Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplications Conn, Angelina V From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Conn, Angelina V Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:33 AM Tingley, Connie S; 'msolada@binghammchale.com' Morrissey, Phyllis G; Hollibaugh, Mike P; Keeling, Adrienne M; Kendall, Jeff A; Brewer, Scott I; Hancock, Ramona B; Brennan, Kevin S; Griffin, Matt L; Littlejohn, David W; Benyola, Linda; 'AVarga@binghammchale.com' Docket No. Assignment: (V) Carmel Science and Technology Park, BIk 11- Medical Office Bldg (#05080031-32 V) Connie, I have updated the file. I have contacted the petitioner and issued the necessary Docket Numbers for (V) Carmel Science and Technology Park, Blk 11- Medical Office Bldg. They will be the following: Docket No. 05080031 V Docket No. 05080032 V Total Fee: $978.50 $463.50 $1,442.00 Carmel Science and Technology Park, Blk 11- Medical Office Bldg The applicant seeks the following development standards variances: Docket No. 05080031 V ZO Chapter 25.07.02-10(b) two signs oriented north Docket No. 05080032 V ZO Chapter 25.07.02-10(d)(i) directory sign height The site is located at the SW comer of Carmel Dr. and Guilford Rd. and is zoned M-3/Manufacturing. Filed by Mary Solada of Bingham McHale for BW Partners. Petitioner, please note the following: 1. This Item will not be on an agenda of the Technical Advisory Committee. 2. Mailed and Published Public Notice needs to occur no later than Friday, September 1, 2005. Published notice is required within the Indianapolis Star. Note: the Regular BZA meeting will begin at 6 pm. 3. The Proof of Notice will need to be received by this Department no later than noon, Friday, September 23, 2005. Failure to submit Proof of Notice by this time will result in the tabling of the petition. 4. The Filing Fee and Nine (9) Informational Packets must be delivered to BZA Secretary Connie Tingley no later than NOON~ Friday, September 16, 2005. Failure to submit Informational Packets by this time will result in the automatic tabling of the petition to the Monday, October 24, 2005 agenda of the BZA. 5. This Item will appear on the September 26, 2005 agenda of the Board of Zoning Appeals under Public Hearings. 6. The petitioner will need to provide a fully filled-out Findings-of-Fact sheets for each petition the night of the meeting for the Board's use (Sheet 8). On Ballot sheets, only fill out docket number, petitioner, and date (Sheet 7). Ballot sheets must be collated. 7.) PETITIONER: refer to your instruction sheet for more details. Ms. Solada can be contacted at 635-8900 (Fax: 236-9907 or e-mail: msolada~binghammchale.com). Petitioner: please complete the followin~t 1.) Make sure the public notice meeting time to the newspaper and neighbors reads 6 p.m. It is suggested to send the notice to the IndyStar by Noon, two days prior to the printing deadline. 2.) Only the docket no & petitioner blanks need to be filled out on the Ballot Sheet, pg 7 of the application. 3.) Provide a filled out and notarized Public Notice Affidavit (pg 6 of the application). Thank you, Angie CITY OF CARMEL- CLAY TOWNSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY~ INDIANA APPLICATION FOR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ACTION DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST FEE: Single Family (Primary Residence) $257.50 for the first variance, plus $77.25 for each additional section Of the ordinance being varied. All Other $978.50 for the first variance, plus $463.50 for each additional section of the ordinance being varied. OR see Hearing Officer Fees DOCKET NO. DATE RECEIVED: 1) 2) 3) 4) s) 6) 7) Applicant: BW Partners, by Mary E, Solada Address: Bingham McHale LLP, 10 W. Market Street, 2700 Market Tower, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204 Project Name: Carmel Drive Office Building Phone: 635.8900 Engineer/Architect: Schneider CorpJCSO Schenkei Shultz Phone: 826.71001848.7800 Attomey: Mary E. Solada, Bingham McHale LLP Phone: 635.8900 Applicant's Status: (Check the appropriate response) a) The applicant's name is on the deed to the property X b) The applicant is the contract purchaser of the property c) Other: If item 3) c) is checked, please complete the following: Owner of the property involved: Owner's address: Bingham · attorneys McHale, ,, at [aw Record of Ownership: Deed Book No./Instrument No.: Book 13 ~r2002-00082653 Page: 65-71 Purchase date: Common address of the property involved: 701 W. Carmel Drive Annemarie Varga Land Use Specialist 2700 Market Tower 10 West Market Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4900 bingharnmchale.com Phone 317.635.8900 Direct 317.686.5228 Fax 317.236.9907 avarga(_a~binghammchale.com Legal description: Lot 11 of Carmel Science and Technology Park [see attached legal clescription) Tax Map Parcel No.: 16.09.36.00.02-009.00 .. State explanation of requested Developmental Standards Variance: (State what you want to do ar',d cite the section number(s) of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance which applies and/or creates the need for this m.-'quest). 1. To allow two wall identification signs on the eiee facade of the building. Section ?,$.;(~7.02-10(b) 2. To increase the maximum allowed height for a directory sign to six (6) feet for e;,ch of two directory signs. Section 25.7.02-10(d)(i) · ~o pr~ exlst, n,E'~;ie[atlon alonfl~ae, south orooe~,-.-,~,~.....,, ~,.~,,.. rath t ' scr~ .- r--hart B i'LL'~' -VL~ CL~,,,,y,,,,~,- ,- ,, residential use 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) State reasons supporting the Development Standards Variance: (Additionally, complete the attached question sheet "Findings of Fact-Development Standards Variance"). ..1... (number of wall signs on the east facade) While the Ordinance does permit a wall sign along the 1 Street frontage, this sion would not be visible from the road due to existing development on thc adjoining ~)roDerty and the angle of the proposed building. Thus the petitioner proposes to move thr permitted sign from the west facade to the east fa~;ade where it would be visible. This would result ir _.two signs on the east facade, one on the north, and no signs on the west or south fa~;ade. The total am;-_ of signa~:le would not change, only the location. 2. (height of directory signs) The ~)m[x)sed building isa 50,000 square foot office building with thc capacity for a large number of individual office uses. The proposed directory signs allow for six tenant~ on each sign. These signs would be placed on opposite ends of the property (one on l~r= St. and onr on Guilford Rd.)~ allowing up to twelve tenants signage at the entrance clos=st to their tenant space_ While the petitioner is able to meet the area requirements of the Ordinance, the height of the sign mus' be increased over rwe feet to accommodate each of the tenant panels. As designed, each panel is only seven inches in height. To reduce the height any further would make the panels illegible from th,-. adjacent roadways. 3. (lan~l_,scape buffer) The petitioner is commiffed to high quality landscaping on this site~ H-,_,,~ever, thc · (~t)~ ~ i)re..~nce of a I..e~lal .dra~a~-'~.eas. ement on the so.u,th'S3-d~ the property eliminat~._'-'t~e possib-~ljtv for a_.dd,t~nal pla. nt, n .¢~ and scml~nin~ls to buffer .fl~site from th~ multi-family dev, M~pment to the s~j~_th ~.(1~, , nere'{.s a sodd li~e of deciduob~ trees and s~bs already locked along th~rop-'rty line Th'- ~, surve _y_b~s officej~s amenable to~[[owinfl ~ screen t~ remain in-"ptac~-~-i'l'owever~'~he su~eY(;r wil~pot allow the'l~et..._~ifio~er any additional p'la~t~s within this easement Present zoning of the property (give exact classification): M-3 Manufacturing Park District Size of lot/parcel in question: 8 acres Present Use of the property: Undeveloped Describe the proposed use of the property: Professional office building Is the pmpert$. Owner occupied Renter occupied As proposed Other Are there any restrictions, laws, covenants, variances, special uses, or appeals filed in' connection with this property that would relate or affect its use for the specific purpose of this application? If yes, give date and docket number, decision rendered and pertinent explanation. Owner must review signage proposal in accordance with private covenants for the property. ~5) Has work for which this application is being filed already started? If answer is yes, give details: No Building Permit Number: Builder: 16) If proposed appeal is granted, when will the work commence? Fall or Early Winter 2005 17) If the proposed variance is granted, who will operate and/or use the proposed Improvement for which this application has been filed? Professional office tenants NOTE: LEGAL NOTICE shall be published in the Indianapolis Star a MANDATORY twenty-five (25) days prior to the public headng date. The certified "Proof of Publication" affidavit for the newspaper must be available for inspection the night of the hearing. LEGAL NOTICE to all adjoining and abutting property owners is also MAMDATORY, two methods of notice are recommended: 1 ) CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED sent to adjoining property owners. (The white receipt should be stamped by the Post Office at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the public headng date). 2) HAND DELIVERED to adjoining and abutting property owners (A receipt signed by the adjoining and abutting property owner acknowledging the twenty-five (25) day notice should be kept for verification that the notice was completed) REALIZE THE BURDEN OF PROOF FOR ALL NOTICES IS THE RESPONSITILITY OF THE APPLICANT. AGAIN, THIS TASK MUST BE COMPLETED AT LEAST TWENTY-FIVE (25) DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE. The applicant understands that docket numbers will not be assigned until all suPporting information has bccn submitted to the Department of Community Services. ~ . The applicant certifies by signing this application that he/she has been advised that all representations of the Department of Community Services are advisory only and that the applicant should rely on appropriate subdivision and zoning ordinance and/or the legal advise of his/her attorney. I, , Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana, certify that the attached (Please Print) affidavit is a true and complete listing of the adjoining and adjacent property owners of the property described herewith. OWNER ADDRESS See attached affidavit from County Auditor Date Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana - Signature AFFIDAVIT I, hereby swear that I am the owner/contract purchaser of property involved in this application and that the foregoing signatures, statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, the undersigned, authorize the applicant to act on my behalf with regard to this application and subsequent hearings and testimony. & - Signed ~ ~ ( i[~~) ~ I~ ~' I...~.-,' O~ ~o'~edy OwneE Atto~n~r'Power (~.t.t~mey) Date Annemarie R. Varqa, AICP for Mary E. Solada, Esq. (Please Pdnt) STATE OF INDIANA SS: County of ((~ounty in which notarization takes place) Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for (Notary Public's county of residence) (P'roi~rt~-~Dw~ier,'Attomey, ~i P~wer of Attomey) /~ dayof County, State of Indiana, personally appeared and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this (SEAL) 200~.~ . ,~':" - ~ It otary Public - ' - S~nCe N'~ta'ry Public- ~eas~ Pri t~// My commission expires: Docket No. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Notice is hereby given that the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals meeting on the day of ,20 at 6:00 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1 Civic Square, Carmel, Indiana 46032 will hold a Public Hearing upon a Developmental Standards Variance application to: permit the construction of a 50,000 square foot office building with the following variances of the development standards 1. To allow two wall identification signs on the east fac.,,ade of the building. Section 25.07.02-10(b) 2. To increase the maximum allowed height for a directory sign to six (6) feet for each of two directory signs. Section 25.7.02-10(dXi) 3. To preserve existing vegetation along the south property line adjacent to a multi family residential use rather than erecting a solid visual screen. Chapter 20D, Chart B property being known as 701 W Carmel Drive (approximate) The application is identified as Docket No. The real estate affected by said application is described as follows: (See Attached Legal Description) All interested persons desidng to present their views on the above application, either in writing or verbally, will be given an opportunity to be heard at the above-mentioned time and place. PETITIONERS BW Partners by Mary E. Solada, Esq. Bingham McHale LLP 10 W. Market St., 2700 Market Tower Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-635-8900 PETITIONER'S AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS I, Mary E. Solada DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CONSIDERING Docket Number , was registered and mailed at least twenty-five (25) days prior to the date of the public hearing to the below listed adjacent property owners: OWNER ADDRESS See attached list STATE OF INDIANA SS: The undersigned, having been duly swom upon oath says that the above information is true and correct and he is informed and believes. Signature of Petitioner County of (County in which notarization takes place) Before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for (Notary Public's county of residence) County, State of Indiana, Personally appeared (Property Owner, Attomey, or Power of Attorney) and acknowledge the execution of the foregoing instrument this day of ,200 SEAL Notary Public--Signature Notary Public---Please Print My commission expires: CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) Number of Wall Signs Per Facade 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the proposal does not suggest any more signage than what is permitted by the Ordinance. It only reorients th~. signa.(3e so that it is visible to those trying to locate and identify the buildinq. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the affected side of the buildinq is more than 300 feet from Guilford Road due to the location of a retention pond, providing a significant distance buffer from adjacent parcels. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoninq Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property_ because the placement of the sign per the terms of the Zoninq Ordinance would result in a siqn that is not legible from the road to which it would be odented (122nd St). Moving the sign to the east side of the building allows the property to be adequately identified with minimal impact to the appearance of the site. DATED THIS__ DAY OF ., 2005. Board Member CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE Number of Wall Signs Per Facade . The approval of this vadance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposal does not suggest any more signage than what is permitted by the Ordinance. It only reorients the signage so that it is visible to those trying to locate and identify the building. . The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the vadance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The affected side of the building is more than 300 feet from Guilford Road due to the location of a retention pond, providing a significant distance buffer from adjacent parcels. . The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The placement of the sign per the terms of the Zoning Ordinance would result in a sign that is not legible from the road to which it would be oriented (122nd St). Moving the sign to the east side of the building allows the property to be adequately identified with minimal impact to the appearance of the site. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals the Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions states in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRE I ARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.' Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) Hei_~ht of Directory Sign 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the proposed vadance raises the heiqht of the sign only one foot above what is required by the ordinance. A si× foot tall sign is consistent with the intent of the Carmel Zoninq Ordinance, as it is the permitted heiqht for a building identification siqn. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the proposed signs are located within a manufacturinq district that allows siqns to a height of up to seven feet when used for buildinq identification. Thus the proposed increase in sign height is consistent with what could be constructed on adjoining parcels. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of thc property because the permitted si,qn height limits the number of tenant panels that can be placed on the siqn and still bo legible for those trying to identify the building. A five foot sign creates a difficulty in creating adequate si~na.ee to direct motorists to the appropriate entrance and parking area for a facility of this size DATED THIS~ DAY OF ,200._~5. Board Member CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE Height of Directory Sign . The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed variance raises the height of the sign only one foot above what is required by the ordinance. A six foot tall sign is consistent with the intent of the Carmel Zoning Ordinance, as it is the permitted height for a building identification sign. . The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The proposed signs are located within a manufacturing district that allows signs to a height of up to seven feet when used for building identification. Thus the proposed increase in sign height is consistent with what could be constructed on adjoining parcels. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difr,:;ulties in the use of the property because: The permitted sign height limits the number of tenant panels that can be placed on the sign and still be legible for those trying to identify the building. A five foot sign creates a difficulty in creating adequate signage to direct motorists to the appropriate entrance and parking area for a facility of this size. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals the Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions states in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECREiARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board am listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) Solid Buffer Area- South Property Line 1. The approval of this vadance will not I:~ injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the intent of the ordinance is being met through the preservation of the existing tree line on the south side of the property. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the existing tree line on the south side of the property creates a buffer for adjoining uses, while the width of the drainage easement separates the proposed ofr~;e use from the adjoining multi-family dwellings. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoninq Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because the County Surveyor will not permit additional plantings in the legal drain easement. This site therefore cannot be buffered in a more effective manner without significant and detrimental impaCts'on the development potential · of the remainder of the site. DATED THIS__ DAY OF ., 2~___5.5. Board Member CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: Petitioner: BW Partners, by Mary E. Solada FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCF Solid Buffer Area - South Property Line The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, mOrals and general welfare of the community because: The intent of the ordinance is being met through the preservation of the existing tree line on the south side of the property. . The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The existing tree line on the south side of the property creates a buffer for adjoining uses, while the width of the drainage easement separates the proposed office use from the adjoining multi-family dwellings. . The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The County Surveyor will not permit additional plantings in the legal drain easement. This site therefore cannot be buffered in a more effective manner without significant and detrimental impacts on the development potential of the remainder of the site. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals the Developmental Standards Vadance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions states in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of ,20 CHAIRPERSON, Cauhel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRP_. IARY, Cam~el/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). EXHIBIT A Land Description - Parcel I Part of Block 11 in the Conditional Secondary Plat Cannel Science and Technology Park, a subdivision in Hamilton County, Indiana, the plat of which is recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 65 thru 71 and amended by Certificate of Correction recorded as Instrument Number 87-01640 in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 18 North, Range 3 East in Hamilton County, Indiana (5/8 inch rebar with cap marked "Schneider Engr. Corp.", herein after referred to as "rebar"); thence North 88 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds East (plat bearing) along the South line of said Northwest Quarter Section and along the South line of said Block 11 a distance of 401.50 feet to the Point of Beginning at the southeast comer of Lot 1 of said Block 11 per plat thereof recorded as Instrument Number 9109164, marked by a "rebar", the following four courses are along the east lines of said Lot 1; (1) thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 265.00 feet to a "rebar"; (2) thence North 88 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 20.00 feet to a "rebar"; (3) thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 190.00 feet to a "rebar"; (4) thence North 30 degrees 46 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 102.20 feet to the southwest comer of a 0.025 acre tract of land described in a deed to the City of Carmel recorded as Instrument Number 200300018026, said point being on a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 652.00 feet, the radius point of which bears North 33 degrees 23 minutes 58 seconds West; thence northeasterly along the southerly line of said tract and along said curve an arc distance of 93.63 feet to the northerly line of said Block 11, being on a non-tangent curve to the fight having a radius of 375.00 feet, the radius point of which bears of South 20 degrees 16 minutes 42 seconds East; thence northeasterly along said northerly line and along said curve an arc distance of 188.15 feet to the northwest comer of a 0.056 acre tract of land described in a deed to the City of Carmel recorded as Instrument Nurnber 200300018026, said point being on a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet, the radius point of which bears North 27 degrees 57 minutes 50 seconds East (the following two courses are along the southerly lines of said tract); (1) thence southeasterly along said curve an arc distance of 147.06 feet to a point which bears South 16 degrees 43 minutes 46 seconds West from said radius point; (2) thence South 84 degrees 51 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 107.03 feet to the aforesaid north line of Block 11, being on a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 735.00 feet, the radius point of which bears North 08 degrees 40 minutes 48 seconds East; thence easterly along said north line and along said curve an arc distance of 46.87 feet to a point which bears South 05 degrees 01 minutes 35 seconds West from said radius point; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 149.95 feet; thence South 28 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 246.50 feet; thence South 33 degrees 08 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 109.03 feet; thence North 88 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the south line of said Block 11 a distance of 139.43 feet to the east line of said Block 11; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds East along said east line a distance of 78.01 feet to a "rebar" at the southeast comer of said Block 11; thence South 88 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds West along the south line of said Block 11 a distance of 824.80 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 8.00 acres, more or less. TEN~ ~ TENANT TENANT '-2' x y.o. TYP, BLACK .,CENTER iDENT. TENANT TENANT W. 122nd ST. ENTRANCE, (i) SiGN GUILFORD RD. ENTB~.NCE, (1) SiGN CARMEL DRIVE ENTRANCE, CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGN (1) SIGN OFFICE BLlmDING CSO EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ~ ., ~ ~ii:~i:~ SI~~t ! ~\CCI ";T B,~,S[ NORTH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SOUTH ELEVATION ~,a, BRF~%,INER & WILEY,~ Medical f:acitio~ Ma~agemtmt OFFICE BUILD~G C AI~\~..., ff~T) IA2-,TA CONSTrUCT)ON CARMEL DRIVE CARMEL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 338,19' \ \ \ \ \ \ (2-STOEY) F.F.E. = 843.~5 :.1 GRA~, OROUNDCOVER + PEI~NMAL8 HR ~ x ~ Retuma' He~)~ Ever Appster O=l~y 15~ 1/4 Ppot Rot ~IE SCHI~ID~ (X~i~RA~ON Historic Fort Horrlson 8901 Otis Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46216-1037 Telephone: 317.826.7100 Fox: 517.826.7200 ~w.schneidercorp.com Architecture Civil Engineering Environmantol Engineering Geotechnlcol Services GIS * US Home Builder Services Interior Design Lond Surveying Landscope Architecture Tronsportotion Engineering Z., LO]I AERIAL LOCATION MAP Carmel Drive Office Building 70t W CarmeJ Drive (approximate address) Carmel Science and Technology Park