Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes TAC 7-20-05Page 6 of 32 Technical Advisory Committee Minutes July ~20, 2005 ~titioner said that utilities would be an issue, because. O~ergy wants to relocate their d~"g~ution line down the north side of 116th in~ement ~'etween the building - Matt Grif~n sa. id th.a_! s.n~d not be a prOblem if~~path is moved because then there would be more ro. om for t~he utilities toNv,~rk with. T. he~~. partment would also like to see the project focused~o,_u_twa~r~: with people on,'~, outside, goring !n. ~he Pe,titione~r agreed.an~ sai~ is what they were trying to do with the comer where t~he pathway became the~'6nt stooge also said that from a signage perspective and ,from_an architectur~l~erspective as on"~ves down 116th it will become the fronts of the buildings. It w~entioned that they migh~t up a separate meeting with the Mat~ agreecl anti woulct Oe open li:)r a meeting w~me ...END... Docket No. 05060042 DP Amend/ADLS: Carmel Science and Technology Park, Blk 11 The applicant seeks approval for a medical office building. The site is located at the SW comer of Carmel Dr. and Guilford Rd. and is zoned M- 3/Manufacturing. Filed by Mary Solada ofBingham McHale. REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER: Mary Solada Anne Marie Varga Ashton Fritz, Schneider Corporation Dan Brueggert, CSO Schenkel Shultz Ross Goyer, Bremner Healthcare Bob Falk, Duke Realty The plan for the site is a 2-story office building, with approximately 50,000 square feet. There is a brick exterior, with aluminum windows, and a canopied drop off up front for medical use. The petitioner thinks that there is some potential to do some retail uses on the northern part of the site, however they have not defined those uses at this time, and are only presenting the 2 story office building at this time. - Greg Hoyes - Faxed Ashton Fritz a letter. He wants to make sure that with the new street coming out to Guilford Road, they do not lose any detention volume. Would like some guardrails or bollards to protect vehicles turning so they do not go toward the lake. - Greg Hoyes said that the biggest concern is the 9 x 9 structure that is going to tie all the drainage together. He will look further into that and will make any comments on that. - Mike McBride- No comment. - Chuck Shupperd - Asked if they were going to use gas for heating. Page 7 of 32 Technical Advisory Committee Minutes July 20, 2005 The petitioner said that the project was planned to be a sister to the one on Michigan Road and that is all electric, and so he would assume that this building would be all electric as well. - Chuck Shupperd said that they could contact Vectren. - John South- Sent a letter. Asked the petitioner to include the building construction in the construction sequence, along with immediately stabilizing the disturbed area around the pond perimeter after work is completed there. - He has also been fairly consistent in asking that sites provide some post construction practices before they discharge from the site to the pond. That can be in the form of catch basins and snouts, pervious pavements, etc. - Brooke Gajownik- No comments. - Nick Redden- Sent a letter with comments and will await the petitioner's response. - Gary Hoyt- Sent a letter to Ashton Fritz. Needs to set up a meeting to discuss where the fire department connection for the building will go. - Would like a set of plans for the site to show where existing fire hydrants are and where the water utilities are. - Asked if the building was going to have a basement. The petitioner said no. - More than likely the building is sprinkled so probably there is some type of fire alarm system and the fire department would request an enunciator panel remote and an enunciator panel, located at the main entrance some place. It will probably be the same way the other building is on Michigan Road. - Gary Hoyt would also like to have a Knox-box on the building too. - Scott Brewer- Sent out an email. The main thing is the buffer yards, especially along the south side along the drainage easement. Bob had said that they were going to let all of the vegetation remain there, and Scott Brewer had said that he needs to have a letter from the surveyor's office indicating that that would be OK with them. - Scott Brewer also said that the landscape buffer on the north side is a little light, but they can probably work with it depending on if the parking lot design changes at all. - Matt Griffin- The department sent a letter, but otherwise he had no additional comments. The petitioner said that they are drafting a response to that letter which will be sent out fairly soon. The petitioner asked if the existing landscape buffer was OK to remain within the easement. - Greg Hoyes said that he would have to look, but if it exists then it will probably be fine, especially if it is pretty much on the property line. ...END...