HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes TAC 06-19-02 Notes Steve Broerma • had no questions. He requested a copy of the final plat and review
sheet when availai e.
Chuck Shupperd had 'o concerns.
Steve Cash did not receive plans. This new lot is across from lots 7, 8 and 9. It was
Common Area 4. Mr. Cash lad no further comments.
Dennis Olmstead stated there is qo change beyond replatting the and from a common
area to a building lot. The site mi_ht have been used for a poo ouse and pool. The size
of the subdivision could not support 't.
Dean Groves, Tom Skolak, and Jim Bla hard had no co- ments.
Jon Dobosiewicz made the recommendation o replat he common area instead of
replatting the entire subdivision. Dennis Olms -ad ought it would be cleaner as a
replat. The Plan Commission has changed their_: Iles of Procedure to allow the
Subdivision Committee to approve a primary p .t a• endment. A public hearing is still
required. The Subdivision Committee could ,approve his in the first week of August.
Mr. Olmstead sent notices yesterday. Jon •obosiewicz will ask the Plan Commission to
waive their rules and approve the amend t ent on July 16 ' There are no issues to review.
Dennis Olmstead will provide the repla It will take 30 da after the primary plat is
amended before the Department of Co munity Services can °'gn off. This period of
time provides opportunity for anyone to file an appeal. Jon Dobosiewicz anticipates
approval of the primary plat amen. lent on July 16th . Laurence illig inquired about
subdivision signage. Jim Caito s d not know. Dennis Olmstead b lieves there was a plan
that was submitted with the in • al plat. The signage was erected wi hout a sign permit.
There is a gatehouse structu in Common Area 7. The median is n ow; it is 10-15 feet
wide. Steve Broermann stated the structure is okay. The median is w e enough and
there is the necessary ri•, t of way. This went through the County. Laurence Lillig will
provide an application or a sign permit this morning.
Keystone Office Park—'Amerivest Office Building (Development Plan) 86-02
DP/ADLS
The site is located at 3077 East 98th Street (southeast corner of 98th Street and SR 321).
The site is zoned by B-3/Business.
Filed by Charles Frankenberger of Nelson & Frankenberger for Sheridan Realty Partners,
LP.
Charlie Frankenberger represented Sheridan Partners for approval of a parking lot and
additional building in Keystone Office Park at the southeast corner of Keystone and 98th'
Street. The office park has four two-story brown, brick buildings just north of the Penske
and Dan Young car dealerships. The petitioner wants to construct another building and
parking lot on the eastern edge. The B-3 zoning requires ADLS and DP approval from
SCANNED
s:TechnicalAdvtsoryCommtttee\Minutes\tac2002june 5
JLUAJL
the Plan Commission. Drawings and plans were given to the Department of Community
Services and TAC members.
Steve Broennann had no comments.
Chuck Shupperd believes the existing buildings are totally electric. He had no
comments.
Mike McBride stated Dick Hill wrote a letter. He asked their engineer to certify these are
the same drawings that were previously approved and reviewed. Carmel will wait for
that certification before providing further comments. Mr. Frankenberger will get a
response to Mr. Hill's letter.
Steve Cash said this project does not affect any regulated drains and no permits are
needed. He asked if this is being built over the existing detention area. Charlie
Frankenberger did not know but will check. There is a low area with an inlet where the
parking lot is proposed. Mr. Cash wished to provide a"heads up" regarding the matter.
He distributed his letter.
Jim Blanchard requested a pre-submittal meeting prior to issuing permits. He gave Mr.
Frankenberger a checklist.
Tom Skolak will take care of mail delivery.
Dean Groves thought this was in their territory. He will check the area.
Jon Dobosiewicz had written landscape comments from Scott Brewer. Laurence Lillig will have
additional comments about right of way A 25-foot access easement is identified on the east side
of the property. A great deal of landscaping is proposed in that area. Mr. Dobosiewicz will write
a letter regarding issues addressed by the B-3 zoning. -
Laurence Lillig stated over the past 10-15 years the City has been gathering commitments for the
right of way on LaSalle Street to extend it between 96`i' and 98°i Streets. The Amerivest property
is the last parcel needed to make this connection It requires a 25-foot half right of way on the
east side of the property. Mr. Frankenberger does not know if this is an existing easement. He
stated the question is whether that indicates a willingness to dedicate or is it a separate easement.
Laurence L►11►g said it is shown as a proposed 25-foot access.easement. It seems the
surveyor knows where LaSalle goes but they are proposing landscaping and two parking
areas and a dumpster pad that encroach. Mr. Frankenberger knows they are aware of the
request for additional right of way. He is concerned about whether the road will be built.
It is not on the thoroughfare plan. Laurence Lillig agreed it is not on the most current
version. He thinks it was inadvertently dropped. Kelli Lawrence will address that error
in the next thoroughfare plan amendment. The petitioner is concerned whether this
project justifies such a significant dedication of right of way. However, the client is
aware and considering their position. Mr. Lillig is concerned about making the LaSalle
Street connection work. Several variances will be needed. Then, this becom- . . t as
well. The setback will be affected and the parking arrangement will need to be
reconsidered. Mr. Lillig stated the petitioner might shift the building north and put the
s.TechnicalAdvisoryComrruttee\Minutes\tac2002j une 6
a
majority of the parking to the south. The parking areas will need to be less deep. By
shifting the building north or south they avoid the long/narrow parking. That would
move the parking out the LaSalle right of way. Charlie Frankenberger said assuming
they agree to dedicate this land; he needs to reevaluate the site and identify which
vas ran es are required and file for them. the City is willing to sL�port the variance
e• i-sts to ma Ffifis iappen. e ross hatches at the north end of the site are occupied
partially by the : treet right of way. Jon Dobosiewicz noticed that parking spaces are
terminated. The petitioner could pick up lost parking by shifting it to the west. It would
pull the spaces out of the right of way. Jon Dobosiewicz will write a letter. Mr. Lillig
inquired about the heavy- duty asphalt at the south side in the drive. Mr. Frankenberger
does not know why it is there. A dumpster pad is nearby, but a single garbage truck does
not necessitate the heavier asphalt.
Carey Lake Subdivision (Primary Plat) 84-02 PP, 85-02 SP
The applicant seeks approval to plat a 10-lot residential subdivision on 6 19 ,cres. The
site is located on the south side of 146th Street, 1/8 mile east of Carey Ro.i -The site is
on s R-1/Residence.
Fi -d • David Barnes of Weihe Engineers, Inc. for Springmill : .° •ers, Inc.
Dave B. es c'stributed a revised primary plat layout of • bdivision. Also in
attendanc- ere ent Shipley and Marvin Taylor, Sp • ill Builders, Inc. The lots
have changes . litt c but are not significantly diffe '. The parcel is zoned R-1,
however, the pe i one 's now filing under theer0•: Space Standards. The streets and
utilities have not cl-a gee. There will be t\y f ore lots and additional open space. The
entrance will be off 14 th St -et. The sa rtd i sewer flows through the Worthington
Subdivision. They will be able .• out -t7'orm water through the subdivision's lake into
Worthington pond. Carmel uti 'ti- • service the project. The location is off 146th
Street east of Carey Road. Mr. 4�' invited questions.
Steve Broermann asked i cam: to wour be .nnexed. It is currentl. the subject of an
Y J
annexation ordinance/It be adopted b the City Council within the next 30-45 days.
Construction will 13e6d,i •ermit for the road cut. othing has changed since their
meeting yesterda 'P ere are no new questions,\ r. :roermann had no more comments.
n
Steve Broernn panded about that meeting:T�1p 'tioner brought up the possibility
of exchang(ofs•edian cuts to allow one at their entranc-. he County is not willing to
enterta% ha •ea. Hamilton County suggested eliminatin: •e cut at the existing house.
The rive) .y cut is in the left turn lane. The other house has own cut. The property
o the .rth side has a right in and right out. The property in We %,eld on the north side
ill •,.t get a cut if developed. There is a full-dedicated left turn into :rentwood
Si. a7ivision. If the room exists for left turns in both directions and ther6\\i\enough
stacking room, the County will consider that idea. But the left turn lane dd�\s\not give
enough room for stacking for a left in the other way. The problem is not erili st. h room
for any stacking.
s:TechnicalAdvtsoryConumrttee\Minutes\tac2002j une 7