HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes BZA 04-22-13 / r4aRT\tiky,,\`
�� � / City
N-1111 IAN/
MINUTES
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Monday, April 22, 2013
6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, Carmel City Hall
Present: James Hawkins, President
Leo Dierckman
Earlene Plavchak
Alan Potasnik
Ephraim Wilfong(arrived late)
Connie Tingley, Recording Secretary
Staff members in attendance: Alexia Donahue-Wold,Planning Administrator
Mike Hollibaugh, Director,Department of Community Services
Legal Counsel: John Molitor
Previous Minutes:
On a motion made by Leo Dierckman and seconded by Earlene Plavchak:
The Minutes for the meeting dated March 25,2013 were approved as circulated.
MOTION CARRIED 4-0
Department Report: Alexia Donahue-Wold
o Items 3-5, Getchell Accessory Dwelling, 11333 N. Gray Road,tabled to May 28, 2013 meeting
® Items 6-7, Holiday Inn— Signage, 9797 N. Michigan Road, tabled to May 28, 2013 meeting
o Items 14-15, Carmel Corners, Meijer Outlot B, need suspension of rules for Public Notice
o First Public Notice had incorrect date
o Second Public Notice did not make 25 days' timeline; but more than 10 days
Motion: On a motion made by Leo Dierckman and seconded by James Hawkins:
The Rule of Procedure be suspended to hear Items 14-15,Docket Nos. 13020003 V and 13020004 V,
Carmel Corners,Meijer Outlot B.
MOTION CARRIED 4-0
ILegal Report: John Molitor
• City declined to participate in.Appeal for decision regarding Bowen's cabin with remonstrance by
neighbors, Barnetts
o Barnetts have appealed decision by Trial Court to the Indiana Court of Appeals
WWW.CARMEL.IN.GOV Page 1 of 6 (317) 571-2417
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
April 22,2013
Public Hearing:
1-2. WITHDRAWN: (V) Greyhound Commons—Signage.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
Docket No. 12070014 V PUD Z-344, Section 11.3(C) (1): Number of signs (2 additional proposed,1
existing allowed)
Docket No. 12070015 V PUD Z-344, Section 11.3 (C) (3): Ground sign height(20 +1- proposed, 10'
allowed). The site is located at 14480 Lowes Way. It is zoned PUD/Planned Unit Development. Filed by Joy
Skidmore of Kite Realty Group.
3-4. TABLED TO TUESDAY MAY 28- (UV,DSV) Getchell Accessory Dwelling, 11333 N. Gray Rd.
The applicant seeks the following use variance approval for an accessory dwelling in an S-1 Residence District:
Docket No. 13010015 UV ZO Ch.5.01.01 Permitted Uses
Docket No. 13030002 V ZO Ch 25.01.01.B.1: Max. Height 18 feet for Accessory Structure
The site is located at 11333 N Gray Road. It is zoned S-1/Residence District. Filed by Joe Getchell, owner.
5-6. TABLED TO TUESDAY MAY 28- (V)Holiday.Inn—Signage
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
Docket No. 13020024 V Ch. 25.07.02-03 b) 1. Number of signs (2 proposed, 1 allowed)
Docket No. 13020025 V Ch. 25.07.02-03 b) 1. Number of signs facing west ROW(2 proposedd, 1
allowed). The site is located at 9797 N. Michigan Rd.It is zoned B-6 and is within the US 421 Overlay Zone.
Filed by Lee Heppenheimer of HC Carmel,LLC.
7-9. TABLED TO TUESDAY MAY 28- (V)Butler Hyundai—Signage.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals:
Docket No. 13020026 V Ch. 25.07.02-03 b) 1. Number of signs(6 proposed,2 allowed)
Docket No. 13020027 V Ch. 25.07.02-03 b)3. Number of signs facing south ROW(4 proposed, 1
allowed)
Docket No. 13020028 V Ch.25.07.02-03 b) 1. Number of signs facing east ROW (2 proposed,, 1
allowed). The site is located at 4200 E. 96th St. It is zoned B-3 and is not located within any Overlay Zone. Filed
by Timothy E. Ochs of Ice Miller on behalf of 4148 96th St., LLC
10-12. (V) Salain Garage,Woods at Lions Creek Lot 19. The applicant seeks the following development standards
variance approvals for a detached garage.
Docket No. 13030003 V ZO Ch.25.01.01.B.3(a)(i) Min 25 ft setback behind front building line,.0
requested
Docket No. 13030004 V ZO Ch. 25.01.01.B.5 Max ground floor area 720 sq ft, 1316 sq ft
requested
Docket No. 13030005 V ZO Ch. 25.01.01.B.1 Max height 18 ft, 19 ft requested
The site is located at 4417 Serengeti Circle. It is zoned S-1/Residence. Filed by Dan Salain, owner.
Present for Petitioner:
Dan Salain, owner
• Bought property from Pulte contingent upon being able to build exterior garage
o Already exterior garage on Lot 8
o Approved another on Lot 29 to be constructed in a few months
o All lots are over one acre
• Pulte built house next to their lot; adjoining location of garage
o Built home after they approved Salain garage
o Letter of support with no objections
• Structure will meet architectural guidelines within community
Page 2 of 6
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
April 22,2013 •
o Prairie style home
o Similar brick and mason work for garage
o Structure will face as if a home with side load entry
• House is forty feet from building line
o Lot curves making garage 56 feet past street line; 14 feet from building line
o Giant slope on property preventing moving garage back further
o Structure about 80 feet from adjacent home on Lot 20
• Structure about 1300 square feet
o Meeting75 % rule
• Height variance for boat with 10-foot boom
o Need 16 feet height to work in garage
• Garage is for personal items
o Currently using two storage places
o Boat, 1991 truck, trailer, off-road motorcycles, lawn mowers, equipment, etc.
• Boat on trailer almost 28 feet in length
• Existing rule is 24 by 30 feet for detached garage; too short for boat on trailer
• Layout of garage shown
o Very end of back of garage is where land slopes off 9 to 10 feet
• Pervasive curve around whole neighborhood
• Cannot push back any further
• Shrunk garage to meet front of existing home and fit available spot
• Map of neighborhood shown
o Lot 19 indicated with existing home on Lot 20
• None of the neighbors have raised objections
o Lot indicated with existing exterior structure
o Lot 29 also proposing exterior structure approved by Pulte
• Design of prairie style home and garage shown
o Front of garage will be similar to home
• Brick and cement facing
• Footprint shown with electrical layout
o Rendering of home with garage shown
Public Hearing closed.
Department Report:
Alexia Donahue-Wold
• Variances are for new proposed detached garage
• Most detached garages are required to be setback 25 feet behind front of home
o Slope of property makes that difficult
• Design of garage matches home
• Smallest portion of garage will face street
• Garage doors will face home; not street
• Have not heard any remonstrance
• Received approval from Homeowners Association/Pulte
Department recommended approval of the variances
Page 3 of 6
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
April 22,2013
Discussion:
• Existing/original home in subdivision (Lot 8) already has large detached garage
o Home was estate home on larger lot with detached garage/guest house
o Originally on lot larger than 3 acres; did not need variance
• Thirty-three feet between two garages
o Enough room to get boat in and out of garage
• Reminded to get Homeowners Association approval
Motion:
On a motion made by Leo Dierckman and seconded by James Hawkins:
Docket Nos. 13030003 V through 13030005 V, Salain Garage, Woods at Lions Creek Lot 19, for
minimum 25 feet setback behind front building line, 0 requested; maximum ground floor area 720 square feet
required, 1316 square feet requested; and maximum height 18 feet required; 19 feet requested, be approved.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
13-14. (V) Carmel Corners,Meijer Outlot B
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals for a multi-tenant commercial
building.
Docket No. 13020003 V ZO Ch. 20G.05.07.B.4(d) No parking between a building and the street
•
Docket No. 13020004 V ZO Ch.25.07.02-04.b.1.b No ground sign permitted,only 1 street
frontage. The'site is located at 1425 W. Carmel Dr. and is zoned OM/M: Old Meridian District,Meijer
Subarea. Filed by Ryan Schultz of Versa Development.
Present for Petitioner:
Ryan Schultz,Versa Development
• Propose 8000"'square'feet retail facility
• Ordinance prefers buildings be pushed to roadway with parking behind
o Development within overall parking field for Meijer
o Trying to preserve existing traffic patterns for pedestrian and customer safety
o Large stor'mand sanitary sewer existing on property defines position of building
• Diagram shown
o Existing shopping center to south applied for similar variances
• For preservation of traffic patterns throughout development
• Variance needed for ground sign not permitted in Old Meridian District
o Sign will help direct traffic to development from corner of 126th Street and Pennsylvania
• Existing berm somewhat obscures building
o Sign will direct customers to site
Public Hearing closed
Department Report:
Alexia Donahue-Wold
• Normally buildings in Old Meridian District are pulled up to street
• This is existing site in Meijer outlot
o Existing site conditions make sense for layout and location of new building
o Discussed pulling the building up to Pennsylvania Street
• With existing site conditions, they chose this location
• As in-fill project, should not have any negative affect on surrounding properties
Page 4 of 6
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
April 22,2013
• Since they face one street frontage, they would be allowed either signs for each tenant or a ground sign
o Building is set back about 110 feet from Pennsylvania Street with large landscape buffer and
street trees that block part of building
o Additional ground sign needed to aid in identifying tenants of building
o Sign meets size requirements and is six feet tall
Department recommended positive consideration
Discussion:
• Sign needed because berm restricts visibility of some of the tenant signage on building frontage
o Substantial landscaping at corner of 126`" Street and Pennsylvania Avenue
o Monument sign beneficial to get people to site ,
o Tenant signs will be over doors; indicated in packet _
o Landscaping on berm and the trees block visibility
• If building brought to street, variances would not be needed
o Visibility would be increased
o Financially, it makes more sense to leave building in proposed location
• Petitioner willing to give up or table monument sign in order to have parking variance
• Petitioner would like to table sign variance to.later date rather than withdraw
o Need to negotiate with tenants,who thought monument sign was part of
package
o If tabled, it can be voted on at next meeting
Discussion of tabling process:
• Can remained tabled until Petitioner is ready to continue or Board can remove,it from agenda if it has
been too long
• Mr. Dierckman & Mr. Potasnik felt they should be handled together; not vote on one and table the
second
• Mr. Hawkins,felt this could affect the Petitioner's ability to negotiate with tenants , - _ -
o Mr. Schultz stated their negotiations with tenants were predicated on fact that ground sign was
not permitted and an attempt would be made to obtain one
• If it would jeopardize entire development, he was willing to let the sign go and deal with
it on their end
• Petitioner has right to withdraw either or both of the variances any time before a motion is made
• Up to Board if they want to vote on one variance and allow Petitioner to table other variance to
future date
• If petition is withdrawn, it can be re-filed three months later
• If petition is defeated, it could not be voted on for six months
•
Discussion:
• Mr. Dierckman did not like all the signs
o Board is not precedent setting; there will be trees everywhere
• Carmel has the most broad-based beautiful landscaping requirements
• A lot of signs are not visible without being on top of them
o No compelling reason to vote in favor of ground sign
• If building brought up to street, they would not need first variance
• He felt they could have one or the other; not both
Page 5 of 6
Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
April 22,2013
• Everybody has to deal with landscaping and their signage not being visible from a
distance
• Mr. Wilfong stated it was pointed out at Plan Commission that the building cannot be brought up to the
street without spending an enormous amount of money to re-route the utilities
• Mr. Potasnik felt tabling was open-ended and never ending with no drop dead date
o Board can withdraw an item for lack of prosecution
WITHDRAWN by Petitioner: Docket No. 13020004 V
Motion:
On a motion made by Leo Dierckman and seconded by James Hawkins:
Docket No. 13020003 V, Carmel Corners,Meijer Outlot B, no parking between a building and the
street, be approved.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Adjournment
Motion: On a motion made by James Hawkins and seconded by Earlene Plavchak:
The Meeting be adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m.
•
•
Approved this 25( day of M" 2013
P esident- James R. Hawkins Secretary - I ni-r ingley
Page 6 of 6