West Park Master Plan (2016)DECEMBER 13, 2016
WEST PARK MASTER PLAN
CARMEL CLAY PARKS & RECREATION
Carmel West Park B
Acknowledgements
cArmel clAy PArks & recreAtion | december 13, 2016
PARK BOARD
James L. Engledow, President
Richard F. Taylor III, Vice President
Jenn Kristunas, Treasurer
Joshua A. Kirsh, Secretary
Wendy Franklin
Kathie Freed
James D. Garretson
Nicholas Plopper
Linus Rude
CCPR CORE TEAM
Mark Westermeier, CPRP
Michael W. Klitzing, CPRE
Michael Allen, CRPR
Kurtis Baumgartner, CPRP
Ben Johnson
Audrey Kostrzewa
Lindsay Labas
PLANNING TEAM
SEH of Indiana
Williams Architects
Pros Consulting
PUBLIC EDUCATION SERIES
Steve Apfelbaum- Applied Ecological Services
Melissa Guffey- Recreation Insides
Neelay Bhatt- Pros Consulting
CCarmel West Park
table of Contents
Carmel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
INTRODUCTION
INVENTORY & ANALYSIS
COMMUNITY INPUT
MASTER PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION
APPENDIX
• ACQUISITION HISTORY
• PRELIMINARY PRO FORMA
• OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
• POLLING RESULTS
• PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER INPUT
4
8
18
32
66
81
85
87
91
167
1
2
3
4
5
A
West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 20164
Chapter 1: IntroduCtIon
INTRODUCTION 1
Photo 1-1. Existing west Park Boardwalk
5Carmel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016 West Park master Plan
ChaPter 1: introDuCtion
Carmel and Clay Township are well known for their
high quality of life and excellent park and recreation
system. Founded in 1991, Carmel Clay Parks &
Recreation (CCPR) was established through an
Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City
of Carmel and Clay Township in Indiana. CCPR was
community, manage and develop existing spaces and
resources, and create a sustainable future for parks
and environmentally conscious parks system. CCPR
manages and maintains more than 500 acres of park
land and numerous recreation facilities, with 71% of
all Carmel Clay households using CCPR’s parks or
services at least once per year. CCPR contributes to
the community’s outstanding quality of life by providing
enriching, enjoyable escapes through recreation,
West Park is CCPR’s only park west of U.S. 31/
Meridian Street, making this a highly popular
destination and important asset for the community.
The original 75 acres for West Park was purchased in
1997 and developed in three phases between 2000
and 2002 based on the 1999 West Park Site Master
Plan. Some of the original amenities, such as the
playground and spray pad, are nearing the end of their
anticipated life and will soon need to be replaced. The
park was expanded through the acquisition of adjacent
property in 2003 (5 acres) and 2005 (40 acres),
accounting for its current 120 acres.
In light of the aging infrastructure and expansion
of the park due to acquisitions, the time is right for
CCPR to develop a new West Park Master Plan that
will help guide the park’s development over the next
several years. To accomplish this task, a project team
was compiled to assist CCPR with recognizing the
desired path forward. This process incorporated public
engagement, background research, data analysis,
an action plan to assist with implementation. This
report is the product of an open and transparent
process highlighted by an intense, three-day
schematic design charrette that engaged a wide range
of community residents and project stakeholders.
West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 20166
Chapter 1: IntroduCtIon
Figure 1-1. 1998 Aerial of West Park Property Figure 1-2. 2014 Aerial of Existing West ParkWest Park, Carmel, IN
Basemap information here
Parcels
January 4, 2016 0 0.1 0.20.05 mi
0 0.15 0.30.075 km
1:7,200
±
Figure 1-3. Aerial Showing Expansions
Original West Park
(75 ac.)
2003 Acquisition
(5 ac.)
2005 Acquisition
(40 ac.)
7Carmel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016 West Park master Plan
ChaPter 1: introDuCtion
West Park Master Plan kicked off in August 2015 with
a stakeholder meeting and site tours with the project
team and CCPR staff. The team outlined the project
delivery process and public engagement that would
be rolled out in 2016, headlined by a three-day design
charrette in Carmel.
The design team met with CCPR staff and
stakeholders and reviewed various ecological,
hydraulic, cultural and historic documents to develop
a better understanding of the site’s characteristics
and potential for development. To engage community
feedback, the project team developed an Educational
Series, consisting of three public presentations
to engage the community on early childhood
development, ecology and park programming.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
structure the three-day design charrette that took place
May 2 through May 4, 2016, in Carmel near West
Park. Throughout the three days, the project team
programming, goals and guiding principles, framework
plans and a draft master plan, through an inclusive
and transparent process.
designs based on input at the last charrette meeting
along with additional input gather from CCPR staff
and on-site interviews of West Park users. An
implementation strategy was also developed and is
included within Chapter 5 of this report.
8
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
INVENTORY & ANALYSIS 2
Photo 2-1. Historic 1987 Image of southeast West Park site
9
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
SITE CONDITIONS
Historically agricultural lands since settlement of
the area, the original 75 acres for West Park was
purchased in 1997 and developed in three phases
between 2000 and 2002 based on the 1999 West Park
Site Master Plan. The park was expanded through the
acquisition of adjacent property in 2003 (5 acres) and
2005 (40 acres), accounting for its current 120 acres.
The original park and west 40 acre parcel expansion
contained covenants restricting certain types of
development, which are summarized to the right.
Understanding the project area, its natural features
and built systems, along with its cultural history is
an important initial step in maximizing potential and
respecting limitations and constraints, critical for
sustainable development and reasonable planning
goals. The design team focused the inventory and
analysis of the project area on transportation, land
use, culture, environment and infrastructure. The
stakeholders, along with the general public for
Photo 2-2. View from top of Jill’s Hill, looking southwest
Original Park
1. The property shall be used solely for park and
recreational facilities and activities.
2.
be constructed to adjoin the property to the adjacent
school property.
3. For so long as Mrs. Perelman makes her residence
on any part of the adjacent property, there shall be
no swimming pool or lighting of any facilities on the
property without the consent of Mrs. Perelman.**
4. To the extent that it is reasonable to do so, CCPR
may consider input from those landowners whose
property is adjacent to the property for the planning
of the facilities to be constructed on the property.
** No longer occupied
West 40 acres
1. The development of the property for residential and/
or commercial development is prohibited.
2. The property shall be used solely for park and
recreational facilities and activities.
South 5 acres
• No restrictions
DEED RESTRICTIONS
10
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 2-1. Regional Aerial Figure 2-2. Regional Topography
Figure 2-3. 1936 Aerial
Figure 2-6. Historic Ecosystems Figure 2-7. Existing Ecosystems
Figure 2-5. 1971 AerialFigure 2-4. 1962 Aerial
11
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Photo 2-3. Riley Parcel
Photo 2-4. North Woodlands
Photo 2-5. View of Shelter and Toilet Buildings
Photo 2-6. Drop-off and Rain Gardens
Photo 2-7. Existing Playground and Water Playground
Photo 2-8. Jill’s Hill and adjacent meadows
12
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 2-8. Soil Data
Figure 2-9. Existing Land use
Figure 2-10. Site Topography
13
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Photo 2-9. View North from top of Jill’s Hill
Photo 2-10. Park View Photo 2-11. Existing Wetland Boardwalk
The project team evaluated a series of existing
environmental, infrastructure and social conditions
of the project site, including hydrology, topography,
soils, historic and current vegetation, circulation,
parking, utilities, park programming and facilities, to
better understand the site’s role as a community park
and ecosystem. These system maps are shown on
Figures 2-1 through Figure 2-9. Existing site photos
have been included in Photo 2-1 through Photo 2-11,
to convey the existing character and quality of West
Park.
TOPOGRAPHY & HYDROLOGY
West Park serves as a headwaters for regional
drainage for the West Carmel area. The site is
Jill’s Hill in the center of the existing park. Due to the
areas creating new wetlands on-site, where surface
runoff is impeded by lack of slope or by man-made
impacts, such as the northern wooded trails. It is
anticipated that additional wetlands may exist on the
newly acquired west 40 acres and constructed ponds
are within the new 5 acre parcel to the southeast. The
role of topography and drainage on the overall master
plan will be a primary driver for the design.
ECOLOGY
West Park was evaluated for existing vegetation
(Figure 2-7), along with educated theories on the
historic vegetation patterns through the site (Figure
2-6). Remnants of historic ecosystems can still be
found in the northern woodland within both the original
park and west 40 acre expansion. While both of
these areas have seen some degradation due to past
development and/or farming, large trees still remain
and the areas can be managed to restore the quality of
these ecosystems. The historic ecosystem types and
designs. Below are the assumptions of pre-settlement
ecosystems on site (Figure 2-6).
• Sedge Meadow/Wet Prairie
• Beech-Maple Woods
• Dry mesic woods
• Rough fringe
• Mesic Prairie
LAND USE
An assessment of the existing site development was
used to develop an existing land use plan (Figure 2-9).
• Natural State = 70 acres (58%)
• Disturbed = 20.4 acres (17%)
• Developed = 29.6 acres (25%)
14
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Photo 2-12. Existing Shelter Photo 2-13. Existing Restroom Building
Photo 2-14. Existing Silo Shelters Photo 2-15. Existing House, The Groves
Photo 2-16. Existing Barn, The Groves Photo 2-17. Existing Structure, The Groves
15
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
The existing facilities at West Park include a restroom
building, a large shelter, and smaller picnic shelters
clustered throughout the Park. These structures were
designed in an agrarian style to represent the farming
history of the site. They were built approximately in
1998. The structures appear in fair to good condition,
and with regular maintenance, the structures could
continue to provide support amenities for the Park for
a number of years.
Most recently, the CCPR acquired the 40 acre property
immediately to the west of the original park. Originally
a homestead for a farm, this addition currently contains
a house, a barn, and a storage shelter. Over the years,
the structures have fallen in disrepair and are in poor
condition. While currently serving as needed storage
space for CCPR, extensive renovation to these
facilities is required. Due to their residential nature,
the structures are not compatible to the programmatic
objectives of CCPR.
EXISTING FACILITIES
16
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 2-11. Development Suitability Figure 2-12. Facility Development Suitability
17
Chapter 2: Inventory & analysIs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreatIon | DeCeMber 13, 2016
DEVELOPMENT SUITABILITY
Photo 2-18. Existing Activity Core
Photo 2-19. Woodlands
analysis of the site with CCPR staff and the general
public, the project team prepared development
suitability maps as shown in Figure 2-11 and Figure
2-12. The project team considered the development
potential based on the existing topography, hydrology,
soils and vegetation to understand potential for new
construction within the park, with respects to moderate
and severe restrictions for development (Figure 2-12).
• Preserved (little to no development) = 55.2 acres
• Low-impact development (trails, open space
areas, landscape restoration) = 21.6 acres
• Sustainable development (facilities, pavements
and park programming spaces) = 43.2 acres
Photo 2-20. Pond and Wetlands
18
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
COMMUNITY INPUT 3
Photo 3-1. Day One of Charrette
19
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-2. Public Education Meetings
Photo 3-3. Stakeholder/ Focus Group Meetings
Photo 3-4. Three Day Community Charrette
To provide an inclusive and transparent master
planning process for West Park, the project team
developed a series of touch points with CCPR staff,
key stakeholders and the general public to solicit
feedback on the project.
The project included a series of public Educational
Sessions which served as an opportunity for outreach
and education on critical project elements. This series
of three applicable topics informed and educated
potential participants regarding technical issues that
were to be addressed in the upcoming charrette,
• January 26, 2016 - Early Childhood Development
in Parks, Play and Spray (Melissa Guffey of
Recreation inSites)
• February 23, 2016 - Ecology in Recreation and
Education (Steve Apfelbaum of Applied Ecological
Services)
• March 22, 2016 - International Recreation Trends
(Neelay Bhatt of PROS Consulting)
During the Education Sessions, audience members
were polled on their interests on the topics presented.
Valuable feedback was received regarding preferences
for types of playground equipment, recreational
facilities and programs, plus the level of support for
ecological restorations.
Following the Educational Sessions, the project team
met with local schools to engage input from school-
aged children on program opportunities for West Park.
The public was heavily engaged in the three-day
design charrette that occurred May 2-4, 2016. The
entire three-day charrette was open to the public and
nightly presentations were held to review progress and
solicit feedback.
The team additionally utilized a project website
(YourWestPark.com) and park intercepts to solicit
input. Summaries are provided in the Appendix.
20
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
PRE-CHARRETTE
EDUCATIONAL SESSIONS
“WHAT WE HEARD”
Childhood Development in Parks, Play & Spray
Melissa Guffey of Recreation inSites
January 26, 2016
• Deep ties to existing play/spray
• Potentially more inclusive
•
• Integrate into nature
• Improved support amenities and facilities
•
Ecology in Recreation and Education
Steve Apfelbaum of Applied Ecological Services
February 23, 2016
• Deep connection to nature and water features
• Historic patterns guide restoration and habitat
• Support pollinators
• Manage invasives
• Potential to broaden access and education
• Potential for new management strategies
• Enhance winter experience
• Support for some level of indoor facilities
• Improve trail access to West Park
• Address 116th St.
• Manage dog activity
• Proactively manage special events & parking
• Respect neighbors
International Recreation Trends
Neelay Bhatt of PROS Consulting
March 22, 2016
• Multi-generational Recreation
• Innovative water features
•
• Adventure play
• Space for year-round activities
• Technology in the park
Photo 3-5. Education Session (1/26/2016)
Photo 3-6. Polling Response Card
See Appendix for polling results at public meetings.
21
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-7. College Wood ESE Focus Group
Photo 3-8. Carmel Moms Focus Group
Photo 3-9. Public tour of West Park
STAKEHOLDER INPUT
A variety of stakeholders were engaged for input
and feedback throughout the entire master planning
process for West Park. The stakeholder groups are
listed below, minutes from the meetings can be found
in the appendix of this report.
Stakeholder Groups
• Neighbors/HOA representatives
• Carmel Clay Schools
• University High School
• Carmel Clay Library
• Carmel Dad’s Club
•
• Environmental Groups & Regulatory Agencies
• One Zone Chamber of Commerce
• Area Parks & Rec Departments
• Parents of Children with Disabilities
• CCPR staff
• Carmel Moms Focus Group
• College Wood & West Clay ESE students
• Residents/Neighbors
22
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-10. Interactive Public Exercise, Day One
Photo 3-12. Charrette, Day ThreePhoto 3-11. Site Tour, Day One of Charrette
educational institution that developed the NCI
Charrette System™, a holistic, collaborative planning
process that harnesses the talents and energies
of all interested parties to create and support a
feasible plan. The NCI Charrette System features
an accelerated period within the overall planning
process — typically between three and ten days —
multidisciplinary team of technical professionals work
closely together in groups to discuss options and work
through design challenges. At key stages, community
input is collected by facilitators and is transformed
into a working plan. As the process continues, it
builds synergy from the constant and continuous
The Carmel West Park design charrette was a three-
day workshop that occurred May 2-4, 2016. The
schedule of events and activities for the charrette are
shown in Figure 3-1.
The charrette venue selection was an important part
of the process to ensure maximum participation for
the residents of Carmel and provide close proximity
to West Park. The charrette location was held at the
Meeting House in the Village of West Clay subdivision,
approximately 1.5 miles from West Park.
Over the three-day period, over 100 people
participated in the charrette process, either through
site tours, attending the evening presentations or
popping in throughout the day to engage the design
team.
CHARRETTE
23
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan DRAFT
Three Day Design Charrette - Detailed Working Schedule 3/22/2016
DAY One DAY Three
Time 2-May 4-May
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM Production Design
11:00 AM
NOON
Working Lunch
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM Production Design
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
Key
8:00-9:00 AM Breakfast
Debrief w/ CCPR Team
Guided Public Site Tours on the
Hour: 8, 9, 10 AM
11:30-1:PM Review Alternative Concepts with
Steering Committee
Working Lunch
2:00-3:00 PM
Technical Meeting #2
Organize Program and
Alternative Design Options
DAY Two
3-May
7:00 - 8:00am
Design Team/CCPR Team Breakfast Debrief
1:00-2:00 PM
Technical Meeting #1
Develop Preferred
Alternative(s)
8:00 - 9:00 AM Project Team Coordination Meeting
9:00 - 11:30 AM
Develop Alternative Design Concepts
3:00-4:00 PM
Technical Meeting #3
4:00-5:00 PM
Technical Meeting #4
11:30-1:30 PM Design Team/CCPR
Team/Steering Committee
Working Lunch: Review Goals,
Opportunities, Issues, Guiding
Principles, Program
Public Meetings-
Community Input w/CCPR Team &
Steering Committee Participating
at Workshop Activities /
Discussions, Design Review, and
Open House Discussions
Charrette Technical Meetings -
Input From CCPR Staff, et. al.
Consultants Prepare Concept
Alternatives
Production Design by
Consultants
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #1,
Issues/Ideas & Programming
Workshop
Meeting Set Up Meeting Set Up and Team Dinner
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #3, Open
House Review of Preliminary
Master Plan
Meeting Set Up
Studio Breakdown
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #2, Alternatives Pin-Up
Studio Closed
Continue Design Work/ProductionTeam Dinner/Debrief
Figure 3-1. Charrette Schedule
24
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan DRAFT
Three Day Design Charrette - Detailed Working Schedule 3/22/2016
DAY One DAY Three
Time 2-May 4-May
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM Production Design
11:00 AM
NOON
Working Lunch
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM Production Design
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
Key
8:00-9:00 AM Breakfast
Debrief w/ CCPR Team
Guided Public Site Tours on the
Hour: 8, 9, 10 AM
11:30-1:PM Review Alternative Concepts with
Steering Committee
Working Lunch
2:00-3:00 PM
Technical Meeting #2
Organize Program and
Alternative Design Options
DAY Two
3-May
7:00 - 8:00am
Design Team/CCPR Team Breakfast Debrief
1:00-2:00 PM
Technical Meeting #1
Develop Preferred
Alternative(s)
8:00 - 9:00 AM Project Team Coordination Meeting
9:00 - 11:30 AM
Develop Alternative Design Concepts
3:00-4:00 PM
Technical Meeting #3
4:00-5:00 PM
Technical Meeting #4
11:30-1:30 PM Design Team/CCPR
Team/Steering Committee
Working Lunch: Review Goals,
Opportunities, Issues, Guiding
Principles, Program
Public Meetings-
Community Input w/CCPR Team &
Steering Committee Participating
at Workshop Activities /
Discussions, Design Review, and
Open House Discussions
Charrette Technical Meetings -
Input From CCPR Staff, et. al.
Consultants Prepare Concept
Alternatives
Production Design by
Consultants
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #1,
Issues/Ideas & Programming
Workshop
Meeting Set Up Meeting Set Up and Team Dinner
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #3, Open
House Review of Preliminary
Master Plan
Meeting Set Up
Studio Breakdown
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #2, Alternatives Pin-Up
Studio Closed
Continue Design Work/ProductionTeam Dinner/Debrief
DAY ONE
Photo 3-13. Day One Public Site Tour Photo 3-14. Day One Public Site Tour
site tours and pre-public Steering Committee meeting
for the public meetings and to elicit any last minute
information. Community Meeting #1 established an
understanding of the project purpose, process, roles,
and opportunities for community involvement and to
gather public input on key project topics.
The public meeting concluded with a community
interactive design exercise (Sim Park) in which
park programs on site plans. All the potential
park programs were converted into playing cards.
Participants were broken into groups and the groups
discussed and developed consensus on the programs
they wanted to see in the park and generally where
they determined would be preferably located. Three
separate groups and design scenarios were generated
from this simulation, as shown in Figure 3-2.
25
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-15. Day One Sim Park Photo 3-16. Day One Sim Park
Photo 3-17. Day One Photo 3-18. Sim Park Results
26
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
DAY TWO
Photo 3-19. Day Two Photo 3-20. Day Two
Following day one of the charrette, the project team
spent the second day developing distinctly different
framework alternatives for West Park, based on
community input, project goals and principles.
Community Meeting #2 was held in the evening and
provided direction on a preferred framework plan.
Framework alternatives are shown on Figure 3-2.
West Park Master Plan DRAFT
Three Day Design Charrette - Detailed Working Schedule 3/22/2016
DAY One DAY Three
Time2-May 4-May
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM Production Design
11:00 AM
NOON
Working Lunch
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM Production Design
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
Key
8:00-9:00 AM Breakfast
Debrief w/ CCPR Team
Guided Public Site Tours on the
Hour: 8, 9, 10 AM
11:30-1:PM Review Alternative Concepts with
Steering Committee
Working Lunch
2:00-3:00 PM
Technical Meeting #2
Organize Program and
Alternative Design Options
DAY Two
3-May
7:00 - 8:00am
Design Team/CCPR Team Breakfast Debrief
1:00-2:00 PM
Technical Meeting #1
Develop Preferred
Alternative(s)
8:00 - 9:00 AM Project Team Coordination Meeting
9:00 - 11:30 AM
Develop Alternative Design Concepts
3:00-4:00 PM
Technical Meeting #3
4:00-5:00 PM
Technical Meeting #4
11:30-1:30 PM Design Team/CCPR
Team/Steering Committee
Working Lunch: Review Goals,
Opportunities, Issues, Guiding
Principles, Program
Public Meetings-
Community Input w/CCPR Team &
Steering Committee Participating
at Workshop Activities /
Discussions, Design Review, and
Open House Discussions
Charrette Technical Meetings -
Input From CCPR Staff, et. al.
Consultants Prepare Concept
Alternatives
Production Design by
Consultants
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #1,
Issues/Ideas & Programming
Workshop
Meeting Set Up Meeting Set Up and Team Dinner
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #3, Open
House Review of Preliminary
Master Plan
Meeting Set Up
Studio Breakdown
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #2, Alternatives Pin-Up
Studio Closed
Continue Design Work/ProductionTeam Dinner/Debrief
27
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-21. Day Two Photo 3-22. Day Two
Photo 3-23. Day Two Photo 3-24. Day Two
Figure 3-2. Framework Alternatives
28
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
DAY THREE
Photo 3-25. Day Three Photo 3-26. Day Three
of the preferred master plan, along with sketches,
sections, enlargements and calculations, based
off the preferred framework plan developed at
Community Meeting #2. The third day was primarily
a closed studio for design team production, however
some stakeholders and members of the public were
engaged by the design team throughout the day.
The charrette closed with Community Meeting #3, in
which the overall master plan was presented, along
with the sketches, sections, enlargements and other
data generated throughout the charrette. Comments
and update the master plan as shown within this
report.
West Park Master Plan DRAFT
Three Day Design Charrette - Detailed Working Schedule 3/22/2016
DAY One DAY Three
Time2-May 4-May
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM Production Design
11:00 AM
NOON
Working Lunch
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM Production Design
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
Key
8:00-9:00 AM Breakfast
Debrief w/ CCPR Team
Guided Public Site Tours on the
Hour: 8, 9, 10 AM
11:30-1:PM Review Alternative Concepts with
Steering Committee
Working Lunch
2:00-3:00 PM
Technical Meeting #2
Organize Program and
Alternative Design Options
DAY Two
3-May
7:00 - 8:00am
Design Team/CCPR Team Breakfast Debrief
1:00-2:00 PM
Technical Meeting #1
Develop Preferred
Alternative(s)
8:00 - 9:00 AM Project Team Coordination Meeting
9:00 - 11:30 AM
Develop Alternative Design Concepts
3:00-4:00 PM
Technical Meeting #3
4:00-5:00 PM
Technical Meeting #4
11:30-1:30 PM Design Team/CCPR
Team/Steering Committee
Working Lunch: Review Goals,
Opportunities, Issues, Guiding
Principles, Program
Public Meetings-
Community Input w/CCPR Team &
Steering Committee Participating
at Workshop Activities /
Discussions, Design Review, and
Open House Discussions
Charrette Technical Meetings -
Input From CCPR Staff, et. al.
Consultants Prepare Concept
Alternatives
Production Design by
Consultants
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #1,
Issues/Ideas & Programming
Workshop
Meeting Set UpMeeting Set Up and Team Dinner
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #3, Open
House Review of Preliminary
Master Plan
Meeting Set Up
Studio Breakdown
6:30 - 8:00 PM
Community Meeting #2, Alternatives Pin-Up
Studio Closed
Continue Design Work/ProductionTeam Dinner/Debrief
29
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Photo 3-27. Day Three Photo 3-28. Day Three
Photo 3-29. Day Three Photo 3-30. Day Three
30
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master plan Carmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
POST CHARRETTE
31
Chapter 3: Community input
West park master planCarmel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCember 13, 2016
Following the completion of the design charrette and
the preferred plan, the team worked on setting the
stage for implementation of the plan. Master plan
from CCPR staff and the general public. The design
team also took a closer look at the implementation of
the project by organizing the master plan into logical
phases or bundles, based on similar construction
activities and proximities, as shown in Chapter 5 of this
report.
This report will be provided to the Carmel/Clay Board
of Parks and Recreation (Park Board) for their review
and comments, along with that of the general public.
Once any appropriate revisions are made to the plan
based on direction from the Park Board or public input,
the master plan will be formally adopted by the Park
Board to guide future development of West Park.
32
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
MASTER PLAN 4
Figure 4-1. Site Plan
33
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
A Model of Connectivity
and ease of access, recognizing multiple transportation modes, cross promotions with other regional attractions or other elements of
the system and partnership compatibility.
A Demonstration of Sustainability
West Park should establish a new standard for park sustainability
through its operational standards, maintenance and landscape
and protection of the park’s high quality natural areas, leaving a
minimum of 60% of the property in a natural state.
A Community-Driven Plan
mission and community values, with a focus on core programs within the authority of the Park Board.
A Park for All User Groups
West Park should offer a range of user experiences for each age group, inclusive of cultural backgrounds, recreation preferences and
PROGRAM
Below are a list of programs that were developed by CCPR staff, stakeholders and general public, for incorpation into the West Park
Master Plan.
Play structures / Picnicking
• Covered, wider age appeal play structures with adventure
themed amenities (universally accessible)
•
• Multigenerational equipment for joint parent / child recreation activities (adult swings, adult slides etc.)
• More picnicking opportunities through additional shelter / pavilion space
Connectivity
• Fitness trails – Heart healthy
• Connection to existing spine trail in Carmel
• Nature walk area and discovery trail through new western park property.
• 116th Access/Crossing
• Aquatics
• Updated water features (e.g. splash pad) with safety incorporated in design
Outdoor Activities
•
• Increased camping opportunities
• Fishing pond
Programs
• Interpretive education programs
• Additional special events / cultural events
• Environmental stewardship/community service
Ecological
• Restoration/expansion/management (forest, prairie, savanna,
wetlands, etc.)
• Pollinator plots
• Enhanced habitat transitions
• Demonstration site
Year Round Activity Space
• Multi-use Community Pavilion (including elements of Nature
and Adventure in year round programming space)
Add-Ons
• Technology in the park (Wi-Fi, Agents of Nature – Outdoor
nature gaming experiences)
• Facilities, restrooms and adequate parking
• Increased seating throughout the park & shaded areas
INTRODUCTION
In order to guide the development of the master plan, a series of Guiding Principles and Programs (listed below) were created with CCPR staff, stakeholder and general public input prior to any designs of the park. These provide the framework of the park’s future,
along with being defensible and measurable aspects for evaluating master plan design alternatives.
The following pages of this Chapter present the
preferred master plan as developed through the public
34
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-2. Master Plan
6
1
14
15
13
16
11
8
7
1
2
3
4
5
9
12
17
10
10
10 15
11
18 19
1. Neighborhood Connection
2. Ecological Restoration & Management
3. Expanded Hill
4. Multi-Use Pavilion (Hillside Concept)
5. Flex Lawn/Performance Space
6. Interactive Trails/ Boardwalks
7. Trail Link
8. Program Pavilion and Adventure Play
9. Activity Core
10. Parking
11. Picnic/ Day Camp
12. Multi-Use Pavilion (Waterside Concept)
13. Drop-Off
14. Flex Meadow
15. Pond Expansion
16. Pedestrian Bridge
17. Boardwalk
18. Enhanced 116th Street
19. Intersection Improvements
2
2
7
2
171
19
35
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
SUB AREAS
Figure 4-3. Sub Areas
THE GROVES
THE
HEADWATERS
THE
CORE
The West Park Master Plan is comprised of four
distinct character districts, each with it’s own aesthetic
character, programming and use. These districts are
illustrated and labeled below with an enlarged plan
and description of each on the following pages.
116TH CORRIDOR
36
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
CORE AREA
Figure 4-4. The Core
1
1. Expanded Hill
2. Multi-Use Pavilion Hillside Concept
3. Activity Core
4. Parking (300 cars)
5. Multi-Use Pavilion Waterside Concept
6. Woonerf Special Use Area
7. Restroom Building/Shelter
8. Picnic/Shelters
9. Skating Ribbon
4
2
5
3
6 8
8
8
7
KEY PLAN
9
37
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THE CORE
West Park’s Core serves as the active recreation zone
of the park by featuring an Activity Core with spray and
play zones along with an expanded and enhanced
Jill’s Hill. A new multi-use program pavilion, restroom
facility, and accessory shade structures are also
included throughout the zone.
An improved vehicular entrance from 116th Street with
a 300 car parking lot and drop-off areas are included,
along with an expanded series of trails and walkways.
The Woonerf is a “plaza street” that could be used for
vehicles or pedestrian activities, as programmed by
CCPR.
The Core is buffered on all sides by the Headwaters
sub area of the project, which serve as the natural
stormwater treatment system for area runoff. This
buffer also serves the neighboring residents by
keeping the more active and noisy zones away from
residential properties and serving as a natural visual
backdrop.
The Core master plan contains two different alternative
locations for the multi-use pavilion and restroom
facility, as described in more detail within the multi-use
pavilion section of this Chapter.
38
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-5. Framework Diagram
Figure 4-7. Activity Core PlanFigure 4-6. Conceptual Sprayground Plan
Figure 4-8. Prototypical Concept Section
12
4
5
7
7
8
8
9
10
11
11
11 12
5
5
8
8
8
6
2
3
1. Multi-Use Pavilion
2. Boardwalk
3. Pond
4. Splash Pad
5. Adult Fitness Station
6. Family Zone
7. Swings
8. Entry Plaza
9. 5-12 Playground
10. 2-5 Playground
11. Lawn
12. Parking
To The Groves
PLAYSPRAYENTRY PLAZAPONDMULTI-USE PAVILION FAMILY
ZONE
39
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
ACTIVITY CORE
Figure 4-9. Conceptual Sprayground Perspective KEY PLAN
The Activity Core of West Park is a centrally located
feature that would include spray, play and family
zones for active recreation within the park. During the
design charrette, a framework plan (Figure 4-5) was
developed to organize the active recreation zones of
the park around the proposed multi-use pavilion. The
splash pad was placed nearest the pavilion and the
traditional ages 2-5 and 5-12 playgrounds further to
the north. A central Family Zone was designed to
provide seating and shade opportunities for families to
gather and for parents to have a centralized vantage
point for good visibility throughout the Activity Core.
In addition to the traditional playgrounds and splash
equipment stations have also been included in the
Activity Core. The location of the swings allows
stations were located around the perimeter of the area
to allow for oversight in the play and spray areas while
exercising.
Entry plazas and drop-off zones have been included
in the design to allow for a well-connected and
easily accessible Activity Core. Seat walls should be
considered at the entry plaza locations for meeting
and gathering spaces, while also providing a gateway
feature.
Landscape beds have been shown around the
perimeter of the Activity Core to provide a buffer, and
lawn zones have been included within to provide
are recommended throughout the area.
40
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-10. Jill’s Hill Expansion Plan
1
1. Expanded Hill
2. Multi-Use Pavilion Hillside Concept
3. Flex Lawn/Performance Space
4. Shelters/Picnic
5. Skating Ribbon
43
25
5
41
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-11. Jill’s Hill Commemorative Stone Marker
Figure 4-12. Jill’s Hill Expansion Section
HILL
Jill’s Hill is an iconic element of West Park used for
passive and active uses throughout all seasons, most
popularly as a sledding hill in the winter. The current
layout and topography of the hill does not conform to
the existing landscape of the park and has challenges
in properly programming winter activities.
The master plan expands Jill’s Hill to create a
more natural landform that would allow multiple
programming zones and a well-connected ADA
accessible route. The sledding season could be
enhanced with the addition of a snow machine,
opening opportunities for tube rentals and
to expand the hill horizontally without raising the
overall height, as shown in Figure 4-11.
The circular loop trail around the hill would be
drainage. The existing commemorative stone marker
dedicating hill to Jill Perelman will be retained and
placed prominently at the entrance to the primary
trail to the top of Jill’s Hill. Accessory structures
have been shown around the southern edge of the
circle to accommodate picnicking and general shade
and prairie restorations would occur within the circle.
An ice-skating ribbon could potentially be incorporated
winter activities. This would be a linear paved surface
that could be frozen during the winter and integrated
into the landscape.
One design alternative location for the multi-use
the hill. This facility is described in more detail within
the multi-use pavilion section of this Chapter.
42
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
KEY PLAN
Figure 4-13. “Waterside” Concept Figure 4-14. “Hillside” Concept
Multi-Use Pavilion
Restroom Facility
43
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
MUTLI-USE PAVILIONS CONCEPTS
At the conclusion of the design charrette, the master
as shown on Figures 4-13 & 4-14. These two options
were termed the “Waterside” and “Hillside” concepts,
in relation to the landscapes of their physical locations
in the park. Both options received equal support
through the charrette and were deemed viable to
continue for further evaluation within the schematic
design phase of the project.
In addition to the multi-use pavilion, the need for an
additional restroom facility was deemed necessary
within the park core to allow for good coverage of
services. The Waterside concept looks to preserve
the existing restroom facility on site, while the Hillside
option would provide new restrooms south near the
Activity Core.
44
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
‘WATERSIDE’ CONCEPT
MULTI-USE PAVILION
Figure 4-16. Waterside concept Multi-use pavilion
This design for Multi-Use Pavilion Concept A
are both land and water formations. The Multi-Use
park’s drainage and an existing pond. The building
engages the water’s edge with a generous boardwalk
which transitions to the Park’s trails system.
Figure 4-15. Screened areas remain the same in both central pavil-ion concept options
45
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-17. Floor Plan, Waterside Concept
Figure 4-18. Waterside Concept Pavilion Section A-A
The building’s architecture, via the use of natural
materials, sloped roofs, and extensive glazing is
an eye to the future. The building’s architecture and
placement create an identity and an entrance marker
for the remainder of the site.
The building could house multi use rooms, multi
activity gymnasium, adventure play course and
support amenities. Through the generous use of
glass, the interior spaces are well lit by natural light,
and feel inviting. Furthermore, the guests in the
building are always able to view with the beautiful
water and landscape environments of the park.
The Waterside Concept for the Multi-Use Pavilion
could be built in phases based on available funding
Park.
3 3
6
2 2
5
1 1 A
A
A
C
Climbing Wall Adventure
Activity/Day
Camp T T4
46
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
‘HILLSIDE’ CONCEPT
MULTI-USE PAVILION
Figure 4-19. Hillside Concept Multi-use Pavilion
This design celebrates Jill’s Hill and enhances it’s
designation as the signature feature in West Park.
The building gently nestles itself into the hillside and
emerges from the landscape with stepped green roofs,
outdoor plazas, and tall glass walls. The building
is understated in the surrounding landscape, while
retaining a transparent, and inviting quality. The
potential spaces inside the building, including multi
use rooms, multi activity gymnasium, adventure play
course, climbing wall, an elevated walking track,
outdoor roof garden terrace and support amenities, all
access the natural light and look onto the plazas and
the park. The building’s clean form and architectural
approach to recreation while retaining environmental
stewardship.
The adjacent outdoor plaza, for which the building
is the backdrop and support, further energizes the
experience of the building, and engages the building
with the landscape.
Figure 4-20. Screened areas remain the same in both central pavil-ion concept options
47
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-21. Floor Plan, Hillside Concept
Figure 4-22. Hillside Concept Pavilion Section
Figure 4-23. Floor Plan, Hillside Concept
48
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-24. The Groves Bundle
THE GROVES
1. Neighborhood Connection
2. Trail Link
3. Ecological Restoration & Management
4. Interpretive Trails
5. Program Pavilion & Adventure Play
6. Picnic/Day Camp
7. Drop-Off
8. Parking (20 cars each)
9. Flex Meadow
6
1
7
9
2
5
3
4
8
1
8
The Groves is the activation of the 40 acre western
expansion of West Park. This area of the park is
primarily for the use of park programs and groups,
while providing a restored landscape for trails and
passive park uses. Development within the The
Groves was kept to a minimum with a program
pavilion, entry drive with drop-off and two small parking
lots. Adventure play would be scattered throughout
the native landscape within the The Groves to provide
a discovery experience.
Trails are shown through the different landscape
types of the The Groves to provide multiple education
west edge of the area. The inclusion of a dog park
within The Groves was brought up during the design
charrette, and CCPR is currently evaluating other sites
on the west side of Carmel to provide a community
dog park.
49
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-25.
Figure 4-26. Pavilion perspective
PROGRAM PAVILION
The Program Pavilion serves as an ancillary facility
on the West campus. The structure houses basic
amenities as well as multi-use spaces to support
various program opportunities, such as camps,
recreation or environmental programs, rentals for small
events, etc.
T
T
K
St
M12
C
Fireplace
Consistent with the designs for the Multi-Purpose
building, the ancillary building’s architecture celebrates
pavilion’s natural material pallet, generous windows,
and its adjacent deck connect patrons with the
surrounding landscape while giving the pavilion an
inviting quality.
50
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-27. KOMPAN Double Somersault
Figure 4-28. KOMPAN Forest Bug Springer
Figure 4-29. KOMPAN Water See-saw with 2 Splash Tables Figure 4-30. KOMPAN Robina Play Structures
51
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-31. KOMPAN Parkour
ADVENTURE PLAY
The Adventure Play element of the The Groves
the native landscape. The play equipment uses environmentally friendly and rot-resistant hardwoods that blend into the landscape. The elements can be scattered throughout the The Groves, allowing users
Examples of Adventure Play are shown on this page and can provide a variety of physical and social recreation opportunities.
52
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THE HEADWATERS
Figure 4-32. The Headwaters Sub Area Plan
53
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THE HEADWATERS
The Headwaters refers to the site’s relation in the
overall stormwater drainage patterns for the project
vicinity. A guiding principle for West Park is to provide
sustainability through operational and maintenance
landscape standards along with leaving a minimum of
60% of the park in a natural state. The Headwaters
zone accomplishes both of these principles while also
serving as the natural stormwater treatment system for
the entire park.
The landscapes and ecosystems throughout the
headwaters will vary and transition from woodlands at
the higher elevations to savanna, prairie, wet mesic
prairie and open water, as the site elevation slopes
historic patterns of the site and provide a wide range
of habitat opportunities. Existing landscapes that are
thriving within the park should be preserved, while
new landscapes and transitions should be designed
in conjunction with any site grading. Each of these
ecosystem types are further developed within the
Green Infrastructure section of this Chapter.
Activities and programs within the Headwaters
include pedestrian trails along with educational and
interpretative opportunities. Physical signage and
potential strategies for interpretative outreach within
the park. Seating and shade should be strategically
placed throughout the Headwaters (along pedestrian
pathways) to provide park user amenities in locations
remote from the Core and The Groves development
areas of West Park.
54
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
116 TH CORRIDOR
Figure 4-33. 116th Corridor Plan
Figure 4-34. 116th Corridor Sketch
THE GROVES
TO CENTRAL PARKTOWNE ROADGATEWAY
THE CORE
WEST
ENTRY
GRAND
ENTRY
CONTINUOUS TRAIL
UNIVERSITY
HIGH SCHOOL
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE
NEIGHBORHOOD
ENTRY
COHESIVE PARK STREETSCAPE
116TH ST.
WATER
55
Chapter 4: Master plan
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
116TH CORRIDOR
116th Street is an important east to west connector
road for the City of Carmel and adjacent communities,
along with serving as the only public roadway to
provide vehicular access into West Park. Due to
existing site lines, landforms and roadway speeds,
West Park currently does not have a strong presence
on 116th Street and is often passed by motorists
without recognizing the park exists. Additionally,
116th and connectivity to the school to the south is
challenged without a signalized intersection crossing
into the park.
Street to better engage West Park and all modes of
intersection/access locations into the park, with the
recommendation of roundabouts to be installed.
Roundabouts are prevalent throughout Carmel and
easier locations to cross 116th Street. In addition to
the intersection improvements, pedestrian and bicycle
routes should be accommodated through this corridor,
with the preference to locate the major facilities north
of 116th Street to better serve park connectivity.
only be considered directly at the property lines, but
also at major intersections to the east and west of the
park. Throughout the project, we heard the visibility
and awareness of the park could be improved. By
engaging visitors and passers-by prior to getting to the
park will help promote the visibility of West Park and
attract additional visitors that may not be aware of the
park.
56
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-35. Green/Grey Infrastructure
MASTER PLAN SYSTEMS
6
14
16
15
13
11
8
7
2
4 5
9 12
10
10
1511
2
2
7
2
7
1
4
3
13
1312
13
13
4
4
1313
133
88
8
12
15
1. Activity Core
2. Picnic
3. Trails
4. Perimeter Trail Connection
5. 116th Street Pedestrian Bridge
6. Aquatic/Splash Play
7. Multi-Use Pavilion
8. Ponds
9. Flexible Meadow
10. Forest Restoration
11. Prairie Restoration
12. Savanna Restoration
13. Wetland Restoration
14. Restrooms
15. Parking
16. Skating Ribbon
57
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
LAND USE & PROGRAMMING
The land use and programming framework plan was
developed to better illustrate the locations of activities
and programs for West Park. In broad terms, the park
was divided into four zones including active recreation,
passive recreation, ecological program areas and
open water.
area along with the The Groves. A series of park
structures and shelters would be placed throughout
these zones to provide seating, shade and additional
programming opportunities.
Passive recreation zones are shown near Jill’s Hill
and directly north of 116th Street. These areas would
could be program areas for CCPR.
Ecological program areas and open water were
developed to treat the park’s drainage and provide
native landscape ecosystems for interpretative
and habitat opportunities. These areas are further
described within the Green Infrastructure section of
this Chapter.
Vehicular and pedestrian circulation is shown in grey,
and are further described within the Circulation and
Parking section of this Chapter.
58
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
FOREST
FOREST
WATER
WATERWATER
SAVANNA
SAVANNA
SAVANNA
PRAIRIE
PRAIRIE
WETMESIC
WET
MESIC
WET
MESIC
WET
MESIC
WET
MESIC
WET
MESIC
HILL
LAWN
LAWN
Figure 4-36. Green Infrastructure Framework Plan
WATER
59
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
The Green Infrastructure plan was developed with
the park’s master plan to create a holistic approach
for landscapes and ecosystems throughout the park.
During the initial construction of the park, several
native landscapes (prairie, wetland, etc.) were
developed, however they have suffered a series of
challenges from soil compaction to impeded drainage.
The design team received strong community and
stakeholder input that West Park should be a place
not only for active recreation, but additionally provide
educational opportunities for a variety of ecosystems
and the associated habitat diversity that would ensue.
As shown on the Green Infrastructure Framework
Plan (Figure 4-36) the park’s landscapes are primarily
native ecosystems, with the exception of lawn and
paved areas near the Core. As described in the
Headwaters section of this report, the site generally
drains from the north to the south, creating the
opportunity for linear, natural stormwater treatment
systems to accommodate runoff from the park. Large
wooded areas to the north on both the east and west
sides of the park will be preserved, with only minor
vegetation management to enhance these features.
Savannas and prairie are located to serve as transition
from the woodlands into more open spaces. Wet mesic
areas will capture the park’s stormwater for treatment
prior to entering the open water spaces.
Core area of the park to ease CCPR maintenance
efforts. As West Park enters schematic design, the
limits of these ecosystem zones shall be further
Existing soils should also be further evaluated for
selecting appropriate species within the park. Soil
compaction from the initial park construction has
stunted the growth of trees within the park, therefore
treatments below should be considered when planting
new trees within the park.
Tree Planting Details
1.
cultivating your soil below the rootball, you will
provide your tree with the necessary aeration and
drainage that it needs in compacted soil.
2.
make sure that the water drains from the hole.
Standing water indicates a poor planting area and
the need for a different site selection or additional
steps will be needed for tree survival.
3.
high quality mulch with a weed protection mat will
prevent the natural decomposing of the mulch
from reaching the root zone. An optimal type of
mulch to use is a double shredded hardwood.
4.
aeration tubes around your trees in compacted
soil will strengthen your trees ability to live. The
Rootwell provides nutrients, water and oxygen to
the root zone allowing roots the best chance of
survival.
60
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-37. Ecosystem and Water Cycle Conceptual Section
Photo 4-1. Close-up of Shagbark Hickory from site tour Photo 4-2. Oak Savannah Photo 4-3. Prairie Photo 4-4. Image of existing wetlands/open water at West Park
61
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
FOREST
Quercus stellata (Post Oak)
Quercus alba (White Oak)
Carya ovata (Shagbark Hickory)
Aquilegia canadensis (Columbine)
Iris virginica
Podophyllum peltatum (Mayapple)
(Solomon’s seal)
Polemonium reptans (Jacob’s ladder)
Elymus hystrix (Bottlebrush grass)
Chasmanthium latifolium (Northern sea oats)
Osmunda cinnamomea (Cinnamon fern)
Adiantum pedatum (Maidenhair fern)
Lindera benzoin (Spicebush)
OAK SAVANNA
Quercus velutina (Black Oak)
Carya ovata (Shagbark Hickory)
Quercus macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem)
Bouteloua curtipendula (Side Oats Grama)
Calamagrostis canadensis (Canada Blue Joint)
Carex pennsylvanica (Pennsylvania sedge)
Carex bebbi (Bebb’s sedge)
Baptistia leucantha (White wild indigo)
Baptisia leucophaea (Cream wild indigo)
Camassia scilloides (Wild hyacinth)
Ceanothus americana (New Jersey tea)
Desmodium canadense (Showy tick-trefoil)
Elymus virginicus (Virginia wild rye)
Eupatorium sessilifolium (Boneset)
Veronicastrum virginicum (Culver’s root)
Solidago hispida (Hairy Goldenrod)
PRAIRIE
Coreopsis tripteris (Tall coreopsis)
Dodecatheon meadia (Shooting star)
Liatris spicata (Dense blazing star)
Physostegia virginia (Obedient plant)
Rudbeckia fulgida (Showy Black-eyed Susan)
Silphium laciniatum (Compass plant)
Panicum virgatum (Switchgrass)
Sporobolus heterolepsis (Prairie dropseed)
WET MESIC PRAIRIE & WETLANDS
Allium cernuum (Nodding onion)
Andropogon gerardii (Big bluestem)
Anemone canadensis (Meadow anemone)
Apocynum sibricum (Indian hemp)
Asclepias incarnata (Swamp milkweed)
Symphyotrichum novae-angliae (New England Aster)
Carex granularis (sedge)
Carex gravida (sedge)
Helenium autumnale (Sneezeweed)
Spartina pectinata (Prairie cord grass)
The section developed in Figure 4-37, was developed
to conceptually show the hydrologic cycle of the park
and it’s relation to ecosystems. The following are a
list of recommended plant species within each of the
plan.
62
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
300
Cars20 Cars
20 Cars
Figure 4-38. Circulation & Parking Framework Plan
63
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
CIRCULATION & PARKING
Figure 4-39. Multi-Use Paved Trail Figure 4-40. Soft Trail
Figure 4-41. Boardwalk (Open Water)Figure 4-42. Boardwalk (Wetlands)
The master plan considered a variety of trail typologies to provide pedestrian and bicycle circulation throughout the park. The trail types considered a range of landscape treatments in order to provide an ecologically sensitive circulation network. The master
trails, soft trails and boardwalks), as shown on Figure 4-38 and the sections below.
The park is accessible by vehicle at two entry locations along 116th Street, accessing the The Groves and Core areas. No connection was made between the two access locations, in order to preserve the site’s drainage and provide zones that can be isolated as needed for park programming.
Paved parking has been minimized within the park to serve daily needs of the park. A 300 car parking lot is provided near the Activity Core and two scattered
lots of 20 cars each are included in the The Groves. Vehicular drop-offs should be provided throughout to ease visitor access to the site.
large events is available at University High School with proper coordination. A designated pedestrian crossing
between the park and school.
To aid with stormwater runoff and treatment, rain gardens and bioswales should be associated with paved surfaces. Permeable pavement may not be the ideal treatment for stormwater treatment due to the clayey soils of the site. However, further evaluation should occur in the schematic design phases of the park.
64
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master plan CarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 4-43. Park Structures
Waterside Concept
Hillside Concept
Variation based on bundles and phasing
The Groves Pavilion
Existing Facility
65
Chapter 4: Master plan systeMs
West park Master planCarMel Clay parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
PARK STRUCTURES
The West Park plan is served by a multitude of
with Amenities, Year Round Support Structures
with Support Amenities, Restroom and Shelter and
Season Support Structures. The Programmable
Structures are strategically located in the park to
celebrate a particular land or water formation. The
ancillary structures provide amenities at various other
locations on the campus including toilets and shelters
supporting passive activities throughout the park.
of the surrounding natural setting and complimentary
to the primary programmable structure. The overall
design intent links all buildings together in their form
and function, while allowing the patrons to experience
the beautiful landscape of the park.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
66 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
IMPLEMENTATION 5
Photo 5-1. Existing West Park
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
67West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
This Chapter of the report takes a comprehensive
look at the entire West Park master plan to determine
logical project bundles that CCPR may wish to
implement over the following years as funding
becomes available. Since West Park is an existing
resource within CCPR’s park system, a variety of
depending on the type of park development or
program intended for construction. Items that are new
additions to the park may have one funding source
while replacements of existing structures or programs
may require another.
While the report has bundled projects based on their
proximity to each other and similarities of construction
phased as funding becomes available.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
68 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-1. Product Bundles
THE GROVES
116TH CORRIDOR
THE
HEADWATERS
THE
CORE
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
69West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
PROJECT BUNDLES OVERVIEW
bundles for the master plan implementation of West
Park, which align with the zones described in the
Master Plan Chapter 4 and further described within the
following pages of this Chapter.
1. The Groves
2. The Headwaters
3. The Core
4. 116th Street Corridor
These bundles could be phased or sequenced as
determined by CCPR and stakeholders, or as funds
are available. During the project charrette, initial
phasing of the project was discussed to potentially be
the The Groves and/or the Headwaters, as the cost of
implementation are lower and the land is not currently
developed for park use. The Core zone may be a
secondary phase to replace the existing facilities along
with the spray and play areas. As the 116th Street
Corridor is not controlled by CCPR, partnerships with
City departments and potentially INDOT will need to
occur for development of this zone, thereby making it a
likely last phase of implementation.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
70 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-2. “The Groves” bundle
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
71West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
BUNDLE I
THE GROVES
The Groves is the activation of the 40 acre western
phase of the master plan implementation since
the area is currently undeveloped for park use.
Development within the The Groves was kept to a
minimum with a program pavilion, entry drive with
drop-off and two small parking lots. Adventure play
would be scattered throughout the native landscape
within the The Groves to provide a discovery
experience.
Trails are shown through the different landscape
types of the The Groves, to provide multiple education
opportunities. Boardwalks and soft trails were
designed through the woodlands and drainage
areas to reduce impacts on these area. Paved trails
should be considered in high-use areas adjacent to
meadows.
Design, engineering and construction costs for
The Groves are estimated between $2.5M and
$4.0M. Schematic design for The Groves will
approximately 30% of the budget for this bundle.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
72 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-3. “The Headwaters” bundle
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
73West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
BUNDLE II
THE HEADWATERS
The Headwaters bundle focuses on the landscape
and drainage improvements around the edges of
West Park, along with a variety of trail types to best
accommodate the landscapes they traverse (i.e.
paved, soft, boardwalk). This bundle also includes
the excavation and construction of a secondary
open water body on the The Groves, north of 116th
Street. Mass grading of the entire Headwaters is not
recommended due to the potential of additional soil
compaction along with the high quality landscape and
operational drainage throughout a majority of this area.
Design, engineering and construction costs for The
Headwaters are estimated between $2.0M and $3.5M.
Schematic design for The Headwaters will provide
further detailed investigations on elements of this area
that can be preserved, reducing construction costs and
impacts throughout the park.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
74 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-4. “The Core” bundle
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
75West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
BUNDLE III
THE CORE
The highest intensity development within the master
plan is in The Core area, including a multi-use pavilion,
accessory structures, new playground and splash pad,
an expanded Jill’s Hill, parking, circulation, lighting and
landscaping. The new Core will replace the similar
existing elements within the park that are nearing the
end of their operational life cycle.
As described in Chapter 4, the multi-use pavilion is
should be further studied through schematic design.
Either option may have additional impacts on potential
construction schedules along with the identifying
need to remove or preserve the existing restroom
facility. The design team felt it was appropriate to
preserve and upgrade the existing restroom facility
in the Waterside pavilion concept, but recommended
removing it and building a new restroom facility in the
Hillside pavilion concept, due to the proximity between
new and existing facilities and providing larger service
areas for these amenities.
Design, engineering and construction costs for The
Core are estimated between $18M and $24M, largely
depending on the location of the multi-use pavilion,
along with existing park items that may demolished,
relocated or preserved. Construction estimate ranges
this area.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
76 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-5. “116th Corridor” bundle
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
77West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
BUNDLE IV
116TH CORRIDOR
locations into the park, with the recommendation
of roundabouts to be installed. Roundabouts are
prevalent throughout Carmel and serve to both slow
cross 116th Street. The construction of roundabouts
may result in temporary lane closures, in order to
all adjacent properties.
In addition to the intersection improvements,
pedestrian and bicycle routes should be
accommodated through this corridor, with the
preference to locate the major facilities north of 116th
Street to better serve park connectivity. This northern
trail would connect to the existing trail on the east end
of the park. Right-of-way challenges exist to the west
of the park that may complicate the future connection
of this trail to Shelborne Road. The potential for
a pedestrian bridge or underpass spanning 116th
Street has also been shown and included within the
construction cost estimates for further consideration.
Coordination and cooperation throughout all City
departments will need to occur to continue this linkage
further west.
considered at the intersection of 116th and Towne
Road (east) along with 116th and Shelborne Road
(west), in addition to signage at the West Park
boundaries and access points. These elements could
vernacular, or integrated into existing standards of
CCPR and/or the City of Carmel.
Design, engineering and construction costs for The
116th Corridor are estimated between $10M and
$13M. As this portion of the master plan falls outside
of the lands and jurisdiction of CCPR, a cooperative
team effort with City of Carmel departments
and INDOT should be developed to ensure the
implementation of this aspect of the master plan.
Costs for individual elements of this bundle (i.e.
road reconstruction, signage, trails) could be shared
through multiple departments and funding sources.
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
78 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Figure 5-6. Master Plan
6
1
14
15
13
16
11
8
7
1
2
3
4
5
9
12
17
10
10
10 15
11
18 19
1. Neighborhood Connection
2. Ecological Restoration & Management
3. Expanded Hill
4. Multi-Use Pavilion (Hillside Concept)
5. Flex Lawn/Performance Space
6. Interactive Trails/ Boardwalks
7. Trail Link
8. Program Pavilion and Adventure Play
9. Activity Core
10. Parking
11. Picnic/ Day Camp
12. Multi-Use Pavilion (Waterside Concept)
13. Drop-Off
14. Flex Meadow
15. Pond Expansion
16. Pedestrian Bridge
17. Boardwalk
18. Enhanced 116th Street
19. Intersection Improvements
2
2
7
2
171
19
Chapter 5: ImplementatIon
79West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
NEXT STEPS
While this report represents the culmination of the
master planning process, in reality it serves as a
launching pad for the future of West Park. Grounded
on public input and a better understanding of the
park’s ecological history, the plan presents a vision for
enhancing an already popular and treasured park for
current and future generations to enjoy.
Upon presentation of the draft master plan to the
Park Board on October 11, 2016, this report will be
made available to the public for further review and
comment on YourWestPark.com. Based on the input
received and any direction provided by the Park
Board, appropriate revisions will be made to the plan
for consideration by the Park Board. It is anticipated
Board before the end of 2016 for formal adoption.
Once adopted, this master plan will be used to help
guide the future development of West Park as funding
permits.
With total projected costs ranging from $32.5M to
$44.5M, implementation of this master plan can only
occur through a phased approach, likely beginning
with some features in the West Campus. The phasing
will also need to take into consideration the life
cycles of existing park infrastructure, with amenities
like the playground and splash pad likely requiring
replacement sooner than later. As one of only two
public parks on the west side of Carmel, construction
should be staged in a manner to keep as much as the
park open to the public as is safely feasible.
Multiple funding sources, both existing and new, will
be required to fully develop West Park as envisioned
in this plan. Based on the current Zone Improvement
Plan, Park Impact Fees may be used for development
of new features in the park, such as the proposed
Multi-Purpose Pavilion or everything within the West
Campus. County Option Income Tax received from
Clay Township may be used for both new development
and capital replacements, but this dedicated funding
source will cease once the Central Park Bond is
retired. Currently CCPR receives approximately $3M
annually in COIT and Park Impact Fees. Recognizing
a portion of these funds must support other capital
projects within the park system, proposed items like
the Multi-Purpose Pavilion may require issuance of a
new bond to become a reality.
Schematic design plans will be developed for each
development phase as funding becomes available.
the site and facility plans envisioned within this report,
taking into consideration the budget, surveys, soil
conditions, regulations, and other factors that were not
part of the scope of this master plan.
Appendix
80 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
APPENDIX A
• WEST PARK AQUISTION HISTORY
• PRELIMINARY PRO FORMA
• OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
• POLLING RESULTS
• PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER INPUT
Appendix
81West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
WEST PARK ACQUISITION HISTORY
Appendix
82 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
1
WEST PARK ACQUISITION HISTORY
1997 – Original Park
Original Owner: Jill Perelman
Purchased: 65.4523 acres
Purchase Price: $1,395,690.45
Donated: 10 acres
Donation Value: $213,333.30
Restrictive Covenants:
1.The Property shall be used solely for park and recreation facilities and activities
2.No roadway for the purpose of vehicular traffic shall be constructed to adjoin the Property
to the adjacent school property, prepared by Weihe Engineers, Inc., as job number 97-1203,
dated 11/25/97.
3.For so long as Jill Louise Perelman makes her residence on any part of the Adjacent
Property, as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof, there shall be no
swimming pool or light of any facilities on the Property without the consent of the Jill Louise
Perelman.
4.To the extent it is reasonable to do so, the Grantee may consider input from those
landowners whose property is adjacent to the Property for the planning of the facilities to
be constructed on the Property.
2003 –Southeast Addition
Original Owner: Charles and Tina Riley
Purchased: 5.010 acres
Purchase Price: $173,020.00
Restrictive Covenants: N/A
2005 – Southwest Addition
Original Owner: Jill Perelman
Purchased: 35.14 acres (through lease-purchase agreement)
Purchase Price: $2,142,282.51
Interest Paid: $131,295.27
Total Cost: $2,273,577.78
Donated: 5 acres
Donation Value: $250,850.00
Appendix
83West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
2
Restrictive Covenants:
1.The development of the Real Estate for residential and/or commercial development is
prohibited.
2.The Real Estate shall be used solely for park and recreation facilities and activities.
Notable Terms from Lease Agreement
Lease Premises may be used by the Tenant for any and all government purposes, for
purposes of locating a park and other improvement thereon and for any other purpose
lawful for the Tenant to undertake, including the sublease of all or any portion of the Leased
Premises to private third parties
The Tenant shall be permitted, at its own expense, to make any alterations, additions,
repairs or improvement to the Leased Premises
Lessor hereby agrees that Tenant may demolish the residence, barns and other outbuildings
and otherwise improve and alter the Leased Premises for use by the Carmel-Clay community
as an extension of West Park
Acquisition Summary
Total Acres: 120.6023
Purchased
Jill Perelman Charles & Tina Riley TOTAL
Acres 100.5923 5.010 105.6023
Purchase Price $3,537,927.96 $173,020.00 $3,710,947.96
Interest Paid $131,295.27 N/A $131,295.27
Total Cost $3,669,223.23 $173,020.00 $3,842,243.23
Donated
Jill Perelman
Acres 15.000
Donation Value $464,183.30
Appendix
84 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix
85West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
PRELIMINARY PRO FORMA
Appendix
86 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
87West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
Appendix
88 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Date:8/22/2016
SEH:CCPAR - 133691
Item Unit Total Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
CONTRACTOR MOBILIZATION LS 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00
DEMO & EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
GRADING / EARTHWORK LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
HILL EXPANSION LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
MULTI-USE PAVILION SFT 33000 $350.00 $11,550,000.00
SHELTER EACH 10 $75,000.00 $750,000.00
SPRAY GROUND LS 1 $750,000.00 $750,000.00
PLAYGROUND, 2-5 YR. OLD LS 1 $180,000.00 $180,000.00
PLAYGROUND, 5-12 YR. OLD LS 1 $1,100,000.00 $1,100,000.00
PLAYGROUND, ADULT FITNESS LS 1 $240,000.00 $240,000.00
ADVENTURE PLAY AREA LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
CENTRAL PLAZA LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
TRAILS, PAVED LFT 3300 $100.00 $330,000.00
TRAILS, BOARDWALK LFT 980 $600.00 $588,000.00
INTERIOR PARK ROADS LFT 900 $220.00 $198,000.00
PARKING, EAST LOT LS 1 $350,000.00 $350,000.00
FURNISHINGS, FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT (INDOOR & OUTDOOR)LS 1 $350,000.00 $350,000.00
LANDSCAPE, RESTORATION LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
LANDSCAPE, PLANT BEDS LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
UTILITIES LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
$17,511,000.00
$2,626,650.00
$3,502,200.00
$23,639,850.00
CONTRACTOR MOBILIZATION LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
DEMO & EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
GRADING / EARTHWORK LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
POND EXPANSION LS 1 $600,000.00 $600,000.00
TRAILS, PAVED LFT 350 $100.00 $35,000.00
TRAILS, UNPAVED LFT 500 $40.00 $20,000.00
TRAILS, BOARDWALK LFT 1700 $600.00 $1,020,000.00
FURNISHINGS, FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT (OUTDOOR)LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
LANDSCAPE, RESTORATION LS 1 $300,000.00 $300,000.00
LANDSCAPE, PLANT BEDS LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
$2,315,000.00
$347,250.00
$463,000.00
$3,125,250.00
Construction Contingency (20%)
HEADWATERS BUNDLE TOTAL
THE CORE
SUBTOTAL
Design Fees + Soft Costs (15%)
Construction Contingency (20%)
THE CORE BUNDLE TOTAL
THE HEADWATERS
SUBTOTAL
Design Fees + Soft Costs (15%)
WEST PARK MASTER PLAN
CARMEL, INDIANA
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
Appendix
89West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Date:8/22/2016
SEH:CCPAR - 133691
Item Unit Total Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
WEST PARK MASTER PLAN
CARMEL, INDIANA
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
CONTRACTOR MOBILIZATION LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
DEMO & EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
GRADING / EARTHWORK LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
PROGRAM PAVILION SFT 5000 $420.00 $2,100,000.00
TRAILS, PAVED LFT 3050 $100.00 $305,000.00
TRAILS, UNPAVED LFT 2200 $40.00 $88,000.00
TRAILS, BOARDWALK LFT 150 $600.00 $90,000.00
INTERIOR PARK ROADS LFT 1300 $220.00 $286,000.00
PARKING, WEST LOT LS 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00
FURNISHINGS, FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT (OUTDOOR)LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
LANDSCAPE, RESTORATION LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
LANDSCAPE, PLANT BEDS LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
UTILITIES LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
$3,639,000.00
$545,850.00
$727,800.00
$4,912,650.00
CONTRACTOR MOBILIZATION LS 1 $450,000.00 $450,000.00
DEMO & EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
116TH STREET COMPLETE STREET RECONSTRUCTION (TOWNE ROAD TO SHELBORNE)LS 1 $4,000,000.00 $4,000,000.00
ROUNDABOUT EACH 2 $1,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER 116TH LS 1 $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00
LANDSCAPE, RESTORATION LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
STORMWATER / DRAINAGE LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
$9,650,000.00
$1,447,500.00
$1,930,000.00
$13,027,500.00
Design Fees - Soft Costs (15%)
116TH STREET CORRIDOR
SUBTOTAL
WEST CAMPUS BUNDLE TOTAL
THE GROVES
SUBTOTAL
Design Fees + Soft Costs (15%)
Construction Contingency (20%)
2. This engineer's opinion of probable construction cost has been prepared based upon the engineer's experience as a design professional and is furnished for information only. It does not constitute a guarantee of actual construction costs.
3. This engineer's opinion of probable construction cost does not include any professional design fees or permit fees.
4. This engineer's opinion of probable construction cost does not include construction supervision or inspection costs.
5. Construction Mobilization assumed to be 5-8% of total project cost.
Construction Contingency (20%)
116TH STREET CORRIDOR BUNDLE TOTAL
1. This engineer's opinion of probable construction cost has been prepared based upon designs prepared by SEH.
Appendix
90 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix
91West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
POLLING RESULTS
Appendix
92 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
93West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
94 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
95West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
96 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
97West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
98 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
99West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
100 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
101West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
102 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
103West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
104 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
105West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
106 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
107West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
108 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
109West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
110 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
111West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
112 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
113West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
114 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
115West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
116 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
117West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
118 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
119West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
120 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
121West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
122 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
123West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
124 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
125West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
126 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
127West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
128 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
129West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
130 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
131West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
132 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
133West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
134 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
135West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
136 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
137West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
138 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
139West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
140 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
141West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
142 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
143West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
144 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
145West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
146 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
147West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Appendix
148 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Following are comments received through YourWestPark.com or emailed directly to staff. Comments
were edited only to remove the identity of the sender.
Date/Time Comment
1/1/2016
6:48 pm
I’m writing to ask (based on the notice in the newsletter below), if the property
that we back onto is effected by the proposal of developing additional land for
West Park? I’ve copied my neighbors who would also be interested - so if you
would please “reply all”. Thanks so much!
1/2/2016
10:03 am
We seem to have very few community amenities west of US 31, yet sooo many
neighborhoods contributing to the tax base. I am delighted to hear that, though
we must commute to 161st St. for a Proximity Kroger and to Rangeline for many
other needs, we at least have a park to develop & improve.
The only close bark park to us is at Clay Terrace and is not safe for small dogs
since it has the black wrought iron rod fencing spaced 4 inches apart. All breeds
of dogs with a head width less than that can easily escape when distracted.
It would fill a great need for our western population to have a bark park with a
chain link fence, possibly two such areas. I'm in the small 57 home neighborhood
of Shelbourne Park, and there are a dozen dog owners here who would take
advantage of the freedom a dog can have at a park. Multiply that by the much
higher population of the area neighborhoods around us, and you could easily see
two bark parks constantly at capacity at peak times at West Park.
1/4/2016
3:58 pm
We are interested in participating in the development of a new West Park Master
Plan. In that regard, it would be helpful to review the historic master plans. Are
these accessible? I have not been able to locate them in online searches.
1/7/2016
1:25 pm
It’s been such a blessing to have some of the very few remaining undeveloped
acres of land in Carmel as part of West Park. In fact, before we purchased our
home 7 years ago, we researched that land to find that a kind woman had given
the land to the park to protect it… which gave us confidence it wouldn’t be
changed. The wildlife, trees and plants in those woods are a gift to West Park and
those who value this precious resource.
So while we understand the cost recovery mandate, our hope and our prayer is
that the woods remain undeveloped to allow the wildlife, trees, and plants to
remain… while perhaps the open field along 116th street be the area to develop.
Saddlebrook Subdivision has an incredible group of people who’ve volunteered
their time and talents… and been elected to our HOA - two of whom are copied
on this email. I will allow them to represent our subdivision from here. But, again,
I wanted to thank you for your response and to share my heart with you on the
development for consideration.
Thank you for your service to our Park System.
Appendix
149West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
1/18/2016
1:05 pm
I write to supply input regarding the West Park redesign. I understand that an
initial meeting is set in a few days but unfortunately I will be out of town for work
and will miss that meeting.
I and my wife are parents of 3 young children and frequent park users, ages 3, 6,
and 9 respectively. We live fairly close to the park, always biking to it when we
visit, except on soccer practice nights when we drive. As a coach and
commissioner in the Carmel Dad’s Club recreational soccer leagues of each of my
two daughters (6, 9), I have made use of the West Park open space to conduct
their team practices. Carmel Dad’s Club had over 2,000 soccer players as of last
season, with hundreds of teams across the various age groups and two genders.
Only travel teams are permitted to practice at the Shelborne or Badger Park
soccer fields, leaving a few hundred recreational teams (including the ones I
coach) to find other open space in Carmel to practice on. In addition, Coxhall
Gardens green space has been designated by CDC as off limits for practices. As a
visit to West Park on a few week nights during Spring (after Spring Break) or
during the Fall season will show, the open space at West Park is highly used by
multiple soccer teams for practice all week long each season. Finding open space
in the West side of Carmel, particularly for a soccer practice hoping to recreate,
to some extent, playing field size, particularly with the high number of teams
competing for space, is a tremendous challenge. West Park has served as one
useful location for many coaches.
Consequently, with respect to the redesign, my request would be that you
maintain this open space as open space, to allow continued use in this fashion for
the hundreds of kids and dozens of coaches that use it for this purpose. If
possible, mowing the back side of the mound to create open space in that area
would be useful as well, as the front semi-circle can become overused.
Thanks again for considering my input. If interested, I’d direct you to coordinate
with Carmel Dad’s Club for their input as well.
1/25/2016
3:50 pm
As a parent of a child with special needs, specifically mobility issues, I'd love to
help provide input on how this park can be enjoyed by all kids!
1/27/2016
4:46 pm
What is the website or web address to watch videos of the community meetings?
Thanks.
1/28/2016
11:00 am
I was wondering if you would mind forwarding me the minutes of the meeting or
any highlights of interest. I would certainly like to share this information with
other board members at our upcoming Feb 4th board meeting. I will seek input
from other board members as well and share it in your future scheduled
meetings.
1/28/2016
1:28 pm
Walking trails connected across 116th street to the trails on Shelbourne and
Towne should be added so people can walk, bike, rollerblade safely to West Part.
There isn't enough parking on busy days as it is, so safe access without a car to
more walkable neighborhoods is essential. More trails, paved and unpaved as
Appendix
150 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
well as fields for sports, a pool, and a basketball court (or more than one) would
be great!
1/28/2016
4:25 pm
Would love to see a frisbee golf course at West Park.
1/28/2016
4:27 pm
I would play frisbee golf more if I didn't have to drive to the east side of Carmel.
Would love a course at West Park.
1/28/2016
5:11 pm
I was given your information concerning the upcoming focus groups to discuss
the updates to West Park, particularly relating to accessibility for the special
needs community. I recently worked with Smoky Row elementary and Carmel
school corp to install a new and accessible playground for the kindergarten and
early childhood (developmental preschool) classes. I would love to learn more
about the West Park renovation and help in anyway that I can.
1/28/2016
10:31 pm
Please leave the wetlands acreage on the north side of the park untouched.
These wetlands are vital for the lifecycles of many amphibians and insects. Birds
abound in the wetlands/prairie area. I hope to attend the next meeting with my
input regarding this plan.
1/31/2016
8:58 pm
I'd like to stay informed on the plans for West Park
2/5/2016
4:04 pm
Thank you for providing a forum for public input. We live in the area of West Park
and are excited about the future of West Park. I have heard suggestions of
creating a dog park. While a dog lover myself, I strongly oppose using any portion
of West Park land exclusively for dogs. Public parks should promote inclusive use
rather than exclusive use. Restricting limited and valuable park area for dogs
excludes the availability of park land for people. I highly encourage the decision
makers to consider making all of West Park land open to all people for a variety of
uses and to not section off and restrict any portion of land for dogs only.
Additionally, Carmel already created a dog park in the Central Park area. Thank
you very much for considering my input.
2/14/2016
9:46 am
I am a Carmel resident living in the villages of west clay and learned about the
upcoming renovation of west park. We love the close proximity of the park to our
neighborhood, but have been disappointed by the lack of safe playground
equipment for our 21 month old twin daughters. This seems to be a common
issue at many of the public parks. There are very few with play equipment
suitable for toddlers and "new" walkers and climbers.
I would love to see some play equipment or an enclosed area designed with
younger ones in mind. The other problem I run into is not being able to chase two
toddlers at once! An enclosed area with safe equipment would allow me and
other parents of young kids to be able to bring their children to the park without
extra help.
We are so grateful for the wonderful amenities provided in our area and can't
wait to see what is developed at west park.
Appendix
151West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
I thought I would also pass along a website to a fantastic, inclusive park in
California. Something like this would probably be a dream for many families.
http://www.magicalbridge.org/index.html
Thanks again for your consideration. I look forward to hearing about the plan as it
is developed.
2/15/2016
9:18 pm
My husband and I moved to Carmel in May of this year. We love this area and
have found the quality of life here to be truly wonderful. We are empty nesters
but enjoy staying fit and spending time outdoors having fun to stay young.
One of our greatest pleasures is West Park. We go every day and so we took
notice when we read you are seeking input for possible development ideas. Our
idea comes from one of our many trips to Europe. A few years ago we were on a
bike trip from Prague to Vienna and during that trip we happened upon a
fabulous park that was geared toward teens and adults having as much fun as
young children. It seemed to be a blend of a pars course and a playground and it
not only challenged us, it was also tremendously fun. I am including a few photos
to show you some of the features. Happy planning and all the best
This standing swing has a maze and the game becomes trying to work together to
get the ball into the center of the maze by co-operative effort of those on the
'swing'.
Appendix
152 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
This section challenged balance as each of the steps had stepping stone type tops
that moved and required great concentration.
This piece was like a multifaceted see-saw that could rotate in a circle as well as
seats going up and down... It truly kept everyone laughing.
Appendix
153West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
The suspended platforms in the picture below were suspended so that they
moved when you hopped to them and required balance nimble movement.
The one below was clearly the most challenging... One used the rope to 'walk' up
the face of the board and then dismount as you saw fit by dropping off or doing a
Appendix
154 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
somersault type maneuver. In the background you can see the curly balance
beam design.
There were many other features in the park and we tried all of them...and during
our time playing we all felt like kids again. It was nice to know that being an adult
does not been you have to stop playing and having fun.
2/16/2016
9:27 am
I read in the "Current" that you are developing 45 acres of West Park. I would like
to suggest you put in a Pickle ball Court. Pickleball is currently the fastest growing
sport in the nation. We play at the Monon Center inside, but I don't know of any
public outdoor courts in Carmel.
If you are unfamiliar with the sport of Pickleball, please see website for more
information:
What is Pickleball? http://pickleball.com/pages/about-what-is-pickle-ball
Court dimensions: http://pickleball.com/pages/rules-court
2/19/2016
9:43 pm
Playground equipment designed for special needs kids would be an awesome
addition to the park. It would also make so many children feel included in the fun
of being at the park.
I understand that at least one of the parks in Carmel-Clay has some type of
inclusive playground equipment.
I hope when planning the new and improved West Park, my suggestion will
be considered.
Appendix
155West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
2/21/2016
6:22 pm
I don't know if this is the right place to submit this, but I think a second dog park
in Carmel would be a fabulous idea.
2/23/2016
1:17 pm
I would like to have a sidewalk from West Park heading west to provide a safe
connection to the neighborhoods near the Shelbourne round-about.
2/23/2016
7:25 pm
I read the article in Current in Carmel concerning the development of West Park.
I am unable to attend the meeting this evening, Feb 23, but wanted to offer
input. Your email was listed in the article.
This past Saturday when the weather was so delightful, we went to West Park at
about 4PM to walk the trails. However, we had to pass on those plans as there
was no place to park in the designated spaces. This had led many people to
parallel park along the drive, filling in every possible space and creating tight
driving conditions and poor visibility for spotting pedestrians. It is encouraging to
see the park being utilized to such an extent. However, as the westernmost areas
of Carmel are being filled in with more residential developments, this city park,
the only one west of US 31, is going to experience even more crowding on a
routine basis with the current very limited supply of parking on site.
I would like to suggest that the smaller piece of land on the southeast corner of
West Park be utilized for parking. I see that there are 2-3 private homes in
Crossfields adjacent to that piece of land. A buffer of trees and land running at
the property line should be left in place to shield those homeowners from the
parking lot. Given that this portion of land appears (from the image in the
Current article) to be about 1/8 to 1/10 the larger tract, it still leaves the bulk of
the additional land available for nature/recreational purposes and could add
multiple times the number of current designated parking spaces.
I am happy to see plans being put in place to expand West Park. However,
planners need to keep in mind that it is important for the expanding west side
population to be able to continue to utilize West Park without frustration due to
inadequate parking.
2/24/2016
10:10 am
I attended the West Park "Ecology" meeting last evening. This morning as I
walked around my property observing the water backing up at the drains on my
property I thought of two questions I was surprised no one asked last night.
1) Assuming West Park makes a decision to proceed with the restoration project
and disables the drain tile system at West Park, how will that affect properties
immediately adjacent to West Park? Will our drainage systems become
overwhelmed in the event of heavy rains?
2) How will "wetlands" affect the mosquito populations in the area? In the event
those populations increase, how will they be controlled?
Do not construe these as negative comments, I am in favor of restoration
projects, but I believe these are important questions to ask.
Appendix
156 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
2/27/2016
2:16 pm
I would like to receive emails regarding this project. Thank you
3/1/2016
6:13 pm
I'm a University High School sophomore, and I'm very interested in the upcoming
development of West Park. Would you consider adding electronics recycling
facilities at the park?
Over the past few years I've become very concerned about the the environmental
effects of disposing electronic waste in landfills. Families keep accumulating
electronic devices, but don't know how or where to dispose of their old
electronics properly. Often, they simply toss them in the trash, which, as you
know, leads to dangerous chemicals leaching into our soil and ecosystem.
I would very much like to be involved in any efforts to implement electronic
recycling programs/facilities at West Park. I've worked on the following projects
in connection with electronic waste:
1. Currently, I am researching the effects of methyl mercury (a component of
much electronic waste) on animals with a professor at Marian University.
2. In September 2015 I made a 20 minute presentation to our entire student body
and faculty about the dangers of electronic waste.
3. In October 2015 I ran a two-day community recycling drive based at University
High School (in conjunction with TechRecyclers) during which 200 people
dropped off their old electronics for proper disposal. A 24-foot truck was
completely filled with old TVs, monitors, computers, cables, etc.
Given the large number of "patrons" during my October drive, I believe that it
would be extremely beneficial to have a regular, West Park-based, electronics
recycling program to keep electronics out of landfills. Please let me know if and
how I could assist in developing such a program!
3/19/2016
1:43 pm
Members of the Indiana Astronomical Society use, with permission, West Park for
astronomical observing at night. We sincerely hope that park plans do not include
lighting.
3/22/2016
5:20 pm
Thank you once again for inviting me for the focus group this afternoon. I
appreciate all the work that you're doing to make our community great. Also, I
appreciate you connecting me with the appropriate person for the Boy Scouts in
my church to have potential Eagle service projects in West Park building benches.
3/23/2016
1:12 pm
I would like to propose more usage of West Park - indoor facility - health wise -
with aqua exercise for seniors, yoga for all, Zumba, pilates extra...
3/23/2016
9:33 pm
Hopefully the playground and water feature doesn't change too much; it's
uniqueness with the rock stream feature and silo/slide area makes it different
from the other parks. We are on the very east side of Carmel so we don't make a
lot of trips over to West Park but it is fun every time we visit!
3/27/2016
12:48 pm
We are frequent users of West Park and enjoy its natural beauty and walking
paths immensely. We attended the meeting at the Village of West Clay and
Appendix
157West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
wanted to let you know that It is our strong desire to keep West Park and the
new addition a nature park. The current amenities are fine but the balance of
West Park should remain in its natural state (save pathways) without further
amenity expansion. Amenities are available at other locations including tennis
courts, basketball courts and athletic facilities at the nearby schools and almost
all neighborhoods in the area have pools and the Monon center is always
available. With all the development in Carmel, we strongly feel the need that
there should be some remanence of nature preserved which would be West
Park. Thank you for the consideration.
3/29/2016
9:36 am
I wanted to reach out and say hello and thank you again for including me in the
focus group to talk about how to accommodate kids with disabilities. I’m just so
proud and blessed to live here where you all take ALL kids into consideration
when you’re building play spaces. Thank you!
My family and I had a chance to visit a park this past weekend and I thought I’d
share some of the pictures because it was an awesome experience for my son
who uses a walker. It was Brooks School Road Park in Fishers - not sure if any of
you are familiar with it - and it was touted as ADA accessible so we thought we’d
try it out. All in all, it had a lot of features that I think could be incorporated into
the new West Park playground and I’d encourage you to visit it if you can!
Some of the features that were really nice for our family were the ramps to
access the playground features from all entrances, the solid surface playground,
ramps to get into the playspace itself, lots of ground level play features, and the
ADA swings that support low trunk control. I’ve attached a few pictures and as
you can see, kids of all abilities are enjoying the playground. In fact, it was one of
the largest we’ve ever seen and I think it was really neat how it included some
aspects that would appeal to older children as well (such as a third level on the
playspace and a pretty big tube slide).
A few other aspects that we really enjoyed were the creek (my son loved
throwing rocks and watching the splash), the easy sight lines from all areas of the
park, benches along on the edge of the playspace, and how flat the entire play
area was (unlike the current hilly nature of West Park playground).
Feel free to use and share these pictures for the purposes of the planning of West
Park :) Sorry, some of them have a filter that I didn’t realize I had selected.
Also, I plan on attending the design days scheduled in May - is there a best
day/time for me to attend and give input to help plan ADA aspects of the
playground?
4/1/2016
11:11 pm
I am a west Carmel resident with five young children. Thank you for your time
and effort to make our already-wonderful West Park an even better place for our
children and our community! My only personal request is that you make the
splash area safer. My four-year-old slipped on the cement last summer and
ended up with 9 stitches in his head. I have seen other splash parks that have
Appendix
158 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
material that is softer and also gives more traction than cement. I think this
would be a safer alternative for our children. Thank you.
4/7/2016
3:31 pm
I'd love to see a dog park on the west side!
4/19/2016
12:13 pm
I would love more benches and more walking trails. Would love an updated
splash pad, like mulberry fields or better. I don't like that huge climbing thing!
Would be nice to have more diverse playground structures geared towards a
range of ages. It would be cool to have something new and different, like a
skating rink or something else unique to Carmel. I would also love a lot more
shade trees. Thank you!!!
4/20/2016
10:28 pm
One of the major attractions of West Park, is that is IS natural, and unimproved. I
am very concerned that you folks are trying to turn it into a carmel disneyland. I
am also concerned, that certain interests will try to bring in that "DNA" testing
malarky just to allow dogs to walk in that park. That is self serving to certain
special interests. My opinion? Improve existing facilities, keep the natural
facilities, and for the most part, leave it alone. Thats what makes it as attractive
as it is.
4/22/2016
5:21 pm
Pickleball please...growing fast...family fun...thx
4/24/2016
4:03 pm
Outdoor dedicated pickleball courts. Many communities across the U.S. are
adding courts to meet the growing demand for pickleball.
4/24/2016
8:09 pm
I just wanted to reach out again and say hello. I’m very excited to see the team
next week and see what develops for the new park! As a mom whose son wants
to explore and play just like any other three year old, but often can’t because of
his mobility restrictions, having a park that allows him to explore and experience
being a kid is something that I can’t wait to see. I read a blog written by a mom
whose son also has spina bifida and I felt like it was so well timed for this
upcoming park design project. It’s a short blog and I promise it won’t take more
than five minutes to read - but I think it really captures how much an accessible
playground means to us.
http://www.whatdoyoudodear.com/if-you-give-a-mouse-an-accessible-
playground/
Thank you for taking the time to consider all kids :)
4/30/2016
1:02 pm
I would love some sort of indoor play facility for year round play! Thank you!
4/30/2016
6:59 pm
I have appreciated your outreach to Carmel neighbors for input on a redesign for
West Park.
I have talked to many neighbors near West Park and throughout Carmel and will
share some of our suggestions for West Park. We feel strongly that we would like
to maintain the natural green space in West Park. Once West Park has been
Appendix
159West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
developed it will be very difficult to take it back to its natural state. We are
concerned about overdevelopment leading to loss of green space. There are a
limited number of natural green spaces in our community and much of our
remaining green space is being gobbled up by developers.
Neighbors have made the following suggestions: A bridge or underpass between
University School and West Park would help provide a safe crossing across 116th
Street. There should be clear posted rules for bringing dogs into the West Park.
Consider an intergenerational playground, where families can play together.
Have mile markers along the paths.
I believe that my suggestions below will have minimal impact on the natural state
of West Park. I attended the first 2 community meetings. I watched the video of
the third community meeting. I also participated in one of your focus groups and
shared with you some information about designs for playgrounds and exercise
equipment for older community members.
I look forward to seeing the design for the new playground and water play area. I
often take my grandchildren to play at the playground and water play area at
West Park. *I think that it is important to include areas with shade and benches
for the caregivers who are bringing children to play at the park.
*I encourage you to include playground equipment at West Park that will be
handicapped accessible.
I want to share my feelings about some of the additions to the park that were
presented at the third public meeting. (I was not able to attend that meeting.
I am strongly in favor of having outdoor fitness equipment (outdoor gym or adult
playground) at West Park, and ask that it includes equipment that could be easily
utilized by older Carmel residents. This would be the first location in Indiana to
provide outdoor exercise equipment for our older citizens.
I am 68 years old. I have had back and knee surgery, and have some current foot
problems that limit me from walking long distances. Many Carmel residents have
similar issues. I know it is for me to be outside and to do aerobic exercise that
will also give me strength and flexibility and endurance and balance. For the past
ten years and for the first time in my life I have been working out regularly at a
fitness center (at the Monon Center). I think that exercising with family and
meeting friends at West Park to walk and exercise will provide an increased
motivation to keep my body functioning at its best. I would value combining
soaking up the peace of nature with an expanded opportunity for exercise.
*I ask that this fitness equipment be near parking and that there be some
benches and shade in this area.
*Because of my walking limitations, but also to encourage me to do more walking
I suggest that equipment for older citizens be grouped in one area, and also some
equipment spaced out on a trail leading from that area to encourage walking and
more exercise.
Appendix
160 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
*This area could also be connected to an outdoor challenge course.
I am interested in having a year around Nature Center in Carmel. I think that is an
option worth considering for West Park. I often take my grandchildren to the
Cool Creek Nature Center in Westfield. I encourage you to have interpretive
labels and signs throughout West Park. I would encourage you to have some
public art and/or sculpture built out of natural materials.
I am opposed to having WI-FI in West Park. I feel that it is healthy for people to
get away from electronics and provide an oasis for focusing on nature, rather
than have yet another venue for electronics.
I am opposed to an Indoor Adventure Park. I believe that there are several
commercial options that people could use.
I am opposed to a large year around indoor facility. There are many places in our
community where people or groups can meet.
I feel neutral about the below options.
*I would want to know more about them and how much of the green space they
would use and how they would impact the park experience.
Outdoor games in park (ex. chess, checkers, ping pong)
Green space integrated water features/spray parks
Food Trucks in the park
Camping or Glamping (glamour camping)
Community Gardens
I look forward to attending much of the 3-day design workshop as you develop
the preliminary draft of a new master plan for West Park.
5/1/2016
11:11 pm
We have participated in all three West Park Community Meetings, a focus group,
and have read the website postings. The first two Community Meetings left us
feeling hopeful and thinking about what we would like to see for the
park. However, the third meeting left us feeling alarmed and thinking about what
we absolutely would not want to see done to this park. Rather than just putting
options on the table, that presentation felt like a marketing pitch of why we
ought to want the biggest, best, preferably totally unique entertainment
developments (especially Indoor Adventure Parks), similar to and beyond what
big cities in other countries have done. We actually do not want that, nor the
crowds it would entail.
The surest way to ruin West Park is to convert it into just another noisy, crowded,
entertainment venue. West Park is a neighborhood park and respite, beloved as
a place to unwind, explore nature, exercise, and engage in imaginative play
surrounded by natural beauty and wildlife. Commercial and technological
entertainment is available all around us these days, in the belief that we all must
be constantly entertained. West Park is a gem in that few nature escapes of any
Appendix
161West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
size have survived the development push by Carmel, as mature trees are cut
down, wildlife corridors are disrupted, and residential yard sizes
shrink/disappear.
We strongly believe that West Park should remain focused on being a
functioning, educational ecosystem with open spaces, and with play elements
that blend in and do not disrupt the natural look and feel. Not overdeveloped,
over programmed, or over lit.
WE WOULD SUPPORT:
1) Improve/Restore the Park's Ecology: Include education about how it
functions, the wildlife, and the plants (label them). Restore/create amphibian
habitat.
2) Preserve the Woods (shade, windbreak, wildlife cover): Add more benches
within, and reconnect the two woods along the park edges.
3) Keep as Natural Looking as Possible: With minimal and discreet signage, and
no advertising. Do need to add signage near parking lots regarding bicycle and
dog regulations. Enforce them.
4) Pollinator/Butterfly, Herb, and Sunflower Gardens: And related education
(covered box of brochures).
5) Expand trail system, provide natural and/or built shade, and maybe some
additional water features. Porch-type, two-person swings/gliders, some covered,
would be enjoyable.
6) Another large shelter with restrooms in the new section. Maybe hang a large
chalkboard on the protected side of both shelters, where people can record what
mammals, insects, birds, amphibians, and reptiles they have seen in the park and
the date seen.
7) Encourage recycling, and have an herbicide/pesticide-free compost area
available to West Carmel residents.
8) Place suggestion boxes near parking lots and shelters.
9) Public Art: Only if nature/animal related, not overdone, and only by local
artists/students. No big, bright abstract modern art sculptures, or Main Street-
type statues. Maybe a bird house trail, with imaginative birdhouses designed,
built, decorated, and maintained by area school kids.
10) Pedestrian Bridge over 116th St. to connect the park with University High
School: Better than a crosswalk, and could possibly have local artists/students
paint nature-themed murals on both side walls of a simple bridge. This could be
the signature piece for the park that some desire. Ask for donations. We would
contribute.
11) Improve and Expand Playground and Splash Pad to serve all
ages/abilities. Add more tire swings. Keep noisy activities in one area, so people
can choose to avoid it. Maybe the playground area could expand farther to the
south, an area that's only very lightly used.
12) Outdoor Ice Skating (convertible to roller skating?) with fire pits, seating,
warming/hot chocolate shed, and minimal lighting. No hockey or competitions.
13) Outdoor Fitness Equipment clusters or circuits for older adults.
Appendix
162 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
14) Outdoor Games: Tetherball, corn hole, ping pong, badminton, croquet,
adjustable high-jump course, gathering spot of varied height stools that
twirl. (How would it be possible to prevent theft?)
15) Outdoor movies night at the park on an occasional basis, with some films for
ages besides very young children.
16) Food Trucks: Two nights a week only.
17) Possibly a SMALL Outdoor Challenge Course.
18) Snow machine for Jill's Hill.
19) Would only support an indoor year-round building if it was a Nature Center
with areas for educational classes/programs/workshops. This would honor Jill
Perelman's desired legacy to preserve the park as a natural place and to provide a
Nature Center. Make it look natural, maybe like a cabin. And not huge.
20) SPECIAL EVENTS: The following could be Special Events, with a small fee
charged (except for Astronomy nights and Nature walks).
** Easter Egg Hunt.
** Camping.
** Astronomy Nights Program.
** Dog Parade.
** Educational Nature Walks led by conservationists.
** Displayed, Lit, Jack-O-Lanterns: Multiple nights. (A fee, except for those
who contribute Jack-O-Lanterns to the show.)
** Luminary Walks: Multiple nights.
** Live Animal Programs.
WE WOULD STRONGLY OPPOSE IN THIS LOCATION: (Not in character with this
park, available elsewhere, and/or disruptive to other park users/neighbors.)
1. Swimming Pool.
2. Frequent Camping.
3. Dog Park: Some of our dog-walking neighbors have switched to Coxhall
Gardens because, at least for now, it is a less crowded and more peaceful place to
relax in nature.
4. Ziplines and Outdoor Adventure Park.
5. Stages and Outdoor Concerts.
6. Ball Courts and Tennis Courts.
7. Private "community garden" plots, separate drone areas, or other such
ventures that use up space, but mainly benefit a comparatively small number of
park users.
8. Advertising of any kind, and anything themed or designed based on
marketed, licensed characters.
9. Cluttering the top of Jill's Hill. Need room for people. No big rocks. Need a
couple more benches.
10. Overly prominent and/or too numerous signs, especially commercial
sponsorship. The existing sponsorship signs suggesting how we should play are
not necessary, and would be better used to convey environmental information.
Appendix
163West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
11. Any Large Year-Round Buildings, especially Indoor Challenge Course or Indoor
Adventure Park Buildings:
These were encouraged, probably as a way to address the 80% cost recovery
mandate via user fees. Besides that mandate being unreasonable, West Park is
not a resort, nor does it need to be a destination for team building, birthday
parties, and large meetings. Commercial-type entertainment is not a park's
purpose, and there are plenty of commercial options already available (e.g.,
Chuck E. Cheese's, Incrediplex, Recreation Unlimited, etc.), as well as plenty of
places with large meeting spaces. This type of development is out of character,
too big, would add to already existing crowding and parking issues, and should
remain a commercial venture.
12. Free WiFi: Virtually everyone is aware that people spend too much time on
their technology devices. We should be encouraging people to disconnect from
those for a little while, and go play, interact with the people around them, and
become aware of their surroundings. Free WiFi would attract those who just
want the free WiFi. Nothing ruins a park experience more than everyone staring
into their phones, or having to listen to lengthy, unimportant, loud conversations
all around you directed at people who are not present. This topic was accurately
titled, "Nature Deficit Disorders and Technology Addictions". It is not the
function of a park to accommodate that addiction any more than it would be to
bring in a casino, cigarette machines, drugs, or alcohol to accommodate those
addictions. Those who choose technology over the park would not really be using
the park anyway.
FUND RAISING OPTIONS INSTEAD OF BIG INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY:
* Fees for Special Events and shelter rentals.
* Donation boxes at Nature Center building and near parking areas.
* Memorial trees, benches, swings, bricks (with low-key labels).
* Drink/Snack vending machines at the two large shelters. Low-key, retro look,
and not covered in marketing images, and not lit.
* Hot chocolate shack.
* Sell herbs and sunflower heads from gardens, and native plant seeds.
* Fee to participate in nature photo contest.
* Build a wishing well or fountain that people will throw coins in.
* Restoring the ecology will result in less maintenance costs and water
demand. That would be unique and profitable.
* Since the Monon Center is at capacity, charge somewhat more for those users
who don't live in Carmel. We pay extra to enter Eagle Creek Park because we are
out-of-county.
We sincerely thank the Park's Department for its time and outreach to gather and
consider public input about what the public wants for West Park. That is unusual
these days, and is much appreciated. We look forward to attending as much of
the upcoming 3-day design workshops as possible. Please forward this email to
any others on the team who are still accepting public input.
Appendix
164 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
5/4/2016
1:22 pm
I would suggest use for future land a small to mid-sized dog park. We take our
dogs there often and see many others doing the same.
5/8/2016
4:23 pm
Unfortunately, we were unable to attend the planning sessions last week. We
are in favor of leaving West Park in its natural state as much as possible. As a
result, it If we had to pick a plan it would be Concept Plan A1 although I don’t
think you need 300 parking spots in the east parking lot and some of the shelters
to the north can be eliminated. Thank you
5/17/2016
7:59 pm
I like the activity core design. It seems to provide a lot of options for caregivers as
little ones are playing.
5/26/206
10:33 am
appreciate being able to participate in the process of redesigning West Park. I
have enjoyed attending a focus group, the tour of West Park and the various
community meetings.
I would like to share 2 concerns that I hope you will address in the redesign of
West Park.
I understand that you are thinking about having a linear nature center at West
Park. I urge you to include in the Indoor Adventure Park a room/one or areas
with more extensive and varied resources related to the nature of West Park
including books, puzzles, puppets, models of animals and plants and other
interactive hands on materials. I feel that this area would be used by visitors to
the park and also by programs being planned for camps and other group
activities.
I am also eager to see and hear about your plans for a playground/exercise area
for seniors. I will be bringing by your office a group of articles I googled about
playground and seniors.
1 in 5 Americans will be over 65 by 2039.
Every 8 seconds a Boomer turns 62.
The Baby Boom generation is almost 80 million strong.
54% of Boomers expect to exercise regularly into retirement.
I’ll bring several articles about playgrounds for seniors:
Playgrounds for Senior Citizens are Becoming Popular in America
A Brief History of Wellness Playgrounds for Elders
Why Playgrounds for Elders
Programs for Elders Among Top Fitness Trends for 2013
Physical Exercise
Social Engagement
Our Process
Balance Paths and More
New Playground Design
Appendix
165West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Following are comments received through YourWestPark.com or emailed directly to staff. Comments
were edited only to remove the identity of the sender.
Date/Time Comment
9/5/2016
6:26 pm
I'm a University High School junior, and I'm very interested in the upcoming
development of West Park. Would you consider adding electronics recycling
facilities at the park? Over the past few years I've become very concerned about
the the environmental effects of disposing electronic waste in landfills. Families
keep accumulating electronic devices, but don't know how or where to dispose of
their old electronics properly. Often, they simply toss them in the trash, which, as
you know, leads to dangerous chemicals leaching into our soil and ecosystem. I
would very much like to be involved in any efforts to implement electronic
recycling programs/facilities at West Park. I've worked on the following projects
in connection with electronic waste: 1. Currently, I am researching the effects of
methyl mercury (a component of much electronic waste) on animals with a
professor at Marian University. 2. In September 2015 I made a 20 minute
presentation to our entire student body and faculty about the dangers of
electronic waste. 3. In October 2015 I ran a two-day community recycling drive
based at University High School (in conjunction with TechRecyclers) during which
200 people dropped off their old electronics for proper disposal. A 24-foot truck
was completely filled with old TVs, monitors, computers, cables, etc. Given the
large number of "patrons" during my October drive, I believe that it would be
extremely beneficial to have a regular, West Park-based, electronics recycling
program to keep electronics out of landfills. Please let me know if and how I could
assist in developing such a program!
9/25/2016
8:47 pm
Need dog park right away...
9/30/2016
1:17 pm
I live in the Larkspur sub-division and would like to have an easier/safer access to
the park.
Appendix
166 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix
167West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER INPUT
Appendix
168 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1
January 26, 2016
1:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Douglas Callahan (Clay Township
Trustee), Rich Taylor (CCPR Board and Clay Township Trustee)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and an overview of team roles, project history and planning
process. The following meeting schedule and expectations were discussed
A.Monthly meetings will occur with the consultant team for the three months of charrette
preparation. Future dates will be 2/23/16 and 3/22/16. These will include daytime
stakeholder meetings and an evening public education and input meeting focusing on key
project topics such as creative play facilities, ecology and recreation programming and
operations.
B.There will be a three-day charrette, date TBD but likely April/May 2016.
C.There will be a review meeting 4-6 weeks after three-day charrette, after which the draft plan
would be forwarded to the Park Board for review and approval.
D.It is anticipated that a first phase of construction will occur shortly after the master plan is
approved, using available COIT and Impact Fees.
E.The following items discussed
1.The plan will focus on the entire 125 acres, not just the new 45 acres, in order to have a
holistic design for the entire park.
2.The existing boardwalk is in good condition for its age and a very popular park feature
but will be looked at if there are ways to improve or even expand it in the new design as
part of a broader trail and environmental network. It is conceivable that existing
ponds/water features could be augmented.
3.Pedestrian/trail links to adjacent neighborhoods and Dad’s Club/School properties to
the north have been discussed in the past and will need further discussion with
appropriate parties in this plan.
4.Programming and physical connectivity with adjacent University HS will be explored.
Furthermore, it was discussed that a holistic approach with University as well as the
school and Dad’s Club properties to the north could create a much larger, fully
functioning open space network that fulfills a wide range of programming needs and
trail linkages through partnerships.
5.There is a lot of interest in a west side dog park and heavy dog activity currently in the park. The public will likely request this for consideration at West Park.
Appendix
169West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1
January 26, 2016
Page 2
6.Shelters and potential indoor programming space will be considered based on
community need and capacity of facilities in other parks (Central and Founders).
7.It was suggested that the library has good data on how to serve the west side and
should be contacted accordingly.
8.The approach that the new Central Park playground is taking for people with disabilities
was cited as a model and minimum standard for the new West Park playground.
Features for children with autism were specifically mentioned.
9.Large events have recently overwhelmed West Park and coordination with Cox Hall
Gardens was encouraged to manage larger events.
II.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 2/23 and 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-1-26 stakeholder meetings\2016-1-26 west park stakeholder 2 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
170 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2
January 26, 2016
2:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Bruce Knott and Adam Harrington (Carmel Fire), John Thompson and Julia Litchford (Carmel Engineering), Carolyn Goolsby (Carmel Library), John Duffy (Carmel Utilities), Drew Williams (Clay Township Regional Waste), Chris Stice (Hamilton Co. Parks), Steve Engelking (Carmel Administration)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and an overview of team roles, project history and planning process. The following meeting schedule and expectations were discussedA.Monthly meetings will occur with the consultant team for the three months of charrette preparation. Future dates will be 2/23/16 and 3/22/16. These will include daytime
stakeholder meetings and an evening public education and input meeting focusing on key
project topics such as creative play facilities, ecology and recreation programming and
operations.
B.There will be a three-day charrette, date TBD but likely April/May 2016.
C.There will be a review meeting 4-6 weeks after three-day charrette, after which the draft plan
would be forwarded to the Park Board for review and approval.
D.It is anticipated that a first phase of construction will occur shortly after the master plan is
approved, using available COIT and Impact Fees.
E.The following items discussed
1.There is adequate sanitary capacity in West Park but low/flat terrain will require a
grinder pump.
2.Water service is good via 6” main along 116th Street.3.Preliminary investigations suggest that a well dug on site could yield 300 gallons per minute (gpm).4.There are City plans for trail linkages along 116th that could improve West Park non-motorized access. Some ROW dedication is still needed. It was also noted that the park currently has three entrances from 116th and alignment with those on the south side would be preferable.5.There are opportunities to implement upgraded stormwater treatment train approaches in West Park, building on what was put in place in the original design. It was also suggested that green lots be considered to reduce potential stormwater fees. Same with the potential for green roofs and a potential net-zero approach to new facilities.
Appendix
171West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2
January 26, 2016
Page 2
6.Cox Hall Gardens was discussed as it relates to larger functions currently housed in
CCPR parks, West Park included. It was suggested that we review their master plan
which may decrease the amount of lawn space currently used for large event parking.
Based on this it was suggested that a proactive strategy be undertaken between
appropriate City and County entities for large event planning.
7.The library has no current plans for additional facilities there could be some cross
programming opportunities in a West Park CCPR facility. Further dialog was suggested
during programming.
8.New structures would need to coordinate fire protection needs as the program and
design advances. It was also noted that any new structures that may be considered on
the far north end of West Park may require a secondary access for fire protection.
9.It was noted that the current pond flows south under 116th via a regulated drain.
10.The idea of trail fitness nodes were suggested as a potential program to consider.
II.Next Steps
A.Plans will be reviewed with most of the above parties as the designs advance. This could
potentially happen as part of the three-day charrette in April/May.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-1-26 stakeholder meetings\2016-1-26 west park stakeholder 2 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
172 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3
January 26, 2016
3:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Wendy Franklin (Carmel Mayoral Appointment) and Jim Garretson (Clay Township Trustee Appointee).
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and an overview of team roles, project history and planning process. The following meeting schedule and expectations were discussedA.Monthly meetings will occur with the consultant team for the three months of charrette preparation. Future dates will be 2/23/16 and 3/22/16. These will include daytime stakeholder meetings and an evening public education and input meeting focusing on key project topics such as creative play facilities, ecology and recreation programming and
operations.
B.There will be a three-day charrette, date TBD but likely April/May 2016.
C.There will be a review meeting 4-6 weeks after three-day charrette, after which the draft plan
would be forwarded to the Park Board for review and approval.
D.It is anticipated that a first phase of construction will occur shortly after the master plan is
approved, using available COIT and Impact Fees.
E.The following items discussed
1.Demand for a west side pool was suggested, questioning whether West Park would be
a candidate site. It was suggested that this would be explored with other suggestions
during the programming stage and done in light of the comprehensive parks and
recreation plan for CCPR that suggests a need for a future west side community facility.
2.It was noted that hockey is popular in the community with limited available facilities in
Carmel. It was noted that skating was suggested and eliminated in the original West
Park plan but included in the 2003 plan for the 5 acre Riley Site. This plan was never
implemented but some level of non-competitive skating could be considered in the plan
in line with the park’s heavy winter use.
3.The idea of a West Park nature center was suggested to support the park’s extensive
natural areas. It was noted that the park may need additional water elements to
support an extensive enough ecosystem to support such a center. However, nature
interpretation would be a logical component in any design.
4.It was noted that the current pond near 116th is stocked for fishing, a popular program from the boardwalk.
Appendix
173West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3
January 26, 2016
Page 2
5.Destination plan was noted as a draw for past and current park users. The non-
traditional design of the play and spray components with places for parental viewing
and socialization and emphasis on “imagination” was specifically noted as positive.
6.The issue of large special events overwhelming the park was noted as a challenge in all
of CCPR’s facilities and something not aligning with the department’s mission. It was
also suggested that events that remain consider off-site parking strategies and
temporary solutions to minimize over paving of the park.
7.It was suggested that signage be added to reinforce City ordinances pertaining to dog
activities in the park, supported by greater enforcement.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-1-26 stakeholder meetings\2016-1-26 west park stakeholder 4 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
174 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4
January 26, 2016
4:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Jim Engledow
(CCPR Park Board), Jeff Worrell (City Council), Kevin Rider (City Council), Carol
Schleif (City Council),
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and an overview of team roles, project history and planning
process. The following meeting schedule and expectations were discussed
A.Monthly meetings will occur with the consultant team for the three months of charrette
preparation. Future dates will be 2/23/16 and 3/22/16. These will include daytime
stakeholder meetings and an evening public education and input meeting focusing on key
project topics such as creative play facilities, ecology and recreation programming and
operations.
B.There will be a three-day charrette, date TBD but likely April/May 2016.
C.There will be a review meeting 4-6 weeks after three-day charrette, after which the draft plan
would be forwarded to the Park Board for review and approval.
D.It is anticipated that a first phase of construction will occur shortly after the master plan is
approved, using available COIT and Impact Fees.
E.The following items discussed
1.It was suggested that there needs to be more to do in the park. More active, including
trails. More use of the “circle”, including Jill’s Hill.
2.Spray plan gets heavy use. Some operational challenges with kids blocking drains and
creating standing pools. Unattended kids an issue. Future design will re-evaluate
operations.
3.Dog walking is very popular.
4.Consider expanding the lagoon and adding more boardwalks.
5.West Park will have some “legacy” issues due to long-term personal connections of
residents and park users. It’s well liked but “refreshing” will be viewed as positive, as
will making it bigger and better.
6.The park currently serves some University HS needs, including cross country.
7.The park may benefit from a flexible facility like Founders Park. Possibly with a stage
and ability to serve summer camps.
8.West Park is a heavily used winter park due to Jill’s Hill. There is opportunity to expand
and improve this with things like a snow machine, toboggan run and skating ribbon.
Appendix
175West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4
January 26, 2016
Page 2
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-1-26 stakeholder meetings\2016-1-26 west park stakeholder 4 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
176 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting
January 26, 2016
12:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House - Village of West Clay
M Gregg Calpino
M Gregg Calpino
P Gregg Calpino (SEH), Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Dan Dutcher, Jim
Engledow, Matt Snyder, Jeff Worrell (Steering Committee)
C Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and an overview of team roles, project history and expectations
of the Steering Committee. The following meeting schedule and expectations were discussed
A.Monthly meetings with the consultant team for the three months of charrette preparation.
Future dates will be 2/23/16 and 3/22/16.
B.Regular milestone reviews and briefings during the three-day charrette, date TBD but likely
April/May 2016.
C.Review meeting 4-6 weeks after three-day charrette, after which the Committee would likely
forward the draft plan to the Park Board for review and approval. At this point the Committee
could sunset unless the Park Board desired to maintain the group for additional purposes.
D.It was also discussed that the Committee would be expected to assist the staff and team in
gauging community input through their respective networks between meetings and assist with
community engagement.
E. T
1.There is a near-term need to replace the playground and water play features due to
age/lifespan.
2.The park is heavily used and cherished by the community, making it one of CCPR’s first
“legacy” projects where existing parks are updated. There are many personal
connections and meaningful user engagement will be critical factor for success.
3.Pedestrian/trail links to adjacent neighborhoods and Dad’s Club/School properties to
the north have been discussed in the past and will need further discussion with
appropriate parties in this plan.
4.The existing house and structures on the 40-acre Per lman property will be demolished
as a first phase however utility services and the 116th curb cut will remain as
opportunities.
5.There is a lot of interest in a west side dog park and heavy dog activity currently in the
park. The public will likely request this for consideration at West Park.
6.Facilities at Central and Founders Park are at or near capacity and there is a need for
some level of program facility space on the west side that may be a fit in West Park,
mindful of site and access/parking limitations.
7.Additional trail linkages will be a popular program for the park.
Appendix
177West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting
January 26, 2016
Page 2
8.Large events have recently overwhelmed all CCPR facilities, including West Park.
Access/parking challenges make larger events a challenge. Satellite parking is used at
University HS but that poses potential challenges crossing 116th Street. A proactive
planning and coordination strategy will be explored, as will physical solutions in the
design.
9.Significant COIT and Impact Fee budgets have been identified for the first phase of
implementation, which would likely begin late 2016/early 2017 based on direction in the
master plan.
II.Next Steps
A.Steering Committee, stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 2/23 and 3/22.
B.Suggested follow-up stakeholder meetings include schools, Dad’s Club, faith-based groups,
ecology-focused groups and the business community/Chamber.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-1-26 stakeholder meetings\2016-1-26 west park stakeholder 1 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
178 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1-Carmel Clay Parks Foundation
February 23, 2016
1:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier (CCPR), David Hocutt, Mac Williams, Sue Dillon, Dan Dutcher, Mark Varnau
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park. This includedA.Need to be mindful of bees, monarchs and pollinators in general as the park plan progresses and operations and maintenance procedures are considered.B.There were some strong ecological first steps in the original park including the pond and prairie maze. There are also some lessons learned from what didn’t work or could have worked better.
C.The park serves blue bird populations.
D.The spray and play areas could be augmented to better serve older users than current
design.
E.There is an opportunity to integrate and reconnect people with nature in a playful
atmosphere.
F.The park could have larger swaths of nature, balanced by more programmed people spaces.
G.West Park could help raise environmental awareness with educational programs, including
those for bees, monarchs and other pollinators. There are good models out there for
tagging/tracking that could be deployed as well as milkweed and monarch weigh station
programs.
H.The park was originally designed to accommodate 4 grid fields and 4 diamonds for sports but
this is no longer a need due to adjacent Dad’s Club and school facilities.
I.Jill’s Hill could have something more dramatic on top (i.e. Stonehenge).
J.The eastern 5 acres are being overrun by Bradford Pear saplings and other invasives. A plan
to address this should be part of the master plan, including staff education so right tools are
used for the right conditions/locations.
K.A solution is needed for the heavy dog use that runs loose and doesn’t always follow
established laws. Give them a place to run the right way and enforce the laws.
L.Concern that burning as a management tool could impact pollinator habitat, especially the
black locust in the eastern 5 acres.
M.There should be a proactive pollinator approach that aligns with funding (i.e. CP 42 mix that
could align with federal programs and yield $200-300/acre for next 10 yrs).
N.Blue bird viewing generates large numbers of visitors that need support amenities and need
to be considered in proactive event management.
Appendix
179West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1
February 23, 2016
Page 2
O.West Park could better educate through nature programming and facilities.
P.Public art would be a positive addition to West Park.
Q.There are large groups of Hispanic families that use the park’s turf areas for soccer. Similar
for other west side ethnicities.
II.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 2 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
180 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2-Environmental Agencies and Organizations
February 23, 2016
2:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier (CCPR), Erin Baird (Indiana Wildlife Federation), Carol Cavell (Trees Indiana), Julia Kemnitz (US Fish & Wildlife Service), Daren Mindham (City of Carmel), Michael Popa (Hoosier Environmental Council), Chris Roberts (Trees Indiana), John South (HCSWCD), Aaron Stump (Indiana Wildlife Federation), Tom Swinford (DNR, Nature Preserves), Leslie Webb (Carmel Green Initiative), Nichole Speth (City of Carmel DOCS), Steve Apfelbaum (AES), Neelay Bhatt (PROS)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park. Steve Apfelbaum then presented preliminary ecological findings from data analysis and site tour on
2/22/16 and discussed with the group.
II.The following items were
A.It was confirmed that the entire park, not just the additional 45 acres is being planned.
B.It was confirmed that no pre-determined capital and O&M budget has been established for
the plan. The budget will be established by the plan, which will likely be implemented in
phases.
C.There was discussion about the potential impacts of future climate change on the park. The
team acknowledged that the plan is mindful of such matters.
D.There was discussion about the level of use that the “circle” gets compared to other areas of
the park, suggesting that more turf areas could be considered for natural areas if it wasn’t
heavily used.
E.The team confirmed a commitment to native plantings and strategies to combat invasive
species, including the Bradford Pear that is proliferating the eastern 5 acres.
F.There was discussion about the potential to remove some agricultural tiles to restore wetland
habitats in appropriate areas.
G.There was a stated desire to focus on drought tolerant species in light of potential climate
change.
H.It was acknowledged that current soil conditions, including extensive compaction from
excavation activities during the original park development has impeded new tree growth.
Approach to address this, including cover crop strategies, were discussed.
I.It was acknowledged that the current soils would have likely supported mixed deciduous
forests historically and that wet prairies would work well in much of the park. It was further
suggested that future plans align with soil patterns and acknowledge the site’
J.It was suggested that a floristic inventory be developed to guide future restoration.
Appendix
181West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2
February 23, 2016
Page 2
III.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 2 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
182 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3-HOA Representatives and General Public
February 23, 2016
3:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier (CCPR), Dee Fox,Bob Kravitz, Judy
Magnus, Tina Malone
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
A.The playground is very popular and heavily used.
B.The park needs more trails and more trails that link the park to adjacent neighborhoods and
schools.
C.The park could use more shelters, which are popular with families. Potential revenue source
if people aren’t currently paying for them.
D.Kids like using the sledding hill and the water play is fantastic.
E.Add more nature-walking trails with a purpose, possibly with interpretative stations about
Carmel and scavenger hunts.
F.Leverage 4H in the county for tree/forestry learning. Nearest location is Noblesville.
G.
1.Parking is full
2.A lot of dogs
H.Add more hike/bike trails with signage about user groups.
I.Elicit input from the BMW tournament about what would make Carmel attractive to return.
J.Tennis facilities are insufficient in the community.
K.There is nothing to do in the park in winter besides the hill.
L.Pickle ball is a growing activity to be considered.
M.Kids like the big playground slide.
N.Fish is very popular in the park.
O.Food trucks are very popular and crowded.
P.Keep the park nature-oriented as a place to unwind. Nature experience is rare today.
Q.Don’t make the park and entertainment venue.
R.Don’t be too prescriptive with programming and events.
S.Monon Center is not always popular with west side kids due to fees and conflicts with kids
outside the community. Need a west side alternative.
T.Kids like climbing.
U.Park could use at least one more tire swing –current one is very popular.
V.Add more benches in existing woods along trails.
W.The new woods should have trails and stations like Eagle Creek.
X.There are too many off-leash dogs. Needs more signage to control behavior.
Appendix
183West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3
February 23, 2016
Page 2
Y.There are no signs about bikes (rules/regs, where to park).
Z.There needs to be more to connect kids with outdoor interests like water and fishing.
AA.Suggested ideas –bullfrog pond and footbridge at Idlewild Park in PA.
BB.Consider a pedestrian bridge over 116th to University HS.
CC.Consider archery in the park.
DD.Maintain wide open spaces for casual recreation (kites, Frisbee) and sports practice.
EE.Consider adding a maypole and tetherball.
FF.Label the plants in the park like a botanic garden to educate park users.
GG.Consider a year-round skating rink.
HH.Add a sunflower garden for birds with birdhouses designed/built by schools.
II.Add glider swings.
II.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 3 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
184 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4-Parents of Children with Disabilities and CCPR Inclusion
Supervisors
February 23, 2016
4:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier, Aimee Rich (CCPR), Amanda Swearingen,
Becca Wickman, Mike Gould (neighbor)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
The following items were discussed by the group regarding play environments in light of children
with disabilities
A.The playground needs space for younger, safe play. West Park is sometimes intimidating but
Founders Park is much better. River Road also successful.
B.More open space for free-form play.
C.Incorporate ground-based features to augment taller ones. Things like tunnels and sensory
panels.
D.Paved trails are good for mobility challenged kids. Hills and mulch are challenges.
E.Good models allow kids to get to the top of play features through careful grading. Allows kids
to start at the top.
F.Glad to see CCPR so inclusive.
G.There are very few water parks with wheelchair access.
H.Shade is typically lacking in playgrounds.
I.Need to have equal high and low features.
J.Playgrounds have to have the appropriate level of easier and challenging features.
K.Boardwalk is very popular. Kids like the ducks and wetland/nature.
II.
A.There is interested in preserving the existing woods and natural character.
B.Interest in a dog park in the open land closest to 116th was expressed.
C.The neighbors would want to see details about any trails proposed for this parcel and would
want to compare with City trail plans.
D.There were questions about existing standing water in the woods and the status of potential
wetlands on the property. It was noted that National Inventory wetlands are present on
current mapping and that the nature of park soils and observed hydrology and vegetation
suggests additional wetlands may exist. These would be mapped once the park plan and
related development is better defined.
III.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
Appendix
185West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4
February 23, 2016
Page 2
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 5 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
186 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5-HOA Representatives & General Public
February 23, 2016
1:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Neelay Bhatt
Neelay Bhatt
Neelay Bhatt (PROS),Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Bill Gallihugh (Crooked Stick West),
Nancy Harkness (HCMGA & DNR Tree Steward), David Hocutt, Jill Meisenheimer
(Williams Mill &Citizens for Responsible Zoning), Chris Potts (Saddle Creek), Mike
Rogers (Saddlebrook on Shelborne)
Participants, Gregg Calpino, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
A.Infrastructure has to be upgraded and replaced
B.Incorporate and integrate the new purchased 45 (40 acres + 5 acres) into the remaining park
plan.
C.First community meeting focused on PLAY / Second Meeting focused on Ecology / Third
meeting will be on March 22nd
D.What elements need to left as-is versus what else can be updated / modified or added?
II.Saddlebrook on Shelborne
A. Strengths
1.Love having movies at night
2. Love the hill and using it during winter months
3.Connectivity from Shelborne to the park is very much appreciated
4.From the ecology, what areas can be preserved versus modified?
B.Concerns
1.Wetlands and very old trees –safety concerns with people walking around there at
night
a.Don’t add in a path that would come too close to Saddlebrook on Shelborne that
may bring in people too close to the homes
2.Maintain the aesthetics as they are and keep the education component as is
3.Have seen some invasive species in the wood area at the back and would be great to
have nature trails at the back
4.Keep a shield / buffer and develop the natural trail feel similar to Cool Creek Park
5.Remove the ash from the dead beech trees to avoid safety concerns
6.Parking situation is challenging and depending on what the new uses are there,
additional parking will need to be evaluated
C.Potential Ideas
1.Grow the snow hill / bring in a snow machine and maybe even evaluate sponsorship
2.The play area in place is hard from a visibility standpoint for parents and result in safety
/ security concerns with teenagers indulging in troublesome activities
Appendix
187West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5
February 23, 2016
Page 2
a.Reduce closed slides to avoid vandalism / graffiti etc.
b.Lions Park in Westfield has created a play area for older versus younger children
and could be emulated
c.Love the water feature but they are very outdated but could be updated similar to
Zionville’s park with man-made creek along with the splash pads as well
d.Could evaluate potential for integrated climbing and slide opportunities etc.
3.West Park doesn’t encourage kids and adults to do things together
4.Love the idea of a multi-generational playground / need to get adults active and
outdoors too e.g. Dennis the Menace Playground in Monterrey and Boston has
designed a park with brightly colored ping pong tables / corn holes etc.
5.Indianapolis (www.playgroundequipment.com) has a playground / fitness trail and equipment on it for older people and a place to bring in multi-generational audiences
together 6. Grandparents take kids to the park and need more shade structure and benches to sit
so they can stay in the park longer
7.New play scape at the Children’s Museum where kids can’t fall but are easily visible
and no one is scared ($75,000)
8.Camping spot for boy scouts / people for fairly easy but overnight camping would be
great with the woods and the overall experience out there
9.Plays / Theater in the park could be brought back
10.More special events / summer programming in the park would be great to continue
a.Summer Camp is great on the West Side as well
11.Raze the house and build a physical facility (indoor space) to host summer camps etc.
a.Maintain the natural aspect of the park but build a facility (themed liked Indiana)
that allows for 80% cost recovery overall as well
b.Indoor community recreation space with a large enough footprint that can have
opportunities for year round recreation
12.Connor Prairie –steal the flags game that kids enjoy a lot in a natural setting
13.Leverage the height to create a suspension bridge and create a destination area within
the park
14.Discrete labels to ensure interpretive education
15.Decide and establish a policy if this is a dog park / off leash or not
16.Naturalists in the park such as those at Cool Creek Park and add some nature
programming at the park
17.Mile markers in the park to help people make their own route
18.Some art in the park and make it friendly and enticing to walk in the park with painted
squares etc.
19.Bike racks
III.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 5 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
188 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5-One Zone Chamber of Commerce
February 23, 2016
3:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Leon Younger
Minutes Leon Younger
Leon Younger (PROS),Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Mo Merhoff (President), John Schuler (Business Issues Committee President)Participants, Gregg Calpino, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
A.Have all of you been to the park?1.There is a sense of place here in Carmel2.Other communities are following Carmel’s lead3.People want to live here and because4.Yes, I was included in the United Way group and it was naturally attractiveB.What do you like most about the park?
1.It is a really gather place and needs to be enhances
2.We need to incorporate some level of natural areas to go back to
3.The demographics for the area are too close to Westfield and they don’t get parks
publications
4.It is a very high level of diversity
5.Different types of schools that are
6.700 acres of space loosely connect
7.We need to have something to do beyond nature
8.WE need to have some indoor elements that west siders to go to
9.We need to have family space
10.More than a nature space that needs to be 365 years a year
11.We need to make it a destination park that everyone is proud
12.We need to have a another park
13.We have 8years left on Central Park left
14.Do we keep the bond going after 8 years
15.We are a class two city and we have a bond bank now
16.250 bond issue for infrastructure that is planned
17.We need something under roof and we have need to have some level of indoor space
18.We need to go beyond kids and include adults as well
19.We need to have more adults activities as well
20.They like a futsal court for pick-up games
21.We could have a combination
22.We have 120 acres instead of just adding on
Appendix
189West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5
February 23, 2016
Page 2
C.What do you think the needs of residents for this area of the community are that the benefit
this area of the community?
1.The survey the chamber may have done some for apts are now developing apts. CJ
Hart and John success is they own and operate. Steve Pittmen. Justin Moffit is another
one.
2.The village of west clay just got passed
3.We have to think that development is different now
4.They are moving
5.Boomers don’t want large housing and that is not we have to focus on that
6.Go look at the new design downtown is where everyone is going
7.Brookshire are going to the tear down stage and people are looking for more options
8.How many people can walk to West Park?
9.The neighborhood to the south could walk to that area
10.You can cut to Cox Hall on a trail
11.The demographic is younger now
12.The connectivity to the park is difficult to get to
13.No place to sit at the playgrounds and no shade
14.Lake Mendota in Madison Wisconsin and unique trails and meeting
15.They have a nature preserve their and paddle boats
16.The biggest park we need to discuss
17.We need to go see a park that can ice skate and like a ribbon rink
18.We have a small enterprise element and it is a park that supports Grand Park
19.Business want a sense of place and will locate and it is allied
20.The employment is below 4 % and it is difficult to get staff to fill jobs
21.Show us a quality community
22.Unique and a place for a meeting that has something else for them to do
23.We have a favorable housing stock and price and great schools
24.When you cross over 146 street the taxes are
25.Grand Park
D.What do you hear most about the park?
1.We need a place to gather and talk
2.A cricket pitch
3.We need great green space
4.We have to lean of the city to provide the green space so Developers are so hit on
5.Be bold!! Be outside of the world
6.Repurposing the playground
II.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park stakeholder 6 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
190 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting #2
February 23, 2016
12:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino,Jon Ruble (SEH) Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Baljit
Bhatt (Westside Resident), Dan Dutcher (Foundation President), Jim Engledow (Park
Board President), Matt Snyder (Township Board Member), Jeff Worrell (City
Councilor), Neelay Bhatt (PROS), Steve Apfelbaum (AES)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and recap of 1/26/16 public meeting and subsequent community
input received by staff or on the project website. This included
A.Desire for more inclusive play.
B.Minimize development and preserve the woods.
C.Encourage year ‘round use.
D.Some program facilities but not as busy or elaborate as Monon Center.
E.Preserve water play program in the park but augment for multi-generational use including
benches etc..
F.Include multi-generational play.
G. Maintain natural aesthetic.
II.The following additional items were discussed
A.The west side is very diverse with unique programming needs. There are many multi-
generational families that fluctuate in size with 3-4 month seasonal visits.
B.Food is a connector and/or unifier that bridges linguistic barriers (i.e. Food Truck days).Unite
with culinary experiences
C.West Park is viewed as a nature escape (woods, ponds, prairies, etc.)
D.There is heavy use of the lawn areas for unprogrammed uses such as kite flying.
E.There are some challenges connecting with all west side users due to postal code issues and
other factors that necessitate creative outreach methods to maximize inclusivity. Outreach to
churches in the area –Greek Orthodox Church / Jewish Congregation / other places of
worship
F.Emphasize ecology theme -spirit of educating
G.Find the right balance between going to nature and being active
H.Playground at Central Park will be large enough to accommodate up to 200 kids
simultaneously
o Will cater largely to 5-12 year olds and separate area for younger kids
o Some electronic component along with a splash pad as well
o Opening summer 2016
Appendix
191West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting #2
February 23, 2016
Page 2
III. Steve Apfelbaum presented preliminary ecological findings from data analysis and site tour on
2/22/16 and discussed with the group.
IV.Next Steps
A.Additional stakeholder and community meetings will occur on 3/22.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park steering committee meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
192 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1- Carmel Clay Schools, Carmel Dad’s Club and Area Park
Agencies
March 22, 2016
1:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House - Village of West Clay
M Gregg Calpino
M Gregg Calpino
P Gregg Calpino (SEH), Mark Westermeier (CCPR), Ron Farrand, Roger McMichael
(Carmel Clay Schools), Jack Beery (Carmel Dad’s Club), Matt Dickey (Zionsville
Parks and Recreation), Melody Jones (Westfield Parks and Recreation)
C Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A.There are two adjacent middle school playgrounds that could complement West Park
programming evenings and weekends or other times when school is out. Schools would be
open to greater promotion of these resources.
B.There are some paths on school master plans but to date not a lot of walkers to/from school
from immediate neighbors. Some “walking trains” existing in nice weather as alternative to
buses.
C.Schools would support trail connectivity to West Park as long as fields/facilities are protected.
Same with Dad’s club.
D.Dad’s Club fields are primarily for soccer, have been recently upgraded, are irrigated and
focused on high quality competitive use. Roughly 2800 kids in spring with another 2700 in
fall.
E.Dad’s Club has experienced some conficts with animals and snow mobiles, potentially
addressed by a north gate. Golf cart damage to irrigation has also been experienced.
F. Westfield is focused on completing planned trails, possibly a dog park and a 17 acre primitive
camping/adventure park this year. They are also focused on acquiring more passive open
space to complement current active facilities.
G.Zionsville has been 90% focused on passive facilities through donations, augmented by
some youth sports facilities such as Lions Club Park. They do have a sledding hill smaller
than Jills Hill. Community demands has recently been for BMX/bike addition to skate park,
integration of long boarding into skate park. They are working on a 55 acre mountain bike
park and comprehensive trails plan. 116th and 106th Street connectivity important and waiting
on Carmel to finish their links.
H.It was noted that Jill Per lman’s father was a forester and that could be a nice tie to her
legacy.
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
Appendix
193West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #1
March 22, 2016
Page 2
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 1 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
194 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2-Interest Groups, Neighbors and Users
March 22, 2016
1:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Neelay Bhatt
Gregg Calpino
Neelay Bhatt (PROS), Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Naomi Bechtold (Parks Foundation),
Emily Rulo (Huntington Chase HOA), Ann-Marie Rohe (Chaos is Bliss Blog)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A. Strengths
Running paths
Exercise walks – liked the natural look of the park and having preserved the green space
Used the playground heavily – love it because the structures are spread out but within
line of sight
o Provides independent play and exploration opportunities for kids
o Loved the visual effects of the water play features
Often walk over and bike over to the park as well
Went up the hill to watch fireworks the year there was a drought
Camped out over summer camp outs too and really love it – would love to see more of it
Food trucks are wonderful for all ages
B.Opportunities
Indoor facility space would be appealing – don’t need to duplicate the MCC but could
look at different types of indoor uses
o Indoor adventure facility would be very appealing to the older youth, families,
team building etc.
o Rock climbing, trampoline etc.
Ice skating in winter would be awesome; cross country skiing
o E.g. Elkhart, IN has a splash pad that converts to an ice rink in winter
Special events in the park for astronomy related programs during the year e.g. leverage
Opportunities for older children would be great
o Movies for older kids – older kids night
o Concerts for teens / tweens
Appendix
195West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #2
March 22, 2016
Page 2
Playground equipment geared to very young kids – need to upgrade it to older kids as
well
Outdoor challenge courses would be very appealing
Skate-less skate park in St. Louis could easily be replicated here indoors
Mile markers at the park would be very helpful
o Build different loops for various distances as well
Being a female and jogging through the woods could be a concern – need to provide
more safety measures e.g. panic buttons, real time app etc.
Build buffers from soccer field to the park as well to prevent unauthorized use and cross
over
Parking can be an issue during special events, shelter rentals for big groups, days with
food trucks etc.
Like the conservation aspect of the park and would like to keep that balance between
active and passive recreation
Really like the pond and the interpretive education through signs etc.
o Birds nest or on the trails etc.
More structural art in the park
o Temporary rotating displays
o Partners with kids for creating art displays as well
Build activities for kids to do in the park
Outdoor fitness equipment in Westfield is very helpful too
Make it easy to find information about the park and all parks in the system
C.Top Priority
Add outdoor winter time activities
Indoor / outdoor adventure activities for everybody
Mile markers
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 2 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
196 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3-Interest Groups, Neighbors and Users
March 22, 2016
2:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH),Mark Westermeier (CCPR), Michael and Deb Roccaforte
(Larkspur HOA), Claire Lane (Hamilton Co. SWCD), Father Jarrod Russell (Holly
Trinity Greek Orthodox Church), Megan Dillon (IDNR)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A.From SWCD perspective, there are opportunities to enhance wildlife habitat and employ best
practices that could be interpreted for resident/home application. Also opportunity to link kids
with nature programs.
1.Nature playgrounds
2.Outdoor classroom spaces (up to 30 kids with shade/shelter).
3.Immerse kids in nature
4.Community gardens
5.School field trips
6.Potential winter programming.
B.
1. Pollinators
2.Educational programs
3.Improved access
4.Best practices for detention ponds to showcase applicability at neighborhood scale
5.Eradication of invasive species
6.Improved native seed mixes with IDNR input
7.Assess health/quality of existing woods to guide appropriate restoration approach
C.Holy Trinity noted that the park could be great for youth ministry events focusing on outdoors
D.Neighbors see the park as a recreational complement to what already exists in the
neighborhoods (play, basketball hoops, etc.) and not a place to replicate it.
1. Want something better/higher standard
2.Consider parking implications
3.Explore partnerships with adjacent schools
4.Improve bike/ped access, including 116th Street safety
5.Food trucks are good
6.Enhance winter experience with fire pits, winterized shelters, cross country skiing
7.Potential community gardens in the west pasture.
8.Potential dog park or more clear, consistent standards for all users.
Appendix
197West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #3
March 22, 2016
Page 2
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 1 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
198 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4- University High School
March 22, 2016
3:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House - Village of West Clay
M Gregg Calpino
M Gregg Calpino
P Gregg Calpino (SEH), Michael Klitzing (CCPR), John Walls (Athletic Director), Chuck
Webster (Head of School), Stacey Summitt-Mann
C Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A.University HS bought 80 acres from Jill Per lman, received another 30 acre donation.
Jill’s mission important to the school.
B.C
1.Waterways and woodlands education programs
2.Assistance maintaining the woodlands
3.Year of Service – Partnerships through implementation
4.Trail use – needs bike racks
5.Environmental science classroom – 1 year, 16 kids, smaller projects
C.Would be ideal to have a shared design for park and school driveways on 116th, including a
formal crosswalk or possible pedestrian bridge/underpass
D.School likes public use of their facilities with permission (i.e. tennis courts)
E.Big events in the park use the school’s parking lot (i.e. reunions) – dangerous having masses
crossing 116th w/out formal facilities
F. There was a question about future 116th Street plans by the city and potential to revisit school
zone limits to engage more crossers, including bikes
G.Faculty would like to see their grounds and West Park as an outdoor laboratory with small
outdoor classrooms.
H.Jill wanted a nature center as her legacy. Wetlands and amphibian focus, plus
pollinators/insets of the prairie could be good focus. She also had passion for Native
American culture.
I.Consider park drainage implications on adjacent school property as watershed is linked.
J.There is currently very little interpretive signage in the park pertaining to the environment.
K.School has long range plans for larger west side facility to fill service gaps. Could include
additional gym and outdoor fields on the east end of the 30 acres. Not yet funded.
L.The school would like to be part of a larger linked trail network that includes the park and
school/Dad’s properties as well as Hamilton Co. open space to the north/east.
M.Support for enhanced winter
1.Expanded sledding hill
2.Skating ribbon
Appendix
199West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #4
March 22, 2016
Page 2
3.Warming shelter/year-round indoor space
N.Consider environmental art creation/installation possibilities in the park.
O.There are summer camp opportunities shared between school and CCPR. ½ day
workshops, mulit-sport, Square One (smaller kids). Bridge/safer 116th crossing would help.
II.Next StepsA.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 4 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
200 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5-Interest Groups, Neighbors and Users
March 22, 2016
3:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Neelay Bhatt
Gregg Calpino
Neelay Bhatt (PROS), Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Kari Arens, Tim Kopp (Saddlebrook on Shelborne HOA), Mike Kostrzewa, Rade Lukic, Jasper
Copies Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park. This includedA. Strengths
Bike to the park – enjoy the trails a lot
Snow shoeing / cross country skiing has been a lot of fun as well
Adult recreation opportunities
Love the trails / playgrounds for our kids
The pond and watching the fishermen is a very popular activity as well
Love the natural feel of the park – its not too busy and love that we can wander and
have a passive recreation experience
Parking is up front and helps people get away from the noise
Appreciate the diversity of offerings in the park – helps us disconnect and get engrossed
in nature
Trails heavily used for running and runners appreciate the shade as well
B.Opportunities
Circular paths and walking paths get underwater quickly when it rains
o Sheets of ice form during winter which is very dangerous
o Like Cox Hall, West Park must clear their paths after the snow
Not enough shade around the playgrounds as well
Preservation of the park is important – have a good balance of offerings right now
It’s more active for the young kids but not much for older teens or adults for recreation
activities
o More challenging climbing – adventure activities
o Fitness machines and equipment etc. would be very helpful especially if they are
consolidated
Appendix
201West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5
March 22, 2016
Page 2
Group activities for kids to socialize e.g. pick up basketball or pick up soccer (add a goal
post or two)
Ensure long term maintenance and longevity of the equipment
Pet management or incorporate an off-leash area at West Park if people want the dogs
to walk around freely – with the pets etc. coming out there
Family driven events would be very helpful – easter egg hunt, summer movies in the
park, camps etc.
Parking will become a concern with if additional structures are being developed
Allow opportunities and space for unstructured programming and recreation
opportunities
Not a proponent of indoor recreation space at West Park
Conservatory at Cox Hall would be very helpful
C.Single Most Important Priority
Leave it as-is but maintain it
Incorporate additional natural trails
Identify more activities for adolescents
Need additional indoor recreation space at West Park or on the west side
o Must be done reasonably and upsetting the integrity of what is there
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 5 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
202 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5-CCPR Staff
March 22, 2016
4:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Neelay Bhatt
Gregg Calpino
Neelay Bhatt (PROS), Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Michael Allen (Park Maintenance
Director), Kurtis Baumgartner (MCC Director), Eric Mehl (MCC Assistant Director),
Shauna Lewallen (Recreation Manager)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A. Strength
Biggest user groups are moms with young kids
Currently programmed for kids 10 and younger
B.Opportunities
Multi-use classroom for nature programming and close to nature
o Focus on space, flooring and acoustics
Making the park useful year round including adding year round meeting space
o Recreation Unlimited is very popular
o Could build an indoor playground for all ages
Love the idea of the indoor adventure park
Individualized shade structures would be very helpful
Integrate art sculptures in the park too
Extra parking is necessary here as well
Dumpster enclosure required
Wi-Fi in the park / tie in with technology
Build multi generation playground amenities for parents with kids
o Expression swing – parent / child playground
Expand playground footprint and not let it get boxed in by hills
No sand in the playgrounds
No mulch next to the splash pads
The fall line next to the sewer – bring the rest room closer to the sewers
Fitness equipment at the park and building a fitness course
Linear skate park with concrete picnic tables / green space around it etc.
Appendix
203West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #5
March 22, 2016
Page 2
Intergenerational playground
Agents of Nature Gaming options in the park
Dedicated space for RC / Drone use
C.Top Priority
Indoor programming space
Indoor adventure center
Maintenance yard / compound
Splash pads
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 6 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
204 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #7-Neighbors and Users
March 22, 2016
4:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH), Michael Klitzing (CCPR), J.D. Williams (LDS Church), Amy
Magan (Westons), Vince Johnston (Crooked Stick West HOA)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and discussions of issues and opportunities facing West Park.
This included
A.Current positive West Park uses/interest
1.Pond and trails around it and the park
2.Play and sprayground area
3.Picnic areas
4.Multi-use lawns
5.Rustic areas in back, great for dogs
6.Kite flying, rockets
7.Pick-up soccer
B.Pond is great but water is stagnant and in need of aeration/movement
C.West Park is nice as is but could be spruced up to be nicer
D.Stone blocks on Jill’s Hill are dangerous for winter use
E.Church is interested in youth groups
1.Large groups with shelter
2.Would be interested in park clean up –up to 30 kids
3.Hosting church breakfast of 100+
4.Generally looking for service opportunities
F.Interest in a model boat basin or areas for RC airplanes
G.West Park lacks shade, especially in playground area
H.Plant the right trees based on specific site conditions
I.Add sidewalks and trails to link 116th/Shelbourne to West Park
J.Make better use of trail along northwest side of new acreage
K.Add new playground that is different in what it offers and who it serves. Incorporate seniors.
There are good European and Asian models.
L.Consider a simple, fenced dog park
M.Consider something like Holiday Park Nature Center
1.Allows use in poor weather
2.Could provide space for CCPR classes on west side
N.Consider west side facility with pool access –not necessarily in West Park
O.Consider west side library branch through collaboration
Appendix
205West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
West Park Master Plan Stakeholder Meeting #7
March 22, 2016
Page 2
P.Keep the park as natural as possible –it’s the most appealing aspect of West Park
Q.Keep some primitive trails
1. Aggregate
2.Forest trails
R.Add benches to boardwalk nodes. Same for forest trails
S. Attract butterflies back
T.Have police on bikes to patrol the park
U.Add more toilets
II.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-3-22 stakeholder meetings\2016-3-22 west park stakeholder 7 meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
206 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
MINUTES
West Park Master Plan Steering Committee Meeting #3
March 22, 2016
12:00 pm (Eastern)
The Meeting House -Village of West Clay
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino
Gregg Calpino (SEH) Mark Westermeier, Michael Klitzing (CCPR), Baljit Bhatt
(Westside Resident), Dan Dutcher (Foundation President), Judy Hagan (Park
Foundation), Neelay Bhatt (PROS)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Meeting began with introductions and recap of 2/22/16 public meeting and subsequent community
input received by staff or on the project website.
II.The following additional items were discussed
A.Need to explain to the community what a charrette is an how specifically how and when they
can contribute.
B.Important to stress how a balance will be achieved in the master plan.
C.Need to consider West Park in broader context of school properties, Dad’s club, etc. so West
Park can focus on what is there vs trying to do it all for all users.
III.Gregg Calpino and Neelay Bhat previewed their public meeting presentations to the group and
integrated suggested edits.
IV.Next Steps
A.CCPR staff will conduct intercept surveys in West Park in April.
B.The three day design charrette will occur 5/2-4.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Gregg Calpino at 219.513.2503.
GEC\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-2-23 stakeholder meetings\2016-2-23 west park steering committee meeting minutes -seh.docx
Appendix
207West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Page 1
NOTES
West Park Master Plan: Public Input following Park Board Presentation
October 11, 2016
6:00 pm (Eastern)
Monon Center -Lobby
Jon Ruble
Jon Ruble
Jon Ruble (SEH), Tom Poulos (Williams Architects), Neelay Bhatt (PROS
Consultants), Gregg Calpino,Mark Westermeier (CCPR)
Participants, Tom Poulos, Leon Younger, file 133691
I.Following the draft master plan report presentation to the Carmel/Clay Parks and Recreation Board
(CCPR), the design team met in the lobby of the Monon Center for further input and feedback from
the public. The following notes represent questions and comments received
o
with the sports fields and schools? Also, would right-of-way be needed?
ter plan shows the potential for connection and the location of an
existing “ad hoc” pathway that currently exists. Additional coordination will need
to occur with adjacent northern property owners, not necessarily right-of-way or
land acquisition.
o northern soccer fields be used for overflow parking?
further discussion could occur to utilize the fields for overflow parking during peak
events.
o water to the north?
site. The open water to the north will likely be intermittent.
o -use pavilions accommodate a green roof?
n is a large green roof and the waterside concept
option does not preclude a green roof.
o
an “open air” experience. Incorporating “open air” to the Mulit-Use Pavilion
options can be further assessed in schematic design.
o
sledding season on site. Additionally, the design team noted the skating ribbon
and other winter use activities that can occur at West Park.
o
The master plan identified “bundles” of projects separate from phasing. The
phasing would be determined by CCPR staff and board based on needs and
Appendix
208 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
October 11, 2016
Page 2
available funds. Additionally, the playground and sprayground would need to be
constructed while the existing facilities are in operation. Likely the new
playground and sprayground would be within 5 years.
o General comment at the end of the discussion stated that all the program elements for
the park were accommodated and not compromised through the process.
II.Next Steps
A.Park Board approval of final master plan report at December board meeting.
SEH of Indiana believes that this document accurately reflects the business transacted during the
meeting. If any attendee believes that there are any inconsistencies, omissions or errors in the minutes,
they should notify the writer at once. Unless objections are raised within seven (7) days, we will consider
this account accurate and acceptable to all.
If there are errors contained in this document, or if relevant information has been omitted, please
contact Jon Ruble at 219.513.2508.
JRR
\ae\c\ccpar\133691\1-genl\14-corr\2016-10-11 park board_public comments\2016-10-11 west park_public input notes -seh.docx
Appendix
209West Park Master PlanCarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
FW: Mom's Focus Group - Meeting NotesNeelay Bhatt to:Jon Ruble 11/11/2016 11:12 AM
From:Neelay Bhatt <neelay.bhatt@prosconsulting.com>
To:Jon Ruble <jruble@sehinc.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kurtis Baumgartner <kbaumgartner@carmelclayparks.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:21 AM
Subject: Mom's Focus Group - Meeting Notes
To:Neelay Bhatt <neelay.bhatt@gmail.com>, Michael Klitzing <
mklitzing@carmelclayparks.com>
Questions:
1. What will be the biggest determining factor on the larger building location, understanding that the construction of the facility is several years down the road?Answer: Cost, and community needs
2. How will CCPR determine what the updated playground play structure will look like?
Answer: West Park will be a destination park so we anticipate the playground will have
a “wow” factor to it much like West Commons. We will work with the playground
manufacturer, and architects to ultimately come up with a final plan.
Comments:
Would like outdoor fitness equipment sooner rather than later
Would like to make sure that there is adequate shade throughout the park, along trails, etc.
Jill’s hill seems like an appropriate place to put a “lookout” gazebo so that you can really
view the park
Most “pleased” by elements of the current plan:
Appendix
210 West Park Master Plan CarMel Clay Parks & reCreation | DeCeMber 13, 2016
Addition of water bodies
Making park more useful/activating trails
Refreshing the splash pad
Variety (multiple visits leading to different experiences each time)
Neelay – I think this captures a large portion of what was discussed. Please free to add anything
that I missed. You did an outstanding job!
Thanks,
Kurtis Baumgartner, CPRP
Monon Community Center Director
Monon Community Center
1235 Central Park Drive East
Carmel, IN 46032P317.573.5238
kbaumgartner@carmelclayparks.com
--
Winning is not everything....
It is the ONLY thing.