HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact •
F
•
INDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR
F.
PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION
Carmel Plan Commission
Carmel, Indiana
a_ s n
DOCKET NO. 5 if Do) PP NAME OF SUBDIVISION: L,t-I-1-1--U
PETITIONER: l— " '-� Lo
1/1;"'ased upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and
certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development,I determine that the plat
complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance.
I hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to
by the petitioner.
Condition 1.
Condition 2.
Condition 3.
I hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons:
1.
2. ,
3.
DATED THIS- 2/ DAY OF /��G/, ,200 Z-- .
L/
Co i.fission Member
s:\plancomm\applictn.pc\primplat.apx Rev. 11/7/2000
•
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel,Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
'1 FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: SA" a c-•
Petitioner: ""c". aN-.4.A 1141%,-......k.a - A�--
Section Variance:
Brief Description of Variance:
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,
the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,morals and general
welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual
and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner,
I approve of the requested
subdivision variance. S V{1)Ec.--S-D cot b -n,t,r4 pec.e.o,,.N Dstz, y -S
vr.lborec
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this 2/ day of ' // ,200.2
ommission Member
s:\forms\Subdivision Waiver Findings-of-Fact 2000.0111
II
CARIVIEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel,Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
,) FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 6`�"`D 02' b
Petitioner: ---Ti v -,errAur t it f re"--°"'"'``
Section Variance:
Brief Description of Variance:
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance,
the Plan Commission should consider the following:
- The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,morals and general
welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual
and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
- The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
V Based on all the evidence -presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested
subdivision variance. Sun srxr'rb >14-rpw4 Asre.40.TMs+.,a, ar1::■ocS it
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this Z-day of / ,200 ..
../ .�. :///_ , ,,iiii_
!{mmission Member
s:\formslSubdivision Waiver Findings-of-Fact 2000.0111