HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication
.
.
FEE:
9
t
RECENEO ~IL TON COUNTY, INDIANA
ARRl2ltJC~~ON FU>."S BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION
~ . ~oPli/r STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST
Single Family (Pri~~ ~q~257.50 for the first variance, plus $77.25 for each additional section of the
ordinance being var~~-
All Other $978.50 for the first variance, plus $463.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied.
OF CARMEL - CLAY TOWNSHIP
DOCKET NO. OCJO'700C...:-1 \I
DATE RECEIVED:
1) Applicant: Frank M.Hahn
Address: 2850 E. 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240
2)
Project Name:
Pavinq of Parkinq Area
Phone: (317) 846-0840
Phone: (317) 846-0840
Phone: (317) 639-6151
Engineer/Architect: Hahn Survevinq
Attorney: Mark T. Monroe
3) Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response)
X (a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property
(b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property
(c) Other:
4) If Item 3) (c) is checked, please complete the following:
Owner of the property involved:
Owner's address:
Phone:
5) Record of Ownership:
Deed Book No.llnstrument No. 92-46531
Page:
Purchase date: 1992
6) Common address of the property involved: 2850 E. 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana
Legal description: Please see attached leqal description
Tax Map Parcel No.: 17-14-07-04-06-022.000
zyJ ~h~ 21.0'3.02
Page 1 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 01/04/2005
e
e
7) State explanation of requested qevelopment Standards Variance: (State what you want to do and cite the section
number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinao~g~e-t.bat applies and/or creates the need for this request).
-,:s
Petitioner re uests variance of Secti n 27 .03.02 ~f t 'e Carmel Zonin Ordinance to eliminate curbin from the
proposed parkinq area.
8) State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question
sheet entitled "Findings of Fact-Development Standards Variance").
The elimination of the curbinq will help in maintaininq the residential character of the area.
9) Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): S-2 residence
10) Size of loUparcel in question: .772 acres
11 ) Present use of the property: professional office
12) Describe the proposed use of the property: professional office
13) Is the property: Owner occupied X
Renter occupied
Other
14) Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in connection with this
property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket
number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation.
UV-33-93 - ~-eel.8.jZ-~-4?
15) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details:
Building Permit Number:
Builder:
16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence?
As soon as possible
17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed improvement for which this
application has been filed?
Frank M. Hahn and all subsequent owners, tenants, assiqnees and heirs.
NOTE:
LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Indianapolis Star a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public
hearing date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of
the hearing.
Page 2 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 01104/2005
e
e
AFFIDAVIT
I, hereby swear that I am the attorney for the applicant and owner involved in this application and that the foregoing
signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed: V1r,/UIIr. Y. '"h1,~
Mark T. Monroe Date ~-Z,-S-t)S-
STATE OF INDIANA
SS:
County of
.~
(County in which notarization takes place)
Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public
for
~.~ ,,-0
(Notary Public's county of residence)
County, State of Indiana, personally appeared
~ \::f /?/~
(Property Owner, Attorney, ,or Power of Attorney)
and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this
a..3
day of
~
, 20 0 15
(SEAL)
~ t?)t?~
, C"" Notary lic--Signature
~h1# ~/ to ~~HP~
Notary Public--Please Print
~O~S;i~eXPir.e. s:
~ d:1e5J/ dJ dJP?
Page 4 of 8 - z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 01/04/2005
e
e
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
Frank M. Hahn
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot-Sheet)
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS
DAY OF
,20
Board Member
Page 7 of 8 -z:\shared\forms\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 01/04/2005
e
e
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
Frank M. Hahn
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
proper drainaqe and traffic circulation will be maintained without the curbinQ.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because: .
proper drainaqe and traffic circulation will be maintained without the curbinq.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
the residential nature of the property will not be maintained.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this
day of
,20
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
Page 8 of 8 - z:\shared\forrnS\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 01/04/2005
Hahn Surveying, 2850 E 96t Street
Hahn Surveying, 2850 E 96t Street
200\
~, .
41d'
\qq~
~ Z A- vVWekt2J yvu YWtej
computer publishing.
The sig
Adj ust~,
ordinaI1
Also pro . ed was a photograph showing the view of the south facia of the 1 ding as seen frOIn
1465; superim sed on the east end of the building is the sign Prentic .a.I1 ComputerPublismng ~
and the logo. TIi ariance r~quired for thi~ sign is to permit additional sign on the south
facia of the building an to permit the sign to exceed the si requirements under the ordinance.
Members of the public were in · ed to speak; no
'; A com]
,~d if;
"east an
,The pa
:,to the "
!'~gran til1
;:!develo
:':,(it~enera
~lan Klineman comm? that both Sign.S on the building emed to tilt the building in his eyes.
Bill Ensign move~pprove Docket No, SV-32-93, sign one on
seconded by n Carter, unanimously approved.
,---
Bill SIgn moved to approve Docket No. SV-32-93, sign two, south facia, see
· eman, unanimously approved.
---------
7g. Docket No. UV-33-93 a Use Variance Application for Frank Hahn - Hahn & Associates for
property on which they have entered into a purchase agreement locat~d at 2850 East 96th Street,
Indianapolis. Petitioner is requesting a us,e variance to allow an existing residentially zoned
dwelling to be used as an engineering consulting and surveying facility, and offices. Parcel is'
zoned 8-2. Filed by Lawrence E. Lawhead, Attorney for Frank Halm/Hahn & Associates, Inc.
Lawrence E. LawheacL 8900 Keystone Crossing, Indianapolis, appeared before the Board
representing Frank Hahn/Hahn & Associates, Inc. Mr. Frank'Hahn was also in attendance. The
proposed site was shown on the overhead projector and its location was pinpointed as well as
existing and surrounding uses and businesses. The site is presently a residential house with 1,824
square feet with an additional 1600 plus square feet for storage. The site is located in an area
of medium density, residential. and local commercial office 'space. Hahn & Associates planning
objecting is to provide a transition from heavy commercial along Keystone and 96th Street to the
residential areas to the north and west of the site. Mr. Hahn's use is particularly suited to provide
this. transition. The w:ea is not compatible with heavy commercial uses but using the site as a
buffer to the residential ,area is a sound planning. move.
The residential areas receive the majority of their traffic along Haverstick; the entrance to the site
is from 96th Street. The area from Keystone to the site is commercial in use. The petitioner will
leave the existing, mature pine trees and Beech and hardwood trees as they are. The petitioner
will not be expanding the building, and any further change would require an additional
appearance before the Board.
8
IVl
" .
3n 'from
)Iishing
e south
lnance.
y. Mr.
e them
lS eyes.
riI ding, ,
y Alan '
~tes for ',.'
Street, ,
. zoned '
~~~~~;:~i:;
. ::/::."
Board,,:;;ijji;.i,:':
,. The::';:;'!':t:
{ell as.':),!,~I::':::
1, 824 ,:,,:~i;,,;"
'.;l'
[l . areat!ij:::;'
LIming ,,:;i::;
to the ,~~:;:.
~ovide ,
e as a '
le site
~r will
tioner
tional
I:.:'j\;::
r.~
The signage will be 3 feet by 3 feet located on the building, and wi'll not exceed 1 0 square feet.
Adj ustable motion lights will be used and will not exceed .1 foot candle limits as required by the
ordinance.
A commitment, in recqrd<:tble form, will be submitted to install a'sidewalk along 96th Street when
and if a sidewalk plan is developed for the area in cooperation with the property owners to the
east and west of the site.
The parking area will use treated timbers to provide a residential look similar to the dental office
to the west, all in keeping with providing a transitional area to the residential neighborhood. The
granting of the variance would provide a stabilizing buffer between, increasing commercial
development to the east and south, and residential to the west. The surveyor's office would
generate light traffic, since one half of the employees are in the field.
Members of the public were invited to speak; one appeared.
Alan KIineman asked ,if this was a use variance specifically for a surveying and engineering
office; Mr. Lawhead's response was that it was not specific for Mr~ Hahn and that the variance
would run with the land.
Mr. Klineman also questioned the dedication of the. right of way. Prank Hahn responded that it
has been submitted, b1;1t to date, nothing has been received from the County. Mr. Lawhead also
stated that his client had no objection to annexation.
Ron Carter' asked about proof of notice; Rick Brandau's response Was in the affirmative.
Alan KIineman moved for approval of Docket No. UV-33-93, subject to receiving, in recordable
form, a dedication of. a 4S foot half right of way, statement as to non-opposition to annexation,
and installation of sidewalks, seconded by Bill Ensign, unanimously approved.
8g. Docket No.V-34-93, a Developmental Standards Variance, Application for Me 5t
,Medic laza Partners North, L.P. and their prospective property, commonly kn as MCP
(Meridian orate Plaza) bounded on the west by US 31, the east by Call Avenue, and on
the south by 1-4 The specific addresses involved with this appltca, . are 101, 151 and 201
Pennsylvania Parkwa Carmel. The petitioners' are requesting following variances of the
Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordi
Variance A -- Variance IT
without curbing.'
o allow the construction of parking areas
Variance B -- Variance fro
number of parking sp
parking within a portion of t.i.e
9
O ;.J.,. re-
. ~7.(