Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Operations Analysis Sp)ort Report . Page 1 of 1 . SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RMB Intersection 136th Street & Rangeline Road Agency or Co. A&F Engineering Area Type All other areas Date Performed 12/20/2004 Ju risdiction Carmel Time Period AM Peak . - Analysis Year Existing Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH AT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ...ana group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (vph) 5 239 32 83 147 17 13 154 95 51 493 25 % Heavy veh 0 0 3 0 4 12 0 8 0 4 2 4 PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.80 0.80 ~ctuated (PIA A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eft. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 8 0 4 0 23 0 6 ...ane Width 9.0 11.0 15.0 13.0 Parking/G rade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parkinglhr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 28.0 G= G= G= G = 30.0 G= G= G= y= 5 y= y= y= y= 5 y= y= y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 68.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 462 329 275 704 ....ane group cap. 688 494 804 796 vIe ratio 0.67 0.67 0.34 0.88 Green ratio 0.41 0.41 0.44 0.44 Unit. delay d1 16.3 16.2 12.5 17.4 Delay factor k 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.41 Increm. delay d2 2.6 3.4 0.3 11.6 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.8 19.6 12.8 29.0 Lane group LOS 8 B B C Apprch. delay 18.8 19.6 12.8 29.0 Approach LOS B B B C Intersec. delay 22.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2000™ Copyright <0 2000 University of Rorida? AJI Rights Reserved Version 4.Je Short Rerort .- Page ] of 1 '- ~ SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RMB Intersection 136th Street & Rangeline Road Agency or Co. A&F Engineering Area Type All other areas Date Performed 12/20/2004 Jurisdiction Carmel ime Period PM Peak . - Analysis Year Existing Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB IT TH RT LT TH RT IT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (vph) 48 272 21 66 132 43 13 568 99 39 320 6 0/0 Heavv veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 3 1 0 PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 ~ctuated(P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A ;c)tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I xt. eft. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~rrival type 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedlBike/RTOR Volume 0 5 0 10 0 24 0 1 _ana Width 9.0 11.0 15.0 13.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parkinglhr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 ~.O Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 23.0 G= G= G= G = 28.0 G= G= G= y= 5 y= y= y= y= 5 y= y= y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle length C = 61.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB I\dj. flow rate 411 293 684 419 Lane group cap. 586 531 924 801 'w/c ratio 0.70 0.55 0.74 0.52 Green ratio 0.38 0.38 0.46 0.46 Unit. delay d1 16.1 14.9 13.5 11.7 Delay factor k 0.27 0.15 0.30 0.13 Increm. delay d2 3.7 1.2 3.2 0.6 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 19.8 16.2 16.7 12.4 L..ane group LOS B B B B Apprch. delay 19.8 16.2 16.7 12.4 ~pproach LOS 8 8 B B rntersec. delay 16.3 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000™ Copyright (Q 2000 University of Aoridat All Rights Reserved Version 4.le 3 Sh,ort Report .. Page 1 of 1 . SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ~nalyst RMB Intersection 136th Street & Rangeline Road Agency or Co. A&F Engineering Area Type All other areas Date Performed 12/20/2004 Ju risdiction Carmel Time Period AM Peak . - Analysis Year Existing+Proposed Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (vph) 8 248 36 83 149 19 14 155 95 61 498 27 0/0 Heavy veh 0 0 3 0 4 12 0 8 0 4 2 4 PHF 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.80 0.80 ~etuated (PIA A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 8 0 4 0 23 0 6 Lane Width 9.0 11.0 15.0 13.0 Parking/Grade/Parldng N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parkinglhr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 rriming G = 23.0 G= G= G= G = 28.0 G= G= G= y= 5 y= y= y= y= 5 y= y= y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 61.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ~dj. flow rate 490 333 277 724 l-ana group cap. 626 425 834 819 vIe ratio 0.78 0.78 0.33 0.88 Green ratio 0.38 0.38 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 16.8 16.8 10.5 15.0 Delay factor k 0.33 0.33 0.11 0.41 Increm. delay d2 6.4 9.3 0.2 11.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 23.2 26.1 10.8 26.3 Lane group LOS C C B C Appreh. delay 23.2 26.1 10.8 26.3 ~pproach LOS C C I B C Intersec. delay 23.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2000™ Copyright <0 2000 University of Aoridal' All Rights Reserved Version 4. Ie 4 Shf.)rt Rerort .. Page I of ] . SHORT REPORT General Information ~ite Information IAnalyst RMB Intersection 136th Street & Rangeline Road IAgency or Co. A&F Engineering Area Type All other areas Date Performed 12/20/2004 Time Period PM Peak . - Ju risdiction Carmel Analysis Year Existing+Proposed Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 _ane group LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (vph) 51 276 23 66 140 53 17 572 99 44 322 9 0/0 Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 3 1 0 PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 ~ctuated (PIA A A A A A A A A A A A A ~tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eft. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 5 0 13 0 24 0 2 Lane Width 9.0 11.0 15.0 13.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 rnmin9 G = 24.0 G= G= G= G = 27.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 y= y= y= y= 5 y= y= y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 Cvcle Length C = 61.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB 58 ~dj. flow rate 421 312 692 429 l-ana group cap. 607 563 886 752 vIe ratio 0.69 0.55 0.78 0.57 Green ratio 0.39 0.39 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.4 14.4 14.5 12.7 Del~y factor k 0.26 0.15 0.33 0.16 Increm. delay d2 3.4 1.2 4.6 1.0 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.9 15.6 19.0 13.7 _ane group LOS B B B 8 Apprch. delay 18.9 15.6 19.0 13.7 ~pproach LOS B 'B B B Intersec. delay 17.2 Intersection LOS B HCS2000™ Copyright (Q 2000 University of Aorida~ AJl Rights Reserved Version 4.Je 5 .. A & F ENGINEERING CO., LLC TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY CLIENT: INTERSECTION: DATE: CENTEX HOMES 136TH & RANGELINE ROAD 12/16/2004 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TOTAL VEHIC.~ES (PASSENGER CARS + TRUCKS) AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES OFF PEAK HOUR VOLUMES PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES BEGINS 7:00 AM BEGINS BEGINS 4:45 PM L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL 13 154 95 262 13 568 99 680 51 493 25 569 39 320 6 365 5 239 32 276 48 272 21 341 83 147 17 247 66 132 43 241 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEAK HOUR FACTOR OFF PEAK HOUR FACTOR . PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND APP'ROACH 0.87 0.80 0.58 0.74 INTERSECTION APPROACH 0.91 INTERSECTION APPROACH 0.96 0.87 0.82 0.79 INTERSECTION 0.92 TRUCK PERCENTAGE AM PEAK HOUR PERCENTAGE OFF PEAK HOUR PERCENTAGE PM PEAK HOUR PERCENTAGE L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL NORTHBOUND 0.0% 7.8% 0.0% 4.6% 15.4% 1.2% 0.0% 1.30/0 SOUTHBOUND 3.9% 2.2% 4.0% 2.5% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% 1.4% EASTBOUND 0.0% 0.4% 3.1% 0.70/0 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% WESTBOUND 0.0% 4.1% 11.8% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00/0 0.0% HOURL Y SUMMARY HOUR NB SB NB+SB EB we EB+WB TOTAL 6:00 AM TO 7:00 AM 98 245 343 85 108 193 536 7:00 AM TO 8:00 AM 262 569 831 276 247 523 1354 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM 208 357 565 74 207 281 846 3:00 PM TO 4:00 PM 497 404 901 153 350 503 1404 4:00 PM TO 5:00 PM 575 413 988 260 179 439 1427 5:00 PM TO 6:00 PM 676 353 1029 337 231 568 1597 TOTAL VOLUME 2316 2341 4657 1185 1322 2507 7164 PERCENTAGE 32.3% 32.7% 65.0% 16.5% 18.5% 35.0o,{, 100.0% 6 Release 11-18-04 . :."',', ': . A & F ENGINEERING CO., LLC TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY CLIENT : ~ CENTEX HOMES ~ .. INTERSECTION : 136TH & RANGELINE ROAD DATE: 12/16/2004 DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: NORTHBOUND HOUR lEFT THROUGH RIGHT TOTAL AM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM 5 0 5 60 5 65 28 0 28 93 5 98 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 13 0 13 142 . - 12 154 95 0 95 250 12 262 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 10 0 10 173 7 -180 15 3 18 198 10 208 PM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 23 3 26 403 8 411 57 3 60 483 14 497 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 20 1 21 474 13 487 64 3 67 558 17 575 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 11 1 12 554 7 -561 103 0 103 668 8 676 PASSENGER 82 1806 362 2250 94.3% 97.2% 97.60/0 97.2% TRUCK 5 52 9 66 5.7% 2.80/0 2.4% 2.80/0 BOTH 87 1858 371 2316 3.8% 80.2% 16.0% 100.0% DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: SOUTHBOUND HOUR lEFT THROUGH RIGHT TOTAL AM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 6:00 AM- - 7:00 AM 24 0 24 213 2 215 6 0 6 243 2 245 7:00 AM- 8:00 AM 49 2 51 482 11 493 24 1 25 555 14 569 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 19 0 19 314 14 328 10 0 10 343 14 357 PM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 36 1 37 336 18 354 13 0 13 385 19 404 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 47 1 48 349 6 355 10 0 10 406 7 413 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 33 0 33 311 3 314 6 0 6 350 3 353 PASSENGER 208 2005 69 2282 98.1 % 97.4% 98.60/0 97.5% TRUCK 4 54 1 59 1.90/0 2.6% 1.4% 2.5% BOTH 212 2059 70 2341 9.1% 88.0% 3.0% 100.0% DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: EASTBOUND HOUR LEFT THROUGH RIGHT TOTAL AM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM 2 1 3 77 0 n 5 0 5 84 1 85 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 5 0 5 238 1 239 31 1 32 274 2 276 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 9 2 11 48 1 49 13 1 14 70 4 74 PM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK- - BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 29 1 30 95 5 100 22 1 23 146 7 153 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 36 0 36 206 1 207 16 1 17 258 2 260 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 41 0 41 273 1 274 22 0 22 336 1 337 PASSENGER 122 937 109 1168 96.8% 99.0% 96.5% 98.6% TRUCK 4 9 4 17 3.2% 1.0% 3.5% 1.4% BOTH 126 946 113 1185 10.6% 79.8% 9.50/0 100.0% DIRECTION OF TRAVEL: WESTBOUND HOUR LEFT THROUGH RIGHT TOTAl AM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 6:00 AM - 7:00 AM 21 0 21 69 2 71 16 0 16 106 2 108 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM 83 0 083 141 6 147 15 2 17 239 8 247 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM 61 0 61 121 2 123 20 3 23 202 5 207 PM TIME PERIOD PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH PASS TRUCK BOTH 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM 98 1 99 174 2 176 74 1 75 346 4 350 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 58 0 58 81 1 82 37 2 39 176 3 179 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 58 0 58 133 0 133 40 0 40 231 0 231 PASSENGER 379 719 202 1300 99.70/0 98.2% 96.20/0 98.3% TRUCK 1 13 8 22 0.3% 1.80/0 3.80/0 1.7% BOTH 380 732 210 1322 28.70/0 55.4% 15.9% 100.0% Release 11-18-04 7 . INPUT Intersection Information: In tersecti on: Jurisdiction: Date: North/South Street: EastlWest Street: - Project 10: Scenario: Peak Period: 136th Street & Range-line ~oad Carmel, IN 12-20-04 RanfeIine Road 136t Street Centex Homes Scenario 1 - Existing Traffic Volumes AM Peak Roundabout Geometries: Northbound Westbound Southbound Eastbound Ent Width, E 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m Flare Len th, L' 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 m Half Width, V 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 m Ent Radius, R 15.0 m ]5.0 m ]5.0 m 15.0 m Ent An Ie, PHI 20.0 de 20.0 de 20.0 de 20.0 de Inscribed Circle 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m Diameter, D Flows: Approach PCU Flows FLOF CL 1 sl Exit 2nd Exit 3rd Exit U-Turn Northbound ].05 95 ]54 13 0 ].00 50% Westbound 1.05 17 147 83 0 1.00 50% Southbound 1.05 25 493 51 0 1.00 50% Eastbound 1.05 32 239 5 0 1.00 50% A roach Flow Ratio Flow Time Northbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Westbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Southbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Eastbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 OUTPUT - A vera e Dela A roach Avera e Dela Northbound 3.6 see Westbound 3.0 see Southbound 5.4 see Eastbound 4.8 see Intersection 4.3 see & LOS Level of Service A A A A A . INPUT Intersection Information: In tersecti on: Jurisdiction: Date: North/South Street: East/W est Street: Project ill: Scenario: Peak Period: 136th Street & Rangeline .Road Carmel, IN 12-20-04 Ranieline Road 136 Street Centex Homes Scenario 1 - Existing Traffic Volumes PM Peak Roundabout Geometries: Northbound Westbound Southbound Eastbound Ent Width, E 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m Flare Len th, L' 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 ill Half Width, V 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 ill Ent Radius, R ]5.0 m 15.0 m 15.0 m 15.0 m Ent Angle, PHI 20.0 de 20.0 de 20.0 de 20.0 de Inscribed Circle 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m Diameter, D Flows: Approach peu Flows FLOF CL 1 st Exit 2nd Exit 3rd Exit U- Turn Northbound 1.05 99 568 13 0 ].00 50% Westbound 1.05 "43 132 66 0 ].00 50% Southbound 1.05 6 320 39 0 ].00 50% Eastbound 1.05 2] 272 48 0 1.00 50% A roach Flow Ratio Flow Time Northbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Westbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Southbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Eastbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 OUTPUT - A vera e DeJa A roach Avera e Dela Northbound" 7.2 see Westbound 4.2 see Southbound 3.6 see Eastbound 4.2 see Intersection 5.4 see & LOS Level of Service A A A A A 9 . INPUT Intersection Information: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Date: North/South Street: EastlWest Street: Project ill: Scenario: Peak Period: ] 36th Street & Rangeline Road Carmel, IN ]2-20-04 Ranleline Road ] 36 Street Centex Homes Scenario 2 - Existing + Proposed AM Peak Roundabout Geometries: Northbound 4.88 m 25.0 m 3.35 m 15.0 m 20.0 deg 36.59 m Ent Width, E Flare Len th, L' Half Width, V Ent Radius, R Entry An Ie, PHI Inscribed Circle Diameter, D Westbound 4.88 m 25.0 m 3.35 m 15.0 m 20.0 de 36.59 m Southbound 4.88 m 25.0 m 3.35 m 15.0 m 20.0 de 36.59 m Eastbound 4.88 m 25.0 m 3.35 m 15.0 m 20.0 de 36.59 m Flows: Approach PCU Hows FLOF CL 1 st Exit 2nd Exit 3rd Exit U- Turn Northbound 1.05 95 155 14 0 1.00 50% Westbound 1.05 19 149 83 0 1.00 50% Southbound 1.05 27 498 61 0 1.00 50% Eastbound 1.05 36 248 8 0 1.00 50% A roach Flow Ratio . Flow Time Northbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Westbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 - 60 Southbound 0.75 ] .125 0.75 0 30 60 Eastbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 OUTPUT - A vera e Dela A roach Avera e Dela Northbound 3.6 sec Westbound 3.0 see Southbound 5.4 see Eastbound 4.8 sec Intersection 4.5 see & LOS Level of Service A A A A A ,. , INPUT Intersection Information: Intersection: Jurisdiction: Date: North/South Street: East/W est Street: Project ill: Scenario: Peak Period: 136th Street & Rangeline ~Road Cannel, IN ] 2-20-04 Ranleline Road ] 36 Street Centex Homes Scenario 2 - Existing + Proposed PM Peak Roundabout Geometries: Northbound Westbound Southbound Eastbound Ent Width, E 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m 4.88 m Flare Len th, L' 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 m 25.0 m Half Width, V 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 m 3.35 m Ent Radius, R ]5.0 m ]5.0 m 15.0 m 15.0 m Ent An Ie, PHI 20.0 deg 20.0 de 20.0 de 20.0 de Inscribed Circle 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m 36.59 m Diameter, D Flows: Approach PCU Flows FLOF CL 151 Exit 2nd Exit 3rd Exit U-Turn Northbound ].05 99 572 17 0 1.00 50% Westbound 1.05 53 140 66 0 1.00 50% Southbound ].05 9 322 44 0 1.00 50% Eastbound ].05 23 276 51 0 1.00 50% A roach Flow Ratio Flow Time Northbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Westbound 0.75 1 .125 0.75 0 30 60 Southbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 Eastbound 0.75 1.125 0.75 0 30 60 A roach Northbound Westbound Southbound Eastbound Intersection & LOS Level of Service A A A A A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ~nalyst RMB Intersection ~gency/Co. A&F Engineering Uurisdiction Carmel Date Performed 12/22/2004 . -, ~nalysis Year Existing+Proposed t\nalysis Time Period ~M Peak )roject Description Centex Homes East/West Street: 136th Street Ir'JorthlSouth Street: Access/1 sf A venue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStlldy Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 l T A l T A Volume (vehlh) 3 276 -4 4 186 3 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate (veMl) 3 306 4 4 206 3 Proportion of heavy 3 3 vehicles, P HV -- - - - Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configu ration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 12 1 12 16 1 14 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate (veMl) 13 1 13 17 1 15 Proportion of heavy 3 3 3 3 3 3 vehicles, P HV Percent grade (Ok) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 K:;onfigu ration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB we Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ....ane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR !Volume, v (vph) 3 4 27 33 Capacity, cm (vph) 1356 1245 545 562 v/c ratio 0.00 . 0.00 0.05 0.06 Queue length (950/0) 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.19 Control Delay (slveh) 7.7 7.9 11.9 11.8 _OS A A B B Approach delay (s1veh) - - ,; 11.9 11.8 Approach LOS -- - 8 B Tw'o-Way Stop Control w. . . : . - , t HCS2000™ Page 1 of~ Copyright Q 2003 University of Rorida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 . ~ 'Two-Way Stop Control Page I of . . . ! TWO-WAY ~TOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ;ite Information Analyst RMB ~ntersection Agency/Co. A&F Engineering Jurisdiction Carmel Date Performed 12/22/2004 t\nalysis Year Existing+Proposed Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Centex Homes EastlWest Street: 136th Street !North/South Street: Access/1st A venue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 lVehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume (vehlh) 13 342 13 14 1St 15 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 14 380 14 15 167 16 Proportion of heavy 3 3 vehicles, PHV -- -- -- -- Median type Undivided AT Channelized? 0 0 :"anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement -7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R. L T A ~olume (vehlh) 8 1 8 8 1 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0,,'90 0.90 0.90 0,,90 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 8 1 8 8 1 6 Proportion of heavy 3 3 3 3 3 3 vehicles, P HV Percent grade (0/0) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 ~T Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configu ration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 14 15 17 15 Capacity, cm (vph) 1386 1159 479 493 vIe ratio 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.03 0.04 0.11 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 8.1 12.8 12.5 ...OS A A 8 B Approach delay (s/veh) - - 12.8 12.5 Approach LOS -- -- 8 8 ~ . i HCS2000™ Copyright 0 2003 University of Rorida. All Rights Reserved Version 4. 14 ~ T,,!o+Way Stop Control i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ~nalyst RMB Intersection Rangline Road & Access ~gency/Co. A&F Engineering Ju risdiction Carmel Date Performed 12/22/2004 Analysis Year Existing+Proposed Analysis Time Period AM Peak . - Project Description Centex Homes EastlWest Street: Access Drive !North/South Street: Rangeline Road I ntersection Orientation: North-South !Study period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R l T R Volume 3 179 0 0 570 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 198 0 0 633 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configu ration LT T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 l T R L T R ~olume 0 0 0 10 0 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Row Rate, HFR 0 0 0 11 0 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (0/0) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 AT Channelized 0 0 lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB S8 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 3 28 C (m) (vph) 943 409 vIe 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.22 Control Delay 8.8 14.4 LOS A B Approach Delay -- -- I 14.4 Approach LOS -- -- B r Rights Reserved Copyright <0 2003 University of Rorida, An Rights Re$erved Version 4.1d 16 Tv.~o.{W'lY Stop Control 4. . Page 1 of2 .. ~ TWO-W A Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RMB Intersection Rangline Road & Access Agency/Co. A&F Engineering Uu risdiction Carmel Date Performed 12/22/2004 ~nalysis Year Existing+Proposed Analysis Time Period PM Peak - - Project Description Centex Homes Eastf\Nest Street: Access Drive 1N0rth/South Street: Rangeline Road Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy period hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 15 661 0 0 368 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 734 0 0 408 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 - -- 0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 L.anes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LT T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Wolume 0 0 0 5 0 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0,,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 5 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue LenQth, and Level of Service Approach NB 58 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 16 12 C (m) (vph) 1135 343 ~/c 0.01 0.03 ~5% queue length 0.04 0.11 Control Delay 8.2 15.9 ,...OS A C Approach Delay -- -- 15.9 ~pproach LOS - -- C t Rights Reserved Copyright <0 2003 University of Aorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d