United Consulting/Addl Serv 4/ENG/$259,000/Illinois Extension a 1,
United Consulting Engineers Architects
Engineering 2011
Appropriation #12200- 401. 2200 9462000,2200 2300,202- 509.203 -509; P.O. #25837
Contract Not To Exceed $259,000.00
ADDITIONAL_ SERVICES AMENDMENT TO 12°
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES i ik
THIS AMENDMENT TO THE GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT "Agreement") entered into by and
between the City of Carmel and United Consulting Engineers Architects (the "Vendor"), as City Contract
#060210.02 shall amend the terms of the Agreement by adding the additional services to be provided by Vendor
consistent with the Scope of Work attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A The terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall not otherwise be affected by this Additional Services Amendment and shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Amendment as follows:
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA United Consulting Engineers Architects
by and through its Board of Public
Works and Safety
By:
Aka fa
James Brain d, Presiding Officer A► horized gnat e
Date: `Nott6 ro.-
,A. Printed Name
M.ry A Burke IV)6mber
Date: j •lw 144- gfgPePi
Title
Lori S.`W_ ats ember FID/TIN:
Date: r�ti27l ta--
Last Four of SSN if Sole Proprietor:
ATTEST:
Date: `S 201
a Cordray, IAM Clerk- Treasurer
Date:
{FI..srmNUar Ud k Good: S.atTuy,vuonn,AT0Ii CONSULTING ENGINEERS k ARCIOTECTS Add'I Svc. Arnold W.ck,I 111.5/101110.17 AM}
Fyn tN As',. It
4 I.
:S�tJ IIRL4 IIL F V ��Y
IS viz siv
December 14, 2011
EL
JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR
Mr. Dave Richter, P.E., L.S.
United Consulting Engineers Architects
1625 N. Post Road
Indianapolis, IN 46219 -1995
RE: Additional Service Amendment #4, PO 25837
Dear Mr. Richter:
As we discussed, the City of Carmel has a need for additional professional services and pursuant to our current
contract with United, Contract #060210.02, dated June 2, 2010, I have requested and received from you the
proposed scope of services and fee estimates for the following work task:
Additional Service Amendment #4— 10 -10; Illinois Street Extension, Spring Mill to 106th
Design Phase 3, 100% design completion
See "Project Budget Cost Estimate"
Not to Exceed: $259,000.00
Per our contract procedural requirements, I hereby approve these Additional Professional Services estimates, and
request that the Board of Public Works ratify the above referenced Contract Amendment.
PLEASE NOTE
Please be advised that "Additional Services" performed on City contracts must be billed separately from the original
contract and other additional services. More importantly, the invoice must reference the appropriate Additional
Service and P.O. shown above. Invoices received without the Additional Service referenced will be returned
for proper identification. Thank you for your continued assistance in providing the City of Carmel with your
professional quality services. If you should have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
Michael T. McBride, .E.
City Engineer
Reviex A aapproved 9y:
S. 1 Engelkin_
DEPAR FALENT OF ENGINEERING Director Of Admin]Strati0
ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317 571 2441 FAX 317.571.2439 Exhibit A
EMAII, engineeringFFcannel.in.go\ i O
City of Carmel
Illinois Street 'ee nstrucfion
from Spring Mill Road to 106th Street
Description of Proposed Project
n 175
_..3.�,`�S^r ",d��i::� n_ S" r, ..._IS...-
I. GENERAL
The proposed project is located in the City of Carmel in Hamilton County, Clay Township,
Township 17 North, Range 3 East, within Sections 2, 10 and 11 (see previous "Project Location"
sheet).
The proposed project includes approximately 0.75 miles of Illinois Street beginning at Spring Mill
Road and heading northeast to 106 Street. As part of this project 0.25 miles of Illinois Street will
be realigned to intersect 106 Street approximately 450 feet west of its current location.
Roundabouts will be constructed at the intersections of Spring Mill Road, Superior Street1103r
Street and 106 Street (see previous "Project Layout" sheet). Funding for this project was pursued
through the Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization (Indy MPO) in 2010 and 2011 for a
combination of 20% local funding and 80% federal aid funding.
However, after not being awarded federal funds through the Indy MPO, the City decided in June
2011 to construct the needed project utilizing 100% local funds. The City has elected to pursue
generally the "Partial Reconstruction" alternative, as proposed by UNITED in July 2010
II EXISTING FACILITY
Illinois Street is a two lane boulevard with approximately 26 feet of pavement on either side of a
variable width median. In several locations throughout the project the median width is reduced to
provide for a left turn lane. ,The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
The intersection at Spring Mill Road is a "T" configuration with Illinois Street being stop controlled.
There are dedicated left and right turn lanes from Illinois Street to Spring Mill Road and one
receiving lane from Spring Mill Road to Illinois Street. There are no turn lanes provided along
Spring Mill Road.
A 330 foot diameter traffic circle is located at the center of the project for the intersection of Illinois
Street, 103 Street and Superior Street. Revised pavement markings were placed in 2010 at this
intersection to encourage standard roundabout operation, however the approaches remain unchanged.
UNITED CONSULTING 07/18/11 Page 1 of 9
Despite the recent improvements, this traffic circle does not provide optimal operation and
performance.
The intersection at 106 Street is a "T' configuration with Illinois Street being stop controlled. The
northbound approach consists of a dedicated right turning roadway and a shared through/lefi lane.
The eastbound and westbound approaches consist of two dedicated through lanes with short
dedicated right and left turn lanes. The eastbound approach of the 106 Street/US 31 intersection
has a right turn lane which is continuous back to the Illinois Street intersection.
III. DRAINAGE
Based on contours obtained from the Hamilton County GIS site and observations from a field
investigation, it appears the storm water runoff is divided into thirds with both the north and south
thirds draining into their respective existing detention ponds, while the central portion drains to the
east side of the traffic circle to an undetermined location. The northern detention pond is located just
west of the existing Illinois Street alignment. The pond has an overflow structure located in the
northwest corner with an outlet located in the shallow channel on the south side of 106 Street. This
channel flows west along 106 Street for 400 feet before joining the Unnamed Tributary (UNT) of
Williams Creek. Approximately 200 feet of Illinois Street at the north end of the project, outlets
directly into the shallow channel on the south side of the 1 06 th Street rather than the existing
detention pond. Similar drainage features exist on the southern third of the project with storm water
runoff being collected by road inlet structures and discharged into the southern detention pond. The
outlet structure is located along the west bank near the center of the pond. The outlet discharges into
the northeast quadrant of Spring Mill Road and Illinois Street where it follows a small meandering
channel southwest for nearly 550 feet to an estimated 48" culvert under. Spring Mill Road and
continues west before joining Williams Creek. Runoff from the intersection of Spring Mill Road and
Illinois Street flows directly into the adjacent quadrants through storm inlets and shoulder runoff.
An existing 18 foot lone small structure spans the UNT of Williams Creek as it crosses underneath
106 Street approximately 550 feet west of the current intersection of Illinois Street and 106 Street.
The UNT of Williams Creek does not have a published FIS profile; however, the study for Williams
Creek indicates the Q100 flood elevation does not overtop 106th Street at its intersection with
Williams Creek.
IV. UTILITIES
There are overhead utilities along the east side of Spring Mill Road including electric, cable and
telephone. Utility vaults are located in both the NE and SE quadrants at the intersection with Spring
Mill Road. An electric vault is located on the south side of Illinois Street approximately 200 feet
east of Spring Mill Road. A water main is located along Illinois Street with fire hydrants located on
both sides of the roadway. A sanitary line travels the Length of the project, starring just west of the
northern detention pond at 106 Street, passing into the center of the existing traffic circle and
continuing south along the east side of Illinois Street. Both a petroleum and gas line cross through
UNITED CON'SULTING 07/18/11 Page 2 o f 9
3(j) 1\
the project, running east -west along the south side of 103` Street. Three large electrical cabinets are
located along the east side of Illinois Street north of the central traffic circle. The southernmost
electrical cabinet is located in the northeast quadrant of the 103r Street/Illinois Street intersection;
geometries of the proposed center roundabout will be designed to avoid impacts to this cabinet.
Finally at the north end of the project, at 1.06 Street, there are overhead utilities including electric,
cable and telephone. A water main runs parallel with 106th Street on the north side, as well as a
potential communications duct bank. South of 106` Street a gas main was identified, as well as an
existing sanitary sewer line.
Several utilities will require relocation due to the proposed improvements. It appears most of the
existing facilities are within the existing public right -of -way, and would therefore, not be a
reimbursable utility. The right -of -way engineering will reveal if any easements exist. Early and
continued utility coordination will be critical to the success of this project; however, it will not
follow Title 105, Article 13 of the Indiana Administrative Code exactly, as it has an accelerated Bid
Date and will not follow the INDOT guidelines.
I! SURVEY LIMITS
UNITED will provide a topographic survey for design purposes. See the enclosed Design Survey
Scope of Work document for additional information and proposed limits.
VI. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
A Geotechnical Evaluation will be completed to determine the subsurface conditions and assess the
impacts of these conditions on the proposed construction of the roadway, bridge, retaining walls and
detention pond.
VIL ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION
a. Environmental Documentation:
Due to construction not being funded by federal dollars, the completion of an environmental
document will NOT be required.
b. Section 4(D Resources:
Section 4(f) resources were NOT identified within or near the project limits.
c. Historic Resources Impacts (Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act):
The Hamilton County Interim Report was reviewed for the proposed corridor. The interim
report did NOT identify any historic structures within the probable area of potential effect.
d. Wetland and Stream Impacts:
The National Wetland Inventory Map does not show any wetlands within the proposed
project limits. A July 15, 2011 site visit revealed the presence of three potential wetland sites.
UNITED COA'SULTING 0i //8/11 Poge 3 of 9 r
A "Waters of the U.S." (wetland determination/delineation) report will be required to verify
the absence or presence of wetlands throughout the project corridor. Wetland impacts are
anticipated to result from this project.
Three potential stream crossings have been identified along the project corridor. The
proposed project calls for the relocation and /or enclosure of greater than 150 feet of two
unnamed tributaries. Due to these impacts, stream restoration or mitigation is likely. A
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHE1) assessment will be required to determine the
overall condition of the unnamed tributary to Williams Creek. A "Waters of the U.S."
(wetland determination/delineation) report will be required to officially determine the
boundaries and locations of all jurisdictional ditches, streams, or other watercourses within
the project limits.
The City of Carmel has developed a 5 acre mitigation site for several construction projects
within its jurisdiction. The mitigation site has excess acreage available to accommodate the
wetland impacts associated with this project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Louisville District is requiring all projects using the mitigation site to be permitted prior to
2012. It is being assumed that wetland impacts resulting from this project will be mitigated
at this site. The mitigation site does not contain a stream corridor. As a result, stream
impacts will be mitigated at an offsite location.
e. Regulatory Permits:
An IDEM Rule 5 permit will be required since the project will be disturbing greater than 1
acre. The proposed project will involve work below the ordinary high water mark of UNT of
Williams Creek. As a result, a US Army Corps of Engineer's Section 404 permit (Louisville
District) and an IDEIvt Section 401 Water Quality Certification will be required. An IDNR
Construction in Floodway permit will be required. As the UNT of Williams Creek is NOT a
regulated Legal Drain, Hamilton County Outlet and Crossing permits will NOT be required.
Historic Resources Impacts (Section 106 of the Historic Preservation A ct):
The Hamilton County Interim Report was reviewed for the proposed corridor. The interim
report did NOT identify any historic structures within the probable area of potential effect.
lz. Asbestos Rules:
A single family residence (Kirk property) will be demolished as part of this project. The U.S.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Construction Industry Asbestos
Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) requires that asbestos inspections be completed prior to
demolition activities. According to the Indiana Air Rule (326 IAC 14 -2 -1 and 14 -10) and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standard for Hazardous
Air Pollutants NESHAP 40 CFR 61 Subpart M) structures that are being demolished or
renovated must be inspected for the presence of friable and non friable forms of asbestos.
The Indiana Department of Environmental Management enforces both the Indiana Air Rule
and the NESHAP federal regulations.
UNITED CONSULTING 071)8/11 Page 4 of 9 f
Vill. PROPOSED FACILITY'
The proposed project includes partial reconstruction of Illinois Street from Spring Mill Road to
106th Street. It includes the construction of roundabouts at the intersections of Spring Mill Road,
103rd Street/Superior Street and 106th Street as well as the re- alignment of Illinois Street from 103rd
Street/Superior Street to 106th Street. This re- alignment will shift Illinois Street approximately 450
feet west to align with the future connection of Illinois Street to the north.
Illinois Street will be designed to meet City of Carmel standards for a Secondary Parkway, as
identified in the Carmel Clay Comprehensive Plan, Thoroughfare Plan. and the IN standards for
an Urban Local Road. All work performed on both Spring Mill Road and 106th Street will be
designed to meet INDOT standards for a Local Urban Collector. The portions of existing Illinois
Street between the roundabout approaches and the realignment will be given a mill and resurface
treatment.
During the development of this proposal several roundabout alternatives were considered,
particularly in regards to the roundabouts at 106`'' Street and Illinois Street and at 103
Street/Superior Street and Illinois Street. Based on available information, the proposed roundabouts
are anticipated to provide sufficient capacity and flexibility for both current and projected traffic
volumes and patterns, and future development. During the design phase each roundabout will
undergo further refinement based on VISSIM simulation results, fast path criteria and other physical
constraints such as minimizing right -of -way acquisition and utility relocations.
Beginning at the south end of the project, the first roundabout will be constructed at Spring Mill
Road. This three legged, single lane roundabout will have dual lane approaches on both northbound
Spring Mill Road and westbound Illinois Street. Southbound Spring Mill Road will have a single
lane entrance. Dedicated right turn lanes will be provided from both multilane approaches. Single
lane exits will be constructed along Spring Mill Road while a two lane exit will be provided at
Illinois Street. The proposed roundabout will be shifted south and east of the existing intersection to
eliminate the need for right -of -way along the west side of Spring Mill Road.
Following Illinois Street north, the second roundabout will be constructed at the intersection with
103` Street/ Superior Street. The proposed layout for this intersection calls for two circulating lanes
along the east and west sides, and single lanes across the north and south sides. Traffic along Illinois
Street will have dual lane entrances and exits. 103 Street will be constructed with a dual lane
entrance and a single lane exit. while Superior Street will have a single lane entrance and exit. In
order to reduce the roundabout from two circulating lanes to one, the northern splitter island will be
extended into the roundabout allowing only traffic on the inside lane to continue around the
intersection, while traffic in the outside lane will be forced to exit onto northbound Illinois Street. In
the southern portion of the roundabout a spiral will be utilized to safely move circulating traffic from
the inside lane of the intersection to the outside lane, allowing traffic to exit at Superior Street or
103 Street. Both methods will provide physical barriers to the circulating traffic, enhancing proper
movement throughout the intersection.
UNITED CONSULTING 07.48/11 Page 5 of 9
During the evaluation process for the central roundabout consideration was given to the future
reconstruction of US 31 by INDOT. Based on Stage 1 design plans, provided by INDOT through
RW Armstrong, the intersection of 103rd Street and US 31 will be eliminated, and a cul -de -sac will
be constructed along 103rd Street. The challenge was to provide sufficient capacity for 103rd Street
prior to the reconstruction of US 31, anticipated for construction in 2015, while providing a
minimalistic solution for 103r Street beyond 2015. To accomplish this, 103r Street was limited to a
single lane exit in addition to eliminating direct right turns from Superior Street to 103r Street. For
northbound Superior Street traffic to go eastbound on 103rd Street, they will need to traverse the
entire roundabout before exiting at 103 Street. It is believed the desire for this movement will be
almost completely eliminated following the reconstruction of US 31.
Continuing. north along Illinois Street, the final roundabout will be constructed at the intersection
with 106 Street. This will be a four legged roundabout with two circulating lanes constructed
throughout. Two lane entrances will be constructed on all four legs with two lane exits provided to
Illinois Street and eastbound 106 Street. A single lane exit will be provided for westbound 106th
Street traffic. Due to the single lane exit, a dual left turn movement will be provided for westbound
1 06 Street to southbound Illinois Street traffic, which will accommodate the higher inbound traffic
volumes. The proposed intersection will be located approximately 450 feet west of the existing
Illinois Street 106th Street intersection and will be situated to minimize impacts to UNT of
Williams Creek. The proposed north leg of the roundabout will be designed to coordinate with the
City's concurrent North Illinois Street project, which is being designed by American Structurepoint.
In addition to the 103r Street intersection, INDOT provided Stage 1 plans for the proposed tight
diamond interchange at 106th Street and US 31. The proposed configuration calls for two lanes in
each direction along 106 Street with dual left turn lanes onto the existing Illinois Street. Based on
the proposed relocation of the Illinois Street 106 Street intersection, coordination will be required
with INDOT and RW Armstrong to revise the 106 Street US 31 interchange geometry to
accommodate the proposed roundabout. Further, the City desires to minimize impacts to both the
existing parking lot in the northeast quadrant and the existing residential home in the northwest
quadrant of the 106 Street roundabout. Due to the gently rolling topography of the 106 Street
surroundings, it is anticipated that a couple short segments of retaining wall (approximately 100 feet
in length per each) will be required to support the existing, higher topography from the proposed
lower urban roadways.
A 10 foot multi -use path will be included along Illinois Street in accordance with the Carmel Clay
Comprehensive Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The path will travel along the west side of
Illinois Street with the south end of the trail turning to the north along Spring Mill Road and
terminating at the end of construction. Due to the proximity of the path to the south detention pond,
it is anticipated that a retaining wall approximately 275 feet in length will be required to support the
path in this area. The path will fully encompass the central roundabout, with pedestrian openings in
the splitter islands, connecting all existing sidewalks within the vicinity. The path will cross from
the west side of Illinois Street to the east at the south leg of the l 06 Street roundabout connecting to
an existing path heading east. Access will also be provided to the north side of 106 Street through
U,v /TED conisuLTLANG o :%18/11 Page 6 of 9
the east leg of the roundabout. Finally, a small portion of pathway will be constructed on the small
structure on 106th Street over UNT of Williams Creek for future development.
IX. TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Traffic data provided by INDOT for the intersection of 106 Street/Illinois Street will be utilized in
conjunction with the equations from "NCHRP Report 672 Roundabouts: An Informational Guide,
Second Edition" to determine /confirm proper lane assignments. Additionally, traffic management
along Illinois Street will be reviewed to determine where existing median openings could be
removed to provide a smoother flow of traffic through this portion of the corridor.
Utilizing the provided traffic data, VISSIM traffic simulation modeling software will be utilized to
model the entire project as well as a portion of the 106 Street/US 31 interchange to verify lane
configurations and capacity at each roundabout. A simulation will also be generated for the
construction year traffic to confirm capacity for the proposed configuration at 103rd Street, prior to
the US 31 construction. All findings will be summarized in an abbreviated traffic report.
X. .PROPOSED DRAINAGE
The existing storm water runoff drainage patterns will be perpetuated in the proposed design. A
detention pond will be constructed just east of the proposed realignment of Illinois Street to allow
infrastructure reconstruction in the future where the existing north pond is located. It is anticipated
that it will hydraulically require the same size and generally same shape as the existing north pond,
simply a mirror image and moved onto the City- acquired former "Kirk" parcel. The proposed
northern detention basin will be modeled for and required as the outlet of the proposed surface run-
off from the northern one -third drainage area of the proposed project. The south detention pond will
be modeled to verify capacity due to the small increase of impervious area to drain the southern one-
third of the proposed project, plus possible re- shaping to acconunodate the proposed west side path.
The shallow channel along 106 Street will be conveyed under the south leg of the roundabout via a
proposed culvert. The existing culvert under Spring Mill Road, north of Illinois Street, will be
replaced to accommodate the Spring Mill Road roundabout approach alignments.
The existing 18 -wide structure which carries l 06 Street over UNT of Williams Creek is anticipated
to be replaced with an in -kind structure, although the proposed skew will make the width over 20-
feet thereby classifying it as a "bridge" structure. The proposed structure is anticipated to be an 18
foot span three sided culvert or four sided box hydraulically sized to provide the same waterway
opening as the existing structure. The culvert will be placed on a skew which takes it diagonally
across the middle of the proposed roundabout. Concrete wingwalls are anticipated to be used as
retaining walls to limit the impact of the proposed reconstruction of 106 Street and Illinois Street to
the alignment of the UNT of Williams Creek as it is realigned.
UNITED CONSULTING 07/19:11 page i of 9 f
Bicycle height, concrete Texas rail will be used in the areas over the structure. On the northeast and
southwest corner of 106` Street, the multi -use path typical section will be provided over the end
sections of the proposed structure. The concrete Texas rail is anticipated to be placed behind the
multi -use path and grass buffer.
XL LIGHTING
New decorative street lighting will be provided along the partial reconstruction portions of the
roadway, including all three roundabouts.
XII LANDSCAPING
Landscape Architectural services will be subconsulted, including both nursery plantings and
irrigation design. Plant selection will conform, as much as possible, to the City of Carmel Urban
Forester's preferred plant species. The design of the roundabouts will be consistent with those
recently constructed in Carmel and will feature limestone retaining walls, plantings, accent lighting
and irrigation. The landscaping treatments for the medians and shoulders will primarily consist of
shade trees and grass plantings, with additional shrubs and perennials at certain locations.
XIII. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC
Illinois Street will remain open during construction with traffic maintained on a single side of the
boulevard during each phase. Drive access will be maintained at all times throughout the project.
Intermittent and partial closures will be required along Superior Street and 103` Street. The
roundabouts at the intersections of Spring Mill Road and 106 Street will be constructed in phases
utilizing varying traffic patterns in combination with existing, temporary and proposed pavements.
The majority of the central roundabout will be constructed within the existing traffic circle without
impacting traffic.
XIV. LAND ACQUISITION
Though funded locally, the land acquisition will generally follow the federal -aid process using the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies for Federal and Federally
Assisted Programs Act. This process includes title research, right -of -way engineering, appraisal
problem analysis (APA), an appraisal, a review appraisal and negotiations/buying with the property
owner. The only difference would be the City of Carmel prefers to substitute an independent 2nd
Appraisal for the Review Appraisal.
After review of the project layout and the Hamilton County GIS information, it is estimated that
there will be impacts to a total of 18 parcels (5 residential and 13 commercial, of which 7 are
classified as vacant land) within the project limits (see Estimated Right -of -Way (A) and (B)). The
UN /TED CONSULTING 07 /19/)1 Page 8 of 9 1
l l
City completed an early- acquisition of the "Kirk" parcel (between current parcels no's 11 and 12) in
2010, such that there are only 17 parcels remaining.
All existing right -of -way will be verified during the land acquisition process, which may reveal the
need for additional parcels. If recorded documents do not exist, it may be necessary to reacquire
portions of the existing right-of-way, which could also increase the number of parcels.
X'V. PEER REVIEW
To assure applicable design standards and procedures are being maintained for the complex design
features of the roundabouts proposed for this project, American Structurepoint, Inc. will provide a
peer review at each stage of plan development. Additionally, a review of the VISSIM model will be
completed.
XVI. PROJECT SCHEDULE
This project will be developed for construction in the Spring of 2012. We anticipate two formal City
reviews, Preliminary Plans and Final Plans. A Field Check will be conducted with the City of
Cannel and the utilities following the Preliminary Plan's review. Refer to the project schedule
provided herein for additional details.
XVIL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATE
A Project Development Cost Estimate has been provided, based on the "Partial Reconstruction"
Alternative and the re- scoping meeting that was held on June 15, 2011 1
The estimates were developed based in current dollars and inflated to the anticipated
construction year of 2012. The inflation rate used for the projection is 3.0% per year (see the
'`Project Budget Estimate" Section of this proposal for more information).
UNITED CONSULTING 07119111 Page 9 u/ 9 _1
b 611.
City of Carmel
Illinois Street
Project Budget Cost Estimate
Partial Reconstruction Alternative
Revised Overall
September 6, October 5, 2001 f1'1+ Project 103rd
2011 Agreement 60 NTP'.`s'' 100% NTP Services 106th Street Street Springmill
Survey 569,000 069,000 r $69,000
Geotechnical Investigation $33,000 $33,000 r: $33,000
U.S. Waters Report with Wetland Determination /Delineation $7,000 07,000 $7,000
Regulatory Permits (1) $23,000 $23,000 I $23,000
Wetland and Stream Mitigation Design (2) TBD TBD
Asbestos Inspection $4,100 $4,100 t' $4,100
Williams Creek Bridge, Wall Rail Design and Plans $55,000 -.533,000. $22,000. 555,000
Retaining Wall Design and Plans $35,000 $35,000' $20,000 515,000
Traffic Capacity and Operations Analysis $6,000 $6,000'.' $6,000
Landscaping and Irrigation Design and Plans $0 I $0
Lighting Design and Plans $20,000 020,000. $9,000 $6,000 $5,000
Detention Ponds and Plans $30,000 $30,000''] i $30,000
Utility Coordination $35,000 .7_ 521';0001:
.c, 521;0001: $14,000 $35,000
Peer Review $0 40;y:4-'L. $0 1
Road Design and Plans $420,000 �'5252,000'F $168,000 1 0189,000 $126,000 $105,000
TOTAL DESIGN ENGINEERING $737,100 $136,100 $259,000° $177,100 $303,000 $132,000 $125,000
17 parcels Total Unit Price 4.1f.
Title Search $300 $5,100 onHo6 t :',$5
Right-Of-Way Engineering 2,750 $46,750 on Hold
9 Y 9 9
i
Appraisal Problem Analysis (APAs) $200 $3,400 on Hold 'F $3,400
Land Acquisition Management $900 $15,300 on Hold $15,300
Appraisal (Short Form) Avg. $2,227 $37,852 on How 537,852
2nd Appraisal (Short Form) Avg. $999 $16,984 on HOia 6 516,984
$1,625 $27,625 on How
Negotiating/Buying
4'
$27,625
Relocation 2 each $3,000 06,000 0n Hold 1- 03 $6,000
Land Costs (3) TBD 4 -!'a3- y3
TOTAL LAND ACQUISITION 6153,011 $51;850 $101,161
Construction Cost (March 2012) 3% inflation /yr from 2011 06,038,900 •�r:
Wetland and Stream Mitigation Cost 1 TBD
Construction Inspection (Estimated at 12.5 $754,900
Utility Relocation Cost (4) TBD
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $6,793,800 w':-.;
TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST (s) $7,683,911 $393,85 N $360,161
Includes IDEM 401 Water Quality USACOE Section 404, IDNR Construction in a Fioodway, and IDEM Rule 5 Permits.
The Wetland and Stream Mitigation Costs will be determined based on the coordination with IDEM and the City, and
are anticiapted to be known after the Preliminary Plans are completed
The Land Cost will be determined based on the amount of right -of -way required and will be estimated after the
Prelimmary Plans are completed and the APAS are done.
Petroleum and Gas pipelines are known to exist south of 103rd Street, which reside within easements.
Does not include items "to be determined', which are Land Costs and Utility Relocations.