The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEAliS C RMEL,. INDIANA. Docket No• � — —O Pe:t-i tioner r FINDINGS' 'OF EACT - VARIANCE 1. 2. 3. � 4 . 5: . , DATED this �_ day .of� J/�QfLr�� , 198�J.� �/; ��e��1/� � BOARD MEMBER � Form effective•, April. , 1g.82 � I CARM'EL BOARD OF ZONING APPEAL'S . CARMEL, INDIANA ' Docket :No:. V - `T'- �� Pet-i�tioner : A Le's ��, (��.,,c . i FINDINGS OE FACT - VARIANCE� 1. 2. 3. 4':. 5. DATED this (, �— day of I /" l �L� , 1'98y �✓,��: ��r.�,,,_) BOARD ,MEMBER Form effective , �.pril,, 1982 CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL,, Z-NDIANA Docket No: � 9 - f�`/ Pet-itionei�,��=�i�= ��p2�. � U FZNDINGS OF FACT - VARIANCE 1. 2 . 3. 4 . 5'. % � r DATED thi5 ___[.� day Of �, s,J , 198� i� �v,-.� �,��/ BO ' MEMBER Form effective , April„ 1982 � ; r;. CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ' CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No• -,��j'� Petitioner : .O,c,s�,�° DS_ FINDINGS ,OF FACT - VARIANCE 1. 2 . 3. 4 . 5. DATED this /� day of _ ��i�� , 198� �I BOARD EMBER Form effective , April , 19$2 ' � .rOlt%(n/6uRG •, CAFd�L BQ�RD OF ZONING APPFATR C11itt�'iQ � INDIANA DOCf�T NO: ✓� 9- � � , PEIZTIONER: /$;(�pnw.t �os. FINDINGS QF FACT `- VARIANC'E 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence+ of special oondition(s) :such tl�at enforcement of t�ie zoning orc3inance will result in unnecessary hardship because: the property is located in an � undeveloped' area of the zoning �urisd'i'ction, consists of a, 5 acre tract ,with .a ,large ,barn sui-table for storinq equ-ipment, machinery and plant - material and the property is ideally suited. to the intended use. 2. The grant of this variance will hot be injurious to the publie healtki, safety; irorals and general welfare of the commumity because: plant nur-.ser:ies - aarden shops do not have a negative impact on :public health, safetv morals and aeneral welfare. 3. The use or �ralue of the area adjacent to the subject properfy will not be substan- tially affected in any adverse manner because: there will be no visible change in the exterior other than improved upkeep and the "planting of a substantial number of trees and shrubbery. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural conclition peculiar tA the subject because: the 72 x 48 foot barn located on the property is ideallv suitable for interior storaqe of equ'ipment and -inventorv . The topography of the seal estate is ideaTly suifed for-. tree farmYnq and without any residence located on the property, it is ,not suYted for permitted R-1 use. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Can�l- C2ay Conq�rehensive Plan because: the use is comnatible with the rural surrounding area and does not chanqe the basic intent of the zoning for the area. * DECISION * IT SS Tf�REFURE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning AppeaTs t1�at Variance Docket No- �/- �j- 8`� is �j_ granted, ,subject to .any conditions stated in the minutes of this Boa�, which are incorporated herein by referenoe and made a part hereof. P,�3opted thi§ 02 � day of /r/�� 198 `/ . �;�� ' ��a � � �,�� :� i�i/'i'�i� - � �.1�� ; ATPEST: . /r� !� :..t� �[� — , EG , Carmel of ; Boazcl of Zoning AptPeals Zo ' g Appeals ****COAIDITIONS, IF ANY AR� LSSTED ON B71CFC. (PE'TITIONER OR HIS (HER) REPRESENTATIVE 2t� SIGLVj 1/17/84 I . CAR�L B(�1RD OF ZONING APPEALS . C11RNg:T,, SNDIFINA �r :NO: t/'_ S - ��I . PETITIONER: � FIAIDINGS QF PACT - VARIANCE' 1. Ttie grant of this'variance will not be contrary to tlie public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such 'that enforcement of the zoning ordinance will result iii unnecessary hardship because: the property is located in an undeveloped area of the. zonin4 `9urisdictaon., consists of a 5 acre tract with a large barn suitable for storinq equipment, machinery and plant materi.al and the ,property is ideally suited to 'tfie intended use. 2. The grant of this 'varianc� will not be injurious to the public health, safety; morals and general, welfare: of' the coinmfffity because:' plant ;nurseries - aarden shoos do not have 'a 'negative impact on public health,. •safetv morabs and qeneral weLfare : 3. Zhe use or �ralue 'of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substan- tially affected in any adverse mariner `because: there will be no visible change in the exterior other fhan improved upkeep and the plantincr of a substantial .number. of trees and shrubbery. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition 'peculiar to the subject because: the '72 x 4'8 foot barn located on :the prooertv is ideallv suitable for in£erior storaqe of equipment 'and inventorv.: The t000cxraohv of the real estate is ideal-ly suited for :tree farmina and with�ut any residence located on the property, it is not suited for permitted R-1 use . 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Cai�rel- Clay Caiy�rehensive Plan because: th`e use is compatible wifh the rural surround 'Ynq area and does 'n'ot chancre the basic intent of the zonincj for the area. * DECSSION• * � IT IS TIIEAEFt9RE the decision of the Cazmel Board of Zoning Appeals .tl�at Variance Lbcket Np, is (not) granted, sutiject to any 'conclitions statecl in the miiiutes of this Bbard, which are incorporated herein by referesice and.r.iade a part hereof. Pdogted this day of 198_ ATPEST: ' SECRETAFZY,; Ca�mel Bo�ird 'of C�iAIR�7PN, Ba�zcl of Zoning Flppeals Zoning Appeals ****CONDITIONS, IF ANY ARL I,ISTLD ON BACK. (PETSTIONEF2 OR HIS. (HER) REPRFSENTATIVE ?t� SZGN) 1/17/89 _ CAR��I, BCY�RD OF 7ANING APPEFILS, CAFL�III,, INDIANA DOCKET NO: _v - �- �� 'PETITIONER: FIDIDINGS OF FAGT - VARIIINCE, 1. The grant of this °variance caill not be contrary to t1�e pubLic interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such t1�at enforcenent of the zoriing ordinance will result in unnecessary har3ship because: the property is located ,in an undeveToped area of the zoninq �,urisdiction, consists of a 5 acre tract with a large. barn suitable, for storinq equipinent, macliinerv and pl.ant mater-ial arid the property is ideally suited to "the intended use. 2. The grant of this varianoe will not be injurious to the public :health, safety; morals and general. c.elfare of the commmity because: plant nurser-ies - 'aarden shops do not have a negative impact on public h'eal,th safetv morals and qeneral weTfare . ' 3. 4he use or �ralue of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substan- fially affected in any adyerse maiuier because: there �will be no visible change in the exterior other than improved upkeep and the planting of a substantial -number of trees arid' shrubber.v. , 4. The need for the variance arises from a -natural oondition pec�liar- to the subject because: the 72 x 48 foot barn located on the p"ropertv i's ideallv suitable for �snterior storaqe of equipment and inventorv,. The toboaraphv of the real estate is ideally .suited £or Eree farminct and without any residence located on the property, it is not suited for permitted' R-1 use. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere wit-h the Can�l- Clay Ca�rehensive Plan because: :fhe use is comnatible with the rural surroundinq area and does not chande the basic i'ntent of fhe zoning for the area. * DEGISION * IT IS Tf�Itg'ORE the decision of the Carrtiel ,BOard of 2oning, Appeals that Variance Ibcket Dlp, is (not) grant�d, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by referenoe arid riade a part hereof. Pclopted, this day of� 198_ ATPEST`. SECRETI�t; Carnrel Board of CIIAIFd�iP1V, Boarcl of Zonin9 APPeals Zoning Appeals ****C�NDITIONS, IF ANY• ARi? ISSTED ON SACK. (PEI`I`I'IO[�IER OR HIS (HER) AEPRFSIIVTATI�IE � SIGN) 1/17/84 • CAFh�I, BC�1RD OF ZONING APPEALS 1 ' CF�RD�L„ INDIA[Q7) DOCKE,T NO: �/ Q' . �� PETITIONER: FII�IDINCS QF FACP - VARIANCE �"1. �he grant of this_ variance wlll riot be contrary to the public interest, due to =t-he existence of special cnndition(s) such that enforcement of the zoriing ordinance will xesult in unnecessary hardslup. because: fhe pro erty is located in an undeveloped area of the zoning iurisdictiori, consists of a 5 acre tract with a 1ar-ge barn suitable for storina .equipment:, machinery and pLant mater 'ial and the ,property is ideally suited to the intended use. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to tlie public health, safety; ,irorals and general c.�lfare of the cmRmmity because: plant nurser:ies - ctarden shops do not have a negative impacf on pubLic health .safetv' morals and Qeneral welfare. " • ' 3: The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not• be substan- tially affected in any adverse maruier because: there wiL-1 be no v-isible change in the exterior other than' improved upkeep and the plantina of a subsfantial' number` of trees and shrubbe�. 4: The need' for the variance arises, fmm a natural condition peculiar to the subject because: the 72 x- 48 foot barn located on the propertv is ideallv suitable for interior storaQe of equipment and i-nventorv. The topoaraphv of the real estate is ideally suited for' tree 'farminq and without any residence located on the property, °it i�s not suited for permitted R-1 use. . 5. The: granting of this varianoe° does not substantially interfere with t!�e Cara�el- Clay Ceai�rehensive' Plan because: the use is comnatib3e with the rural surround'inq area and does not chanqe the basic intent of th"e' zoning for the area.. * DECISION * IT IS Tf�REE'ORE the decision of the Canrel Board of Zcning Appeals tY�at Variance DocJcet • �. is (not) ,granted, subject tn any conditions ,stated in the minutes of- this Boarrl, which are inco y reference and made a ' rporated herein b . pai.-t hereof� Adopted this day of 198_ ATPFST: • � SECRETAIZY, Cannel Board of C�IAIRMAN, Board of 2oning Appeals Zoning Appeals ' ****COTIDITIONS, IF ANY ARi3 LISTED ON BACK. (PETITIONEF2 OR HIS (HER) REPR�SENTATIVE Zll SIGN) 1/17/84