HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact, ex
f- 1
Lily at rmel
Wesley G. Bucher
DIRECTOR DEFT OF COMMI.11,1ITY DEVELOPMENT
_
Dow thy J.HAncoek
mmfol:t
February 22, 1989
Ken Sebree
Kensington Development Corp
2001 E. 52nd St,
Indianapolia, IN 46205
RE: Special. Use & Developmental
Standards Variance Applications
Dear. Mr. Sebree:
•
After reviewing the above referenced applications, I have the follow-
ing' comments:
o Need seven copies of a site plan and location maps.
o Need five copies of all finings Of facts sheets.
o Need five copies of statement of practical difficulties and
statement of request for the developmental standards variance
Application.
o Need five copies of statement of request and supporting statement
for the special use application.
o Site plan' need more detail
- Identify the lot sizes in sq. feet for each lot and location
Identify _
of sidewalkS.
- Ideritify. the 50 ft lot width on lots 10, 11, and 12.
- Address all items/concerns mentioned in: a letter dated
February 13, 1989 from Dave Cunningham of this Dept. '
= Identify U:S.31 Overlay Zone boundary.
o' Filing fees need to be -paid -.$250.00 for the :Special Use and $100
for the first variance and $50.00 for every additional variance
requested:
•
4o EAST MAIN STREET CARMEL,INDIANA 46032 317/849-6433
Page 2 •
2/22/89
•
Once the above items ;are addressed and submitted, I foresee no problem
with issuing a Docket Number. Please realize the revised site plan may
result in additional comments or concerns.
If you have any questions., Please feel free to contact me at 844-6433.
- Sincerely,
o‘ri)/
Richard R. Brandau
Deputy Director/Plan/Zoning Admin.
RRB/ck
cc• file
Stephen A. Harlow
Frank Hahn
•
•
•
•
CARMEL BOARD Or ZONING APPEALS =1
•CARMEL, INDIANA
Docket No: V If
Petitioner": xansi ngton D.yalopment Corporation
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL 'STANDARDS VARIANCE
•
1. The approval of thi•s variance will not be i'njur'ious to the public
health, uafety, morals and general welfare of the community
;;i
because:
This is a reclassification of an existing project.. rThere
' arP_�_nhan es i'n thP4:31ygica1 Structure of the Protect. ' i
'i
2. The use and value Of the 'area adjacent to the property included i4
in the variance wi`ll not be affected in a substantially adverse 1U
•
manner because:
There are no changes in the physical structure .of the II'
projects the .pro--ject is. of high qualify and enhances — I �'
tfiP surrrn,ri i n rn _
g F Peru ..a ,i
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning 'Ordinance `to ; ,
the property will result in practical difficulties in the use • _ II'
. of the property because. t• 1
The marketability rof .the_housing .units is affected by
the_wa. � .structnr-
v th,� P."t ,.. �;_ rf -it cp„atinues to
hr. CtrniC a ...,. .. ! ojeCt, it will be more
di ffi rill t tcL maxkPt
;i
•
DECISION
IT IS TI1LREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board, of Zoning- A ppeals + I
that Variance Docket No _ is, :granted, subject to j.' j•ire-any conditions stated in t m7nutes of Firs Board, which are ineor- •1i
porated herein. by refe ence and made a part hereof.
Adopted thisday of - •�
•
__ ,;
CJIAIRM. -- 1
1
• j -
.
Condit•iona� 'of the Board are listed
on the back.. (Petitioner or his •
repesentative to sign) .
•
•
9/'10/04'
•
•
oip BOARD OF ZCNING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA •
Petitioner:
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVITOPAINIAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
• "
2.
3.
•
•
•
, •
DMZ THIS 2 DAY OF . -f-Lc 0 . 10.1j_
.
WARD rtu.
Revised October 1987
•
•
, . -, •IT :
1
, ■04 DOI= OF ZQVIT.0 APPEALS
CARICL, INDIANA
. ,
• Docket No: \i - ,C ^ %°?
. ,
• Petitioner: _ ' s', , s,-, •
. ,
FINDINGS or FACT - DEVIIOPIUMTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
•
• .
:....,...,-,%.
I. •! ::.:.Z. '■
• -'..;- ? - :-. tg'
•
. . .
. .
2. -
• ,,‘.. ,
• .. .. . .
•
3.
. .
. . .
. ..
•
•
.
. .
•
ci_z_DATIM THIS DAY or 10.4
• . .
. if,A.I., - 1.,- ,,i . -. • 7- . . .. -
. 135-ZO A • 11.
400f
Revised October 1987
. :
•
• •
• .
. .
•
•
• .
•
•,,
•
•
.
..-- /
.
•
CARREL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
ovoct,, Iramva •
• ' Docket NO: V - ....0 - 5--)c-1
Petitioner;
_____ 5 • e....-s. •
_-—
6 ... .. ,.. .
•
FINDIMS or FAcr - DEVFLORIENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
■
. .
b ;I:: .,..
•
•
: .•,...• .%
, :;.:,
. .,- 4 -.••.'t;l?
1.
. .
I ;-. .',''
...
.• ' :,''';'....•
. .
•
3.
. .
.. •,.
. ,
•
. .
. .
•
•
• 10 `Pi'.
DATIM THIS "2.it_ DAY or ______Ied____________.
. #7 ... . 6 1 • .
, .
DOM) .". 1 ai. - -
•
. .
Revised Octol,er 1987
/ .
•
•
CARMEL, DOARD OF ZCIIIIC APPEALS
cArtmEL, INDIANA
. ,
• Docket
Petitioner:
5'1 •
•
, .
. •
•
FINDINGS OF FACT DEVFIDIltENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE ,•
•
• • •
"/";:•-:
, .
2,
. • •
3.
4 07 ' •
•
• ,
. •
•
DATU) TIIIS 2- DAY 01P k-t/ , 1.9 ./ .
. •
-
, • . . .
DDAJ1D 1413,41311t V
•
•
•
Revised October 1987
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
KENSINGTON PLACE I
V b '
LOTS A_PPROX. REAR SET BACK BZA MEETING 4/24/89.
1 14' 6 FRONT YARD 25'TO 5'
2 14' 6" SIDE YARD 5' TO0'
3 14' 6" SIDE YARD AGG. 10'TO 5' i
4 14'6" REAR YARD 20'TO 15' A,�
5 12' 6" LOT COVERAGE 40% TO 50% ��
6 14' 6" 1k ' ,
7 14' 6" 1\
8A 19' REAR YARD 11 LESS THAN 15'
0 3 MORE THAN 15'
10 13' 6" 5 NOT BUILT
11 13' 6"
BLOCK B LOT COVERAGE 11 OVER 50%
13A VACANT 3 LESS THAN 50%
14 15' 5 NOT BUILT
15 VACANT F'
16 VACANT ,,,/1/6
1.7A 18'6" iU
18 13'6'' I
10 13'6" n''j ,,/,
20 VACANT v C ',VV
21A VACANT 0
0 1��J
13 BUILT ��
1 STARTED D
5 VACANT ,/
OJP/17