Loading...
121614 Request for COIT funds HOWARD & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS FOR 1-1A1'v{IL:I'ON COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NOBLESVILLE MICHAEL A. HOWARD DARREN J. MURPHY howardma(a aol.com dmurphy @ori.net December 16, 2014 Mayor Jim Brainard City of Carmel Carmel City Hall One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 • Honorable Diana Cordray Clerk-Treasurer City of Carmel Carmel City Hall, Third Floor One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Dear Mayor Brainard and Clerk Treasurer, Cordray: On behalf of Hamilton County, please accept this letter as a request for payment of$454,993.78 to Hamilton County, Indiana. This represents the shortfall of TIF collections from the Thomson Consumer Electronics Economic Development Area for the Fall of 2014. This amount is due and owing from the City of Carmel to the County pursuant to the terms of an Interlocal Agreement between the City and the County, approved by the Carmel City Council on August 15, 2005, as well as Ordinance D-1771-05; also approved by the Common Council on the 10 day of August, 2005, both of which are attached. As you may recall, this Interlocal Agreement and Ordinance was approved in order to allow the 1-la.milton County Redevelopment Commission to issue its Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 2005 in the amount of$5,580,000 ("the 2005 Bonds") and its Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 2006 in the amount of$19,080,000 "the 2006 Bonds"). The 2006 bonds were issued on March 3. 2006, and the proceeds of the bonds were used primarily for right of way acquisition and construction of Illinois Street from 126`h Street to 136th Street. See page 5 of the Official Statement for the bonds which is attached. The annual payments for the 2005 and 2006 bonds are also shown on the attached pages B-8, B-9, and B019 of the Official Statement from the 2006 Bonds. •694 LOGAN STREET,NOBLESVILLE, INDIANA 46060 (317) 773-4212 •(FAX) (317) 776-2369• • As is explained in the e-mail from Loren Matthes, this shortfall is the result of three major factors: 1. The continued erosion of assessed value in the Area resulting from appeals granted by the state. 2. A refund to a single taxpayer in the district for three years' taxes plus interest, which refund totaled $304,566.89, as shown on the attached settlement statement from the Auditor and the calculation of the shortage. 3. The fact that a major taxpayer in the area had failed to pay the taxpayer's Fall 2014 installment of approximately $238,000. The County needs your immediate attention to this issue and requests a wire of the above amount to the County by the 29th of December so that the 2014 payment will be made to the Trustee in a timely manner. 1 have reviewed and agree with Loren Matthes' summary of the causes for this shortfall. The shortfall should be substantially reduced, but not eliminated, in subsequent years because of the following: 1. The taxpayers in the Area have historically paid on time and we would anticipate them doing so in the future. 2. The tax refund responsible for most of the shortfall was for three years' taxes, plus interest. Only one-third of the amount of the appeal, or about $85,000 per year would apply in subsequent years. 3. Finally, we have asked the Assessor to look at the properties in this district. As you are probably aware, there were substantial vacancies in this district during the economic downturn of the past few years. With the economic development efforts of the City, we anticipate that most, if not all. of the vacancies have been filled in these buildings and the assessed values should consequently rise. Finally, we would look forward to working with the City to refund these bonds to substantially reduce the future debt service. Hopefully, this will eliminate, or at least minimize, any future shortfall payments from the City. Very truly yours, Michael A. Howard MAll:jep Enclosures cc: Loren Matthes Dawn Coverdale Commissioners • Invoice for Tax Increment Guarantee Payment City of Carmel, Indiana Attn: Mayor James Brainard and Diana Cordray One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Payable to: Hamilton County, Indiana Payment to Hamilton County for COLT Guarantee for Fall of 2014 for Thomson Consumer Electronics Economic Development Area pursuant to Ordinance D-1771-05 $454,993.78 Calculated as follows: Fall 2014 Bond Payment (Series 2005 & 2006) 902,253.00 LESS Net Fall 2014 Collections 388,531.47 Cash in Fund 58.727.75 TOTAL Receipts 447,259.22 (447,259.22) Guarantee Payment 454,993.78 Payable December 29, 2014 Wiring Instructions: To Hamilton County Treasurer Bank One Account Number: 641874946 Routing Number: 074000010 to accordance with 1C 364.U1-4,!hereby certify!am the Clerk-Treasurer for the City of Carmel,Indiana,and the following document(s};consisting of 3 page(s),is a true and accurate copy of Ordinance 1)-1771-05. Witness ary hand and official seal/this 3 day of Oc..:.1 15. , Diana L Cordray,Cannel Clad-Trq-mer, SPONSOR: Councilor Kirby • ORDINANCE D-1771-05 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL PLEDGING COLT REVENUES To BONDS OF THE HAMILTON COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - WHEREAS, the Hamilton County ("County") Income Tax Council has imposed the County Option Income Tax under IC 6-3.5-6 ("COIT") at a rate of one percent (1.0%)annually on the adjusted gross income of City.taxpayers; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City of Carmel ("City") is a recipient of a distributive share of the COLT ("COIT Revenues") and receives its COLT Revenues monthly • from the County Auditor; WHEREAS, the Hamilton County Redevelopment Commission ("Commission") established the Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Clay Township, Economic Development Area("Area")in the City in accordance with IC 36-7-14; WHEREAS, the Commission has determined to issue bonds to finance the acquisition and construction of road improvements in, serving or benefitting the Area ("Project") and such Bonds will be payable from incremental tax revenues collected in the Area ("Tax Increment") and,if necessary,from a portion of the COIT Revenues; WHEREAS, the City has agreed to pledge COIT Revenues in the annual amount of $650,000 ("Pledged.COIT") to the payment of the New Bonds (as defined below) issued to finance the Project located in the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the.City of Carmel, Indiana: • Section L The City, in consideration of the Commission's desire to proceed with the completion of the Project and with the redevelopment and economic development of the Area, hereby pledges Pledged COLT to the Commission for the payment of debt service . on its Redevelopment District Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, issued in two or more series, in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed Twenty Five Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($25,400,000) ("New Bonds") on a parity with the pledge of Pledged COIT by the City to the Outstanding COIT Obligations of the City, which are as follows: • • • A. Outstanding.Twenty-six Million One Hundred Eighty-five Thousand _ Dollars($26,185,000)ofCarniel Redevelopment Authority County Option Income Tax Lease Rental Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2004 under a Lease dated July 8, 1997,as amended on September 4, 1997,and as further amended on March 1,2004,which bonds were originally issued In the amount of Twenty-seven Million Nine Hundred Eighty-five Thousand Dollars ($27,985,000) • B. Outstanding Eight Million Four Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($8,430,000)of City of Carmel Redevelopment District Taxable COIT Revenue Bonds of 1998 which bonds were originally issued in the amount.of Ten Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars($10,500,000). C. Outstanding Nine Million Eight Hundred Fifty-five Thousand Dollars ($9,855,000)of City of Carmel,Indiana, COIT Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 which bonds were originally issued in the amount of Ten Million Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars($10,450,000). Section IL The City further covenants that it will take no action(including action as a member of the Hamilton County Income Tax Council)to rescind or repeal COIT or to take any action that would result in the City receiving a smaller distributive share of COIT than the-distributive share of COLT to which it was entitled on the effective date of this ordinance. The City further covenants that it will take no action(including action as a member of the Hamilton County Income Tax Council)to rescind COIT or reduce the COIT rate as long as the Bonds are outstanding. Section III. Except for the Outstanding Obligations listed in Section 1 above,the City has not pledged or otherwise encumbered its COIT Revenues, and there are no prior. liens,encumbrances,or other restrictions on the Pledged COIT or on the City's ability to pledge Pledged COIT to the Commission. Section IV. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. Section V: All prior Ordinances or parts thereof inconsistent with any provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and signing by the Mayor. Passed by the Common Council of the City of Carmel,Indiana this /5 day of 2005,by a vote of 7 ayes and nays. COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL P ski g O lcer R. i ald E. Garter ,,,,,--47 -4,-Z, 6'4,1.,,,_ Kevin .. • ,:•, 'ro Tempore • . B:-.: D. Ma o F•wa rick ., / Ratter ,.? J Ai ep ffs Richard L. Sharp . •TTEST: • I f , • . , . .„' i , ,,,,.., Diana L.Cordray,IAMC,Clerk- ' -r Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this /J day of i • `• 2005; at 1 JO P P.M. it L ' �' f ' Diana L.Cordray, IANIC,Clerk-Tr-f -r Approved by me, Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this /43 day of akt t-' . -' 2045, at 1:10 O e.M. ii J es Brainard,Mayor ATTEST: r / , ,•f , i °` i Diana L.Cordray,IAMC,Clerk-Tre. /-r Prepared by. Michael A.Howard Howard&Associates 694 Logan Stream Noblesville,IN 46060 (317)773.4212 In accordance with IC 36-4-10.4,1 hereby certify 1 am the Clerk-Treasurer tar the City of Carmel,Indiana,and that the following,docunrc t(s)consisting of 3 page(s),is a the and accurate copy of Ordinance D-1771-05. Witness my hand and official seal this 27^1,1 day of .2005 egZ e/f. Dina L Cnrdray,Cannel Clafc-Treasra ,[f 4C / • • • AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARMEL AND HAMILTON COUNTY CONCERNING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND PAYMENT OF EXPENSES FROM THE THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., CLAY TOWNSHIP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA Document Cross Reference No. 9133525 This Interlocal Agreement entered into as of August 15, 2005, by and between the Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County, acting on behalf of Hamilton County, Indiana, ("the County"), the Hamilton County Council ("the Council")and the City of Carmel ("the City"). WHEREAS,the Hamilton County Redevelopment Commission("Commission")on the 1 ri day of April,1990,passed a Declaratory Resolution No.4-17-90,which established the Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Clay Township, Economic Development Area ("the Area");and WHEREAS,the Commission,acting on behalf of Hamilton County,Indiana,("the County"), subsequently issued its Redevelopment District Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1991 dated December 1, 1991, ("the 1991 Bonds"); and, WHEREAS, the 1991 Bonds were subsequently refunded by the Commission through issuance of its Redevelopment District Tax Increment Refunding Revenue Bonds of 2002 dated February 21, 2002, ("the Refunding Bonds"); and, WHEREAS,the final principal and interest payment on the Refunding Bonds will be paid on February 1, 2008, from tax increment collected from the Area in November of 2007; and, WHEREAS, since the time of the issuance of the 1991 Bonds,the City has annexed all of • the real estate within the Area; and, WHEREAS,Indiana Code 36-7-14-3.5,provides that after the final date of an annexation by a municipality,a County redevelopment commission may not issue bonds or use the proceeds from allocated property tax proceeds from an allocation area unless the legislative body of the municipality adopts an ordinance permitting the issuance of bonds and use of the allocated property tax proceeds from the allocation area; and, WHEREAS, the City is desirous of entering into an Agreement with the County acting on behalf of the Commission to issue the Commission's 2005 Bonds in an amount not to exceed Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars($6,500,000),the proceeds of which will be used to refund the Refunding Bonds and pay the costs of land acquisition for the extension of Illinois Street north from Clarian Hospital to 126th Street and design costs for part of Illinois Street for the benefit of the City("the 2005 Costs"),which Costs meet the requirements of Indiana Code 36-7-14-25.1, and include the cost of right of way and design of public infrastructure, plus all reasonable legal, accounting,advertising,bond discount,and other expenses which are normally associated with the issuance of municipal bonds, and to fund a debt service reserve. WHEREAS,the City is desirous of entering into an Agreement with the County acting on behalf of the Commission to issue the Commission's 2006 Bonds in an amount not to exceed Nineteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars($19,800,000),the proceeds of which will be used to pay the costs of land acquisition for the extension of Illinois Street north from 126th Street to 136th Street;to pay the construction of Illinois Street from Clarion Hospital north to 136th Street and to construct the 3`d Avenue S.W. and 4th Avenue S.W. realignment project;ail for the benefit of the City("the 2006 Projects"),which Projects meet the requirements of Indiana Code 36-7-14-25.1,and include the cost of right of way and design of public infrastructure, plus all reasonable legal, accounting,advertising,bond discount,capitalized interest,and other expenses which are normally associated with the issuance of municipal bonds and to fund a debt service reserve; and, WHEREAS,the County and the Commission have designated part of the tax increment collected from the Area in collection years 2005, 2006, and 2007 to be used for public projects benefitting the Area. • IT IS THEREBY AGREED by and between the County and the City as follows: Section I: The County agrees to initiate all procedures necessary for the Commission to issue its 2005 Redevelopment District Tax Increment Revenue Bonds("the 2005 Bonds")in an amount no greater than Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000)which shall be paid from semi-annual bond payments not to exceed Two Hundred Thousand Dollars($200,000)from February 2006 through February 2030. The County agrees to initiate all procedures necessary for the Commission to issue its 2006 Redevelopment District Tax Increment Revenue Bonds("the 2006 Bonds")in an amount no greater than Nineteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars($19,800,000)which shall be paid from semi-annual bond payments not to exceed Seven Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars($720,000)from August 2006 through February 2030,and Nine Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars($915,000)on August 2030 and February of 2031. The proceeds of the New Bonds shall be used to fund the project budget in Exhibit A. All tax increment collected from the Area after 2005 shall be irrevocably pledged to be used for payments toward the New Bonds. Section II: The 2005 Bonds shall be issued in October of 2005,and the 2006 Bonds shall be issued in March of 2006. Section III: The proceeds of the 2005 Bonds to be issued by the Commission shall be held by the County Auditor and used to redeem the Refunding Bonds and to pay the costs of the Projects as defined by the City, which Projects are listed on Exhibit A. Those costs shall include all applicable expenses as set out in Indiana Code 36-7-14-25.1(a). Section IV: The City has pledged to the Commission in Ordinance No. D-1771-05 the amount of Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars($650,000)per year of the City's distributive share of County Option Income Tax to cover any difference between the scheduled principal and interest on the New Bonds and the semi-annual tax increment collected from the Area ("the Guarantee Payments"),pursuant to Ordinance D-1771-05. The pledge shall be irrevocable until February of 2031 or until the New Bonds or any refunding bonds used to redeem the New Bonds,are paid in full. Any Guarantee Payments shall be made at least two business days prior to the payment date of the New Bonds to the County Auditor or to the Trustee for the New Bonds and applied to the payment of the New Bonds. Section V: The claims for payment of costs to be paid from the proceeds of the New Bonds shall be approved by both a representative of the City as designated by the Mayor and City Counci,and an officer of the Hamilton County Redevelopment Commission after recommendation by the appropriate construction manager or project engineer designated by the City. Section VI: The City shall select such engineers, and design professionals, as are necessary to design and inspect the construction of the Projects. The City shall be responsible for receiving bids and awarding the contracts for the design, inspection, and construction of the Projects. Section VII. The parties agree that in the event that it is determined that there will be financial benefit to the refunding,or the advance refunding,of the New Bonds,the parties shall take all steps necessary to realize the savings by refunding the New Bonds. However, any such refunding of the New Bonds shall not cause the debt service payments to be increased above,or extended beyond, the terms of the New Bonds. Section VIII. in the event there are any disputes arising under this Agreement, those disputes shall initially be discussed in a settlement conference to be held among the following:one (1)member of the City Council; the Mayor; the City Attorney; two (2)members of the Board of Commissioners;and the County Attorney. if there is no resolution of the dispute at the settlement conference,the dispute shall be submitted to mediation,pursuant to the Rules of Alternative Dispute Resolution prior to initiating litigation. In the event that the parties cannot agree on an acceptable mediator, a mediator shall be appointed by the Judge of the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Section IX. The parties agree to take all steps necessary to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement,including recommendations to the Hamilton County Redevelopment Commission,to pass such resolutions and ordinances as are necessary to issue the New Bonds and to implement the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ALL OF WHICH IS AGREED by and between the City of Carmel, the Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County,and the Hamilton County Council, on the dates set out herein. Adopted this/ day of August, 2005. COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA / /gam s�P - �0 P sidi i•-r ! ••Wald E. Carter ' i Kev e i • •'f t P/roempore !ejs. Ma Fred':, ,/', wre a Mark Ratt ann J,se• C. .riffiths RichartSiZtleirp ATTES ,� J' Diana L. Cordray, !AMC, Cleric-Tr -urer BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HAMIL N OUNTY Date: S-Zt-CAS C ristine an g. ' Of Steven C. Dillinger A , } - Steven A. Holt ATTEST: Robin M. Mills,Auditor This Interlocal Agreement ratified and approved by the Hamilton County Council this {p day of st, 2005. HAMILTON COUNTY COUNCIL M O; r E Carter = es J. :-lden >al.. - _ . dr di Levine r c>c„,,, Hiatt s Rick M '•ney /r wee Sch ' . 's'A, AK" p'. Br =eaver ATTEST: Po-I,tea, o - Robin M. Mills, Auditor Prepared by: Michael.A. Howard Howard &Associates 694 Logan Street Noblesville, IN 46060 (317)773-4212 THOMSON TIE DISTRICT PROJECT BUDGET 2005 SERIES 1. ROW Acquisition $ 3,313,500 Illinois Street from Clarian to 126th Street 2. Design Costs Illinois Street 286,500 to 126t Street TOTAL $ 3,600,000 2006 SERIES 1. ROW Acquisition $ 1,740,000 Illinois Street from 126th Street to 136th Street 2. Construction & Construction 11,099,412 Inspection Illinois Street Clarian to 136th Street 3. 3`d Avenue Southwest and 2,400,000 4th Avenue Southwest Realignment 4. Contingency $ 260,588 TOTAL $15,500,000 EXHIBIT A PROJEC_r DESCRIPTION • The proposed Project consists of road improvements, which will serve and benefit the Area, including land acquisition for the extension of Illinois Street north from 126`'` Street to I36t Street, and construction of Illinois Street from Clarian Hospital to 136" Street (the "Project"). Bond proceeds will also be used to fund capitalized interest through February 1,2008;to partially fund a debt service reserve equal to the Reserve Requirement(defined in the Bond Resolution)for the Bonds and the 2005 Bonds;and to pay bond issuance expenses. • THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA("AREA") The Commission established the Area and allocation area (coterminous with the Area) by adopting a Declaratory Resolution on April 17, 1990 and a Confirmatory Resolution on April 16, 1991. The Area is comprised of approximately seventy acres within the City of Carmel in Hamilton County, Indiana, located at the Meridian Street (U.S. Highway.31)exit of Interstate Highway 465 adjoining the north boundary of the corporate limits of the City of Indianapolis (which is in Marion County). The Area is currently occupied by a variety of companies; including Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. which currently occupies two buildings, Meridian Real Estate Services which leases its building to a number of companies, the former Lilly Industries building which is partially occupied by the lU Medical Group,and a heart hospital and medical office building which are members of the for-profit St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services network. SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT The Bonds do not constitute a corporate obligation of the County. The Bonds shall constitute an indebtedness of the Commission payable in accordance with the terms of the Bond Resolution and secured by the pledge of the funds and accounts defined and described therein, including the Tax Increment, Pledged COIT on a parity with the Outstanding City Obligations (defined herein) and any interest earnings (collectively, the Trust Estate.) (Please refer to the Bond Resolution shown in Appendix C, and also to the section entitled "Risks to Bondholders" contained in this Official Statement). The Bonds will rank on a parity with the 2005 Bonds. The District is not obligated to pay the debt service on the Bonds from any source other than the sources described above. Neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing power of the District or the County is pledged to the payment of the principal of or the interest on the Bonds. The debt service shall be payable from the following: FROM T.4X INCREMENT Tax Increment consists of the tax proceeds attributable to all real property assessed value within the Area, as of the assessment date in excess of the base assessed value,as defined in IC 36-7-14-39(a)reduced by the additional credit (the "Additional Credit") provided for in IC 36-7-14-39.5 as such statutory provision exists on the date of issuance of the Bonds(referred to throughout this Official Statement as the"Tax increment"). The base assessed value means the net assessed value of all the property in the Area as finally determined for the assessment date immediately preceding the effective date of a declaratory resolution pursuant to IC 36-7-14-39 establishing the allocation areas. The base assessment date of the Area is March I, 1990. • • I -5- HAMILTON COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION b c4 Thomson Electronics Economic Dei'elopmenl Area l) SCHEDULE OF AMORTIZATION OF 519,080,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BANDS OF 2006 Assumes Bonds dated March 16,2006 "%) I n Total • Debt Capitalized Net bond Year a; Payment Principal Interest 35 Date Outstanding Principal Rate Interest Service Interest Debt Service Debt Service $341,273.44 $341,273.44 ($341,273.44) 50.00 , 08101!07 519,080,000 455,031.25 455,031.25 (455,031.25) 0.00 $0.00 Q8/01/07 19,080,000 0.00 0&01/07 19080,000 455,03125 455,031.25 (455.031.25) 0.00 0.00 02/01108 19,080,000 455,031.25 455,031.25 (455,031.25) 455,031,25 08/01/08 19,080 000 455 031.25 455,031.25 455,031_25 455,031.25 455,031.25 910,062.50 0 0009 9080,000 455,03125 710 631.25 710 031.25 • 08/01/09 19,080.000 $255 000 3.75% 710,250.00 1,420,281.25 450,250,00 710 250.00 02101!10 18825,000 260,060 3.90% 710,180,00 08/01/10 18,565 000 265,000 3.90% 445,180.00 710,180.00 710 010,00 1 420,192.50 02.'01/11 18,300,000 270,000 4,00% 440,012.50 710,012.50 710 012.50 08!01/11 18,030000 275,000 • 400% 434,612.50 709,612.50 709,112.50 1,418,72500 02101/12 17,755,000 280,000 4.10% 429,112.50 709,1€2.50 2 4.10% 423,372.50 703,372,50 703,372.50 08/01/12 17,495000 95,000 712,632.50 712,632.50 1,416,005.00 02/01/13 17,195 000 295,000 4.20% 417,632.50 711,437.50 08/01/13 16,900000 300,000 4,20% 411,437.50 7114 711 37.50 710,137,50 [,421,575,00 02/01/14 710,137.50 01/14 16,600,000 305,000 4.30% 0.00 0801/14 16,295 000 310,000 43 708,58 0% 398,580.00 708,580.00 • 02101/15 15,985,000 315,000 708,5 80.00 1,415,495.00 j 00 4.40% 391,915,00 766,915.00 709,985 00 08/01115 15,67p000 325,000 4.40% 384,985.00 709,985.00 709,985 1,417,820.00 • `: OZOU16 15,345000 330,000 4.50% 377,835.00 707,83500 7104L0.00 0801/16 15.015,000 340,000 4.50% 370,410.00 710,410.00 418,{70.00 4.50% 362,760.00 707,760,00 707,760.00 I. A 42!01!17 14,675,000 345,000 704,497.50 p 4 50% 354,997.50 704,997.50 02;01/17 14,330,000 365,000 712,122,50 1,417,12000 02!01!18 3980,000 365,000 • 4.50% 347,122.50 712,122,50 708,9!0.00 -t 08/01/18 13,615,000 370,000 4.50% 338,910,00 708,910.00 710,585.00 1,419,445.00 02!01/19 13,245,000 380,000 4.60% 330585.00 710,585.00 • 71 1,84500 08/01/19 12,865,000 390,000 4.60% 321,845.00 711,845.00 711,845,00 1,419 720.00 02/01/20 12475,000 395,000 4.70% 312,875.00 707,875.00 708,592.50 08/01/20 12,080,000 405,000 4.70% 303,592.50 708,592.50 709,075.00 1,417,667.50 0201/21 11,675,000 415,000 4.75% 294,075.00 709,075.00 709,0 5.00 425,000 4.75% 284,218.75 709,218.75 08/01/21 11,260,000 10,835,000 709,125.00 1,418,343,75 02/01/22 10,835,000 435,000 (1) 5.00% 274,125.00 709,125.00 708,250.00 08!01/22 10,400,000 445,000 (1) 500% 263,250.00 708,250.00 718, 50.00 1,420,375.00 02/01123 9,955 000 460,000 (1) 5 00% 252,125.00 712,125.00 710,625.00 08/01123 9,495,000 470,000 (1) 5_UO% 240,625.00 710,625.00 708,875.00 1,419,500.00 480,000 (1) 5.00% 228,875.00 708,875.09 08/0124 9,025,000 ) 08/01/24 8,545,000 490000 (1) 5.00% 216,875.00 706,875.00 706,875.00 `0 709,625.00 1,416,500.00 02/01/25 8.055,000 505,000 (I) 5.00% 204,625.00 709,625.00 712 000.00 08!0125 7,550,000 520,000 (1) 5.00% 192,000.00 712,000.00 709,000.00 1,421,000.00 • 0210126 7,030,000 704,0 30,000 530,000 (1) 5.00% 179,000.00 709,000.00 08%01/26 6,500,000 705,750.00 540,000 (2) 5.10% 165,750.00 705,750.00 1 75000 1 417,730.00 02/01/27 5,960,000 560,000 (2) 5.10% 151,980.00 7119 71 80.00 707,700.00 08/01/27 5,400,000 570,000 (2) 5.10% 137,700.00 707,700.00 708,165.00 1,415,865.00 02/01/28 4,830,000 585,000 (2) 5.10% 123,165.00 708,165.00 708,247.50 ()K0la5 4,245,000 600,000 (2) 5.10% 108,247.50 708,247,50 712,947,50 1,421,14500 02/01/29 3,645,000 620,000 (2) 5.10% 92,947,50 712.947.50 707,137.50 08/01/29 3,025,000 630,000 (2) 5.10% 77,137.50 707,137.50 711,072.50 1,418,210.00 02/01/30 2,395 000 650,000 (2) 5.10% 61,072.50 711,072.50 . 904,497.50 08/01/30 1,745 000 860,000 (2) 5.10% 44,497.50 904,497.50 907,567.50 {,812,065.00 02/01/31 885,000 885,000 (2) 5.10% 22,567.50 907,567.50 Totals $19080,000 139 9-69 $34,219,479.69 ($1,766,367,19) $32,513,112,50 $32,513,112.50 (1)54,335,000 of Term Bonds due February 1,2026. (2)$6,500,000 of Term Bonds due February 1.2031, I (Subject to the comments in the accompanying report dated March 3,2006 of Umbaugh.) 11: B4 0. HAMILTON COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Thomson Electronics Econonzic Development Area AMORTIZATION OF 55,580.000 OF OUTSTANDING TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS OF 2005 Bonds dated November 3,2005 Total Payment Principal Interest Debt Bond Year Date Outstanding Principal Rate Interest Service Debt Service 08/01/06 55,580,000 570,000 3.00% 5125,680.00 $195,680.00 02/01/07 5,510,000 70,000 3.20% 124,630.00 194,630.00 5390,310.00 08/01/07 5,440,000 70,000 3.20% 123,510.00 193,510.00 02/01/08 5,370,000 75,000 3.40% 122,390,00 197,390.00 390 900.00 08/01/08 5,295,000 75,000 3.40% 121,115.00 196,115,00 02/01/09 5,220,000 75,000 3.60% 119,840,00 194,840.00 390,955.00 08/01/09 5,145,000 75,000 3.60% 118.490.00 193,490.00 02/01/10 5,070,000 80,000 3.70% 117,140,00 197,140,00 390,630.00 08/01/10 4,990,000 80,000 3.70% 115,660.00 195,660.00 02/01/11 4,910,000 80,000 3.80% 114,180.00 194,180.00 389,840.00 08/01/11 4,830,000 85,000 3.80% 112,660.00 197 660.00 02/01/12 4,745,000 85,000 3.90% 111,045.00 196,045.00 393,705.00 08/01/12 4,560,000 85,000 3.90% 109,387,50 194,387.50 02101'13 4,575,000 90,000 4.00% 107,730,00• 197,730,00 392,117.50 08/01/13 4,485,000 90.000 4.00% 105,930,00 195 930.00 02/01/14 4,395,000 90,000 (I) 410% 104,130.00 194.130.00 390,060.00 08/01/14 4,305,000 95,000 (I) 4.10% 102,285.00 V97,285.00 02/01/15 4,210 000 95,000 (2) 4.20% 100337.50 < 195.337.50 392,622.50 08/01/15 4,1 15,000 95,000 (2) 4.20% 98,342.50 193,342.50 02/01/16 4,020,000 100,000 (3) 4.25% 96,347.50 196,347.50 389,690.00 08/01/16 3,920,000 100,000 (3) 4,25% 94,222.50 194,222.50 02/01/17 3,820,000 105,000 (4) 4.30% 92,09750 197,097,50 391,320,00 08/01/17 3,715,000 105,000 (4) 4.30% 89,840.00 194,840.00 02/01/18 3,610 000 110,000 (5) 4.40% 87,562.50 197,582.50 392 422.50 08/01/18 3,500,000 110,000 (5) 4.40%' 85,162.50 195,162.50 02/01/19 3,390,000 110,000 (6) 450% 82,742,50 192,742.50 387,905.00 08/0€/19 3,280,000 115,000 (6) 4.50% 80,267.50 195,267.50 02/01/20 3,165,000 115,000 (7) 4.60% 77,680.00 192,680.00 387,947.50 08/01/20 3,050,000 120.000 (7) 4.60% 75,035.00 195,035.00 02/01/21 2,930,000 125,000 (8) 4.70% 72,275.00 197 275.00 392,310_00 08/01/21 2,805,000 125,000 (8) 4.70% 69,337.50 194,337.50 02/01/22 2,680,000 130,000 (9) 4.75% 66,400.00 196,400.00 390,737.50 08/01/22 2,550,000 130,000 (9) 4.75% 63,312.50 193,312.50 02/01/23 2,420,000 135,000 (10) 4.80°/ 60325.00 195,225.00 388,537.50 08/01/23 2,285,000 140,000 (10) 4.80% 56,985.00 196,985.00 02/01/24 2,145,000 140,000 (I I) 5.00% 53,625.00 193,625.00 390.610,00 08/01/24 2,005,000 145,000 (11) 5.00% 50,125.00 195,125.00 02/01/25 1,860,000 150,000 (11) 5.00% 46,500.00 196,500.00 391625.00 08/01/25 1,710,000 155,000 (11) 5.00% 42,750.00 197,750,00 02/01/26 1,555,000 155,000 (11) 5,00% 38,875.00 193 875.00 391,625.00 08/01/26 1,400,000 160,000 (I i) 5.00% 35,000.00 195,000.00 02/01/27 1,240,000 165,000 (11) 5.00% 31,000.00 196.00000 391,000.00 08/01/27 -1,075,000 170,000 (11) 5.00% 26,875.00 196,875.00 02/01/28 905,000 175,000 (11) 5.00% 72,625.00 197625.00 394,500.00 08/01/28 730,000 175,000 (I I) 5.00% 18,250.00 193,250.00 02/01/29 555,000 180,000 (II) 5.00% 13,875.00 19387500 387,125.00 08/01/29 375,000 185,000 (II) 5.00% 9375.00 194,375.00 02/01/30 190,000 190,000 (11) 5.00% 4,750.00 194,750,00 389,125.00 Totals $5,580,000 $3,797,620.00 59,377,620.00 59,377,62000 (I) $185,000 of term bonds due August 1,2014. (6) 5225 000 of term bonds due August I.2019. (2) $190,000 of term bonds due August 1,2015, (7) $235,000 of term bonds due August 1,2020. (3) 5200,000 of term bonds due August 1,2016. (8) $250,000 of term bonds due August 1,2021. (4) $210,000 of term bonds due August I,2017. (9) $260,000 of term bonds due August 1,2022. (5) $220,000 of term bonds duc August I.2018. (10) $275,000 of term bonds due August I,2023. (II) 52,145 000 of term bonds due February 1,2030. (Subject to the comments in the accompanying report dated March 3,2006 of Umbaugh.) B-9 -._. ,''...-d.-T. .rr**&Tfil gTt' $4'-- .t �E'cq"�'' ' . k? '7.e :l7 "6Srer a�ls 1.< '� ' .�::7 `�k, � ftl m,��� �`).""�,,"'d'Y ..-..'��t��; '�°,"`�.�'._ ._ .,,,��,< �.�.: _ s � , �.i�'... .c....�'"fit .., ���t,. �., HAMILTON COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Thomson Electronics Economic Development Area COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND DEBT SERVICE Estimated Less: Bond Payments Collection Tax COIT Total 2005 2006 Estimated Estimated Year Increment Pledge Revenues Bonds Bonds Totals Surplus Coverage (I) (2) 2006 $1,563,770 $650,000 $2,213,770 $390,310 $0 $390,310 $1,823,460 (3) 567% 2007 1,682,560 650,000 2,332,560 390,900 0 390,900 1,941,660 (3) 597% 2008 1,801,360 650,000 2,451,360 390,955 910,063 1,301,018 1,150,343 188% 2009 1,920,150 650,000 2,570,150 390,630 1,420,281 1,810,911 '759,239 142% 2010 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 389,840 1,420,193 1,810,033 760,119 142% 2011 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 393,705 1,418,725 1,812,430 757,722 142% 2012 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 392,118 1,416,005 1,808,123 762,029 142% 2013 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 390,060 1,421,575 1,811,635 758,517 142% 2014 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 392,623 1,415,495 1,808,118 762,034 142% 2015 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 389,690 1,417,820 1,807,510 762,642 142% 2016 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 391,320 1,418,170 1,809,490 760,662 142% 2017 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 392,423 1,417,120 1,809,543 760,609 142% • 2038 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 387,905 1,419,495 1,807,400 762,752 142% • 2019 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 387,948 1,419,720 1,807,668 762.484 142% 1 2020 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 392,310 1,417,668 1,809,978 760,174 142% 2021 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 390,738 1,418,344 1,809,081 761,070 142% 2022 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 388,538 1,420,375 1,808,913 761,239 142% 2023 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 390,610 1,419,500 1,810,110 760,042 142% 2024 - 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 391,625 1,416,500 1,808,125 762,027 142% 2025 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 391,625 1,421,000 1,812,625 757.527 142% j 2026 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 391,000 1,417,730 1,808,730 761,422 142% 2027 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 394,500 1,415,865 1,810,365 759,787 142% 2028 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 387,125 1,421,195 1,808,320 761,832 142% 2029 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 389,125 1,418,210 1,807,335 762,817 142% 2030 1,920,152 650,000 2,570,152 1,812,065 1,812,065 758,087 142% Totals $47,291,023 $16,250,000 • $63,541,023 $9,377,620 $32,513,113 $41,890,733 $21,650,291 {l} See page B-9. (2) See page B-8. (3) The Tax Increment surplus in 2006 and 2007 has been committed to funding other improvements serving and benefiting the Area. (Subject to the comments in the accompanying report • dated March 3,2006 of Umbaugh.) B-10 i • . Prescribed by St card of Accounts COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE OF TA_., _.STRIBUTION County Form — J ,` . -No.22(Rev.1998) Hamilton .Indiana. December,, 2014 Prepare four copies I hereby certify that I have this day issued Warrant No. on the Treasurer of Hamilton 1.Taxing Unit County Indiana in favor of Thompson Consumer Electronics 2.County Treasurer who is of Thompson Consumer Electronics-V#002252(Hamilton Co.Treasurer) 3.County Auditor 4.SBTC(State Tax Board) in the sum of 3388,531.47 ' on account of taxes due said governmental unit as follows: Taxes Deductions TIF Net Total TIF District General Property License Excise Tota' Advance Tax Advance Excise Refunds Other Distributed Thompson Consumer Electronics 622,680.10 0.00 622,680.10 0.00 0.00 269,377.76 -35,229:13 388,531.47 Totals 622,680.10 0.00 622,680.10 0.00 0.00 269,377.76 -35,229.13 388,531.47 PC24.(m. o 90,2,x.-53 (5E, 72.7. 75 ) ( .38R . 531 . 47) ,Short 4 4, 993. 76 c� t a-n e- �h� t� Settlement i .{`r`.it�'�.,9'F��„-_.: - ,. :; County Auditor Thomson TIF 2013 pay 2014 December Settlement Distribution Gross Distribution from Collections: $622,680.10 Less TIF Refunds due to appeals: 234,148.63 Net Distribution: 388,531.47 Amount currently in Fund: 58,727.75 Bond Payment: 902,253.00 Shortage $454,993.78