW.COM] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:48 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Mindham, Daren; Brad Walker; Jim Shinaver Subject: RE: petsuites - dunkin donuts Angie, The applicant will not be ready to submit plans for the May 16th TAC meeting. Please have this item remain tabled. Thanks, Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson & Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317 - 844 -0106 (Office) 317 -428 -8393 (Cell) 317 - 846 -8782 (Fax) ion @nf- law.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. * * * * ** aka ***************************** * *:g*** * ** * * * *** * * * * * ****** * *>: * * * * * * ** ** * * ** * *k'*** * ** * *** k**** *** *** ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. From: Conn, Angelina V [mailto:Aconn @carmel.in.gov] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:44 PM To: Jon Dobosiewicz Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K; Mindham, Daren Subject: RE: petsuites - dunkin donuts Ok. thanks. please let me know soon if they are tabling their TAC appearance for this month. -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator 1 Conn, An • elina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Angie, Jon Dobosiewicz [jond @NF - LAW.COM] Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:39 AM Conn, Angelina V Jim Shinaver TAC today - 9800 Michigan Road - Dunkin Donuts We would like to table the DP and ADLS for Dunkin Donuts and withdraw the ADLS for PetSuites. This includes the TAC appearance today. Our client plans on making site plan and building changes and then meeting with you to establish a revised schedule. Thanks, Jon Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Nelson & Frankenberger, PC 3105 East 98th Street, Suite 170 Indianapolis, IN 46280 317 -844 -0106 (Office) 317- 428 -8393 (Cell) 317- 846 -8782 (Fax) jon @nf- law.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This E -mail message and its attachments (if any) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. In addition, this message and the attachments (if any) may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure tinder applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E -mail and immediately delete this message from your system. NYC *x>,e$ex:k** ***** ***i; *•x, **xex ix YC' " yexx *•C " ' **•e Ye Yt ** v<%$:* e********** ********** **•h, ******* *** * ***:******** *X*** ****X, *,***,,*kic•.; j: *: ****** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 1 City of Carmel /Nonta% DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES April 11, 2012 Mr. Eric Gleissner Civil Site Group, Inc 643 Massachusetts Ave, ste 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Petsuites, Dunkin Donuts, C -Store and Gas Canopy Dear Mr. Gleissner: The following letter represents confluents for this project specifically addressing the area of alternative transportation. I have reviewed the project submitted for the April 18, 2012 Technical Advisory Committee meeting, and offer the following comments: Alternative Transportation Review and Comments 1) Please provide a direct pedestrian connection to the Duncan Donuts and C -Store from the external multi -use path. 2) Please provide bicycle parking at the proposed Dunkin Donuts and C -Store location. Please see the City of Carmel's Parking Ordinance in order to determine the appropriate locations and construction details for the required bicycle parking. 3) Please ensure that all ramps and crosswalks comply with ADA standards. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written responses may result in delay of the review process. It is critical that this office be made aware of all modification made on the plans being re- submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please provide revised plans indicating all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any changes, including changes resulting from Plan Commission, Special Studies or other committee meetings. ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 1 CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 City of Carmel iwoiata% DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES The Department of Community Services reserves the right to provide additional comments based on subsequent reviews. If you have questions, please contact me at 571 -2417. Sincerely, David Littlejohn Alternative Transportation Coordinator Department of Community Services cc: Angie Conn, Department of Community Services Engineering Department Review Project File ONE CIVIC SQUARE Page 2 CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571 -2417 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:06 PM To: 'Jon Dobosiewicz' Cc: 'Eric Gleissner'; Jim Shinaver; bradames @comcast.net Subject: Review comments for Docket Nos. 12030014 -16 DP & ADLS: 9800 N. Michigan Rd. /PetSuites /Dunkin Donuts Attachments: Carmel Green Building Checklist.doc Good afternoon, Jon - Please reply to each of the review comments for the DP & ADLS applications via email or letter correspondence by April 27. Additional review comments might be voiced at the April 18 TAC meeting. Also, if you would like, we can discuss the review comments you have questions about at our meeting tomorrow. Thank you. Preliminary Planning/Zoning Dept. review comments: 1. Feel free to bring color /material samples of the building to the Plan Commission meeting. 2. Please provide digital copies of any revised plans and applications. 3. Please provide copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. 4. Remember to include the Development Plan application's Findings of Fact sheet in your final information packets. OIn the future, please provide all Design Information on the DP & ADLS application, or the applications will not be , processed. Svvi- Wi (t P v►ia- / '-e. 6. Provide the filled out and notarized affidavit of notice of public hearing page of the application. 7. Provide the filled out Notice of Public Hearing page of the application. 8. Provide the filled out and notarized Public Notice Sign Placement affidavit page of the application. 9. Provide a copy of the Official List of Adjacent Property Owners from Hamilton County Auditor's Office. 10. Please submit a utility plan, showing the utility lines and easements. 11. Show /label a cross access easement across the site, so that when the site connects to the adjacent sites, there will not be an issue with vehicular traffic accessing the site from the north and from the south. See Zoning Ordinance chapters 23C.13 and 23C.11.D. - '.\---L1 -,NM C.-) 12. The Dept. would prefer if the overall site had a cohesive architecture and colors /materials palate: see ZO chapter 0 23C.06 and 23C.09.A (design theme)... When looking at the outlot building in front of the PetSuites building, it seems there is a disconnect between the two building designs. Could some elements of the PetSuites building be incorporated into the outlot building? 13. Some slight areas of concern on the PetSuites building are: vast roof planes, scale of the vent dormers, little or no facade projections and recessions, and overall design. See ZO Chapters 23C.09.b, 23C.09.D, and 23C.09.E. 14. Please refer to the US 421 /Michigan Rd. Overlay Visual Guide for guidance on architecture: http: / /www.carmel.in.gov/ Modules /ShowDocument.aspx ?documentid =315 15. Please submit to -scale architectural building elevations on 24 "x36" or similar sized paper. 16. The Dept. would like to see clear glass on the east elevation of the Dunkin Donuts building, and no spandrel. This can probably work out with some changes to the floor plan... 17. What is the percent of glass /windows on the north elevation of the multi- tenant building? (It should be less than or equal to 75 %) 18. Please label the building height on the PetSuites architectural building elevations. 19. Please label the roof pitch on the PetSuites architectural building elevations. 1 20. For the largest gable on the PetSuites east (front) elevation, can you make that upper area above the metal porch roof a horizontal fiber cement board (or board an batten design), instead of brick? 9� IrF�C ?SAC 21. The Dept. would like to see less roof area on the PetSuites building. Is there a reason for the steep roof pitch and all that roof area? 22. Is there any way that the PetSuites metal roof can be changed to asphalt shingles? 23. Also see chapter 23C.09.E. — for the PetSuites building dormers and their proportions. 24. BZA variance will be required for the PetSuites building to have metal siding, from ZO Chapter 23C.09.K.2 . Also, the Dept. would prefer that the petitioner show less metal siding on the building, and perhaps horizontal fiber cement board, to reduce a 'pole barn' feel. (We can discuss this further.) 25. On each building, please provide the percent of EIFS of all non- window facade areas, per ZO Chapter 23C.09.K.2. (It must be less than or equal to 10 %.) 26. Multitenant Building : Please lower the parapet to reduce the total percent of EIFS or use more brick, higher than 14 -ft. The ratios look 'off'. Is there not more detailing or a changeup of materials that can be done to break up the upper EFIS portion of the building? 27. Please submit to -scale floor plans or typical store layouts for the Dunkin Donuts and C- store. 28. One the black /white gas canopy elevations, please label the material on the gas canopy columns that is above the face brick utility size (near the height where the pump number flags will be erected). 29. The gas canopy seem a little top- heavy. Is there a way to widen the columns or to reduce the thickness of the canopy, to remedy this? 30. Please show /label on the site plan the percent of green space vs. the percent of impervious surfaces (asphalt, roofs; etc.) 31. Please label the mechanical equipment locations (rooftop or ground level) on the site plan and building elevations and provide details on how they are screened from view or camouflaged. This includes electric and gas meters; see ZO Chapter 23C.10.02.5. 32. The skylights are great! Please consider using additional LEED or 'green' site and building practices, such as a white membrane roof, solar panels, native plants, rain gardens, etc. List is attached. 33. Prepare an estimated construction cost to comply with the Thoroughfare Plan & Alternative Transportation Plan; contact the Engineering Dept. for more details. 34. Please verify with the City Engineering Dept. that no type of traffic analysis is required. 35. Please show /label the bicycle parking areas and provide the bike rack details, per ZO Chapter 27.06 of the ordinance. 36. Is there any way to add an additional pedestrian connection to the Dunkin store, from the path along Michigan Rd., that is more south on the site? 37. Please verify that all parking lot pole light fixtures have flat lenses and /or 90- degree cutoffs so that the tight is downcast. 38. Please provide the wall sconce design details/ cut sheets. 39. Please provide the locations of any building up- lighting or landscaping lighting. Also, what color will these light fixtures be? ( \;�,P-1 40. Per ZO Chapter 23C.12.B, please amend the parking lot pole lights to be a maximum height of 24 feet. 41. Please provide the lighting details of the gas canopy; is it recessed lighting? 42. Please make the gas canopy all one color, or at least lessen the thickness of the white /cream cornice. 2 43. Would like a commitment to have no or very little outdoor sales and displays associated with the gas station /convenience store to limit the propane gas exchanges, mulch stacks, washer fluid displays, etc. 44. The Dept. would like you to try and provide one or two tree preservation areas. 45. Daren Mindham with the City Forestry Dept, will review the Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan. 46. Please provide the design details of the 6 -ft tall fence. Is the finish material shiny or matte? 47. On the construction plans, please provide the pavement specs and the sidewalk /path specs. 48 BZA variance will be required for the drive thru stacking location, per ZO Chapter 23C.11.G. 49. Please show the drive thru stacking area as being able to accommodate 10 vehicles, per ZO Chapter 23C.11.G. 50. Signage review & other miscellaneous comments: A. Ground sign: 1. Would it be possible to move the sign location away from the entrance? It would be nice to have a bit more visual separation between the two signs for the site. 2. The Dunkin Donuts sign: it would be nice if it could be evenly placed within the space available. Right now it looks bottom heavy. Perhaps a smaller logo would allow this to appear centered. 3. What type of gas price numbers are proposed? If electronic, a BZA variance will be required. 4. If a gas station is not the second tenant in this building, how will the sign be divided up amongst tenants? Could the directory sign be eliminated if there were no gas station tenant? 5. Recently, it has become common practice to use an opaque background on cabinet sign panels. This is to help make the sign appear like it has individual letters. The Department would prefer to see that technique used here as well. 6. (The sign size is 39.72 sq. ft., which is within the 45 allowable square feet. Also, the height at 6 -ft is correct for the US 421 overlay zone.) B. Directory sign: 1. Again, the Department would prefer to see that the background of this sign is opaque, so that it appears more like individual letters, rather than a cabinet sign. 2. (The size is 19.44 sq. ft., which is within the allowable 20 sq. ft. for a directory sign. Also, the height is at 5', which is correct for a directory sign. ) C. Directional signs: 1. Please show /label where these signs would be placed on the site plan. 2. (The height is correct at 2'6" — less than 3' tall. ) 3. Please provide dimensions of the actual sign itself, so we can be sure it is 3 sq. ft. or less. D. Gas pumps /canopy: 1. Please provide details on all signage that will be placed on the gas station pumps, canopy, canopy columns, and pump number flags. 2. Please keep in mind that all proposed signage should be 3 sq. ft. or less, so that it can be considered exempt, and therefore allowed. 3. Please know that no additional advertising signs are allowed on the pump or on the canopy. Any advertising would need to be accomplished through window signage on the building, which cannot exceed 30% of the tenant's window area. E. Outlot building: 1. The Department would prefer that both tenant wall signs face the same direction. The Dunkin Donuts sign seems odd not placed over the front door. Perhaps it would be best to seek a variance to add another sign (to face north) or perhaps a logo on the east elevation wall. This could be done for both Dunkin Donuts and the gas station tenant. (This has been done at another location: the NE corner of Keystone and 116`" St. and has worked out well in helping them with identification.) 3 2. Please make the awning colors consistent. Why change the awning colors for the building? The Department would prefer that they maintain the same color throughout the building. ZO Chapter 23C.09.I discusses consistent store fronts. 3. Dunkin donuts sign: the Department would like to see individual channel letters for this sign, similar to the location on Carmel Dr. Also, keep in mind that the logo cannot exceed 25% of the total sign area. Those dimensions will be needed for review. 4. Please address how the gas station tenant's sign will be. The Department would prefer to see individual internally illuminated channel letters. 5. The proposed window signs for Dunkin Donuts will be fine, so long as they are non - illuminated. Remember that non - illuminated window signs are allowed up to 30% of the total window area. The proposed awning signage over the drive through window will need a BZA variance for sign not facing a right of way. The Department would recommend removing this sign, rather than seek a variance for it. 7. Please provide the size and height of the Clearance sign. 8. The illuminated menu board is too large. 16 sq. ft. is allowed by the sign ordinance currently. A BZA variance will need to be applied for. 9. The Department would prefer to see a masonry base for the menu sign, rather than one continuous cabinet structure. Landscaping will also need to be provided around this menu sign base. 10. Please provide the signage details and dimensions on the umbrellas. F. PetSuites building: 1. Is there a wall sign proposed for PetSuites? !vim o Angie Conn, Planning Administrator City of Carmel Planning & Zoning Dept 1 Civic Square, 3rd Fir Carmel, IN 46032 0: 317 - 571 -2417 F: 317 - 571 -2426 E: aconn @carmel.in.gov W: Website Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 4 April 3, 2012 Xenton C. `Ward, C'FJv1 Surveyor of .7- (amilton County Throne (317) 776-8495 (Fax (317) 776-9623 Civil Site Group, Inc. ATTN: Eric Gleissner 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 VIA E -MAIL: egleissnera,civilsite.net Suite 188 One 3- lamilton County Square ,.Noblesville, Indiana 4606o -2230 RE: Dunkin Donuts /C- Store /PetSuites Dear Mr. Gleissner, We have reviewed the construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on March 19, 2012, for this project and have the following comments: 1. The proposed project falls in the incorporated area and MS4 jurisdiction of the City of Carmel. 2. The proposed project DOES NOT fall in a Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone. 3. The proposed project does not fall in a Hamilton County Regulated Drain Watershed. 4. Please direct all stormwater questions to the City of Carmel Engineering Department. 5. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has no comments or concerns on this project Should you have any questions, I can be reached at 317- 776 -8495. Sincerely, Greg Hoyes, AC, CFM, CPESC Plan Reviewer CC: Angie Conn — Cannel DOCS John Thomas — Carmel Engineering Dave Barnes — Carmel Engineering Greg Ilko — Crossroad Engineers Conn, Angelina V From: Boone, Rachel M. Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:10 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Donahue -Wold, Alexia K Subject: Pet Suites /Dunkin donuts site Hi Angie, Here are my review comments for the site signage and overall: Ground sign: 1. I like the design. It looks very classic and clean. 2. Would it be possible to move the sign location away from the entrance? It would be nice to have a bit more visual separation between the two signs for the site. 3. The Dunkin Donuts sign — it would be nice if it could be evenly placed within the space available. Right now it looks bottom heavy. Perhaps a smaller logo would allow this to appear centered. 4. What type of gas price numbers are proposed? If electronic, a variance will be required. 5. If a gas station is not the second tenant in this building, how will the sign be divided up amongst tenants? Could the directory sign be eliminated if there were no gas station tenant? 6. Recently it has been common practice to use an opaque background on cabinet sign panels. This is to help make the sign appear like it has individual letters. The Department would prefer to see that technique used here as well. 7. The size is 39.72 sq. ft., which is within the 45 allowable square feet 8. The height at 6' is correct for the US 421 overlay zone Directory sign: 1. Again, the design is nice. Thank you for keeping it similar to the main ground sign. 2. Again, the Department would prefer to see that the background of this sign is opaque, so that it appears more like individual letters, rather than a cabinet sign. 3. The size is 19.44 sq. ft., which is within the allowable 20 sq. ft. for a directory sign. 4. The height is at 5', which is correct for a directory sign. Directional signs: 1. Please show where these signs would be placed on the site. 2. The height is correct at 2'6" — less than 3' tall. 3. Please provide dimensions of the actual sign itself, so I can be sure it is 3 sq. ft. or less. Gas pumps /canopy: 1. Please provide all signage that will be placed on the gas station pumps, canopy and pump number flags. 2. Please keep in mind that all proposed signage should be 3 sq. ft. or less, so that it can be considered exempt, and therefore allowed. 3. Please know that no additional advertising signs are allowed on the pump or on the canopy. Any advertising would need to be accomplished through window signage on the building, which cannot exceed 30% of the tenant's window area. Outlot building: 1. The Department would prefer that both tenant signs face the same direction. The Dunkin Donuts sign seems odd not placed over the front door. Perhaps it would be best to seek a variance to add another sign or perhaps a logo on the east elevation wall. This could be done for both Dunkin Donuts and the gas station tenant. (This has been done at another location — the NE corner of Keystone and 116th St.— and has worked out well in helping them with identification.) 1 2. Why change the awning colors for the building? The Department would prefer that they maintain the same color throughout the building. 3. Dunkin donuts sign — the Department would like to see individual channel letters for this sign, similar to the location on Carmel Dr. Also, keep in mind that the logo cannot exceed 25% of the total sign area. Those dimensions will be needed for review. 4. Please address how the gas station tenant's sign will be. The Department would prefer to see individual internally illuminated channel letters. 5. The proposed window signs for Dunkin Donuts will be fine, so long as they are non - illuminated. Remember that non - illuminated window signs are allowed up to 30% of the total window area. 6. The proposed awning signage over the drive through window will need a variance for sign not facing a right of way. The Department would recommend to remove this sign, rather than seek a variance for it. 7. The size and height of the clearance sign will need to be provided. 8. The illuminated menu board is too large. 16 sq. ft. is allowed by the sign ordinance currently. A variance will need to be applied for. 9. The Department would also prefer to see a masonry base for the menu sign, rather than one continuous cabinet structure. Landscaping will also need to be provided around this menu sign. 10. In general, is there not more detailing or a changeup of materials that can be done to break up the upper EFIS portion of the building? It seems very bland and not architecturally interesting at all. 11. When looking at the outlot building in front of the Pet Suites building, it seems there is a disconnect between the two building designs. Could some elements of the Pet Suite's building be incorporated into the outlot building? I'm not sure what that is...but it could be nice. Just an idea... Pet Suites building: 1. Think the building design overall is nice, but would like to see less roofing material. Did they explain the reason for the steep slope? 2. Should the entire building not be brick? I am not in favor of the Pre - finished vertical white metal siding for the sides and back of the building. Please let me know if you need anything else from me or further explanation. Thanks! Rachel Rachel/Boone/ Sign Permit Specialist City of Carmel Department of Community Services 3rd Floor One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 317.571.2417 317.571.2426 fax http://www.ci.carmel.in.us/services/communityservice.html Please consider the environment before printing this e -mail 2 .Ci&y:®ff.Carmel Carmel l i1ice, IDepartEment 3 Civic .Sganare Carmel, !ndiaana 46032 March 21, 2012 Eric A. Gleissner, P.T. Civil Site Group, Inc. 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites Dear Mr. Gleissner: The above mentioned project has been received and reviewed. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, Timothy J. Green Chief of Police TJG:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services (317) 571-2500 A Nationally Accredited Law Enforcement Agency Fax (317) 571-2512 NELSON & FRANKENBERGER JAMES J. NELSON CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER JAMES E. SHINAVER LAWRENCE J. KEMPER JOHN B. FLATT FREDRIC LAWRENCE JAMES A. NICKLOY Angie Conn City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3105 EAST 98TH STREET, SUITE 170 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280 PHONE: 317 - 844 -0106 FACSIMILE: 317- 846 -8782 March 16, 2012 Re: DP Application for 9800 North Michigan Road ADLS Application for Duncan Donuts and C -Store ADLS Application for PetSuites Dear Angie: JANE B. MERRILL, Of Counsel JON C. DOBOSIEWICZ, Land Use Professional Pjd Enclosed you will find (i) a DP Application for the site at 9800 North Michigan Road, (ii) an ADLS application for Duncan Donuts and C- Store, (iii) an ADLS application for PetSuites and (iv) associated plan documentation for each. A copy of the TAC distribution transmittal letters is also attached. Our anticipated schedule is as follows: April 18 TAC May 15 Plan Commission Public Hearing June 5 Special Studies Committee Plan Commission (when forwarded out of committee) We will soon be conferring with you to further discuss the request and determine the items where variance requests may be necessary. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, NELSON & FRANKENBERGER, P.C. • Jon C. Dobosiewicz Land Use Professional Enclosures HealthSouth - Ltr to AConn 081911 3 TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: URBAN FORESTRY - DOCS 1 CIVIC SQUARE - 3rd FLOOR CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2283 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DAREN MINDHAM RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2426 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. NSMBTTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL DOCS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS COORDI ONE CIVIC SQUARE -3RD FLOOR CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2283 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 'JOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DAVID LITTLEJOHN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store 1 PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2426 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAT NS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEUCLAY COMMUNICATIONS 31 FIRST AVENUE N.W. CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2586 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: BILL AKERS RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2585 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS I DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: X As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify usi at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL STREET DEPARTMENT 3400 WEST 131ST STREET WESTFIELD, IN 46074 PHONE #: 733 -2001 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 1JOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DAVE HUFFMAN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 733 -2005 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify uslat once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. • TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2441 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3116/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: JOHN THOMAS RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2439 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested !X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. • TRANSMITTAL re� GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 g t ,e, ._ L „,.. _4 TO: HAMILTON CO. SURVEYOR'S OFFICE ONE HAMILTON CO. SQ. S -188 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060 PHONE #: 776 -8495 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: GREG HOYES RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 776 -9628 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CROSSROAD ENGINEERS 3417 SOUTH SHERMAN DR BEECH GROVE, IN 46107 PHONE #: 780 -1555 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: GREGORY ILKO RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 780 -6525 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue,' Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2441 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: GARY DUNCAN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2439 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue; Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 TO: HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. 1700 SOUTH 10TH STREET NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060 PHONE #: 773 -7770 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DAVE LUCAS RE: Dunkin Donuts/ C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 776 -9814 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us` at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL BUILDING & CODE SERVICES DEPT. 1 CIVIC SQUARE - 1st FLOOR CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2444 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: BILL HOLT RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX* 571 -2499 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL UTILITIES 760 THIRD AVENUE SW CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2443 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: JOHN DUFFY RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2642 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. 4 TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL OFFICE OF THE POLICE CHIEF 3 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2500 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: TIM GREEN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2512 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL FIRE DEPARTMENT! 2 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2600 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: CHRIS ELLISON RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2615 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPT. 3 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 571 -2565 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached SETS Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: TERRY KRUESKAMP RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2568 Total pages, including cover sheet => DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEUCLAY PARKS DEPARTMENT 1411 EAST 116TH STREET CARMEL, IN 46032 PHONE #: 848 -7275 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3116/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: MARK WESTERMEIER RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 571 -2468 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue; Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: HAMILTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 18030 FOUNDATION DRIVE, SUITE A NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060 PHONE #: 776 -8500 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: JASON LEMASTER RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 776 -8506 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: HAMILTON CO. SHERIFF DEPT. 18100 CUMBERLAND ROAD NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060 PHONE #: 773 -1872 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: BROOKE GAJOWNIK RE: Dunkin Donuts / C-Store / PetSuites FAX #: 776 -9896 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, iNC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: BRIGHTHOUSE NETWORKS ■ 3030 ROOSEVELT AVENUE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46218 PHONE #: 632 -9077 x291 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: JASON KIRKMAN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 632 -5311 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: DUKE ENERGY 16475 SOUTHPARK DRIVE WESTFIELD, IN 46074 PHONE #: 896 -6711 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: SHIRLEY HUNTER RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 896 -6712 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue; Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: DUKE ENERGY 2727 CENTRAL AVE. COLUMBUS, IN 47201 PHONE #: 812 -447 -2351 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3116/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: GARY McNAMEE RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 812 - 375 -2014 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: VECTREN P.O. BOX 1700 NOBLESVILLE, IN 46061 -1700 PHONE #: 776 -5532 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: JOANIE CLARK RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 776 -5553 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT 1230 W. MORRIS STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46221 PHONE #: 261 -5497 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DAN DAVENPORT RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 261 -5201 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval As requested Other For your use X For review and comment REMARKS: THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: VEOLIA WATER 1220 WATERWAY BOULEVARD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202 PHONE #: 264 -6418 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 1JOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DUANE WHITING RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 263 -6400 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. r TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEUCLAY SCHOOLS 5185 EAST MAIN STREET CARMEL, IN 46033 PHONE #: 844 -9961 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: RON FARRAND RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 844 -9965 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 - 423 -3306 TO: CLAY TOWNSHIP REGIONAL:WASTE 10701 N. COLLEGE AVE., SUITE A INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46280 PHONE #: 844 -9200 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: RYAN HARTMAN RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 844 -9203 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue; Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE CO. 9371 ZIONSVILLE RD. INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46268 PHONE*: 733 -3213 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: TROY YACKLE RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 733 -3204 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: CARMEL POST OFFICE -USPS 275 MEDICAL DRIVE CARMEL, IN 46032 -9998 PHONE #: 846 -2489 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: DOLAND WISE RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 846 -3135 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Thank you, ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E. 4 TRANSMITTAL GROUP, INC 643 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 200 - Indianapolis, IN 46204 - 317 -423 -3305 Fax: 317 -423 -3306 TO: AT&T /SBC 5858 NORTH COLLEGE AVE. INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220 PHONE #: 252 -4275 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Faxed DATE: 3/16/2012 IJOB NO. HHR.001 ATTN: STEVE KREBS RE: Dunkin Donuts / C -Store / PetSuites FAX #: 252 -5000 Total pages, including cover sheet => SETS DESCRIPTION 1 DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLANS For approval For your use REMARKS: As requested X For review and comment Other THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE APRIL 18TH TAC HEARING. PLEASE FORWARD REVIEW COMMENTS TO MY ATTENTION PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TAC HEARING. Thank you, C.C. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ERIC A. GLEISSNER, P.E.