Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWellhead InformationHAMILTON COUNTY Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency 18100 Cumberland Rd. Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Phone (317) 770 -3381 Fax (317) 770 -3384 R. David Bice - Executive Director Carl E. Erickson - Deputy Director January 12, 2011 City of Carmel Plan Commission — Department ofCommunity Services - - — ATTN: Mike Hollibaugh One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 RE: Legacy PUD - Turkey Hill Minit Market Dear Mr. Hollibaugh, I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposed Turkey Hill Minit Market Gas Station within the Legacy Development at the southwest corner of 146th Street and River Road. This proposed gas station, and the underground fuel storage tanks associated with it, fall within the 1 year time of travel for the City of Carmel wellheads, the 1 year time of travel of an Indianapolis Department of Water Works wellhead, and is within 3 different 3,000 foot buffer zones for 3 public water supply wells for Graylan Place and Hamilton Estates trailer parks. This site sits upon very porous soil with sand and gravel beneath the soil and has a very high seasonable ground water elevation. On August 23, 2008 an equipment failure on an underground fuel storage tank at the Marathon gas station at 808 W. Main Street in Carmel caused approximately 8,000 gallons of gasoline to leak in the city's downtown area. Cleanup costs for this release were approximately $1.6 million dollars. A release of that magnitude inside a wellhead protection area would have the potential to contaminate a water supply that serves not only residents of Carmel, but also residents of Westfield and Noblesville. I know the Indiana Department of Environmental Management has made a recent change to allow underground storage tanks with certain standards in wellhead protection areas, but please also take into consideration of the potential for above ground leaks occurring from an unattended hose with someone filling their vehicle or, even worse, a spill caused by a tanker truck filling the underground storage tanks. There are 4 phases in Emergency Management: Mitigation, Preparedness, Response and Recovery. The definition of Mitigation is taking specific actions that will reduce the possibility of a disaster occurring. By not having a gas station in a wellhead protection area you are mitigating against the potential of contaminating a valuable resource in Hamilton County. Because of these concerns. I recommend against the approval of this project. I can be reached at (317) 770 -3381 should you have any further questions. R. David Bice, PEM Executive Director Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Did you receive this? Hollibaugh, Mike P Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:49 AM Conn, Angelina V FW: Wellhead Meeting Wellhead Agenda_1- 11- 11.doc; Wellhead_Minutes_10- 12- 10.doc From: Robert C. Thompson fmailto: Robert. Thompson@hamiltoncounty.in.gov] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:04 AM To: Amanda S. Beaver; ccousins @idem.in.gov; David Bice; 'Andy Wert'; Lynette L. Mosbaugh; Kenton C. Ward Cc: Brian Ayer; Buszka, Paul; Carter, Dave; CJ Taylor; Comer, Pat; Dave Tudor; Davis, Sherrae; <SharonN568 @aol.com >; EAGLETOWN ESTATES (mbwisely yahoo.com); Forkner, Brian; Grayland Place ( Don@000rmaninvestigations.com); Grayland Place (tommv.edens@gmail.com); Harris Hills (mschambo @hotmail.com); Hebenstreit, Jim; Higgins, Joe; Huntley, Steve; Jeff.Robinson @amwater.com; Duffy, John M; Morgan E. Johnson; Josh Goode; Chuck E. Kiphart; Barry L. McNulty; Mike Howard; o'brian, pat; Phifer, John; TALL TIMBERS MOBILE HOME PARK (mbone @astburygroup.com); Tarren Kalber; Tom Cain; Wanninger, Kurt; Whittman, Jack; Mike Howard; Greg R. Noyes; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: Wellhead Meeting Attached is the agenda for next Tuesdays wellhead meeting and minutes from the last meeting. Topics include a proposed Underground Storage Tank in a community water supply area. Meeting will be at 2 PM in Room 1 -A in the Judicial Building, Noblesville. Robert Thompson, RLA, MLA,CLARB, CISEC Program Mgr., SWPP Plan Review, Erosion Control Inspection Hamilton County Surveyor's Office 1 Hamilton Co. Square, Suite 188 Noblesville, IN 46060 317 - 776 -8495 fax: 317 - 776 -9628 Robert .ThompsonPHamiltonCounty.in.gov http: / /www.hamiltoncounty .in.gov /cleanwater/ When you put your hand in a flowing stream, you touch the last that has gone before and the first of what is still to come." - Leonardo da Vinci - Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Confidential information shall not be disclosed, revealed, or given to anyone except employees authorized to receive it. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e -mail and return all copies of the original message. 1 "r § k ye;., .yr s„r r D n 6 R �*' a" +`� a 4.f Y wsc+ fi �� Y _R $ L 'F,,'',D��Q a I Y 0 E yc © � U � • NI 1 g seA 0 .. a i ,� - as �� _;''S�,xO�ad v {�, y�„> �,s-:sa',�,a 't ®'�,1J.w.,'761$4„ r o "� -: A' o f f 4 a of ° f V ' � '• ' 4 ' r' e ,-,•str,� 5-s k r r t r VN t= ���Atit r'.a} W as R, 1h 0�r 4. V �` s t J' ' w d a� k� �w Ile[ dl I� - . s , ... 0 e z„..„...., ,___,... „,...„.....,„ glooap kiviov- v CTM a A 4_ 4 eLite , . . , a �A * -— g�4,i, r \ k L 1 ' 4 ` s � �a , t. �, �1 1- Wv41 .+ ' Rtrg '3a0*VV r F W` •vY a�,e„ ..1,, , ..... e— , ,; *',,. tea' .. sL�...� «..?. 4 :1., Y ” 4 4 e„... 15fq ii f --- ' IV!: ,....—C"'"1 1 44`) - "`r` r4,011._r , ,...,,,„4 lr ., 2 krek. iii•M -••-'"-- 4 , 4,1 ---,,,Ikh,:9., ,....,-i, .'-'4,-, 'f--. - - ' �81i '"'�#)cT : ir 1rf ti T A pia 4 }}, r E r �.,,twis 0 '4,,r1,1-,., , -<4.,4„. 44404 Poot#gait ' � '¢ } 6��fi>atwl6d ACS ,`sy 'A 4:. y",, ? 1; p �.4” sy a ;G s to s + vi.4,.4'IY i gk.9L � d.Vfi J} K E L "P 'ice 41 S� E �,'P'r r'��"1�`'1�"�� Is��q}�a+e$4 ' — � :"L...4,1,'"c�� �'N 7 .ter' z ' t liike�,ke�+"'a1 t"'?, ki+ ewe% '1411,47,1 x x v � tai° r�-Li,xa aLx :, �� zoar�,,,„. vc �i�.r'' ;'k,�i„�.G:� d y Y:S.,i .� Conn, Angelina -V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 10:21 AM To: Thomas, John G; 'Greg R. Hoyes'; Duffy, John M; 'Duane .whiting @veoliawaterna.com' Cc: Duncan, Gary R; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: FW: Legacy PUD - Turkey Hill - Remonstrance letter from City of Westfield Attachments: Westfield Remonstrance Letter.pdf Hi Guys, Happy New Year! We received this letter last week (attached as a .pdf) which is a remonstrance letter addressing wellhead protection areas near the proposed Turkey Hill gas station within the Legacy PUD near 146th & River Rd. Please read it and let me know how we can respond to it. Thank you! -Angie Conn, Planning Administrator -0 -2011 -z P- -rte ■svyi1LQ e Leircuy ■ \ Ue/1_ *NM Ca , Sty-& -7 . - 2 - t ' CUCQa \ - ,en ' y, -- \`\naVuL n 66 O O - Roc-5> spA\ e_o,J\A Li/ .1.\otco-vukcuigvweJ -,E w1 \1\ AA— -12-00,\; ,;‘(\s)Lulavvt svaltd,aj (7, i•P -2_QmwriciA qie-iyALAAA-e-I ,f■Ju,Lk_sfy6_ HAMILTON COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION LOCAL PLANNING TEAMS AGENDA ar 11, 2011 2:OOPM Conference Room 1- AlHamilton County Judicial Building N v<<le N b1d�s , [ Welcome & Introductions Minutes October 12th th, 2010 Community Updates Noblesville - Carmel - Westfield - Sheridan - Atlanta - Arcadia - Cicero - Indianapolis /Harbour Water - Indiana American Water (Noblesville) Committee Reports Contingency Plan Review and Update — Dave Bice- Emergency Operations Plans Management Plan — vacant Education /Funding — Sherrae Davis, Veolia Water, Mary Atkins, Wessler Engineering, Jamie Foreman, City of Carmel, Morgan Johnson, Hamilton County Health Discussion: Gas Station underground fuel storage tanks in Zone 1 in Zone 2 Indy Star Article -Avon Groundwater Ordinance Ruling 2011 Haz -Mat Exercise - Conner Prairie (wellhead area) Other Business Set Next Meeting Date C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead Agenda_1 -11- 11.doc 1/4/2011 Page 1 of 1 .) a 4 # . '���- � i t i ce& t.L-,-� � .._ 1,,,b 5 - 't':�k ._�1;...r� A sr� - SNOUT c k s t r� 11 M1 , .`1 traps oils - Z � � : Anti siphon devices and flOdtables 4 ° � ., € � on surface .I c t.+i e. �'r, %,.-'t' -. � Fabricmadeirorn ' -. , 4 $- .. ky�`i.-- ]Sti°ioAecycl�di�lat2rlalS� i4. a , ._ mow. /, 7y - ` ""`'.-- ' Cleaner.Water:Exitin . r ' reduce '' _ u 5 ,:d 3 _ ` fk ads0rbs Sediment and':‘5;.i".lvv5ke.l-.f,"vI....-t : - 4 hydroea`rbons Fz L,":'..'','_',,-.'.a.,.5, ,.,,t-,., - : # 3 ,_-7-_'',-7-1_.,,'.r ,rt http://bmpinc.com/files/imagecache/fullsize_crop/products/additional_imgs/bioSkirt_diagr... 1/10/2011 Xerxes® tanks now offer the benefits of Parabeam® Xerxes double -wall tanks now feature Parabeam® 3D glass fabric, a lightweight yet strong "sandwich" laminate that of- fers excellent mechanical properties. Parabeam® is a unique glass fabric con- sisting of two decklayers woven together by vertical glass piles that form an inte- gral sandwich structure. When the Parabeam® is impregnated with a ther- moset resin, the fabric rises to the preset height, producing a unique laminate with a defined interstitial space that can be monitored hydrostatically or with a dry leak- detection system. Parabeam° is a wholly -owned subsidiary of ZCL, allowing both Xerxes and ZCL to incorporate a proprietary material that has been successfully used in Canada for more than 12 years. ZCL's PrezerverTM System enhances Xerxes' product line A new option for Xerxes customers is the ZCL PrezerverTM Sys- tem. This "system" solution for owners of petroleum fueling fa- cilities provides a level of equipment reliability and third -party liability protection that is unique in the industry. At the center of the PrezerverTM System are the industry's leading choices for product storage: PrezerverTM double -wall tanks or the ZCL Phoenix System®, together with a unique and comprehensive package of insurance protection, which is only available to Prez- erverTM System customers. Additionally, each PrezerverTM System installation has site inspections of critical steps that are docu- mented by a qualified third -party firm and compiled into a pro- fessional final inspection report (including photos), which is then provided to the owner. While this program goes beyond federal financial responsibility (FR) requirements for tank owners, it is designed to comply with various states' minimum FR requirements. (Check with the spe- cific requirements of your state.) Owners in states that provide a state fund intended to address FR requirements in lieu of private insurance will find the broad coverage of the PrezerverTM Master Program of Insurance to be very attractive, offering a level of cov- erage that exceeds that of state funds. (See Xerxes' ZCL Prez- erverTM System brochure for more information.) Each PrezerverTM System includes the following components: • PrezerverTM double -wall tank and required accessories • TRUCHEK° hydrostatic monitoring system • FRP containment collar and sump with a watertight lid • prefabricated, engineered, concrete deadmen • FRP hold -down straps and galvanized turnbuckles • approved double -wall piping system • approved fiberglass dispenser sumps • approved electronic monitoring system for the tanks, piping and all sumps. Benefits of ZCL's PREZERVER'" SYSTEM • may eliminate the need to purchase /renew annual Insurance policies (with unpredictable premium costs) for 10 years • provides confidence that the fueling system is correctly installed • provides permanent record of key installation steps, with an inspection report that includes photos • may avoid the need to purchase state - mandated private insurance — providing significant savings • coverage for existing tanks may be available at below- market rates (subject to underwriting requirements) 5 TRUCHEK® — state -of- the -art continuous monitoring To enhance the double -wall protection of a Xerxes® tank, Xerxes offers the option of TRUCHEK, its state -of- the -art system of hydrostatic, tank monitoring for double -wall tanks. TRUCHEK is an easy, precise and reliable method for both continuous leak detection and tank - tightness testing. Like the tanks that Xerxes manufactures, TRUCHEK provides a long, successful record of performance. Continuous leak detection For nearly two decades, the Xerxes® TRUCHEK system has suc- cessfully moni- tored thousands of tanks in many different types of installations. In fact, it has be- come an industry standard as a state -of- the -art technique for continuous monitoring. Changing regulations in some markets, such as California, require that new double -wall tanks have continuous leak detection using a constant vacuum, air pressure or hydrostatic pressure in the interstice of a double -wall tank. A Xerxes tank with TRUCHEK's continuous leak detection is the ideal solution for complying with these strict new requirements. While being highly effective, TRUCHEK is also simple and trou- ble -free in both design and operation. With TRUCHEK, simple monitoring of the fluid level inside the reservoir of a Xerxes dou- ble -wall tank is all that is necessary. When you order a Xerxes double -wall tank with the TRUCHEK option, the interstice be- tween the two tank walls is filled at the factory with a monitor- ing fluid. This water /calcium - chloride fluid also partially fills a reservoir on the top of the tank. This creates a hydrostatic pres- sure throughout the interstice, enabling the operator to monitor the walls of both the primary tank and the secondary tank. An electronic probe placed in the tank's reservoir alarms when the fluid level either falls below or rises above the acceptable level. (See the Xerxes TRUCHEK brochure for more information.) Tank - tightness testing TRUCHEK also provides a simple, precise and reliable method to perform a tank - tightness test. It takes into account the impacts of thermal expansion or contraction of the product, vapor pock- ets, tank deflection, evaporation, condensation and the location of the water table. The 10 -hour tightness -test procedure meets the strict NFPA 329 criteria. A shorter 4 -hour test (while product is dispensing) exceeds EPA's criteria for a tank - tightness test. How does TRUCHEK® work? Primary -Tank Leak in Wet Hole or Dry Hole Vent Reservoir Level Down Secondary -Tank Leak in Dry Hole Vent Reservoir Level Down Secondary -Tank Leak in Wet Hole —Vent Reservoir Level Up —Leak in Outer Wall 6 W (I) J' Ii 1— re W W [„ J Z OW 0. n.;, CI) U may: tl 0 Y j 0 w -J LL 98'' 0 FlloiNV R KS BY OPW FUELING CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS One -Piece Polyethylene Dispenser Sumps FlexWorks Dispenser Sumps are installed beneath fuel dispensers to provide access to and secondary containment of dispenser plumbing, emergency shear valves, and underground piping connections. Stabilizer Bar Kits are installed in FlexWorks Dispenser Sumps to provide reliable support for boss - mounted emergency shear valves. Features & Benefits: • Multiple Models — Ensure a custom fit. ® Structural Reinforcing on Large MPD Models — Prevents sump deformation from backfill and high water table forces. • Light Color — Preserves rigidity in sunlight before backfill and provides maximum visibility after installation. + Full Perimeter Liquid Collection Channel — Facilitates quick leak detection and allows flexibility in locating leak sensors. • Integral Rain Lip — Protrudes into the dispenser frame to prevent surface water entry. • Easy Installation — Field height adjustment capability and large pipe entry area ensures installation flexibility. • Available in a Conduitless Model — eliminates conduit entry fittings and prevents a notorious leak point inside dispenser sumps. w A DOVER) COMPANY North America Toll Free — TELEPHONE: (800) 422 -2525 Fax: (800) 421 -3297 • Email: domesticsales @opw- fc.com International — TELEPHONE: (513) 870-3315 or (513) 870-3261 Fax: (513) 870 -3157 • Email: intisales ©opw- fc.com • www.opw- fc.com 9393 Princeton - Glendale Road • Hamilton, OH 45011 © 2009 OPW Fueling Components ONE COMPANY. ONE WORLD. ONE SOURCE.` 24" —> (61)cm 31" (79)cm 14" (36)cm 1- E Ordering Specifications* - One -Piece Polyethylene Dispenser Sumps A B C Model # in. cm in. cm in. cm in. cm in. cm D E Weight lbs. kg. DS -1036 14 36 10 25 40 102 36 91 ! 38 I 97 65 i 65 DS-1117F' 14.5 37 10.5 27 20.5 ' 52 16.5 42. 5 18.5 i 47 32 15 DS -1120 15 r 38 11 28 24 l 61 1 20 51 25 ; 64 33 15 DS -1123 15 38 11 28 27 i 69 23 58 25 64 33 15 DS -1123F ** 15 38 11 28 27 69 23 58 25 64 33 15 DS -1229 15.5 39 11.5 29 33 84 29 74 31 79 49 22 DS -1242 15.5 ! 38 11.5 29 46 117 42 i 107 44 112 j 84 38 1 DS -1543A 19 48 15 38 43 j 109 39 1 99 41 104 84 38 DS -1630 20 51 16 41 34 86 30 76 32 81 52 23 DS -1642 20 1 51 16 41 46 f 117 42 107 I 44 112 84 38 DS -1836 21.5 55 17.5 44 40.5 103 36.5 : 93 i 39 99 70 I 32 DS -1928 18 46 14.8 ; 38 30 76 26 i 66 ! 28.5 ' 72 50 23 1 Refer to FlexWorks Dispenser Sump Selection Chart to select sumps for particular dispensers (See pages 213 and 214 of this catalog) '" Flush mount model supplied without rain lip due to dispenser frame clearance limitations; Frame gasket included. Anchor bolts provided, Stabilizer Bar Kits ordered separately; One kit required for each emergency and vapor shear valve. F!esW RKS Dispenser Containment Manual Order Number: DCM -0001 Dispenser Pans and Entry Fitting Installation Manual Order Number: DPI -0001 Veeder- Root's TLS -35OR Monitoring System Veeder -Root TLS -350R Monitoring System adds value to automatic tank gauging with highly advanced, automatic inventory management capability — Business Inven- tory Reconciliation. This fully integrated system automatically collects metered sales information from electronic and mechanical dispensers and provides a comprehensive reconciliation with in -tank inventories and deliveries. installers and operators relative to inventory reconciliation. Automatic tank -to -meter mapping eliminates the possibility that product being dispensed through a meter is reconciled against the wrong product. When dispensing begins, the TLS -350R recognizes a reduction in in -tank inventory and associ- ates the reduction with a dispensing event. This association allows for the constnution of an accurate meter to tank mapping. Technology that Simplifies inventory management and saves you valuable time AccuChartm The TLS —350R uses AccuChart TM, Veeder- Root's patented tank calibration algorithm, to minimize errors clue to clynamics,such as tank tilt, deflection and end shape,to create an optimal tank chart for each tank in the system. The automatic calibration process is conducted through the typical operating lev- els in the tank as fuel is dispensed. Once enough valid data is analyzed, updated tank calibrations are made available. The updated calibration charts can also be obtained from the TLS -350R through an RS -232 interface using a computer. Automatic Tank -To -Meter Mapping Manual methods of mapping tanks to meters have historically provided challenges to Tank -to -meter mapping on average takes up to two clays and depends on the level of station activity. Continuous Statistical Leak Detection (CSLD) The TLS -350R is available with Continuous Statistical Leak Detection (CSLD) for 24- hour leak detection without tank shutdown. CSLD is advanced tank testing technology that continuously monitors fuel height and temperature information to detect idle times in the tank. During each idle period, data is collected and combined with information from other idle periods to form a highly accurate leak detection database. Sophisti- cated statistical analysis techniques in CSLD constantly evaluates all new and existing information in the database and discards invalid data. Test reports are provided automatically every 24 hours. Adjusted Delivery Reporting Adjusted delivery reporting ensures that you get what you pay for. When a bulk delivery is made, the TLS-350R measures the amount of any fuel dispensed during the delivery and provides a report showing the volume increase, the amount of fuel dispensed during the delivery and the actual delivery amount. Periodic Variance Thresholds The TLS-350R automatically calculates periodic variance thresholds based 011 the U.S. E.P.A. requirement. of + / -(I% of monthly throughput +130 gallons) and includes the variances on a Periodic Reconciliation Report. The variance threshold is programmable so it can be set to local regulations if necessary. The TLS-350R is available with an integral printer or can be connected to a remote printer. The system can be programmed to generate reports at the end of a shift ,clay, or period.Periodic reports are programmable to cover up to a 35 -day cycle and can print. in either column (summary) or row (line item) formats. Features • Automatic Business Inventors' Reconciliation • AccuChart TM, Automatic Tank Calibration • Automatic Tank -To -Meter Mapping • 0.1 GPH and 0.2 GPH In -Tank Leak Detection with Magnetostric five Probes • Electronic Line Leak Detection Capabilities • Inventory Monitoring and Reporting • Interstitial/Sump Leak Sensing Capabilities • Vapor Well Monitoring Capability • Groundwater Monitoring Capability • Input /Output Capability • Sump and Dispenser Monitoring Capabilities • RS -232. Data Communications Standard Models • Ethernet /IP Communications • Internal Auto -Dial Fax (SiteFaxT`t) /mod.em communications • Optional integral Printer or Remote Printer Interface • Emergency generator- applications selectable. via programming • One system handles mix of standard and emergency generator tanks • Records generator activity • Complete inventory reports before and after generator operation • Audible and Visual Alarm Capabilities • Monitors up to 1.2 tanks • Maximum Tank Capacity: 15,000 Gallons; 37,000 gallons with CSLD software enhancement • Leak Testing and Reconciliation for Manilolded Tanks Console Forni Number: Description: Console Form Number: Description: 848290 -102 TLS -.350R Console 848290 -122 TLS -350R Console tvithout Integral Printer with Integral Printer TLS -350R Interface Modules The TLS -350R monitoring console contains three compartments in which individual interlace modules can be installed.lnterface modules may be factory- installed in the console upon initial ordering,or ordered separately as spare modules w expand an existing system. Low Power Compartment (Limit eight per console, unless otherwise noted) Fonn No. Factory Installed Modules Description 329356 -002 Four -Input Probe Interface Module (Maximum three per console. Includes terminal connector for one ground temperature thermistor for the volumetric line leak detector). 329358 -001 Light -Input Interstitial /Liquid Sensor 329357 -001 Five -Input Vapor Sensor Interface Module 329399 -001 Five -Input Groundwater Sensor Module 329956 -001 Fight -Input Type A Sensor Interface Module 329950 -001 Six -Input type 8 Sensor Interface Module 330843 -001 Six -input Pressurized Line Leak Interface Module (one per console) 329356 -004 Eight -Input Smart Sensor Module Feature Compatibility (Where Applicable) Series 8473 0.1 GPH Magnetostrictive Probe Series 8463 Mag Plus Probe Series 7943 Interstitial Sensor for Fiberglass Tanks and Interstitial Sensor for Steel Tanks Piping Sump Sensor Hydrostatic Sensor Vapor Sensor Series 7943 Series 7943 Series 7943 Series 7943 Groundwater Sensor Series 7943 Solid State Discriminating Interstitial Sensor Series 7943 Solid State Dispenser Pan and Containment Sensors Series 8484 Pressurised Line Leak Detection System Requires TLS -350 Version 7.0 or higher software Smart Sensors Requires TLS -350 Version 24.0 or higher software High Power Compartment (Limit eight per console, unless otherwise noted) Form No. Factory Installed Modules Description 329359 -001 Four -Relay Output Interface Module 329360 -001 Two - Input/Two -Relay Output Interface Module 329999 -001 Pump Sense Interface Module 330374 -001 Three - Output Pressurized Line Leak Controller Interface Module (Two per console) Feature Compatibility (Where Applicable) Accepts up to four inputs Series 8484 Pressurized Line Leak Detection System Requires TLS -350 Version 7.0 or higher software Communications Compartment (Limit three per console, unless otherwise noted) Form No. Factory Installed Modules Description 330149 -002 SiteFax Interface Module 330586 -001 RS- 485/232 Dual Port Communications Module (Slot 4 only) 330148 -001 RS -232 Interface Module with Auxiliary Port (Slot 4 only) 329362 -001 RS -232 Interface Module 330000 -001 Remote Printer Interface Module 330883 -001 WPLLD Communications Module Feature Compatibility (Where Applicable) Allows hookup to most remote facsimile, modem or teletype equipment. Requires -I -LS -350 Plus Version 3.0 or higher software Provides two 25 -pin D- connectors for data transmission to PO.S. terminal, printing device or'computer Provides a 25 -pin D- connector for data transmission to P.O.S. terminal, printing device, or computer Provicles a 25 -pin D- connector for data transmission to a remote serial printer 330020 -425 Ethernet — TCP /IP Communications Module Provides connectivity to local and wide area networks (LAN/WANS) Temperature Range — Operating: 32F to 1 18F (0 °C to 45 °C) Storage: 15 °F to 1 18 °F (10 "C to 45 "C) VEEDER -ROOT 2004 Vicedcr -Root Company • 125 Powder Forest Drive • Simsbury, CT 06070 • USA Telephone: 860 -651. -2700 • Fax : 860 -651 -2719 • www.vecder.com VR 13772 P/N 0576047 -060 Rev. li VR 7/2004 Printed in USA Veeder -Root Sensor Application Guide Sump Sensor The Piping Sump Sensor is installed in a tank piping sump and will delect the presence of a liquid. Liquid lever is monitored by a float ,!magnetic reed switch sensing system. Sensor Detection Capabilities - Alarm Conditions • Fuel alarm is triggered When liquid reaches a nominal height of 1 -inch. • An open sensor triggers. a Sensor Out alarm. Operating Capabilities • Operating temperature range: 0 to +60 °C. • Storage temperature range: -40 to +70 °C. • Sensor dimensions: 12" high. 1.9" diameter. Sensor /Cable Length Configurations • Sump Sensor wi 12 foot cable - Form Number 794380 -2081 • Sump Sensorwi 30 foot cable - Form Number 794380 -2091 'Senors 794280-208 and - 2Yi0are d ecr replacements ibr sump serer 794396.-21S. Sensor Interface Module • TLS -350 series consoles (except TLS -350J) - Interstitial/Liquid Sensor interface module (PJN 329358 -001) accepts up to a sensors (a maximum of 64 sensors could be monitored by the console ). • TLS -350J console - 3 sensors max. • TLS-300/PC-300 series consoles no interface module required) - 8 sensors max. • ILS -350 console - A Two- '.Aire Module (PJN 329675 -001) accepts up to 4 sensors (a maximum of 16 sensors could be monitored by the console). • TLS -450 - USM (RN 332812-001). accepts up to 16 sensors Console Software Compatibility • TLS -350 series+TLS -3010 CVersion 1 or later) • ILS -350 (Alf) • TLS -450 (Ali) Compatible Fuels • Unleaded gasoline • Unleaded with up to 5% methanol. 15 % ethanol, or 15% VISE EE • Leaded gasoline • Diesel • Kerosene • .3e-titre] • Aviation =saline Related Sales Literature Visit our website at tv w.Veeder.ccra for more information on Veeder- -Root products and service,. twr oo Mgr soncrtaaaio; '' • `Ex1:ng ccnduit Cr Orling Cabe to juncucat box and sea• -of 'Sump sensor should: 1. Rest an the base of the sump. 2. Re positioned as close to outer all as passible. 3. Be mounted in a true vertical positfcn. 4. Be instated only in a dry sump. - Product Cat1etoiusu°tion \ PiP brsc ands sal -cH Sump sensor (installation examples) sump base Fag. 2 Typical Piping Sump Sensor Installation r' ;dia�a HAMILTON COUNTY WELLHEAD 1 eilhew , PROTECTION peptectiou LOCAL PLANNING TEAM MINUTES Conference Room 1 -A Hamilton County Judicial Building October 12, 2010 The meeting was called to order Tuesday October 12, 2010 at 2:02 PM. Those present were as follows: Mr. Kenton Ward, Hamilton County Surveyor; Mr. Robert Thompson, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office; Mr. Steve Smith, Town of Arcadia; Ms. Jaimie Foreman, City of Carmel; Mr. Brian Forkner, City of Westfield; Mr. David Bice, Hamilton County Emergency Management; Mr. Kirk Kuroiwa, Indiana- American Water; Mr. Pat Reed, City of Carmel; Mr. Max Williams, Martin - Marietta; Ms. Morgan Johnson, Hamilton County Health Department; Mr. Joe Higgins, Town of Cicero; and Mr. Craig Cummings, Veolia Water. Minutes of July 13, 2010: There was one amendment to the minutes. Foreman made the motion to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Thompson and approved unanimously. Community Updates: Noblesville /Indiana American Water — Kuroiwa stated that the company was granted a Hoosier Ground Water Gardening Award with distinction, which is good through 2014. The IURC required American Water to develop a conservation plan for statewide, but initially Noblesville has been selected as a pilot community along with Johnson County and New Burg. We'll be holding our first meeting later this month to develop our water wise plan. This will be all voluntary activities. We're trying to raise awareness with the public on conservation measures. Carmel — Foreman stated that they had their forth LPT meeting last week and summed up the year for Wellhead Protection in Carmel. They are moving forward with Well #27 currently; it's in the planning stages and is located on the Northern Beach property at Hazel Dell and 116th Street. We haven't received a finalized draft of our delineation only because there were changes to the report, not the actual delineation. I'm still waiting to receive that from the Engineers so it can be submitted to IDEM. Phase II is not due until December of next year. To date the plan is up to date so we'll only have revisions to do. Carmel was chosen by IDEM to be a representative to build their stock photos for Wellhead publications, Hoosier Water Guardian publications. They sent a photographer to take photos of multiple wells, whether they are brick building wells, floodplain wells, household hazardous waste pictures, the flowing well, etc. Those pictures will all be available through IDEM as stalk photos and anybody can use them. Westfield — Forkner stated that they have submitted their Phase II. We will be changing our delineation plan a little bit by including the property we bought since we know we will be putting a well there. Veolia Water— Cummings stated that Harbour Water has nine (9) wells still open, meaning the pumping mechanism is still in there. Wells not active for a number of years have to be abandoned. We'll be testing those wells to make sure they still pump decent water in case a utility sees the need to bring those wells back on line and pump to our White River North facility off of River Road. We sent out wellhead protection letters for the White River North wells. IDEM approved the delineation and we're updating Phase I to incorporate the White River North wells. We've added our White River North monitoring wells to our quarterly sampling program and the data is available on that if needed. Late last week we received a call from a resident off of 146`1' Street and River Road stating that his well had dried up. I contacted Mark Bash yesterday and they sent someone out to see if our wells have influenced the resident's well. We haven't had any rain lately so water levels are down. Mark was out there recently S: \SURVEY STAFF \11m \Sdellhead \2010 \64e11head Ntinutes 10- 12- 10.doc 1/11/2011 1 Thompson stated that Andy Wert sent him an email saying that he wouldn't be here, but was under the impression that the county would adopt the Wellhead map. I indicated that I didn't think there was any formal adoption process other than review by the Committee for accuracy since its data from the various utilities and their consultants. Wert was going to take the map to his council for adoption. Ward stated that it makes sense for Wert to adopt the map because he does have an ordinance for Wellhead, which refers to the map. We also have the ordinance for the county itself, but it only affects 3 areas and those are the trailer parks. I'll get with Chuck (Kiphart) and see if we need to do that. Wellhead /Gravel Pit Study Committee: Thompson stated that Wert indicated that the Gravel Pit Committee hasn't met for a while so there is nothing new to update. Ward asked if Wert knew when the next meeting was going to be. Thompson stated that the next meeting isn't scheduled. The last I heard there was going to be some discussion between the entities and mayors. Drop by Drop Video: Thompson stated that he will show a 30 minute video just released by WFYI. The video was put together by the Indiana Regional Sewer District Association and by the Alliance of Indiana Rural Water. Next Meeting Date: The next meeting date was set for Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was adjourned. Kenton C. Ward, CFM Hamilton County Surveyor ATTEST: Executive Secretary S: \SURVEY STAFF \11m \We11head \2010 \Wellhead Minutes 10- 12- 10.doc 1/11/2011 3 HAMILTON COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION LOCAL PLANNING TEAM MINUTES Conference Room 1 -A Hamilton County Judicial Building January 11, 2011 The meeting was called to order Tuesday January 11, 2011 at 2:08 PM. Those present were as follows: Mr. Kenton Ward, Hamilton County Surveyor; Mr. Robert Thompson, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office; Ms. Jaime Foreman, City of Carmel; Mr. Harry Nikides, City of Westfield; Mr. David Bice, Hamilton County Emergency Management; Mr. Kirk Kuroiwa, Indiana - American Water; Mr. Pat O'Brian, Indiana - American Water; Ms. Morgan Johnson, Hamilton County Health Department; Mr. Joe Higgins, Town of Cicero; Ms. Sherrae Davis, Veolia Water; Mr. Paul Pace, Carmel Water; Mr. John Duffy, City of Carmel, Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz, Nelson & Frankenberger; Eric Carter, Weihe Engineering; Mr. Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office; Mr. Tim Stottlemyer, City of Noblesville; Mr. Brett. Huff, Stoeppelwerth Engineering; Mr. Tim Walter, Platinum Properties; Mr. John Thomas, City of Carmel; Mr. Dann Stapp, Diamond Z Engineering; Mr. Andy Wert, City of Noblesville; Connie Cousins - Leatherman, IDEM; and Mr. Alan Melvin, IDEM. Minutes of October 12, 2010: There was one amendment to the minutes. Higgins made the motion to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Foreman and approved unanimously. Community Updates: Noblesville — Wert stated that the city does intend to take the updated Wellhead map to the Plan Commission for public hearing at Council. Carmel — Foreman had nothing to report for Carmel. Westfield — Nikides stated that the city is finishing up their Phase 11. IDEM has requested some background information that we're compiling for them. Cicero — Higgins had nothing to report for Cicero. Indianapolis/Harbour Water — Davis stated that they are continuing investigations of impact to private wells for the Indianapolis' River Road Well Field. We received an inquiry last week on impacts to Lochaven Subdivision Lake. We're going to take some groundwater elevations and look at. precipitation. Indiana- American Water — Kuroiwa had nothing to report for Indiana - American Water. Committee Reports: Contingency Plan Review and Update — Bice stated that he would like to remind everybody to go through their plans for the new year and update maps, employees, position titles, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. Fire Departments should be invited to your facilities for a walk through so they know where chemicals are stored and the general layout of the facilities. Have a list of your on call people or have a representative that could stand by the incident commander if there is an incident at your facility. Thompson stated that he would imagine with all the annexations that occurred last year that a lot of jurisdictions have changed. C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead Minutes 01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 1 Education/Funding — Davis stated that they met as a sub - committee. last year and talked about how we might implement our education program in the schools. There was concern if we put together some experiments, provide handouts and we merely gave them to the teachers that they may not implement those. Our thought was to try to get a grant to be able to provide a paid consultant to actually do the implementation for us to go into the schools and demonstrate the experiments. I had Craig Cummings do some research on grants and found opportunities unfortunately they were closed by the time we started doing our research. I did ask Craig to go back and look at information they were asking for that was common to those grants so we can start looking at that and making sure the information is readily available to each of us. We also wanted to look at when the time period was for getting the application submitted. We put together some information and talked about being able to send those to the schools so they go into news letters. Those will be triggered by an event such as National Water Awareness Week or a season change. In order to be able to get into the schools we need to have contacts so we would like a representative from each community to be responsible for getting that list of contact information. Thompson stated that each community has to submit their Phase II requirements that they're in the process and have invested interest in sharing public information. Gas Station Underground Fuel Storage Tanks: Dobosiewicz stated that his firm was assisting Turkey Hill in its zoning approvals necessary for the construction of the fuel center which includes underground storage tanks. The property was zoned in 2006 and approved in early 2007 with a fuel station as a permitted land use. We have a public hearing on the 19`h of January for the Plan Commission to review the plan for compliance with the zoning and development requirements necessary for us to pursue building permits. At the conclusion of that planning process and our approval process with the City of Carmel we would anticipate beginning development in 2011.. Its our understanding that this Committee is a group of many different local planning teams that are set up by ordinance throughout the different municipalities and other jurisdictions such as County Commissioners and that those ordinances are in place across a broad spectrum of the county. At the subject location we're required to comply with the Wellhead Protection Ordinance that has been adopted by the City of Carmel. In our discussions with the utility director he has indicated that Carmel does have a Wellhead Protection Ordinance and that the underground storage tank at this location is permitted provided that the proposed entity meets certain specification requirements including federal, state, IDEM, EPA and local Carmel requirements that are specified within their Wellhead Protection Ordinance. If we have a plan in place that meets the requirements of the Carmel Wellhead Protection Ordinance we would presume that a permit would be forthcoming. Stapp stated that the system is a continuously monitored double walled system throughout. From the underground storage tanks to the piping; everything is double walled. The proposed tanks are double walled, fiberglass underground storage tanks. Its essentially two tanks separated by fiberglass hairs on edge to create an interstitial space. That interstitial space is filled with a monitoring fluid which is a salt water solution dyed blue so you can see right away that the interstitial space is throughout. There is a reservoir on top of the tanks with a float sensor to identify if the fluid leaks out whether it be a primary or secondary wall failure. Over the years sumps have been designed to be an integral part of the tank and the dispenser both so at those areas there is a secondary point to contain any releases and a place to locate sensors so we're notified if there is a release. Turkey Hill is proposing a double walled flexible pipe. The advantage of this pipe is to run it joint free from sump to dispenser. With the current UST regulations the systems have to be monitored. Some companies will monitor only at the tank sump, but Turkey Hill installs sump sensors in each sump. The tank sump and each of the dispenser sumps have their own sensor in it that is continuously monitored. In comparison to the regulatory requirements and then other retail companies Turkey Hill's system is designed to identify a problem immediately if one were to happen. The sensors are wired normally closed and programmed to trip if they open so if anything were to happen to the sensor then the alarm would trigger. Duffy asked who normally monitors the alarm; who gets that alarm? Stapp stated that the alarm goes to the store and shuts the product pumping down from the tank to the dispensers. C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content. Outlook\ 9BL9MK6R \Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 2 Duffy asked if the station was going to be manned 24 hours? 1 understand that the alarm shuts the pump down, but most of us know there is the occasion that it won't. What backup is there? Bice stated that he remembers the tank incident in Carmel last year especially in a wellhead zone. If that release in Carmel got out in the soil in this area. Stapp stated that most tanks made in the 1980's were made of unprotected steel that rusted and corroded after 10 plus years. Comparing the UST system of today to the 1980's would be like comparing computers. Davis stated that the gas station in Carmel that had the incident was put in, in the 1990's and the system was only 10 years old. A company was looking to put in a similar system in Indianapolis' well field area and was using the same technology because it was the most current. The failure in Carmel was a gasket failure and apparently the leak was so small it wasn't detected. Stapp stated that the system is connected to a positive shutdown so there is a tine leak detection system which is testing for basically pressure decay every time the system goes quiet. Every time the system is quiet or idle the system will start the pump up a little bit, check pressure and in that interim time if the pressure did not decay then the system will identify it as pass. The system is doing that during all the short periods during the day. However, the system is required to do a longer period so statistically you have the assurance that the system is tied to a higher degree of accuracy and a lower leak tolerance. Pace asked if there was a backup alarm system. Is there any redundancy or do you just have one alarm and that's it. Stapp stated that he believes there is just one alarm, so when the alarm goes off it shuts off the pumping. Pace stated that the system shuts down the pumping and the alarm is at the gas station. Is anybody else notified? Who's responsible for checking the system? Stapp stated that the station manager is responsible for checking the system. Pace stated that the station manager will come into work to check the alarm. Stapp stated that you're not able to turn the pump back on. Duffy stated that he understands there is a system and then there is how you are going to manage that system. Those are concerns. Davis asked if the alarms are tested. You talked about the sensor being tested, but is there a way to test the alarm? Stapp stated that the alarms are tested when they are initially installed. The alarm knows that it's still hooked up so it. knows that the circuit hasn't been broken or that the switch hasn't been tripped. Thompson asked if the system was on a battery backup in case of power failure? Stapp stated that it is not, but if the power goes out then you have to manually reset the alarm so it does trip. Ward asked if the alarm system could be over ridden? Stapp stated that it could by someone who knew what they were doing. Ward stated that nobody could come in and rewire the alarm so it bypasses the sensors? C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead. Minutes 01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 3 Stapp stated that it would be someone making a conscience effort to override the alarm. Ward stated that he was thinking of the sump system at the Carmel Fire Department in Home Place where they allowed that to go in to pump the detention area based on the fact that there was a generator backup in the Fire Station with alarms in the Fire Station and the electrician rewired it to bypass everything and we flooded in Home Place because of that. Stuff like that happens. Stapp stated that we could go through and start a process where we work through each of the sumps so that you activate a dispenser, it turns on the submerged pump, you can feel the submerged pump running and trip the sensors and confirm that the pump shuts off and work your way through the system. Once the site is constructed, there are operational responsibilities by the operator afterwards. Bice asked if the facility would be open 24 hours? Stapp stated that he didn't know the answer to that question. Bice stated that if they're not open 24 hours and a leak develops in the tank during closed hours; it automatically shuts down the pumps, which is great, but you still have a leak until the manager comes back in unless he gets notified offsite. Stapp stated that, there is a company that monitors these systems across the U.S. 24 hours a day. Turkey Hill does not currently use them, but it could be connected to that system. Dobosiewicz asked if we are hearing that this is a preference of the Committee? Bice stated that an alarm does no good if the station is not open 24 hours. Dobosiewicz stated that what we're trying to take back to Carmel is that we've met with the group, we've described the system and they have a recommendation on how we may improve monitoring. I don't . know how this group organizes itself, votes or sends a message to someone who's proposing to install a tank. Is there a process by which the group offers up recommendations? Thompson stated that every week he gets a report from IDEM on spills. Mechanical failures occur all the time. Every week there are dozens of bypasses that occur. Most of the time sewage gets into the waterways or the road. That's bad, but the point here is that I think the system works and I would have no problem with it, but as it gets older the system will be prone to more mechanical failures. Because this site is in a Wellhead Protection Area what if a tanker that's doing refueling spills its load'? What if only three gallons spills out? I have a document from IDEM stating that just. 3 gallons in a community water supply is enough to cause an issue. What if a tanker loses its load? The fuel will go into the storm drain system, which is going to run offsite of the property into the wellhead zone and with the soils; the two letters that were sent from the Surveyor's Office and the City of Westfield were not. so much concerned about the storage tanks, but more on the spills that are not only possible, but do happen. Three gallons is all it would take to impact the water supply. Imagine a tanker and what kind of impact that could have on the water supply. These soils are such that the fuel would go very quickly into the water supply. Davis stated that on 146th Street there is an interceptor that takes the runoff directly to the pond where the wells are located. Thompson stated that it's a direct shot into the water supply. Dobosiewicz stated that. if you have questions related to the SWPPP (storm water pollution prevention plan) lets have Eric (Carter) make his presentation. Duffy stated that Carmel just got plans for the tanks last week. We don't have the level of expertise internally to review those. It's my intention to get somebody to review those plans. Any type of redundant monitoring or remote monitoring in our world is absolutely a plus. Cannel's questions are C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \9BL9MK6R\ Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011. 4 going to be right along those same lines as this Committee as how the monitoring will be done. Any recommendation will be viewed positively. Carter stated that we've been working with John (Duffy) on the Stormwater plan for any potential spill and we're upgrading the storm system to the sanitary sewer design with pressure testing, double gaskets and we're installing sumps and inlets with the snouts and bio skirts which will aid in collecting oil on the surface and also a downstream storm separation. Wathen with Rinker stated that the water quality unit is made of reinforced concrete much like a manhole. When the water comes in oil or gas will rise into the trap underneath the insert. The storm separator we're proposing for this will hold about 250 gallons of oil or gas. There is double wall containment with fiberglass and concrete and is great for spill capture. Thompson stated that in a worse case scenario like a tanker dumping its load, do you have adequate containment for that? Carter stated that the grading has been created so it's pretty much a contained area. Everything will go into the inlets. Thompson asked how many gallons a tanker holds? Stapp stated that the largest tanker holds about 3,500 gallons of fuel; 8,700 would be a grand total of four compartments. Duffy stated that the total tank capacity for the fuel station is proposed to be; your total volume capacity? Stapp stated that the proposed fuel station will have a 20,000 gallon tank, 10,000 gallon tank and an 8,000 gallon tank; 38,000 total. Davis stated that you will also have infiltration and if you lose a tanker on the lot the integrity of your pavement; most of the fuel will go to your system there, but depending on how well you've maintained your pavement you're still going to have introduction into the well field. Nikides stated that a tanker would exceed the capacity of that particular structure. Dobosiewicz stated that they weren't in disagreement with that. I think if a catastrophe happened along 146'' Street today it would be a situation that would have to be addressed. The situation that would have to be addressed would be identical if it were to occur on this side, but there are measures on this side that help to address it. We can't plan or design for the worse case scenario, but I think we are taking measures that go above and beyond the standards that are in place to help provide assurances that our site is being managed and developed in excess of the requirements of the ordinance. Davis stated that this just increases the likelihood of a probability of that sort of thing. Dobosiewicz stated that he doesn't know what the truck routes are for fuel stations within the various communities. I don't know if 146h Street is well traveled or not. I don't know that we've been provided that information. Ward stated that at the last SAB (Service Advisory Board) meeting someone brought up the fact that the worse spill was a tanker truck filling the underground storage tanks and the hose itself failed on the site and went into the aquifer in Lebanon. This was in a Wellhead Protection area. Davis stated that they should look at a transport model of the worse case scenario. If you had a failure, what's the likelihood that it will be introduced into the well field? C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead Minutes o1- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 5 Kuroiwa asked if the developer had Looked at other locations where this proposed station could be located? Duffy stated that we have one being constructed now at Rangeline Road and Carmel Drive. This will be the second one in Carmel. Kuroiwa asked what type of liability insurance would you carry? Dobosiewicz asked if there was an industry standard that the Committee is looking for them to hit? Kuroiwa stated that Indiana - American Water can provide numbers of how much water they treat there and what it would cost to construct treatment plants to handle hydrocarbon removal. It would be tens of millions of dollars. Dobosiewicz stated that he knows that the developer will carry the liability insurance that's necessary to address the business operation. If a company has a spill at the intersection of 146th Street and River Road there's going to be a process set in place to address as best we can the impact of that spill. Kuroiwa stated that we're talking about a project that increases the risk of this happening. We could talk about transportation routes, but when you're physically storing and loading and unloading chemicals here it's a greater risk than just trucks driving down the street. Thompson stated that the costs implicated in the remediation after an event is probably what you're looking for. How many people are served by these three water supplies? We're talking about thousands of people. Ward stated that you have Carmel Water that's in the one year time of travel. Duffy stated that Carmel gets the fuel and water don't mix; we understand the concerns. Carmel Utility didn't go out and recruit a gas station to be placed here. Our ordinance does permit the gas station. Our ordinance was developed in the mid 1990's; we followed the IDEM guidelines; that's what we have. The most recent delineation that was done clearly shows that they are within Carmel's one year time of travel, but that takes into account two future wells that don't exist today. We hope to have those wells in place; we anticipate having those wells in place, but a consideration we have is that they don't exist today and we don't own the property today. If you take those two wells out Carmel is not in the one year time of travel; we're not even close. We totally respect other's ordinances and the fact that other people are close. We understand the concerns, but those are the facts in relation to the one year time of travel in Carmel. Wert stated that Carmel has a Wellhead Protection Ordinance; did they adopt the county model? Duffy stated that Carmel passed its own Wellhead Protection. Ordinance prior to the county's ordinance. Wert stated that Carmel didn't adopt the county's wellhead map then? Duffy stated that we did not officially adopt the map to my knowledge. We recognize the county's wellhead map as we recognize our own wellhead delineation. The county group is a working group and we certainly recognize it, but we didn't change our own ordinance of our own well sites. Davis stated that the Harbour Water community population is about 15,000 served off of that well in addition to we take that supply south and it's dispersed into all the different areas within Hamilton County, Fishers, some portions of Carmel Clay, Noblesville and an emergency connection point at Moontown Road for Westfield. Ward stated that the proposed site is also within the 3,000 foot service area for the two trailer parks. Davis stated also the private wells that are along 146`" Street. C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content. Outlook\ 9BL9MK6R \Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 6 Dobosiewicz asked if those items were being pointed out because those items disallow the location of the tank or is this just a point of information. Ward stated that it's a point of information. I do believe that Westfield's Wellhead Ordinance disallows gas stations. Davis stated that Westfield's disallows as does Hamilton County. Ward stated that Carmel's Ordinance would supersede. Davis stated that Marion County's Ordinance disallows gas stations. Dobosiewicz stated that we're in Cannel's jurisdiction and must conform to their ordinance rather than conforming with an ordinance adopted by a different legislative body than Carmel City Council. Ward stated that Dobosiewicz was correct. Cousins asked if there were other location options on the property that's being evaluated that would either be to the east or the west. of the location that we're looking at now? Dobosiewicz stated that when the ordinance was adopted by the City Council to rezone the property to permit the fuel station there is a seven acre parcel that surrounds the southwest corner where a fuel station was permitted. Cousins stated that the map shows the one year time of travel that goes over that intersection which does include several well fields, but if you move to the east or the west you move into the five year time of travel. That means when these wells are pumping 24 hours a day instead of the natural ground water flow going towards the river as it naturally does those wells are pulling towards them. If there was a release those wells would be pulling it towards them and that's why this area has been delineated as an area of concern. Essentially we could do modeling, but the modeling has been done indicating that it takes about one year time of travel under capacity pumping operations. That is really the concern about having a release at that location. Dobosiewicz stated that he doesn't know what to do with that. It's a site where this use is permitted and Carmel has an ordinance that addresses it and we're not going to build outside of the perimeters of the requirements of the Carmel Ordinance. If I'm reading between the lines I'm hearing from other local planning teams that their ordinance doesn't. permit. this and we would attempt to impose our will on Carmel acknowledging that they have an ordinance and whether or not this group had an opportunity to comment on Carmel's Ordinance or because they have multi million dollar facilities within their zoning jurisdiction; I don't know if that happened, but I know that the Carmel City Council adopted an ordinance and at the time they took input from whoever they took input from in adopting it. This project is permitted at this location and what we want to do now is go above and beyond whatever requirements we're required to follow to comply with the Wellhead Protection Ordinance of the City of Carmel. We want to gather input from you folks because we have a concern to be good citizens and we want to implement where we can measures that exceed the minimum standard. We've heard from the design consultant and others about these facilities which aren't necessarily required and we're going to implement those above and beyond the minimum standard so we can have a use that co- exists within the Wellhead Protection Area being regulated by a Wellhead Ordinance that's in place today. I don't know if it's important or if it's appropriate that this body forward it's findings or discussion to the legislative authority in consideration of amending their Wellhead Protection Ordinance for future application, but it's almost like we're in a reaction mode of now that we actually have someone that wants to build one of these here we're offering comments when perhaps the better time to do it. was from a proactive standpoint and offer recommendations to those jurisdictions in adopting and amending their ordinances to address these items. I'm not talking down to anybody; we have a business plan in place and it's to implement a fuel station where it's permitted use by right. We want to comply with all the standards and we're here today to present to you our plans and solicit additional input so we can make it even better. C: \Documents and Settings \acorn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content. Outlook\ 9BL9MK6R \Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 7 Ward stated that we would never disrespect Carrnel's Ordinance. It's in place and we have to respect the fact that it is in place. Duffy stated that this goes both ways. If it helps the group our intention is to be certain that whether it's in the one year time of travel or that things are constructed properly perhaps above and beyond properly. I don't have the expertise internally to do that so it's my intent to hire somebody to do that review and work with the developer, owner and fuel tank people to review their plans. If the Committee wishes we would be happy to have that same individual or company /consultant come in and discuss the findings or discuss whatever you want to know. I get the soil issue; we know the volume of water. I believe this fuel station is manageable, but the first step is to make sure that things go in right and that we have the best monitoring system that's out there. You can have the best monitoring system in the world; you can spend big bucks on it, but if your management system isn't there to oversee it, it's not going to be worth a lot in time. Nikides stated that one of the concerns is if a large dump would happen and it would get into the storm system and overwhelm all the protection in the storm system. I've read also you can put an emergency valve in and shut off the storm system from leaving the site. I don't know what that takes or what that looks like, but that might be a consideration also because if it can be contained within the storm pipes and if they are mostly sanitary type pipes that would give time to someone. dealing with this situation instead of the spill getting offsite and then becoming a bigger problem than anybody can really handle. Duffy stated that his comments are on Wellhead Protection. We don't have jurisdiction over storm sewers. That's another department of the city. My comments are not the only comments that the developer will get. Thomas stated that he's been working with engineers on surface water treatment because I need to do the same work in ordinances we have in place for the Stormwater Program. The developer has gone above and beyond in some areas. I will continue to work with the developer and take into consideration any recommendations that come out from. our utility department and go from there. We had discussed any type of storage of storm water runoff. I'm not sure it's still proposed, but at the time it was proposed that there would an EPDM liner; any type of sump or the snout structures; sanitary piping would be used in lieu of thenormal concrete storm piping to prevent leakage from the storm system. We also asked for the storage for the car wash runoff that is to be pumped and treated that those also be lined as well. Thompson stated that a lot of people would feel better if, in case of a worse case spill, you had 100% containment through a liner and whatever other mechanisms could be improvised. Cousins stated that a lot of spill plans include 110% containment.. Bice stated that you should absolutely plan for the worse case scenario. Cousins stated that she heard the statement that we can't plan for the worse case, but that is what the standard should be. If you bring in tankers that carry 3,500 gallons you need to be able to contain 1 10% of that. at. a minimum. Size is a big thing because cost. is going to vary depending on the size. If you want to keep the size smaller you're going to have less cost. Kuroiwa asked if there were Monitoring wells that are required with this project? Stapp stated that as far as at the service station typically no unless there was some active assessment and /or remediation. Typically for a site that is under assessment or remediation as soon as the site is closed those are almost. immediately grouted to prevent infiltration from surface to ground water. C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content. Outlook\ 9BL9MK6R \Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 8 Davis stated that was a good point; to have something between there and the well field and have those periodically sampled. Stapp stated that in the tank backfill we install on diagonally opposite corners a 13" and a 4" vertical PVC slotted pipe similar to a monitoring well pipe; the 13" pipe being at the lowest end. That would give you a point where you could take a ground water sample and test the ground water. We call this an observation well versus a monitoring well that would be in the virgin soil. Duffy stated that this will be part of our review process as well. Wert asked if Ward envisioned this group issuing some sort of advisory recommendation to Carmel Plan Commission? We don't have any enforcement mechanism. Ward stated that this was merely a discussion; what if? Carmel is the only area that allows a fuel station in a wellhead protection area. What kind of recommendations could we give to Carmel or to the developer? I'm glad the people are here to explain the process and what they're planning. We don't have any authority, but we can make a recommendation. Cousins stated that we could also give estimates of potential impact costs if there was a release if that information is helpful to Carmel in assessing financial responsibility. Duffy stated that at the very least Carmel owes this group a review of our review process. That hasn't been completed yet, but when it is we certainly should come back to this Committee and tell them where it's at good, bad or indifferent. Wert asked what the approval track was; is it the January Plan Commission? Dobosiewicz stated that the approval track through Planning Commission would be a public hearing on January 19, 2011, a committee meeting on February 1, 2011 and then provided that the Plan Commission has issued their address we would return back to the Plan Commission as soon as February 15, 2011for their final approval of the development plans. The Plan Commission doesn't approve the tank placement or the requirements set in place for the City's Wellhead Protection Ordinance; that's a separate track through their local planning team and utility. Wert asked what action is the Plan Commission taking? Dobosiewicz stated that the Plan Commission approves the development plan. They haven't passed their authority for development review onto staff as other jurisdictions commonly do and is our case sometimes with Noblesville. The Plan Commission does development plan review as a commission and approval granting is through the Commissioner rather than administratively through the department head of the planning. Wert stated that Dobosiewicz's position is that the Planning Commission is obligated to approve this as long as you're consistent with the preliminary plan? Dobosiewicz stated that Plan Commission reviews for compliance with the zoning ordinance and we would anticipate if it's determined by the Plan Commission that we comply with the zoning ordinance, that the development plan would be approved. Davis asked how the public hearing notification was done? Is that done such that residents within Noblesville or those folks that could potentially be impacted also aware of that. Is that a public notice to them? Dobosiewicz stated that the notice requirement for the City of Carmel for this type of petition would require that we send notice to owners of real estate within 660 feet of the subject site or two parcels deep which ever is fewer. C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead Minutes 01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 9 Cousins stated that the notification would include the two mobile home parks? Dohosiewicz stated that the notification would include the owners of real estate within 660 or two parcels. Ward stated that Westfield and his office has sent a letter to the Carmel Plan Commission recommending against the site within a Wellhead Protection Area. If the Committee wants to do something like that we can; if you want us to remain silent we can. Duffy stated that we certainly would respect the Committee if you send such a letter. Ward stated that if we did anything it would be just a recommendation. Bice stated that somebody had a question about the cost of the clean up in Carmel last year; it was $1.6 million. Ward asked if Bice knew how many gallons of fuel was spilled? Davis stated that the spill in Carmel was 8,000 gallons of fuel. Duffy stated that there are better people to address what the outcome of all of that was, but the gas station had a release. I'm not sure what kind of fuel, but it followed the path of the storm sewer to the southwest corner and found its way into the sanitary sewer which is when the utility really got involved. There was a massive clean up. The fuel followed a path and the good news was; there were homeowners that dates back well before any wellhead protection rules were in place; homes that were built in the 50's and 60's that were still on wells that were much closer than this site is. All the ground water testing that was done after that the fuel didn't go that way; the wells were fine. Cousins stated that the difference in a private well is the size of the pump compared to the size of the pump that we have in public wells. Dobosi.ewicz stated that he appreciates the fact that this isn't for this committee's consideration a yes /no proposition, but I'm hearing comments about stormwater prevention, monitoring and with providing evidence of liability coverage to address the potential event of a spill. Those are all items that we'll take into consideration and address accordingly. Wert stated that the City of Westfield and the County Surveyor's Office have come out in opposition of this project. Noblesville came out. with something different than that, that may send mixed messages, but I wondered if -the Carmel Plan Commission could get a copy of the minutes of this meeting. There have been some good suggestions. I assume Carmel can make reasonable conditions to their approval. Duffy stated that he believes that this Committee meets quarterly, is that correct? Ward stated that Duffy was correct. Duffy asked if the Committee could meet sooner than that if we have part of this done and we wanted to meet sooner than that? Ward stated that they could meet sooner. Indy Star Article — Groundwater Ordinance Ruling: The Surveyor stated that the Town of Avon tried to regulate the groundwater within the township and it didn't go well for Avon, the court ruled against them. Wellhead Ordinances: C: \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content. Outlook\ 9BL9MK6R \Wellhead_Minutes_01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 10 Bice stated that if everybody's ordinances aren't the same why have them. Why don't we just let people build in floodplains? Ward stated that every ordinance around the county is different as far as some of this. Some people's floodplain ordinances are tweaked a little bit differently. Bice stated that from a mitigation standpoint it is ridiculous to allow a gas station to go up in a Wellhead Protection Area. Why don't we allow them to put that dike back up so everything will flood? If what happened in Carmel happens there we're in major trouble. It all could have been fixed by having a set ordinance countywide that everybody follows that doesn't allow you to build a gas station in a wellhead area. Wert stated that Carmel should have amended their ordinance to adopt the county map. It would have put that area clearly in a one year time of travel. Ward stated that Carmel's ordinance still allows the site in the Wellhead area. 2011 Haz -Mat Exercise: Bice stated that the table top will be April. There aren't any set dates for anything. A full scale exercise will be in September or October. The location will be at. Conner Prairie. They haven't. narrowed down what they are doing yet. We're trying to incorporate as many different organizations as they can; hospitals, water companies, individual departments. We're trying to put a scenario together that everybody can use and take credit for. The scenario that we're thinking about is a tornado causing a hazardous material spill so we can take credit for it, but also exercise some units that don't get much; fire response, public works, search and rescue, etc. There is a planning meeting on February 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. in my office conference room in the basement of the Sheriff's Department to lay out the game plan and meeting schedule. Right now I have communications, haz -mat, EMS, public health, law enforcement. If the water companies want to come to the meeting we can discuss ideas at the meeting. Bring your exercise requirements and we can see if we can incorporate those into this exercise. We may not be able to incorporate all the requirements, but. I want to give everybody an opportunity to come to a planning meeting. Education Committee: Cousins stated that there is a new Protect Your Groundwater day that the National Groundwater Association is sponsoring in September. There are some other national environmental education programs and science foundation that do have some grants available. Thompson stated that this could coincide with the River Clean Up and Water Quality Awareness week in September. Stottlemyer stated that there may be very large presence this year. There are some outside entities that want to partner on a large event that coincides with White River Clean Up. It's still early, but as things start to come together we can see what opportunities there are to integrate that same message and would all be a water based education event. Next Meeting Date: The next meeting date was set for Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was adjourned. Kenton C. Ward, CFM Hamilton County Surveyor C. \Documents and Settings \aconn \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \9BL9MK6R \Wellhead Minutes 01- 11- 11.doc 2/28/2011 11 Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Pls add this to the file Hollibaugh, Mike P Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:17 PM Conn, Angelina V FW: Wellhead Minutes Wellhead Minutes 01- 11- 11.doc From: Robert C. Thompson fmailto: Robert. Thompson @hamiltoncountv.in.govj Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:50 PM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: FW: Wellhead Minutes fyi Robert Thompson, RLA, MLA, CLARB, CISEC Program Mgr., SWPP Plan Review, Erosion Control Inspection Hamilton County Surveyor's Office 1 Hamilton Co. Square, Suite 188 Noblesville, IN 46060 317- 776 -8495 fax: 317 - 776 -9628 Robert.Thompson(HamiltonCounty .in.gov http: / /www.hamiltoncounty.in.gov /cleanwater/ From: Robert C. Thompson Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:41 PM To: Foreman, Jamie; Forkner, Brian; John Duffy; Wanninger, Kurt Cc: David Bice; Davis, Sherrae; ccousins@idem.in.aov; Huntley, Steve; ericaCchwittmanhydro.com Subject: FW: Wellhead Minutes Attached are the wellhead minutes (unapproved) for your review for internal use. Robert Thompson, RLA, MLA, CLARB, CISEC Program Mgr., SWPP Plan Review, Erosion Control Inspection From: Lynette L. Mosbaugh Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:31 PM i To: Robert C. Thompson Subject: Wellhead Minutes I have attached the Wellhead minutes with the changes. Lynette L. Mosbaugh Hamilton County Surveyor's Office One Hamilton County Square, Suite 188 Noblesville, IN 46060 Phone - 317 - 776 -8495 Fax - 317- 776 -9628 Ounonpm ir� 1VUl/ © ©Th o ofd ©B ® L -i mer Ll aU c ✓ V ces Stormwater treatment devices are designed to trap and store both sediment and oil from urban stormwater runoff. Many devices also capture oil spills that may occur at gas stations or on industrial sites. While installing a treatment system step is important in protecting our waterways, it is also critical to establish a process to regularly monitor the oil levels in these units to ensure proper clean out of the captured toxins. �-J l On many commercial and municipal sites, the person or group responsibile for monitoring the stormwater treatment units is often unclear. At best it is added to the Facility Manager's list of tasks. But without proper resources or training, a Facility Manager is too often unprepared to fulfill the necessary duties to ensure proper maintenance is being performed. In addition, should an unreported oil spill occur, the stormwater treatment device could then be holding a large amount of hydrocarbons for long periods of time if frequent monitoring is not being carried out. Installing an oil level alarm sensor and control panel takes the risk out of monitoring. The sensor is typically set to issue an alert when the Stormceptor unit has reached 85% of its oil storage capacity. The vacuum truck can then be scheduled to perform the proper maintenance procedure to clean -out the unit. This monitoring system will also alert the owner of any accidental industrial spills so that they can respond to it immediately to reduce the risk of contaminating the environment. imbriumsystems -com USA: (888) 279 8826 CANADA: (800) 565 4801 INT L: +1 416 960 9900 Oi% Sumnpro These monitoring systems are installed onsite during the initial construction of the Stormceptor. This involves mounting a control panel at a convenient indoor or outdoor location and laying power and com- munication cables from the panel to the treatment device. r - J \ /��� LJ H _ n Control Panel Operating Temperature Power Input Alarm Relay Standards Enclosure Optional -20 °C to 60 °C 24 vdc or 110 vac or 220 vac 5 amp, DPDT, dry UL, CSA Type 4X, IP65 Lights, buzzer CONTROL PANEL 3 CONDUIT CABLE EXTERIOR WALL OUTLET' SENSOR Sensor/ Process Temperature Ambient Temperature (sensor head) Approval • No moving parts • Remote electronics via standard twisted pair o Available with Intrinsic Safety Barrier for hazardous locations (explosion proofing) • High corrosion resistance Teflon and stainless steel wetted parts • Capacitance technology responds to all oil types D Easy calibration and control set -up • All calibration, control relays and power wiring is available at the main control panel. to 1/2 mile (1 km) away from Stormceptor -60 °C to 260 °C -60 °C to 50 °C CSA class 1, Zone 1 & 2, Div 1 & 2, groups A, B, C, D (also available with an intrinsic barrier on the 9830 -OWS) ABSA -CRN #0F07450.2 This can be safely mounted up imbriumsystems.com USA: (888) 279 8826 CANADA: (800) 565 4801 INTL: +1 416 960 9900 [Imbrium www.ImbriumSystcros.com Stormceptor`' Stormceptor® Performance Claim: OiI & Grease The following details the definitions, conditions, and specifications related to the performance of the Stormceptor oil and sediment separator to remove oil and grease from stormwater influent. Definitions Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) OiI Removal SpiII Capture A measure of the concentration or mass of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents present in a given amount of soil or water. The term "total" is a misnomer- -few, if any, of the procedures for quantifying hydrocarbons are capable of measuring all fractions of petroleum hydrocarbons present in the sample. Volatile hydrocarbons are usually lost in the process and not quantified, and some non - petroleum hydrocarbons are sometimes included in the analysis (USEPA, http: / /www.epa.gov /OCEPAterms /tterms.html). The capture of the minute volumes of free oil mobilized by runoff from impervious surfaces. A manner of TPH removal more appropriate to recovery of a relatively high volume of a single phase deleterious liquid that is introduced to the storm sewer system over a relatively short duration during dry or wet weather. Conditions When considering the removal of TPH from a storm sewer system there are two ways the oil and grease can be introduced into the system: 1. Small volumes of typical drippings from the normal operation of automobiles and other equipment; or 2. Large volume accidental releases or spills. Both manners of introduction will result in a different level of performance from the Stormceptor unit. Oil Removal describes the type of performance related to the first type of TPH introduction. In this instance, relatively low concentrations, volumes, and flow rates are considered. While the Stormceptor unit will still provide an appreciable oil removal function during higher flow events and /or with higher TPH concentrations, desired effluent limits may be exceeded under these conditions. SpiII Capture describes the type of performance associated with the second manner of TPH introduction to the system. The two design criteria involved when considering this type of performance are: • Overall volume, and • The specific gravity of the material. A Stormceptor unit will be able to capture and retain a maximum spill volume and a minimum specific gravity. For spill characteristics that fall outside the limits of a standard Stormceptor, unit modifications are required - please contact your local Stormceptor Representative, 1 of 3 www.ImbriutnSystcros.com Stormceptor ' Specifications The following constitutes the actual oil and grease removal performance claim of the Stormceptor® oil and sediment separator as per the conditions stated. Oil Removal Field testing and monitoring studies DEMONSTRATE that the Stormceptor system can remove FREE OIL from storm water to an effluent concentration of LESS THAN OR EQUAL to 15 mg /L GIVEN THAT influent concentration of TPH is LESS THAN OR EQUAL to 300 mg /L for FREQUENTLY OCCURRING runoff rates. Spill Capture When SIZED ACCORDING to spill volume and density, monitoring studies DEMONSTRATE that the Stormceptor System can remove up to 97% of FREE OIL spills from storm sewer system for DRY WEATHER or FREQUENTLY OCCURRING runoff events. DISCLAIMER Imbrium Systems refers to Imbrium Systems Inc. and Imbrium Systems Corp. Imbrium Systems offers this performance claim, ( "Claim ") to stormwater quality designers and specifiers on the conditions and understanding that: 1. whilst Imbrium Systems has endeavored to include relevant stormwater quality design considerations in the Claim, to allow its use in a broad range of situations: a. the Claim is deliberately general in nature, b. the Claim should only be used as a guide, and c. the interpretation, verification and application of the Claim is the responsibility of the stormwater quality designers and specifiers and should be performed by an appropriately qualified engineer. 2. to the maximum extent permitted by law, Imbrium Systems: a. makes no representations or warranties (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Claim, and b. disclaims any duty of care and liability (whether or not arising out of Imbrium Systems' negligence, default or lack of care) for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect and whether foreseeable or not) suffered by the stormwater quality designer, specifier, or any other person arising out of, or in connection with, any use of or reliance on the Claim, 3. the stormwater quality designer or specifier waives any right to claim loss or damage against Imbrium Systems or any of its respective agents or employees arising out of, or in connection with, any use or reliance by the stormwater quality designer, specifier, or its representatives or any other person on the Claim, and 4. use of the Claim will constitute an acceptance of these Conditions of Use. 2 of 3 ORDINANCE 1030 ORDINANCE AMENDING /VELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLA]ZONING The City Council of the City of Lake Mills, Jefferson County, Wisconsin does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 10 -3 -17 of the Municipal Code of the City of Lake Mills is hereby repealed and recreated to read as follows: 10 -3 -17: WELL HEAD PROTECTION (WHP) A. Purpose and Authority 1. The residents of the City of Lake Mills (hereinafter "the City ") depend exclusively on groundwater for a safe drinking water supply. Certain land use practices and activities can seriously threaten or degrade groundwater quality. The purpose of this section is to protect the City's municipal water supply and areas from which City wells draw water, and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City. 2. These regulations are established pursuant to the authority granted by the Wisconsin legislature in 1983, Wisconsin Act 410 (effective May 11, 1984), which specifically added groundwater protection to the statutory authorization for municipal planning and zoning in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Areas appropriate for protection in the WHP are established in the Well Head Protection Plan for City of Lake Mills, Wisconsin, dated October 1998, and the Well Head Protection Plan for the City of Lake Mills, dated November 2007, hereinafter the "Plans," or if referred to separately, "1998 Plan" and "2007 Plan ". Both Plans were prepared by Strand Associates, Inc. The Plans are hereby incorporated herein by this reference, and a copy of the 1998 Plan and the 2007 Plan are on file in the office of the City Clerk. B. Applicability. 1. Zone 1. The regulations specified in this section shall apply to lands within those portions of the five -year Time of Travel Zones (hereinafter sometimes "TOT ") of Well No. 6 shown on the 1998 Plan, Protection Area Map (see Appendix E, Figure 2 of WHP) (hereinafter the "Map "), and to lands within the minimum separation distances from potential sources of contamination described in Chapter NR 811.16(4)(d) of the Department of Natural Resources Code, which areas also lie within the City of Lake Mills corporate limits. 2. Zone 2. The regulations specified in this section shall apply to lands within those portions of the five -year Time of Travel Zones (hereinafter sometimes "TOT ") of Well No. 4 shown on the 2007 Plan, Protection Area Map (see Figure 2.04 -1 of WHP) (hereinafter the "Map "), and to lands within the minimum separation distances from potential sources of contamination described in Chapter NR 811.16(4)(d) of the Department of Natural Resources Code, which areas also lie within the City of Lake Mills corporate limits. 3. Zone 3. The regulations specified in this section shall apply to lands within those portions of the five -year Time of Travel Zones (hereinafter sometimes "TOT ") of Well No. 5 shown on the 2007 Plan, Protection Area Map (see Figure 2.04 -1 of WHP) (hereinafter the C. "Map "), and to lands within the minimum separation distances from potential sources of contamination described in Chapter NR 811.16(4)(d) of the Department of Natural Resources.Code, which areas also lie within the City of Lake Mills corporate limits. 4. The attached map shows the Well Head Protection Area of lands where these regulations apply at each of the wells — No. 4, No. 5, and No. 6. Definitions. AQUIFER A saturated, permeable geologic formation that contains and will yield significant quantities of water. CONE OF DEPRESSION EXISTING FACILITIES WHICH MAY CAUSE OR THREATEN TO CAUSE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION FIVE -YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL (TOT) GROUNDWATER DIVIDE GROUNDWATER PROTECTION OVERLAY DISTRICT RECHARGE AREA The area around a well, in which the water level has been lowered at least one -tenth of a foot by pumping of the well. Existing facilities which may cause or threaten to cause environ- mental pollution within the corporate limits of the City's Well Nos. 4, 5, and 6 recharge areas which include but are not limited to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources' draft list of "Inventory of Sites or Facilities Which May Cause or Threaten to Cause Environmental Pollution," and Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations list of "Leaking Underground Storage Tanks" (hereinafter "LUSTs ") and the Registry of Waste Disposal Sites in Wisconsin, all of which are incorporated herein, together with future amendments thereto, as if fully set forth. The Five -Year TOT is a portion of the recharge area, the outer boundary of which it is determined or estimated that groundwater and potential contaminants will take five years to reach a pumping well. The Five -Year TOT for Municipal Well Nos. 4, 5, and 6 are established based on the volumetric flow equation. The TOT area is shown on the Map. The TOT area shown on the Map is hereinafter referred to as "the TOT ". Ridge in the water table, or potentiometric surface, from which ground water moves away at right angles in both directions. Line of highest hydraulic head in the water table or potentiometric surface. Shall be defined as those areas within each TOT, or Zones of Influence, which are shown on the map attached in Appendix E of the Well Head Protection Plan and incorporated herein as if fully set forth. Area in which water reaches the zone of saturation by surface infiltration and encompasses all areas or features that supply groundwater recharge to a well. WELL HEAD Those Zones of influence or TOT at each municipal well that lie within PROTECTION AREAS the City of Lake Mills corporate limits. D. Well Head Protection Areas (hereinafter "WPA "). 1. Intent. The area to be protected is the Lake Mills WPA (as determined by the Plans) contained within the City boundary limits. a. These areas are designated on the Map that is attached, as well as the Map within the Plans. These lands are subject to land use and development restrictions because of their close proximity to the TOT and the corresponding high threat of contamination. b. Minimum separation distances from potential sources of contamination as defined in the DNR Code chapter NR 811.16(4)(d), latest version, shall also be maintained when these separation distances exceed the dimensions of the Well Head Protection Area illustrated on the Map. 2. Permitted Uses. The following are the only permitted uses within the WPA. a. Any existing use, even though listed on Prohibited Uses, below, located within such areas to the extent that use currently exists, subject to the requirements for existing prohibited uses, (5) below. b. Those uses permitted under Lake Mills Zoning Code consistent with the Zoning Map, as amended by action of the Lake Mills City Council and which are not prohibited under Section (3) below. 3. Prohibited Uses. The following uses, if created after the adoption of the WHP Ordinance, as adopted in 1998 or as amended in 2008, are prohibited uses within the VVeII Head Protection areas designated on the Map. These uses are prohibited based on the high probability that activities routinely associated with these uses (storage, use, and handling of potential pollutants) will cause groundwater contamination. Uses not listed are not considered permitted uses. a. Underground storage tanks of any size. b. Septage and /or sludge spreading. c. Animal waste land spreading. d. Animal waste facilities. e. Animal confinement facilities. f. Gas stations. g. Vehicle repair establishments, including auto body repair. h. Printing and duplicating businesses. Bus or truck terminals. j. Repair shops. k. Landfills or waste disposal facilities. I. Wastewater treatment facilities. m. Spray wastewater facilities. n. Junkyards or auto salvage yards. o. Bulk fertilizer and /or pesticide facilities. p. Asphalt products manufacturing. q. Dry- cleaning businesses. r. Salt storage. s. Electroplating facilities. t. Exterminating businesses. u. Paint and coating manufacturing. v. Hazardous and /or toxic materials storage. w. Hazardous and /or toxic waste facilities. x. Radioactive waste facilities. y. Recycling facilities. z. Cemeteries. 4. Where any of the uses listed in (3) above exist within the WPA on the effective date of this ordinance when adopted in 1998 or when amended in 2008, owners of these facilities will be allowed to upgrade such uses to facilitate or enhance groundwater protection. The Plan Commission and Public Works Board must approve plans for the proposed upgrade and the appropriate permit issued by the City Building Inspector /Zoning Administrator's office prior to any work being initiated. 5. Requirements for Existing Prohibited Uses, (d)(3) Above. a. Such uses shall provide copies of all federal, state and local facility operation approvals or certificate to the City Zoning Administrator and ongoing environmental monitoring results to the City Director of Public Works. b. Such uses shall provide additional environmental or safety structures/ monitoring as deemed necessary by the City, which may include but are not limited to storm water runoff management and monitoring. c. Such uses shall replace equipment or expand in a manner that improves the existing environmental and safety technologies already in existence. d. Such uses shall have the responsibility of devising and filing with the City a contingency plan satisfactory to the City Zoning Administrator for the immediate notification of City officials in case of an emergency. E. Enforcement. 1. In the event the individual and /or facility engaging in permitted use(s) under this ordinance causes the release of any contaminants which endangers the WPA, the activity causing said release shall immediately cease and a cleanup satisfactory to the City shall occur. 2. The individual /facility causing the release of contaminants shall be responsible for all costs of cleanup. The costs of cleanup shall include, but not be limited to, City consultant fees, at the invoice amount plus administrative costs for oversight, review and documentation. 3. Following any such discharge the City may require additional test monitoring and /or bonds /sureties as it deems necessary and reasonable. 4. Penalties for noncompliance shall be provided pursuant to applicable sections of the code and Wisconsin Statutes. Section 2. This ordinance was sponsored by Council Representative Joe Van Tassel. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with or contravening the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication as provided by law. Adopted this day of , 2008. Ed Grunden, Council President Attest: James E. Heilman, City Clerk- Treasurer Format Dynamics :: CleanPrint :: http:// www. indystar. comlarticle /201101270245/LOCA... Page 1 of 2 M Gas station 14 th /'river site draws r Written by Chris Sikich an for a fia Officials from neighboring communities worry that a Turkey Hill gas station being considered for a site near the White River could contaminate area water supplies. Indianapolis, Hamilton County and Westfield officials have written letters to the city that protest a gas station proposed for 146th Street and River Road. In the letters, they cite concerns about the contamination of drinking water from underground storage tanks and surface spills, both to the river and wells in the area. In his letter, County Surveyor Kent Ward says the risk is too great for water supplies in Carmel, Westfield and Noblesville. Carmel and Westfield have or are contemplating wells nearby, while the Indianapolis Department of Public Works has wells in the area that supply water to Noblesville. Ward notes the gas station is permitted by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management as long as certain protections are in place, but he believes the contamination concerns are great enough to deny the project. Reached by phone Wednesday, Ward said he hopes the outcry is great enough that Carmel will deny the project. "I really hope they give good consideration to the folks who have come out against it, because I do have a big concern," he said. The gas station is proposed as part of Legacy, a 413 -acre multiuse development under construction at 146th Street and River Road. "I think we all have concerns and want to do everything possible to protect our water supply," said Mayor Jim Brainard. "It's important to remember that Carmel did not make this proposal, but it's made by a private developer. The Plan Commission and other city officials will deal with it as appropriate." After being notified of the letters, Kroger - affiliated Turkey Hill pulled the proposal http://www.indystar.comfidcp/?1296152454159 Advertisement Print Powered By tDynarnicsi 1/27/2011 Format Dynamics :: CleanPrint :: http: / /www.indystar.com /article /201101270245/LOCA... Page 2 of 2 from consideration at last week's Plan Commission meeting. Mike Hollibaugh, director of Carmel's Department of Community Services, said Turkey Hill officials wanted more time to work on their proposal before going before the commission. It's not yet clear when that will happen. This is not something to be taken lightly, and they are getting that message," Hollibaugh said. City officials will examine the project closely, he said, pointing out Carmel also wants to locate wells within that area. Still, he believes the project can win approval if Turkey Hill can demonstrate the project would be safe. Charles Frankenberger, a partner in the law firm Nelson and Frankenberger, is representing Turkey Hill. He could not be reached for comment. The gas station is proposed for land that once was affiliated with Conner Prairie. Earlham sold the land to developers as part of a deal that separated the nearby living - history museum from the college's financial control. The City Council approved zoning for Legacy in 2007 under a plan that does allow the gas station. Council members Joe Griffiths and Rick Sharp were on the council then, and both said no one voiced concerns about a gas station in numerous public meetings. To the contrary, Griffiths said residents in the area were glad it was part of the proposal because no other gas stations are nearby. "Most people were elated to hear there could be a gas station," said Griffiths, who now lives within Legacy. Follow Star reporter Chris Sikich on Twitter at twitter.com /ChrisSikich. Call him at (317) 444 -6036. http:// www.. indystar .corn/fdcp/ ?1296152454159 Advertisement w .w app for i e' d Wed touch°. Print Powered By Forn-tatDynaarnics 1/27/2011