Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05020028-Misc.June 22, 2005 Jay Smith U.S. Housing Components PO Box 428 3926 West Highway 146 Buckner, Kentucky 40010 R334 Curtis Residence, Indianapolis, Indiana Per your request, we have reviewed the information you provided us regarding the roof system at the ~bove project and are prepared to provide an opinioh regarding the suitability of the trusses and framin~ system at the two particular locations discussed below: that both plies c at a 2-ply 2x12 header which is supported at each end and the R4 trusses pick up interme~liate bearing at the load at the end of the R4 truss which, in supported by the R3A truss. We beam design and found it to be are required. This observ~ition are appropriately sized and made and together to act as a single structural unit. Issue 2:R9/R10 Hip Girders ,, Per your description both trusses were manufactured 3 too short. The existing !~,s,s designs were then analyzed with the top chord bearing locations (joint "J on R9, joint 'E on R10) shil :d 3" to the right to reflect the as-installed conditions. In both cases the truss analysis rev, ~ed no overstressed or inadequate plates or members. Truss loading was checked and found to ~ appropriate for the condition. No corrections or modifications are required. This obs vatlon assumes that appropriate blocking is installed from the underside of the top chord to the p of the R7 girder truss to provide adequate bearing for the R9 and R l0 and that connections bev :eh the R9 and RI0 girder trusses and the trusses being supported are properly sized and made. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, BTM [ D. Brett Graves, P. [N Lie. No. 10403989